define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true); define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true); No Runny Eggs

No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

February 18, 2009

Gassed by taxes

by @ 15:54. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin, Taxes.

Yesterday, Gov. Jim Doyle (D) unveiled his “Back To The ’70s” budget, which features a whole host of tax increases. The largest is a $540 million tax on oil companies. Despite a claim that they will be prohibited from passing it along, it will be passed along, with interest paid to the oil companies from the state once that provision is adjudicated as unconstitutional.

I hope you didn’t spend your $13/week from Obama. More than half of that will be going right to Uncle Craps so he can build roads continue to raid the transportation fund.

Revisions/extensions (8:50 pm 2/18/2009) – The Doyle administration halved the effects. Still, considering all the other taxes that are in the budget, I hope you haven’t spent that $13/week from Obama (assuming, of course, you qualify for it).

Hypocrisy, DNR-style

by @ 15:24. Filed under Envirowhackos, Politics - Wisconsin.

Dr. Emil Shuffhausen found some serious hypocrisy from the Wisconsin DNR (or as Dad29 calls them, Damn Near Russia). Even as they demand that those that own rental properties rip out their current lighting and install high-efficiency lighting, they continue to light up the unoccupied interior of their building like a Christmas tree.

Need to get back in the groove

by @ 15:19. Filed under The Blog.

In case you haven’t noticed, I’ve been too silent lately. I’m still chewing over an epic topic or two, but while I’m chewing, I should fire off some quick hitters.

In that vein, the Emergency Blogging System has issued a Freezing Drizzle Advisory for No Runny Eggs, to be in effect until I’ve emptied out my feed reader.

February 17, 2009

The New Obama English

by @ 5:12. Filed under Politics - National.

During his January testimony to the Illinois House impeachment panel, Roland Burris provided the following:

Rep. Jim Durkin: Prior to his arrest, did you have any conversations with the governor about your desire to be appointed to the seat?

Roland Burris: No.

Durkin: OK. Did you talk to any members of the governor’s staff or anyone closely related to the governor, including with family members or any lobbyists connected with him, including oh, let me throw out some names: John Harris, Rob Blagojevich, Doug Scofield, Bob Greenlee, Lon Monk, John Wyma? Did you talk to anybody who was associated with the governor about your desire to seek the appointment prior to the governor’s arrest?

Burris: I talked to some friends about my desire to be appointed, yes.

Durkin: I guess the point is I was trying to ask: Did you speak to anybody who was on the governor’s staff prior to the governor’s arrest or anybody, any of those individuals or anybody who was closely related to the governor?

Burris: I recall having a meeting with Lon Monk about my partner and I trying to get continued business and I did bring it up, it must have been in September-maybe it was in July of ’08 and you know, ‘If your close to the governor, well let him know that I will feel certainly interested in the seat.'”

Durkin: OK.

(Later in the hearing)

Durkin: At any time were you directly or indirectly aware of a quid pro quo with the governor for the appointment of this vacant Senate seat?

Burris: No sir.

Durkin: Ok. If you were aware of a quid pro quo, what would you have done?

(Burris’s lawyer calls it a hypothetical question and inappropriate. Durkin calls it “highly relevant” and what his response would have been. Rep. John Fritchey (D-Chicago) says his response to something that did not occur was “irrelevant” and “speculative.” Durkin says its “germane” to the hearing and a “reasonable request” of what he would have done. Burris’ lawyer says Burris will respond because he wants to be “clear and open.”)

Burris: Rep. Durkin, knowing my ethics, I would not participate in anybody’s quid pro quo. I’ve been in government for 20 years and never participated in anybody’s quid pro quo.

Durkin: I guess the point is, would you have gone to the federal authorities if you were aware of that?

Burris: I have no response to that.   emphasis mine

Today, in explaining why he felt it necessary to release a new affidavit that says he  had have conversations with Gov. Blag0jevich’s brother and that the brother requested “campaign fundraising help”, Burris stated:

“It was done because we promised the (impeachment) committee we would supplement information in case we missed anything,” Burris said Monday before embarking on trip to talk with constituents. “End of story.”

