define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true); define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true); No Runny Eggs

No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

February 26, 2009

Brief CPAC Thursday afternoon update

by @ 17:28. Tags:
Filed under Conservatism.

– First things first, I found the time to get back to the room and upload the Paul Ryan audio from this morning.

– Ed Morrissey and Jim Geraghty decided to drag me into Ed’s interview with Jim. Folks, that’s the reason why I don’t do multimedia involving me.

– In addition to Jim, I ran into Justin Higgins. Even though he’s THAT GOOD (good enough to get a Rush Limbaugh mention or two), he’s still amazed that he’s taken seriously as a 19-year-old. Like I said, he is THAT GOOD, so it shouldn’t be a surprise.

Back to the grind party, then who knows where.

Roll bloat – after dark edition

by @ 12:05. Filed under The Blog.

Yes, I know, it’s just after noon back in the land of ice cream and frozen beer (and 1 pm in the bowels of CPAC), but I need to add Skye and MidnightBlue.

Brief CPAC Thursday AM update

by @ 10:49. Tags:
Filed under Conservatism.

– Listened to Paul Ryan open up CPAC. He got a lot of applause, as he was on a roll. One odd thing; he seems to be a bit of a goldbug. I do have audio and pics, but since I’m posting from a borrowed computer and cell coverage is at best spotty, I don’t have a way to pull it off the digital voice recorder and phone (respectively).

– There’s somewhere between 8,500 and 9,000 of us floating here. For those paying attention, that is a record.

– Last night, I ran into Sean Hackbarth, Melissa Clouthier, Ali Akbar, Matt Margolis, and a couple other silent types. Sean, Melissa and Ali put on Politics 625.

– Today, I ran into Katie Favazza, Rick Moran, Ed Morrissey, Fausta Wertz, and had my copy of the “Pretty in Mink” calendar signed by Amanda Carpenter.

– The BHO weekly passes for the Metro SUCK! First one demagnetized on me after 3 trips.

Oops; just missed a session I wanted to hit. DAMMIT!

Revisions/extensions (12:07 pm 2/26/2009) – Right after I posted, I ran into Krystle Weeks, and a bit after that, Doug Welch and Skye.

February 25, 2009

Is There a Draft In Here?

by @ 10:05. Filed under Politics - National.

Even “American Pravda” couldn’t listen to President Obama’s speech without noticing a few, shall we say, stretches of the truth.

FACT CHECK: Obama’s words on home aid ring hollow

OK, I’m not going to quibble over who exactly created the first thing called an automobile but not knowing what the total imported oil level is?   Come on, Buuuuuuuuuuush would have been crucified for misses like that.

When American Pravda is able and willing to point out “inaccuracies” in PEBO’s facts, it is now politically acceptable to say “The Emperor has no clothes!”   The speed with which this happened must be what was referred to, as an Obama administration official told Jake Tapper:

“President Obama has accomplished more in 30 days than any president in modern history!”

Not since Britney Spears’ wedding to Jason Allen Alexander, has there been a honeymoon that has been this disastrous and this brief!

February 24, 2009

Steve is away working on his new KRM Proposal

by @ 22:42. Filed under Choo-choos.

I though I would give you a preview….n1270217983_294743_5575

Doyle sabotages the future (and new NRE poll)

by @ 18:01. Filed under NRE Polls, Politics - Wisconsin.

Buried in the FY2010/2011 Budget in Brief is a stinker of a table called the “General Fund Condition Under Governor’s Budget”. This year, it’s Table 9, on page 36 of the printed copy (page 39 of the PDF). It projects what the Department of Administration believes the proposed budget will do to the general fund in the biennium, as well as what it projects continuing that budget will do in the next one.

I would like to draw your attention to the “Balances” section of that chart, specfically what the 2011-2013 (FY2012/2013) projected balances are. The gross balance in FY2013 is projected to be -$559,500,000. For those that missed the minus sign, that’s a deficit of $559.5 million. That does not include the “required statutory” positive balance of $130 million, which would make the net deficit $689,500,000.

