No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

Archive for December 11th, 2008

There Will Be Rioting In the Streets!

by @ 14:43. Filed under Politics, Politics - National.

In an interview yesterday, Senator Jim DeMint made the following comments while discussing the possible auto bailout:

"We’re going to have riots. There are already people rioting because they’re losing their jobs when everybody else is being bailed out. The fairness of it becomes more and more evident as we go along. The auto companies may be hurting," he said, but "there are very few companies that aren’t hurting and they’re going to hurt. We don’t have enough money to bail everyone out." (emphasis mine)

Wow!   People are rioting because of the bailouts?   Where have I been?

Flash to google.   Quick Check “US riot”…..response

….Greek riots

….Chinese worker riots

….Iceland riots

….Zimbabwe riot

….Afghans riot

…Iraqi riot

…Thailand riot

….Quiet Riot

Huh, can’t find a darn thing about US riots.

I agree with DeMint’s sentiment that the bailouts need to cease.   The government has tried everything and have found nothing that works.   However, inserting this level of hyperbole into an issue that does have high emotion and large consequence attached to it does nothing but diminish the credibility of DeMint’s usually clear thinking.

Fight the fight Senator DeMint, but leave the “over the top” language for those who have no facts and are left to argue only with  emotion.

The Morning Scramble/Open Thread Thursday – 12/11/2008

I was going to go with the usual Thursday blues, but Shoebox’s take on the Big Thr…er, UAW bailout shifted the musical focus just a little bit….

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nGS2yyODQg[/youtube]

Before I get to the heart of the Scramble, I must pass along a “clarification” from KHQA denouncing its 11/5 story (dumped into the ether) stating that Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich (D-Corrupt) and President-elect Barack Obama were to meet later that day. Of course, it doesn’t exactly address its 11/8 story from a different reporter that stated that a meeting did take place (which also got dumped into the ether).

  • Speaking of corrections, I need to correct a major oversight missing from yesterday’s Blago Scramble Special – Kate dug up a bunch of Blago toons.
  • Jeff Dufour and Patrick Gavin run the Lexis-Nexis numbers on Blago mentions by the presstitutes. Care to guess which is higher; mentions in the last 48 hours or mentions in all of November? Hell, I’ll wager there were more mentions in the last 48 hours than there were in any of the first 11 months.
  • Nate Beeler can’t put a price on the criminal complaint against Blago. I believe I can say with some confidence that “@$&*!’N” doesn’t really stand for “@$&*!’N”.
  • Gabriel Malor believes his lying eyes over Obama’s greasy assurances. I will note that it is only a pic, so we can’t even read lips on whether they discussed Obama’s replacement in the Senate.
  • Jim W. Ainsworth channels Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and various members of Congress answering some bailout questions.
  • Lance Burri found immigration wasn’t exactly a deal-breaker in November. Of course, there was no substantive difference between Obama and John McCain on shamnesty.
  • Mark Tapscott explains why there is a credibility problem in the DC power structure. Of note, Joe the Plumber wanted off the Straight Double-Talk Express after McCain tried to explain why he was in favor of the $700 billion $850 billion $8 trillion bailout of October.
  • Doug Mataconis points out that the current-year deficit is on pace to hit $1 trillion. The truly-scary thing is, other than the bailouts and the on-autopilot increasing welfare programs, the federal government is running on continuing resolutions until sometime after Obama is sworn in, and both he and the Congressional Democrats have a boatload of additional spending plans.
  • Uncle Jimbo lays the smackdown on Jimmy Carter’s candy-ass.
  • Jo Egelhoff has the proper solution for Wisconsin’s budget crunch – freeze and prune. It’s far better than increasing spending by nearly 10%, with over half of that increase coming from Wisconsin’s own bailout.
  • Tom Blumer plays Name That Party, ABC edition. In their montage of 14 political crooks (evenly divided between Republicans and Democrats), they named the GOP crook as such 5 of 7 times (4 in the first sentence, the 5th in the 3rd), but named the ‘Rat crook as such only 2 of 7 times (both in the first sentence).
  • Okie Campaigns found 650 scientists, many former Gorbebal “Warming” acolytes, committing heresy against the Religion of Gorebal “Warming”.
  • William Teach caught the UN cardinal of Gorebal “Warming” admitting that “(t)here is no clear evidence that global warming is an imminent danger to the world.”
  • Tracy Coenen reports Milwaukee County Board Chairman Lee Holloway wants to let others get away with the type of fraud he got away with. I wonder if he’ll try to bend any of his fellow supervisors over their desks this time; he does have a history of that.
  • Jim Geraghty wonders why the FBI is asking about Obama’s home purchase (with convicted briber Tony Rezko’s wife also involved).

That’s it; the thread’s yours.

Paul Ryan on the Big Thr…er, UAW bailout

Because I bashed Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI, my Congresscritter) for his vote on the UAW bailout, it is only fair that I present his side of the argument. From a press release that came into my mailbox a half-hour ago (only stripping off the announcement that it was a statement):

It is clear that the mounting hardships throughout Southern Wisconsin have been downright gut-wrenching. In addition to the imminent closure of the GM plant in my hometown of Janesville and mass layoffs elsewhere, hard-working Wisconsinites are finding it increasingly difficult during this recession to cope with strained credit markets, rising health care costs, and making their monthly mortgage payments.

The American automotive industry is under considerable distress, and various proposals have been put forth to provide aid to those in need. I’ve maintained that any assistance to the domestic auto industry should be drawn from previously approved funds from a U.S. Department of Energy loan package, rather than divert resources from the financial rescue package or rely on additional taxpayer dollars. H.R. 7321 cuts through the bureaucratic red tape and expedites these previously appropriated funds. Because no additional taxpayer dollars were appropriated, I was able to support this legislation.