“There was no change of any of our testimony,” Burris, 71, said. “We followed up as we promised the impeachment committee. … The information that’s being reported in terms of that this was done because of a fed statement is absolutely, positively not true.” (again, emphasis mine)

Since the election of Barack Obama, the word “change” has well, undergone a change.

“Change” used to mean simply “different.”   While change ultimately could be good or bad, there was nothing inherent in the word itself that indicated which of those outcomes the “change” would be.   Since Barack Obama has come on the scene, the possibility that “change” could be anything but hopeful and positive, has been eliminated from the consciousness of the entire left side of the political spectrum.   “Change,” when used by the Left, now means positive, hopeful differences that further the power entrenchment of the particular Left organization or person using the word.

When Burris says “there was no change of any of our testimony,” he is using the New Obama English.   Using New Obama English, his statement does not indicate that his testimony is the same as it was previously, i.e. no different.   Rather, it is the equivalent of using the double negative indicating that his testimony has not gotten better than before.  

Finally, Burris is using “change” in Leftist code.   His use of the word in this context is warning others on the Left that they should not expand their investigation, call for his resignation or attempt to force him from office. Burris is after all, from Illinois and if anyone believes he would go quietly now that he’s reached a seat in the most exclusive club in the world,  without causing collateral damage, well, they’d be hoping for change that wasn’t good and that’s just not what a Leftist in good standing does!

When you really think about it, Burris has good reason to believe his position won’t be in jeopardy.   After all, if the Illinois Legislators accepted an indefinite answer to a specific question about political impropriety, what makes us think that any of the Legislators have gotten significantly smarter in the past six weeks?

“Shovel Ready,” “uniquely qualified” and “worst since the Great Depression” are already words and phrases that have lost their historical meanings with the New Obama English.   “Change,” if not already, will soon be added to the list.   By the end of Obama’s Presidency anyone using these words in other than a satirical manner, will be seen as caricatures of serious thinking individuals.   Come to think of it, that already describes most of the extreme left!

February 15, 2009

THIS is the way to start the season

by @ 18:07. Tags: ,
Filed under Sports.

There’s nothing like going from worst to first in a backup car that had to make an emergency trip back from the shop after being wrecked in last week’s Bud Shootout – Matt Kenseth won the Daytona 500, thanks to a couple wrecks, Kevin Harvick (who repaid the favor Matt gave him 2 years ago) and a rain dance.

Looks like I’ll be taking a road trip to Cambridge tomorrow.

February 14, 2009

Roll bloat – Latin edition

by @ 7:18. Filed under The Blog.

I guess that procrastination is a good thing sometimes. Warner Todd Huston moved Publius’ Forum from a Conservablogs host to his own host, so the time is definitely right to add him or correct your links if you haven’t.

February 13, 2009

Attention those with FeedBurner accounts

by @ 22:27. Filed under The Blog.

Google is finishing its absorbtion of FeedBurner at the end of the month, and as part of that, they are requiring those of us who use FeedBurner to tie it to a Google account. There is a poison-pill incentive at the end of the FAQ:

If you don’t tie FeedBurner to a Google account by the end of the month, you will lose your FeedBurner feed.

Besides the Google account tie-in, they’re stripping away Site Stats (because it competes with Google Analytics, which quite frankly sucks) and FeedBurner Network (because it’s too tied to FeedBurner Ad Network, which was dropped for AdSense).

Beyond that, there’s no changes that should be noticable. There are new addresses for feeds so that they’re on Google servers rather than FeedBurner ones, but the current addresses will redirect to the new ones.

Porkulus picture of the day

by @ 20:22. Tags:
Filed under Politics - National.

