The question is out there again courtesy Allahpundit, so it’s time to bring the old poll back, but with a twist. Since WP-Poll now supports multiple answers, let’s run it again. This time, you get up to 3 options, and if I still haven’t hit your sweet spot, pipe up.
Who should we retaliate against if the Islamokazis nuke the US (part 2)?
Up to 3 answer(s) was/were allowed
- After determining which group it was, send the B-52s in for the nuclear Grand Tour of their bases of operations. (21%, 32 Vote(s))
- We nuke Islam's "holy" sites, no questions asked. (19%, 30 Vote(s))
- We nuke the supplier(s) of the nukes. (17%, 27 Vote(s))
- We nuke Waziristan, or wherever the current home of Al Qaeda is at the time, no questions asked. (17%, 26 Vote(s))
- After determining which group it was, we send the B-52s on a conventional Grand Tour of their bases of operation. (7%, 11 Vote(s))
- We lay waste to Islam's "holy" sites with conventional weapons, no questions asked. (6%, 9 Vote(s))
- We wage conventional war on the supplier(s) of the nukes. (6%, 9 Vote(s))
- No one because that would be "wrong". (4%, 6 Vote(s))
- No one because we're waving the French battle flag (aka white flag of unconditional surrender). (3%, 4 Vote(s))
- Something I missed (please explain in the thread). (1%, 2 Vote(s))
Total Voters: 156
Loading ...If you’re wondering what happened last time, let’s review:
Who should we retaliate against if the Islamokazis nuke the US?
Up to 1 answer(s) was/were allowed
- We nuke Islam's "holy" sites, no questions asked. (32%, 7 Vote(s))
- After determining which group it was, send the B-52s in for the nuclear Grand Tour of their bases of operations. (23%, 5 Vote(s))
- After determining which group it was, we send the B-52s on a conventional Grand Tour of their bases of operation. (18%, 4 Vote(s))
- We nuke Waziristan, the current home of Al Qaeda, no questions asked. (14%, 3 Vote(s))
- We nuke the supplier(s) of the nukes. (5%, 1 Vote(s))
- We wage conventional war on the supplier(s) of the nukes. (5%, 1 Vote(s))
- Something I missed (please explain in the thread) (5%, 1 Vote(s))
- We lay waste to Islam's "holy" sites with conventional weapons, no questions asked. (0%, 0 Vote(s))
- No one because that would be "wrong". (0%, 0 Vote(s))
- No one because we're waving the French battle flag (aka white flag of unconditional surrender) (0%, 0 Vote(s))
Total Voters: 22
Loading ...
Where is the option to nuke Iran into a huge glass covered parking lot, no matter who dun it? Knowing it would happen would be the only way to stop them from passing nukes along to others when not if,(because even with French permission do I expect we will stop them) they get them.
Good point. However, Qom is in Iran, and the Shi’ite flavor of Islam considers it holy city #3 behind Mecca and Medina.
‘Tis why I said to pipe up if I didn’t hit the sweet spot.
Slight edit (4:33 pm 9/1/2007) – Did you somehow lose your password for your account here?
Hell, i’m just glad i could give multiple answers!
We have enough gas to fly to all those places, right?
The Holy sites nuking is on the right track.
These guys don’t get Mutually Assured Destruction, so a lesson is in order.
The President should announce the Islamo-fascist-murder doctrine:
If ANY WMD is used on US soil by islamic murderers, the USA will give 5 days warning prior to incinerating (and rendering unusable) the city of Mecca. The 5 days will be to allow the non-combatants to leave. Jihadists may use the time to get there to become martyrs.
Other ‘holy’ places can be listed separately for their 5 day follow-ups. This doctrine will permit Muslims who are not jihadists to pressure and/or expose those who are to end the attacks.
If we find this response somehow creates more jihadists, THEN we announce the nulear B-52 world tour.