That is the second time a Doyle budget has admitted that it would short the following biennium budget. That is before the initial agency requests for mo’ money, mo’ money, mo’ money create a multi-billion deficit that supposedly gets filled. Let’s review the history of the Doyle budgets, with the previous budget’s projected surplus/deficit, and the “agency requests” deficit:

FY2004/2005

  • Previous budget (FY2002/2003) projected net surplus/(deficit) for FY2005 – unavailable (not part of Scott McCallum’s budget)
  • “Agency-request” net surplus/(deficit) for FY2005 (from Table 3) – ($966 million) (note: to match up with succeeding budget formats, this does not include FY2003 deficits and adjustments or a decision to increase shared revenue funding, but does include the structural deficit and adjustments to FY2004/2005 revenue)

FY2006/2007

  • Previous budget (FY2004/2005) projected net surplus/(deficit) for FY2007 (from Table 6 of that budget) – $146 million (includes withholding a required statutory balance of $251.4 million)
  • “Agency-request” net surplus/(deficit) for FY2007 (from Table 1) – ($1,666 million) (note: this does not include a re-estimate of the FY2005 Medical Assistance shortfall)

FY2008/2009

  • Previous budget (FY2006/2007) projected net surplus/(deficit) for FY2009 (from Table 5 of that budget) – ($232.7 million) (includes withholding a required statutory balance of $65 million)
  • “Agency-request” net surplus/(deficit) for FY2009 (from Table 1) – ($1,654 million) (note: this does not include FY2007 shortfalls)

FY2010/2011

  • Previous budget (FY2008/2009) projected net surplus/(deficit) for FY2011 (from Table 8 of that budget) – $212.5 million (includes withholding a required statutory balance of $130 million)
  • “Agency-request” net surplus/(deficit) for FY2011 (from Table 1) – ($5,945 million)

With that history of blowing budgets in mind, I present the latest NRE poll. What will the “agency-request” budget hole be next time around?

What will the Wisconsin "agency-requests" FY2013 (released in or around November 2010) deficit be?

Up to 1 answer(s) was/were allowed

  • Over $5,945,000,000 (55%, 12 Vote(s))
  • Between $1,666,000,001 and $5,945,000,000 (32%, 7 Vote(s))
  • There won't be a deficit (9%, 2 Vote(s))
  • Between $966,000,001 and $1,666,000,000 (5%, 1 Vote(s))
  • Between $1 and $1,000,000 (0%, 0 Vote(s))
  • Between $1,000,001 and $100,000,000 (0%, 0 Vote(s))
  • Between $100,000,001 and $966,000,000 (0%, 0 Vote(s))

Total Voters: 22

Loading ... Loading ...

More Necro-Budget numbers via Dennis Yor…er, Christian Schneider

by @ 15:02. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin.

For those of you who came into the Cheddarsphere after February 2007, you missed the best anonymous blogger ever, Dennis York. The man behind the legend, Christian Schneider, really went to town yesterday over at the Wisconsin Policy Research Institute, apologizing to the future for the Necro-Budget.

I can’t even come close to duplicating the Schneider/York humor, but I can give the humor-challenged the hard, cold numbers gist:

– Included with $2.2 billion in tax hikes, supposedly only on the top 1% of wage-earners, is a $257 million cigarette tax hike. The cigarette tax is the most regressive tax that exists (i.e., it hits the poor harder)
– “Major cuts” equals an 8% spending hike (this number is rather fungible; but the lowest estimate, which is mine, is 5.4% and 6.3% once the budget “repair” bill is added in), funded in large part by the “one-time-only” $2.1 billion Generational Theft Law.
– The biggest, but not only, example was a swap of $498 million in state funds for the school equilization aid for $498 million in federal funds for the school equilization aid. Where do you suppose that $498 million is going to come from in 2 years?
– Despite the $2.2 billion tax hike in the budget, the aforementioned $2.1 billion from the Generational Theft Law, and the unmentioned $1.4 billion tax hike in the recently-signed budget “repair” bill (that itself increased the current-year deficit to something north of $400 million), the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles deficit in the general fund would only drop $138.1 million from FY2009 to FY2011 to $2,278.9 million (or $2.3 billion), and actually would increase $38.6 million from FY2009 to FY2010 to $2,455.6 million (or $2.5 billion).

Revisions/extensions (3:40 pm 2/24/2009) – If you want a truly-frightening experience, take a gander at Table 9 of the Budget in Brief, specifically the balances section for FY2012 and FY2013, found on page 36 (page 39 in the PDF file). For those of you without Adobe Acrobat, I’ll summarize:

  • FY2012 – Gross balance of -$127.6 million, net balance of -$257.6 million (there’s supposed to be a $130 million required statutory balance), and a structural balance of -$396.3 million
  • FY2013 – Gross balance of -$559.5 million (based off the gross balance of FY2012, not the net), net balance of -$689.5 million, and a structural balance of -$431.9 million

That’s right, all of those numbers are negative. For the first time in a Doyle budget, they are admitting that the following 2-year budget will be massively in the red.