It is somehow fitting that the Generational Theft Act of 2009 will be passed on Friday the 13th. Seco Tributa and Americans for Tax Reform came up with a very fitting movie promo Photoshop.

friday_13th_stim-5_03
Click for the full-size pic

There’s shades of Zucker, Zucker and Abrahams in the credits. Note the transportation and gaffer.

Searchable version of the final Porkulus

by @ 18:01. Filed under Politics - National.

While there are copies of the final version of the Generational Theft Act of 2009 floating around (thanks, ReadTheStimulus.org), I haven’t seen a fully-searchable version of the final version of the Generational Theft Act of 2009 up yet. Specifically, there isn’t a searchable version of Division B, which deals with taxes, unemployment, health, the state bailouts, broadband bailouts, and limits on executive compensation. Since a friend of mine who works with the Senate Republicans, Sean Hackbarth, wanted a PDF copy of the entire bill, I decided to fire up something called PDF995 and create one from the “printer-friendly” version of the conference report on H.R. 1 from THOMAS.

Searchable version of the conference report on H.R. 1

It clocks in at 421 pages and 3.48 MB, so if you want to put it up on your own blog or website, by all means do so. I can’t guarantee that this place will survive any ‘lanches.

Revisions/extensions (6:12 pm 2/13/2009) – Would help if I actually put the pdf file up instead of the html one that I used for the conversion.

R&E part 2 (10:44 pm 2/13/2009) – Let the thieving begin – thanks to The Maine Blunder Twins and Scottish Law, and a taxpayer-financed charter flight that these same ‘Rats blast private enterprise for, the Generational Theft Act of 2009 is on its way to Obama’s desk.

Bumper sticker of the year

by @ 16:35. Tags:
Filed under Politics - National.

My blogfather Chris has the perfect sticker-sized answer to the Generational Theft Act of 2009, which is in the final stages of setting up for a sink of the fangs into the neck of the economy.

Obama Lied And The Economy Died!

The markets didn’t exactly like the House package, which happened despite bipartisan opposition.

One more tidbit – running with some numbers that Newsmax provided (H/T – Dad29), more than the entire reduction in the cost came from the elimination of tax breaks. They went down from $352 billion (42% of the original $838 billion) to $276 billion (35% of $789.5 billion). That’s a drop of $76 billion, $27.5 billion more than the $48.5 billion reduction in cost.

Comparative Effectiveness

by @ 5:56. Filed under Economy, Health, Politics - National.

Late last week a provision of the Stimulus bill managed to break through the dung and was finally seen in the sun light.   The provision calls for the establishment of a Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research.  

The Comparative Effectiveness Council is to be established to review medical treatments to ensure that the most effective treatment is being used for the ailment.   Those who support the Council make the argument that it can help eliminate unneccessary treatments for patients thus eliminating costs.   Those opposing it see the Council as being a care rationing group who would not allow life saving treatments for patients that they don’t see as having an economic benefit from the treatment, read that “the elderly.”   This is one of the rare situations where I think both of these arguments are accurate.   I base my conclusion on this article  from the UK Telegraph.

Two years ago, dentists received a new contract under the UK’s nationalized health care.   Prior to the new agreement, dentists were paid much like they are in the US.   They were paid different amounts depending upon the procedure performed.   Crowns and root canals, procedures that are more complex and require extra time, were paid at a higher rate than simpler procedures like standard fillings or simple tooth extractions.

The new contract changed how dentists were paid.   Now, dentists are paid a flat salary and are given targets, that they must achieve, for the number of patients they service.   The result is that there is incredible incentive for dentists to move as quickly as possible through their patient list while treating their ailments.  

The situation with UK dentists sounds an awful lot like the “efficiency” that the new Council is after right?   What could be wrong with that?   A Lot!

Turns out that the number of pulled teeth and dentures sets have risen significantly since the implementation of the new contract.   Why?   Simple!   Because the dentists  get paid no differently for a tooth extraction than they do for a crown, they get paid no differently for a denture than a root canal.   It takes far less time to do a tooth extraction or denture  than a crown or a root canal and, the dentists need to meet with a specific number of patients each day so the shorter the procedure, the more people they see.  

