No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

Archive for September 1st, 2007

Who should we retaliate against if the Islamokazis nuke the US (part 2)?

by @ 15:58. Filed under Politics - National, War on Terror.

The question is out there again courtesy Allahpundit, so it’s time to bring the old poll back, but with a twist. Since WP-Poll now supports multiple answers, let’s run it again. This time, you get up to 3 options, and if I still haven’t hit your sweet spot, pipe up.

Who should we retaliate against if the Islamokazis nuke the US (part 2)?

Up to 3 answer(s) was/were allowed

  • After determining which group it was, send the B-52s in for the nuclear Grand Tour of their bases of operations. (21%, 32 Vote(s))
  • We nuke Islam's "holy" sites, no questions asked. (19%, 30 Vote(s))
  • We nuke the supplier(s) of the nukes. (17%, 27 Vote(s))
  • We nuke Waziristan, or wherever the current home of Al Qaeda is at the time, no questions asked. (17%, 26 Vote(s))
  • After determining which group it was, we send the B-52s on a conventional Grand Tour of their bases of operation. (7%, 11 Vote(s))
  • We lay waste to Islam's "holy" sites with conventional weapons, no questions asked. (6%, 9 Vote(s))
  • We wage conventional war on the supplier(s) of the nukes. (6%, 9 Vote(s))
  • No one because that would be "wrong". (4%, 6 Vote(s))
  • No one because we're waving the French battle flag (aka white flag of unconditional surrender). (3%, 4 Vote(s))
  • Something I missed (please explain in the thread). (1%, 2 Vote(s))

Total Voters: 156

Loading ... Loading ...

If you’re wondering what happened last time, let’s review:

Who should we retaliate against if the Islamokazis nuke the US?

Up to 1 answer(s) was/were allowed

  • We nuke Islam's "holy" sites, no questions asked. (32%, 7 Vote(s))
  • After determining which group it was, send the B-52s in for the nuclear Grand Tour of their bases of operations. (23%, 5 Vote(s))
  • After determining which group it was, we send the B-52s on a conventional Grand Tour of their bases of operation. (18%, 4 Vote(s))
  • We nuke Waziristan, the current home of Al Qaeda, no questions asked. (14%, 3 Vote(s))
  • We nuke the supplier(s) of the nukes. (5%, 1 Vote(s))
  • We wage conventional war on the supplier(s) of the nukes. (5%, 1 Vote(s))
  • Something I missed (please explain in the thread) (5%, 1 Vote(s))
  • We lay waste to Islam's "holy" sites with conventional weapons, no questions asked. (0%, 0 Vote(s))
  • No one because that would be "wrong". (0%, 0 Vote(s))
  • No one because we're waving the French battle flag (aka white flag of unconditional surrender) (0%, 0 Vote(s))

Total Voters: 22

Loading ... Loading ...

Roll bloat – heavy hitter edition

by @ 7:07. Filed under Miscellaneous.

Since Ed Driscoll was up later than I was last night and stumbled here, I guess it’s time to rectify a serious wrong and add him to the roll.

Photo ID – still not “good enough” for Wisconsin’s polling places,…

by @ 7:01. Filed under Elections, Politics - Wisconsin.

…but good enough for visitors to MPS.

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]