Eggs on the road and Open Blog – rest of the week

by @ 13:48. Filed under Miscellaneous.

Tonight, 7 pm – Blog ‘n Grog, Sprizzos, 363 W Main in Waukesha (yes, this will preclude my participation in any ObamiNation address live thread)

Tonight, sometime after 9pm (if I’m not completely hammered from playing an ObamiNation drinking game) – Papa’s Fat Tuesday party, 7718 W Burleigh in Milwaukee

Tomrrow through Sunday – CPAC.

In For A Penny…

by @ 5:48. Filed under Economy, Politics - National.

What’s that I hear?   it’s the big sucking sound created by the Federal Government mucking around in things they know nothing about.   First on the list:

AIG Needs More Help After $60 Billion Loss

AIG, as you may remember, was the first “too big to fail,” after the Feds got nervous after Lehman hit the dust.   After two bites at the apple, AIG got a total of $150B government support.   Reports are that after several sales of profitable pieces of their company, AIG has gotten their outstanding balance down to $35B.   It’s believed that AIG will report the largest loss ever by a US company tomorrow at $60B.   Please note that we (and by we I mean the Federal Government) owns 80% of AIG so there should be no surprise when money is “shovel ready” to keep them afloat.

Next:

U.S. Eyes Large Stake in Citi

Citigroup Inc. is in talks with federal officials that could result in the U.S. government substantially expanding its ownership of the struggling bank, according to people familiar with the situation.

While the discussions could fall apart, the government could wind up holding as much as 40% of Citigroup’s common stock.

Here again, the Fed is already into Citi for $45B.   This little ditty has a twist from the others.   Citi is spinning this saying “it won’t cost the taxpayers a dime!”   Oh lucky us, not exactly.

You see, nearly all accounting and investing rules will tell you that at 40% ownership you effectively control the company.   Once you own the company, you are responsible for it.   Once you’re responsible for it, if the company should need additional capital, you as the major shareholder will be put in the position of either putting up that capital or diluting your ownership.   For an entity that can just run an inkjet to get the additional capital, the answer is easy.

Oh, and the part about not costing the taxpayers anything, not so much.   The preferred stock that we currently have gets periodic interest payments.   It is also in a senior position to common shareholders should the company go bankrupt.   By converting to common stock the interest payments will go away.   Thus, at the very least it will cost the taxpayer something short term and if the company ultimately fails or needs more money, it will definitely cost more.

Finally thought on this one; even though the Obama administration’s spokes person said just 3 days ago:

“This administration continues to strongly believe that a privately held banking system is the correct way to go, ensuring that they are regulated sufficiently by this government”

Don’t “bank that!”   Remember, all Obama positions have expiration dates.

Bringing it all together:

Remember that the automakers are back talking about plans for their future support.   If any of you believe that just one more government infusion will get the automakers back to a point where they’ll be able to function on their own please take note of what’s happening in the financial industry.   When it comes to government “help,” it’s fair to say:

In for a penny, in for a pound!

February 23, 2009

Did I Say Eliminate?

by @ 5:24. Filed under Economy, Politics - National.

As is apparent to anyone who has paid any attention lately, the economy is challenged.   The situation is so difficult that the latest forecast  from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), issued prior to the Stimulus bill, indicates that the deficit for the current year would be nearly $1.2 Trillion.   The CBO’s estimate of the impact Stimulus bill is to increase the deficit by another $185 Billion for a new total $1.4 Trillion.

This weekend in his weekly radio address, President Obama spoke about the need to get the deficit under control.   With a deficit of at least $1.4 Trillion this year, President Obama set out a goal of reducing the deficit to a mere $533 Billion by the end of his first term.    Simply amazing, or maybe not.

According to that same CBO forecast, the projected budget deficit for the last year of Obama’s first term, FY 2013, was projected to be $257 Billion.   Yeah, yeah, I know.   That nasty stimulus bill really jacked the future deficit up right?   According to the CBO’s analysis, the increase is $28 billion in 2013 for a total of $285 Billion.

Well, that’s odd!   Yes, but that’s not all.

In the same CBO forecast, they gave the estimated change to the deficit  for a variety of other actions.