Sounds alot like the dentists are making decisions based on the economic benefit for both them and their patients.   They get paid the same and hey, you can still chew your government provided gruel so what should you as the patient, care whether you get a crown or have your tooth pulled!

I have no doubt that the Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research can at the same time reduce costs and provide quality care.   That is, as long as like in the UK, you define “quality care” as being agnostic between a getting a crown and getting your tooth yanked!   That same definition of “quality” will likely not be able to tell the difference between an elderly patient with a heart condition getting a new heart valve or just “making do” because the doctor has other patients to see.

Oh, and for those who think that economic disincentives don’t drive health care rationing, the UK dentists have seen 1.1 Million fewer patients in the two years subsequent to the new contract than they did in the two years prior to the contract.   That looks like rationing to me.   Unless, of course, you think the Brits have suddenly developed a new found love for personal dental hygiene…NOT!

February 12, 2009

You’re Doin’ A Hecukuva Job There Timmy!

by @ 5:59. Filed under Economy, Politics - National.

During his press conference Monday evening, Barack Obama was asked a couple of questions that involved the twice delayed announcement of how Treasury was going to work with the second half of the TARP funds.   Obama’s answer was that he didn’t want to steal Geithner’s thunder.   He should have.

Dow futures were down about 40 points at the beginning of Obama’s press conference.   By the end of his conference the Dow futures had dropped about 80 points.   The decline in the futures came immediately following Obama’s refusal to steal the thunder.

Tuesday  Geithner “let loose the thunder.”   Remember, this was a plan that was twice delayed because the Obama administration wanted to “get it right the first time.”   What Geithner layed out was little more than what could be generously called an outline.   There were no details, no time frame, no identification of cost.

Geithner’s “plan” was met with a resounding thud by Wallstreet.   What had started as a nervous day turned into a 400 point rout of the Dow.  

Politicians were equally nonplussed by Geithner’s testimony.   Senator John Kerry’ response:

"We need more details from Treasury on how exactly it plans to remove bad assets while protecting the taxpayer."

and Senator Bob Corker’s response:

“We’ve been here for three hours and 23 minutes and have no discernible idea as to how we’re gonna solve this problem.”

showed that there was disappointment with Geithner’s testimony across the political spectrum.

Corker went on to school Geithner on the   problem of over promising and under delivering:

“I would think that the White House and you all communicate and last night the president said you would be very clear and there would be specific plans.

And today we lost probably a trillion dollars in the market as people looked for those very clear and specific plans and instead heard guidelines and some platitudes. I mean, I haven’t heard today what your commitment is to solving the problem.”

Wednesday, Geithner was back providing more testimony about his plan.   Unfortunately, his testimony provided no more detail than the previous day:

"I completely understand the desire for details and commitments," Geithner told lawmakers today at the Senate Budget Committee in Washington.

In between the two Geithner appearances, President Obama realized he had a problem.   He had either over promised Geithner, didn’t know what Geithner was going to say or thought that his aura would extend to Geithner’s testimony and protect him from serious questions.   I suspect it was a combination of the three.   In any event, during an interview with ABC’s Nightline Obama attempted to paint this as the chattering class not being smart enough to understand what he sees:

Well, you know, Wall Street, I think, is hoping for an easy out on this thing and there is no easy out. Essentially, what you’ve got are a set a banks that have not been as transparent as we need to be in terms of what their books look like.

And we’re going to have to hold out the Band-Aid a little bit and go ahead and just be clear about some of the losses that have been made because until we do that, we’re not going to be able to attract private capital into the marketplace. And so, you know, I think that you have two choices in this situation: You can prolong the agony and shareholders will be happy until they’re not happy, and that could be a year from now or two years from now, or, in the case of Japan, eight years later.