At the forefront of my mind are jobs in Southern Wisconsin and the retiree commitments to workers that could be placed in jeopardy under certain bankruptcy scenarios. To be clear, this bill is not intended to save the American auto industry and makes no guarantees that layoffs in this industry will end. Congress must stop overselling what it can do. At the very least, I am hopeful that by extending these loans to the American auto manufacturers, bankruptcy will be avoided in the near term and protections for retirees will remain intact.

As Jules Winnfield once said, well, allow me to retort. The UAW workers, who are dwindling in number in Wisconsin with or without the bailout by the way, aren’t the only ones who are hurting. Sending $14 billion of everybody’s money down the rat hole known as GM, Ford and Chrysler just so they can survive the next 3 1/2 months without any permanent reforms, without any assurance that they would ever return to profitability, is the height of stupidity. The market forces are saying that the Big Three are sending too much money out the door in compensation, and the bailout only seriously addresses the white-collar portion (not even half) of that.

I suppose I could give a half-cheer that the bailout is using $25 billion that was already committed to the Big Three, and a quarter-cheer that it leaves $9 billion for the original purpose of plant modernization.

Chapter 11 bankruptcy is not the end of the world. Indeed, many of Ryan’s Republican colleagues suggested that a pre-negotiated Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which would allow the union portion of that compensation to be adjusted with less UAW interference, is the way to go. I agree.

The Bill Of The Living Dead

by @ 5:40. Filed under Economy, Politics - National.

By a vote of 237 to 170, the House of Representatives passed the Auto bail out bill this evening.

The Auto bill is being sold as funding to ensure that Detroit can survivef the recession and restructure their businesses so that they are leaner and better competitors once the restructuring is complete.  

After reading the bill, I’ve come to the conclusion that the bill will not allow for the survival of the Detroit automakers.   Rather, the bill is a disguised suicide pact.

You’ve probably heard about most of the provisions in the bill:   There will be an auto czar who will have significant influence over the indebted auto manufacturers, all private airplanes must go, salaries and bonuses have been capped, the Government will get stock warrants for 20% of the company.   What you may not have heard about is the process that the Auto Czar will use to determine who gets loans and how much they get.

The process of doling out “loans” is two fold.   The three auto makers will go to the Czar for bridge loans.   These loans are intended to keep the manufacturers solvent while they work on their “Restructuring Plan.”   According to the legislation, the Czar must consider the following criteria, in the order presented, when determining who gets how much:

SEC. 9. ALLOCATION.

PRIORITIZING ALLOCATION
The President’s designee shall prioritize allocation of the provision of financial assistance under this Act to any eligible automobile manufacturer, based on

(1) the necessity of the financial assistance for the continued operation of the eligible automobile manufacturer;
(2) the potential impact of the failure of the eligible automobile manufacturer on the United States economy; and
(3) the ability to utilize the financial assistance optimally to satisfy the operational and long-term restructuring requirements of the eligible automobile manufacturer.

That seems reasonable.   If we’re really working to have the companies survive and be able to repay the loans we would want to put their financial viability as a first priority.

After the companies are approved for the bridge loan, they are given until March 31, 2009 to put detail to the plans they presented to Congress and produce a “Restructuring Plan.”   The “Restructuring Plan” is the plan they will execute, and that the Czar will hold them to, until they have paid their loans back to the Government.   Based on this plan, the Czar will make determinations about any additional money that the auto company may receive.

The Auto Czar is supposed to use the same criteria, as noted above, to evaluate the “Restructuring Plan.”   However, the legislation provides for a different priority to consider and weight the three criteria:

(c) ORDER OF PRIORITY; SECTION 7."”For purposes of allocating financial assistance for restructuring pursuant to section 7, the President’s designee shall prioritize the considerations set forth in subsection (a) in the following order: paragraph (3), paragraph (2), and paragraph (1).

Well gee, that’s kind of odd.   Rather than focusing on the financial viability of the company, the long term plan is to be evaluated based upon:

the ability to utilize the financial assistance optimally to satisfy the operational and long-term restructuring requirements of the eligible automobile manufacturer.

What do you suppose that means?

Along with the list of provisions that I gave you early in this post, are a couple of others that you’ve likely heard in passing:   If the automaker does not comply with the federal fuel efficiency standards, they can have their loan called, to commence domestic manufacturing of advanced technology vehicles (read that as non fossil fuel vehicles) and do an analysis of how to take excess manufacturing capacity and use it to make mass transit vehicles.

Once the automakers sign up for this loan the government can change the federal fuel standards to anything they want and force to automakers to make the goal. Once the automakers sign up for this loan they have to make non fossil fuel vehicles. Once the automakers sign up for this loan they will be expected to provide manufacturing for mass transit vehicles. All of this will be required or expected of the automakers with the threat of loan recalls if they balk or miss on any of it. All of this will be required or expected without regard to the market or the financial viability of the requirements.

While it’s not surprising that this legislation included “green” requirements, you may find it surprising that the priority for green was placed above all other considerations, including financial viability. Well, you would have been surprised had this happened a couple of years ago before the nation started its rapid and determined race to nationalization of industries and socialism. Now it seems hard to find any sense of fiscal sanity with in any action coming from inside the Washington beltway.

The Auto Industry Financing and Restructuring Act is not an act to bring the auto industry back to health. Rather, it is an act that will create three industrial zombies. Like Zombies, they will be a shell of the real thing. They will be soul less and act in ways that are inexplicable except to their masters.  Their masters will care nothing for the well being of the zombies and are only interested in them to accomplish the master’s goals.

It’s obvious to see why the automakers want the bailout; they see it as they only way to survive. I wonder if they would make the same choice if they understood that they are about to become the new stars in The Night of the Living Dead?

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]