You may remember that Obama has promised to remove troops from Iraq within 16 months?   You may also remember that Obama promised to make Bin Laden “Job #1”.   I think it’s safe to say he’ll have that solved in the same 16 month period and because Bin Laden is the only trouble maker in the region, we should be able to pull the troops out of Afghanistan, certainly by 2013.   The CBO forecast shows an alternative benefit of $30 billion if the total number of troops in Iraq and Afghanistan are reduced to 30,000 by 2013.   He shouldn’t need that many but I suppose a token force is OK.

The CBO forecast assumes that the “Bush tax cuts” are allowed to expire, something that Obama has promised, so you don’t need an adjustment there.

The AMT gets fixed each year so that new folks aren’t pulled into it.   While I doubt Obama will continue this because of his need to trap the few taxpayers left into higher brackets, I’ll be generous and take the $45 Billion, including interest, impact against the deficit.

That leaves us at a projected 2013 deficit of $290 Billion.   That looks to be more than 45% less, $243 billion below, the audacious target President Obama has set for himself.   Huh?   The CBO tells us that discretionary spending, that which Congress can control without changing things like Medicare, Social Security etc., will be $1.220 Trillion in 2013.   For the budget deficit to grow $243 Billion over the latest, adjusted for the Stimulus plan, forecast  by the CBO, Congress will need to increase their discretionary spending by 20% over the assumed increases for inflation, growth and GDP adjustments.   In the CBO’s forecast, discretionary spending is only expected to increase by $36 Billion over Obama’s term.   If discretionary spending does increase by $243 Billion over the rate that the CBO has projected, it will grow at a rate that is 675% higher than that projected rate.  

In November of 2008, while yet simply PEBO, Obama stated:

We will go through our federal budget – page by page, line by line – eliminating those programs we don’t need, and insisting that those we do operate in a sensible cost-effective way.

I guess this is yet another Obama promise that came with an expiration date.

On the plus side, a couple of additional announcements like this and Obama’s planned increase in the capital gains rate won’t be very news worthy.   What capital gains will be left to tax?

February 22, 2009

Two in a row!

by @ 21:36. Tags: ,
Filed under Sports.

Matt Kenseth has become the 5th driver in the history of NASCAR to win the first 2 races of the season in the premier series. While there was some rain this time, it was the Bees that made the difference. Other than one bad stop about mid-race, they picked up a lot of spots on pit road, and Matt held off Jeff Gordon at the end.

On to Vegas and a shot at doing what they say can’t be done – start the season 3-for-3.

February 21, 2009

By the numbers – Wisconsin budget

by @ 12:26. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin.

Revisions/extensions (11:38 pm 2/22/2009) – I used an initial estimate of $59.5 billion for state spending in FY2008/2009, $62.3 billion in initial requests for the FY2010/2011 budget, and some subtraction for the increases in spending in the Necro-Budget as I hadn’t seen hard numbers when I originally wrote this. A pair of sources, the Wisconsin Taxpayers Alliance and the Legislative Fiscal Bureau (H/T – Patrick McIlheran via Dad29), pegs the Necro-Budget spending at $62.7 billion, though both state the FY2008/2009 spending at lower numbers than my estimates. I’ll continue to use the $59.5 billion FY2008/2009 spending estimate.

Since I’m a numbers guy, I’ll reduce the end of the FY2008/2009 Wisconsin budget and the (proposed) FY2010/2011 Wisconsin budget to some easy to ang…er, understand numbers:

– Tax increases in the Wisconsin version of Porkulus (meant to be a budget “repair” bill; more on that in a bit) between 1/1/2009 and 6/30/2011: $1.4 billion
– Tax increases in the Necro-Budget proposal (thanks for the name, Kevin) over that same time frame: $2.1 billion
– Total tax increases between 1/1/2009 and 6/30/2011: $3.5 billion (13.4% increase over the pre-increase FY2007/2008 amount)
– Money anticipated from the federal Generational Theft Law of 2009: just over $2 billion
– Total additional money going to Uncle Craps between 1/1/2009 and 6/30/2011: $5.5 billion
– FY2008/2009 budget shortfall after Wisconsin’s Porkulus: $0.42 billion (up from $0.39 billion in November 2008)
– FY2010/2011 budget “shortfall” before the effects of all the tax increases and the Generational Theft Law of 2009 (hereafter refered to as the “initial FY2010/2011 budget”): $5.7 billion
– Spending increases in the initial FY2010/2011 budget: $2.8 billion (4.7% increase over FY2008/2009)
– Spending increases between Wisconsin’s Porkulus and the Necro-Budget (estimated; assumes no deficit on 6/30/2011 even though I’ve seen projections of a $2.1 billion structural deficit at that point): $2.2 billion (3.7% increase over FY2008/2009)
– Spending increases between Wisconsin’s Porkulus and the Necro-Budget (estimated; assumes a $2.1 billion structural deficit on 6/30/2011): $4.3 billion (7.2% increase over FY2008/2009)