Or you can just go ahead and acknowledge that, yeah, there’s a lot of work that has to be done to put these banks back on a firmer footing.

Yeah, that’s right.   After personally setting expectations for a detailed explanation, Obama is telling America that they shouldn’t have such high expectations, even if “The One” sets them.  

After his appearance on Nightline, it was reported that Obama called Geithner and told him:

Uh, Timmy, uh, I know, uh, I’ve made a uh, political career, uh of being a constant um, campaign speech, uh providing uh, no specifics and um, accomplishing nothing measurable.  

You’re uh, doin’ a heckuva job there, uh Timmy.   But, there’s uh only room uh, for one uh, President at a time.   Therefore uh, you’ll be uh, required to uh, provide details and specifics, uh, from here on out.

At least, that’s what I had heard.

Wow, That Didn’t Take Long

by @ 5:14. Filed under Politics - National.

Rasmussen Reports latest preference poll shows that the generic Congressional ballot is now an even choice between Republicans and Democrats.

On November 2nd, a couple of days before the election, the Democrats held a 6% advantage.

At the first of the year, the Democrats held a 6% advantage.

On January 18th, just prior to the inauguration, the Democrats held a 7% advantage.

In fact, as late as January 25th, the Democrats held a 7% advantage.

Now, in only two weeks  with Pelosi and Reid doing an “in your face” to the will of the American people and President Obama set a vision of the Socialization of vast sections of the US economy there is a large portion of the folks who only two weeks ago supported Democrats saying, “Whoa, not so fast there.”

With all the change that Obama talks about it’s nice to know there’s one thing that doesn’t; the inability for Democrats to keep from over reaching!

February 11, 2009

Oak Creek Mayoral forum

by @ 18:18. Filed under Politics - Oak Creek.

The three candidates for Oak Creek Mayor, Dick Bolender, Dimity Grabowski and Mark Verhalen, will appear at a joint forum between 6:30 and 9 tonight at the Oak Creek Community Center. Julie Becker of Oak Creek Now is running a liveblog, and I will be there with my voice recorder in hand to capture the whole thing.

Revisions/extensions (10:48 pm 2/11/2009) – The Community Center was rather packed, which was always good to see. Several other local candidates were there handing out literature.

The audio is now up. I’m still using the old Sony digital voice recorder, so the quality isn’t exactly broadcast quality.

The websites of the three candates are:
Mark Verhalen
Dimity Grabowski
Dick Bolender

What The Stimulus Is Creating

by @ 5:22. Filed under Defending the American Dream, Economy.

Bandage your heads up tight before you watch this video:

Moving past the Messiah assignment that Julio is doing, Julio is the perfect example of your brain on stimulus!

First, where did the expectation come from that college students should have well paying, high benefit plans?   The purpose of college, if you choose to go, is to learn skills that will enable you to get well paying, high benefit jobs.

Second, note the mentality that says “because I am here, I should get paid.   In fact, because I am here a longer time I should get paid or benefited more!”   Julio obviously has never heard of “pay for performance.”   It’s a nifty little concept that says that your compensation is determined by the value you bring to the organization not the length of time you’ve managed to walk through the front door of the organization.  

Julio is a perfect example of the “I’m owed something” mentality.   He has already determined that he is a person who will be perpetually disadvantaged, not because of any choices he has made or skills he does or doesn’t have, but because “the system” is fixed against him.  

As we continue the full out run towards Socialism you can expect to see more Julios.   As the government spreads its net of benefits over more of the population, more and more people will become just like Julio, slaves of the state and unable to take responsibility or act without some action or provision from the government.   Of course, along with the net of benefits comes the governments ability to dictate how you live and work.   Doubt me, just ask the banks and the auto companies.

This country has always been about the taking and rewarding of risk.   There is little the the Founders of our Country, the folks who risked their lives and livelihood for a chance in the “New World” or those who spanned out to settle the West would have had in common with folks like Julio.  