(Added 2/22/2009) Spending increases from the initial FY2010/2011 budget and the Necro-Budget: $0.4 billion (to $63.7 billion)
(Added 2/22/2009) Spending increases from the FY2008/2009 budget and the Necro-Budget/Wisconsin’s Porkulus combo (includes $300 million from the Generational Theft Law stuck into Wisconsin’s Porkulus per the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel): $3.7 billion (6.2% increase over FY2008/2009)

That’s right; even after the “to-the-bone cuts” and the through-the-roof tax increases, Jim Doyle and the Spendocrats (off-topic; I need to create a Josie and the Pussycats Photoshop) are massively increasing spending.

Way To Go Mr. President!

by @ 5:37. Filed under Economy, Politics - National.

priceless1

Calling Mr. Geithner, Mr. Tim Geithner

by @ 5:29. Filed under Economy, Miscellaneous, Politics - National.

Is it just me or has Tim Geithner been noticeably absent since his ill fated coming out event with Congress.

I’m sure there’s no reason for concern but just in case, it may not hurt to distribute the following:

geithner

February 20, 2009

Today’s statistic – $2.5 trillion

by @ 18:37. Filed under Politics - National.

Fox News has some disturbing numbers on the rate of deficit spending:

– The January 2009 deficit – $83.8 billion (compared to January 2008 surplus of $17.8 billion)
– The 4-month FY2009 deficit – somewhere over $454.8 billion (which was a full fiscal-year record, set in FY2008)
– The projected pre-Generational Theft Law FY2009 deficit (via the Congressional Budget Office) – $1.2 trillion
– Private economists’ estimate of the pre-Generational Theft Law FY2009 deficit – $1.6 trillion

Once last year’s deficit and the FY2009 portion of the $787 billion Generational Theft Law (for which $0 was budgeted) are added in, between November 1, 2007 and October 31, 2009, the federal government will have spent $2,500,000,000,000 more than it took in over that period. That is almost a quarter of the current national debt (the Fox News story goes further and says it is almost a quarter of the entire amount of debt ever taken on by the Feds).

For those of you who don’t remember Paul Ryan’s warnings before Bailoutpalooza hit (to the tune of roughly $1.6 trillion), it would take a doubling of the amount of taxes taken in to fund the government inside of 40 years to 40% of the GDP (for those of you in Rio Linda, that’s $4 out of every $10 produced by the economy). With Bailoutpalooza, it’s far closer to, and I’ll wager, beyond 50%.

Just Call Me “The Architect”

by @ 5:45. Filed under Politics - National.

I wrote two weeks ago about how President Obama seemed to be having a difficult time moving from Monday Morning Quarterback to that of the real thing.   Since that post and its list of fumbles, Obama has over promised and than hung Geithner out to dry on his attempt to roll out a bank plan.   He’s also tuned up his tin ear and rolled out a mortgage plan that looks eerily similar to one proposed by Congress last year and was summarily shouted down by the public because it appeared to reward reckless to stupid behavior on the behalf of too many of the home owners it claimed to help.

In today’s WSJ, Karl Rove notes the same inability for the Obama team to “get it right.”   Rove ascribes the problem to an inability to govern thus resulting in “winging it” on too many issues of substance.   Rove further states that this is out of character for the Obama who ran a tight, effective campaign:

Team Obama demonstrated remarkable discipline during the presidential campaign. From raising an unprecedented amount of money to milking every advantage from the Internet to grabbing lots of delegates from inexpensive caucus states, they left nothing to chance.

From my reading of his opinion piece, Rove sees the events and reasons for Obama’s foibles thus far similar to what I did with one exception:

The president, a bright and skilled politician, has plenty of time to recover. The danger is that what we have seen is not an aberration, but the early indications of his governing style. Barack Obama won the job he craved, now he must demonstrate that he and his team are up to its requirements. The signs are worrisome. The world is a dangerous place. The days of winging it need to end.

Rove seems to believe that Obama hasn’t yet reached the point of no return and that  Obama can change how he operates.   I agree with Rove that the point of no return hasn’t been reached.   However, I have a different perspective on Obama’s ability to change.