It’s unfortunate really, Julio may have talent and ability but he’ll probably never know.    Julio and those like him, are waiting for the next drop from the government gruel bucket.    They’ll eat the gruel, never being fully satisfied but justifying their situation as  being “better than nothing.”

February 10, 2009

The Morni…er, Afternoon Scramble (part 2) – 2/10/2009

by @ 16:48. Filed under The Morning Scramble.

Sorry about being so late with Part 2…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zgtxoAsFV8[/youtube]

  • Dan Riehl find the formerly-Great Britain planning to ration air travel in the name of Gorebal “Warming”.
  • Shoebox asks, “How green is your ethanol?” If it’s corn-a-hole, it’s not exactly green.
  • Nick Schweitzer wonders just how sustainable is “sustainable” energy. It’s not exactly everything it’s cracked up to be.
  • Rep. John Shadegg raises the alarm on a $6.7 trillion tax increase in the name of Gorebal “Warming”. That would be roughly half last year’s GDP.
  • Jon Ham found an acolyte that wants to kill off over 2/3rds of the planet’s population. I wonder why the acolytes don’t have the strength of their convictions…oh wait, they want to be around to rule.
  • Christian Schneider and Dan Bice offer a few rules for those bloggers who want to cover government. I think I’ve broken them all.
  • Second dose of Christian – he outlines the latest attempt by the Government “Accountability” Board to ensure a silent election season followed by a re-ratification of ‘Rat control – the elimination of anonymous speech.
  • Trail-Mix debuts his Contract with America II.
  • Byron Audler lays out the case for using the O.H. Perrys in the role envisioned for the woefully-underequipped and -overpriced LCS.
  • Uncle Jimbo lays some serious lumber into Barack Obama’s CinC side. I don’t think “present” will work when the binary solution is “victory or defeat”.
  • Kevin Jackson explains as only he can why Obama is always late.
  • GayPatriotWest points out that Ronald Reagan never blamed Jimmy Carter for leaving stagflation behind. Unlike the current occupant of the Oval Office; despite being handed an economic mess so bad that a brand new term had to be coined to describe it, Reagan simply went to work to break the malaise.
  • Ed Morrissey wonders if Obama actually pays attention. When the essential characteristic of making a lie the “truth” is blind repetition,….
  • Stephan Tawney wonders what the presstitutes would say if Sean Hannity had received a front-row seat to George W. Bush’s first press conference as President. We know what they did to a blogger who got into the press conferences, and it’s not exactly what they did for semi-successful liberal talk-show-host Ed Schultz.
  • V the K is running a caption contest of Obama’s head/helo collision.
  • Bill Quick calls Bravo Sierra on the latest CNN 76% approval rating for Obama. Bonus item – they crow about getting the undecideds down to 1%. Let me put it this way – if a pollster asks what color a quarter is, there will be at least 4% in the “undecided” category.
  • Emperor Misha I decries the latest example of the death of the southern border – a rancher who had enough of his property being used as a border-jumping point is being sued for defending his property and country.
  • Sean M. proves BDS is alive and well in the Senate. They’re NEVER going to let it go.
  • Thomas Sowell outlines how to deprogram the young skulls full of mush after the screwels (™, Rush Limbaugh) get through with them. One slight problem; relying on simply asking whether one has been exposed to the other side isn’t going to work because critical thinking is not a natural trait.
  • Lawhawk bemoans the creeping auto-gratuity sneaking into restaurants. It is a sign of the socialist times we’re all living in now.
  • Adam hosts “24: Poker Night!” Watch Tony get drunk and Janis flub a field operation.

I need a drink. Unfortunately, it’s still over 2 hours until Drinking Right.

Rep. Paul Ryan conference call

Ed Morrissey is simulcasting the call right now on The Ed Morrissey Show. I’m over there.