Over the years I’ve worked with several people who thought they were the smartest person around.   Along with a lack of humility, typical traits for these folks are thin skins and a dimissive, “you’re not smart enough to understand,” kind of response when they are asked to explain their logic.

Throughout the campaign, any time Obama was challenged directly he showed a tendency towards thin skin.   Even recently, as he saw the stimulus bill hit road blocks and he had to explain himself,  you could see his thin skinned responses towards any who questioned his analysis.   Dismissive, is there any other word for Obama’s “I won” response?

The other thing I’ve noted about folks who think they are smarter than anyone else is that it is very rare for them to change.   In fact, I can only think of one that I’ve known who has only did so after being dealt a serious personal blow.   My point is that unlike Rove, I don’t think Obama will change.   He’s found success with his current method and will stay with it for better or worse.   That makes me believe that while he hasn’t hit the point of no return, he’s careening down the path to the point and we can only hang on.

The Coming Housing Bubble?

by @ 5:13. Filed under Miscellaneous.

Yes, you read that correctly.   It’s entirely possible that there is another housing bubble coming.

Francis Cianfrocca tries to figure out what exactly the latest, no details included, proposal from President Obama means.

Yesterday, President Obama rolled out “a plan” to help homeowners who are behind on their payments.   Cianfrocca believes based on:

uniformly-enthusiastic reactions of banking-industry executives and spokesmen,

Cianfrocca believes that the $75 billion in Obama’s plan leads directly back to the banks/mortgage holders.

Cianfrocca believes the plan will work as such:

I think the proposal is intended to directly supplement mortgage payments for millions of people (using the 31%-of-pretax-income benchmark for mortgage affordability). There are reports that the plan will somehow facilitate refinancings at lower interest rates, which is somewhat similar in effect. If I’m right, this is effectively the same as reducing people’s mortgage payments (but not their mortgage principal amounts) to a level that reflects current market reality.

Great!   We’ve solved all the housing problems for the low, low price of $75 billion dollars!   Now that we’ve fixed it and we’ve learned from our past, all will be right as rain from here on out!

Um, no:

If the program proves popular, however, look for it to expand. And if that happens, look for the fortunes of the homebuilding industry to recover.

This sounds good, but it’s very evil. We have far too much housing already in this country, the residue of the last housing bubble. If we get another one now due to government deliberately overvaluing mortgages, we’ve set the stage for yet another nasty crash in some future year.

Just one more example where President Obama appears to “Hope” there will be “Change” that will be different than the most likely outcome of his plans.

February 19, 2009

Elections have consequences, Wisconsin edition, part 1

by @ 12:57. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin.

The following just came in from Rep. Rich Zipperer’s office:

It’s official. The first major piece of legislation approved by the new majority in the Assembly included $1.2 billion of job killing tax increases. And, after 50 separate suggestions to improve the bill were offered by Republicans and each were summarily rejected by Democrats, not a single Republican voted for the tax increases.

The 389 page bill, dubbed by Governor Doyle as his ‘stimulus’ plan, was fast-tracked through the entire legislative process this week in less than 36 hours – a process that normally takes months. Unfortunately, the ‘stimulus’ bill is actually a budget bailout bill necessary because of yet another failed budget that has harmed our economy and failed to meet revenue expectations.

It became clear to me during the floor debate last night why the Democrat leadership wanted to fast-track this bill and deny the public an opportunity to see, debate, and comment on the legislation. The bill does what politicians in Washington have thus far refused to do – raise taxes in the midst of a recession. The Governor’s bailout plan, disguised as economic stimulus, is more accurately a laundry list of tax hikes that will only serve to further damage our state’s financial security and drive thousands of jobs from our state.

In an attempt to turn this package into a catalyst for economic growth and prosperity, I, along with a number of my Assembly Republican colleagues, offered 50 amendments that put taxpayers first and would have actually put stimulus ideas into the bill. Our taxpayer-friendly amendments would have:

  • Halted the $925 million Sick Tax
  • Eliminated $70.7 million in new sales tax collections
  • Exempted over-the-counter drugs from state sales tax
  • Ensured oversight over the federal stimulus money that is coming to Wisconsin
  • Eliminated the iPod tax, a $10.9 million tax proposed by Governor Doyle on digital downloads
  • Turned $1.6 million of earmarks given by Governor Doyle to labor unions into competitive public grants
  • Created an August sales tax holiday for back-to-school clothing shopping
  • Protected segregated funds, such as the Transportation Fund and the Injured Patients and Families Compensation Fund, from future raids and abuse
  • Stopped a new $215 million job killing tax on businesses
  • Made certain that tax dollars aren’t used to perform abortions
  • Provided immediate incentives for job creators to spend capital on research and innovation
  • Provided immediate tax relief to start-up small businesses

The people and businesses of Wisconsin can and will compete with anyone in the world if just given the opportunity. We have the can-do spirit. Unfortunately, Assembly Democrats stood lock-step with the Governor tonight and refused to accept a single amendment from our side of the aisle.

In this time of job loss and economic uncertainty, we need to make efforts to create jobs and make government accountable to taxpayers our top priorities. We must end the tax and spend culture that has taken hold in Madison. The actions this week by the majority party, however, will only help to shrink our state’s economy, drive jobs from our state, and still leave us with a current budget deficit of $416.9 million – allowing the potential for yet another budget bailout before the fiscal year ends on June 30th.

And this is all before we even begin to debate the over $1.4 billion in additional tax increases sought by Governor Doyle as part of his 2009-2011 proposed state budget.

Slight correction – it’s $2.1 billion of additional tax increases in the Necro-Budget, not $1.4 billion.

Who Knew?

by @ 5:53. Filed under Politics - National.

Democrats like big spending and Socialism!

In the first poll since the signing of the largest, government expanding,  spending bill ever, from Rasmussen Reports:

Democrats grew more optimistic this week, while Republicans showed no change in opinion. More Democrats now say the country is heading in the right direction by a 48% to 41% margin, compared to last week when they believed the opposite was true,by a similar margin. Just 11% of Republicans hold this positive view while 84% say the country is heading down the wrong track.

Drive By Observation

by @ 5:27. Filed under Miscellaneous.

“American Pravda” reports on Nancy Pelosi’s meeting with the Pope.   According to sources at the Vatican the Pope told Speaker Pelosi that

all Catholics"”especially legislators, jurists and political leaders"”should work to create “a just system of laws capable of protecting human life at all stages of its development.”

Evidently, this is Vatican code language for an expression often used by the pope when expressing opposition to abortion.

I wonder if Nancy used the bipartisan, New Obama English and explained her position to the Pope by saying:

I won!

So Much For Economic Decoupling

by @ 5:15. Filed under Economy, Politics - National.

You’ve probably heard the adage, “When the US gets a cold, the rest of the world gets pneumonia.”   The adage comes from the fact that world economies intertwined and the US, being the largest, influences a lot of what happens in the rest of the world.   Early in this economic downturn several financial experts attempted to argue that there had been a significant decoupling of world economies.   They argued that while issues were deteriorating in the US, other countries, especially China, wouldn’t see the downturn because their economy was much more stand alone.   While the evidence is obvious that these folks were wrong, Marc Faber does a good job of reconstructing events and deconstructing the decoupling myth, in yesterday’s WSJ.

Admittedly, Faber is known as Dr. Doom.   He has had a perspective on US financial management that is less than complimentary.   That said, Faber’s analysis is still spot on.

Faber’s key descriptive paragraph of the events of this downturn is here:

In 2008, a collapse in all asset prices led to lower U.S. consumption, which caused plunging exports, lower industrial production, and less capital spending in China. This led to a collapse in commodity prices and in the demand for luxury goods and capital goods from Europe and Japan. The virtuous up-cycle turned into a vicious down-cycle with an intensity not witnessed since before World War II.

As important as the tear down of the decoupling theory is Faber’s take on what caused this bubble to burst and what is to be learned from our experience.   As to what was the cause, Faber says:

Sadly, government policy responses — not only in the U.S. — are plainly wrong. It is not that the free market failed. The mistake was constant interventions in the free market by the Fed and the U.S. Treasury that addressed symptoms and postponed problems instead of solving them.

Faber rightly identifies the Fed’s easy credit monetary policies following the Dotcom bust as the fuel for the next bust.   By keeping rates artificially low for too long, Faber argues:

The complete mispricing of money, combined with a cornucopia of financial innovations, led to the housing boom and allowed buyers to purchase homes with no down payments and homeowners to refinance their existing mortgages.

Read the whole article.   Faber is correct in his analysis and he is correct on what he sees from the folks who are attempting to “do something” to resolve this problem:

So what now? Unfortunately, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner were, as Fed officials, among the chief architects of easy money and are therefore largely responsible for the credit bubble that got us here. Worse, their commitment to meddling in markets has only intensified with the adoption of near-zero interest rates and massive bank bailouts.

Faber’s suggestion for what should be done?

The best policy response would be to do nothing and let the free market correct the excesses brought about by unforgivable policy errors. Further interventions through ill-conceived bailouts and bulging fiscal deficits are bound to prolong the agony and lead to another slump — possibly an inflationary depression with dire social consequences.

All the Fed, Treasury and Congress have done in this downturn is to cause more fear and uncertainty.   They have done nothing to change the arc of the events that they all were a part of creating.   By implementing programs like today’s housing bailout, US financial institutions and businesses will be even less likely to put themselves out to take risk.   After all, who’s to say that tomorrow Congress won’t decide that their business needs to have contracts revoked, rewritten or renegotiated by force.   Until the Fed, Treasury, Congress and President Obama quit making “the rules of the day” don’t expect the US economy to improve or recurrent, wasteful spending to slow down.

February 18, 2009

Freezing Blog Drizzle Advisory expired

by @ 21:38. Filed under The Blog.

This is the Emergency Blogging System. The Freezing Blog Drizzle Advisory that had been in effect for No Runny Eggs has been allowed to expire. The steam that steveegg had has run out.

We now return you to your regularily scheduled schedule of posting.

$1,941 – CORRECTION – $194

by @ 19:06. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin, Taxes.

That is the net per-capita annual tax increase in Jim Doyle’s Spendulus budget. Christian Schneider and the Wisconsin Policy Research Institute broke down all the tax changes, though I believe they grossly understated the oil tax.

Bonus item – give or take a few million, the $2,185,639,000 represents essentially the entire “structural” deficit portion of the $5,700,000,000 hole Doyle created for himself at the beginning of the year, with the remainder being previously-planned increases in spending.

Revisions/extensions (7:20 pm 2/18/2009) – Somewhere in the bloated reader, I read that the Doyle Spendulus budget still has an over-$2 billion structural deficit pushed over to the middle of 2011. So much for limiting spending.

R&E part 2 (8:47 pm 2/18/2009) – I should have known better than to trust the Craps numbers. They screwed up.

R&E part 3 (6:52 am 2/19/2009 – Speaking of screw-ups, I stuck an additional zero somewhere. Sorry about that.

Is it time to liquidate GM?

by @ 18:04. Tags:
Filed under Business, Politics - National.

In case you haven’t heard, General Motors has requested another $16.6 billion in federal “loans” taxpayer subsidies after burning through its initial $13.4 billion in bailout money. My math says that is $30 billion, which doesn’t include all the billions that GM got for “clean car” research, or its share of $15 billion given by the feds taxpayers to it and the other members of the not-so-Big 3 for plant modernization.

Why is that $30 billion significant? Dave Schuler over at The Glittering Eye (H/T – Doug Mataconis) points out that the value of GM’s assets is roughly $30 billion. That’s right, sports fans. when GM gets its additional bailout money, it will owe the federal government its gross liquidation value. That does not account for GM’s liabilities or the fact that, in a liquidation, the liquidated company does not get its full value.

Given the speed with which GM burned through its initial $13.4 billion from the feds the taxpayers, they’ll be through the next $16.4 billion by summer. Then what? At that point, they’ll owe more to just the feds taxpayers than they can get by going through Chapter 7 bankruptcy liquidation. Do we say at that time, “Okay, we’re in for a pound, we’re in for the ton?” GM won’t even begin to repay the loans until 2012.

Do we say at that time, “Enough! Sink or swim?” Since former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson put the feds at the front of the line in the event of liquidation, and since I expect current Treasury Secretary and Paulson acolyte Timothy Geithner to do the same, that would mean none of GM’s other creditors would get paid. Care to guess what would happen to them?

As painful as it may seem, now is the perfect time to tell GM to sleep with the fishes. We don’t have the money to burn (thank you, Obama and the Spendocrats), and at least some of the GM liquidation would make it to its other creditors.

Life doesn’t hand out “A for effort”

by @ 16:06. Filed under Education.

(H/T – Slublog)

The New York Times reports on a bunch of college slackers who got introduced to a bit of grade reality. They seem to think that a failed effort is worth more than a “C”. They should be thankful that the lesson is gentle; once they hit the real world, a failed effort, regardless of the amount of effort poured in, is a failure.

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]