Revisions/extensions (3:50 pm 2/10/2008) – The conference call is over. For those of you looking for just the conference call, it starts at about the 1h04m mark of the archived show (though I recommend you also listen to the first part; Ed did a Melt The Phones show). Besides Ed, Jo Egelhoff, Kevin Binversie and Todd Lohenry asked questions. My voice is still a bit on the gone side, so I simply enjoyed the call; besides, they had better questions than I could come up with.

Drinking Right – tonight

by @ 14:39. Tags:
Filed under Miscellaneous.

If it’s the 2nd Tuesday of the month, we’re drinking. As usual, the details are at the official home:

Date: February 10, 2009
Time: 7 pm – ???
Place: Papa’s Social Club, 7718 W Burleigh in Milwaukee

If you have to stay in Racine County to oppose KRM, we will keep the beer cold for you.

The Morning Scramble (Part 1) – 2/10/2009

by @ 10:48. Filed under The Morning Scramble.

Yes, we’re back to the multi-parters – somewhere north of 350 feeds to choose from will do that…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ubZjbmA1Id0[/youtube]

  • The Death of Newsweek, Part I – Ken found them cheering the fulfillment of Karl Marx’s prediction. As the song says, “Mamama, we’re all crazee now.”
  • The Death of Newsweek, Part II – Jim Geraghty wonders why they’re cheering a 52% drop in single-copy circulation over 2 years.
  • The Death of Newsweek, Part III – Tom Blumer answers that they’re just being honest about being liberal partisans.
  • Lemur King compares and contrasts the presstitute coverage of the “talk-down” of 2000 to the “fear ‘n hope” of 2009.
  • Dad29 on Gubmint Spending, Part I – he points out that federal government spending, without TARP, without the bailouts, and without the Generational Theft Act, increased by roughly 7.2% per year under President George W. Bush. Only in gubmint is a rate of growth double inflation considered “starving”.
  • Dad29 on Gubmint Spending, Part II – he ran the numbers on Sen. Arlen “Scottish Law” Specter’s claim that it would cost “only” $195,000 per job saved and found that it’s 3.6 times the worth of the average job. Even if they were all UAW jobs, it would still be somewhere north of twice the worth of that job.
  • How much are all those bailouts, Part I – Doug Mataconis found that the amount committed to the various bailouts would be almost enough to pay off every last home mortgage.
  • How much are all those bailouts, Part II – John Walker found that liquidating all of the gold in the world at today’s prices wouldn’t even cover half the bill.
  • How much are all those bailouts, Part III – Ace found that the bailouts are worth 2/3rds of everything the economy produced last year. Ahem – it’s closer to 3/4ths.
  • Purple Avenger notes the beginning of health-care rationing in the Generational Theft Act. It’s no longer just the children they’re stealing from; it’s Grandma and Grandpa.
  • Ed Morrissey can’t believe that The News Organization That Cannot Be Quoted™ isn’t buying the “no pork in this Generational Theft Act” line of Bravo Sierra.
  • John Hawkins lists a few good reasons to kill the GTA (and no, I’m not talking about Grand Theft Auto).
  • Is all this pork getting you hungry? Michelle Malkin found your dish – the Turbaconduckhen. I think it’s missing some pork sausage stuffing.
  • Back to Michelle – she lists some of the things it’s not missing, like pork for golf carts, hybrids for federal employees, and Amtrak.
  • Asian Badger hosts an economics mini-lecture. Today’s topic – hyperinflation.
  • Dominic Rupprecht states that those who intentionally misrepresent history are doomed to repeat it. Can you say, “Lost Decade”?
  • Bruce proves that the road to serfdom is paved with “good intentions” married to incompetent actions.

Part 2 will be up after I’m done with some tech support.

Odd Man Out

by @ 5:23. Filed under Energy, Global "Warming".

An article out in Germany talks about growing interest in developing nuclear power in Europe.   According to the article, Germany and even Sweden are talking about restarting nuclear power development.   Apparently previous agreements to cease and desist are now considered old fashioned:

Sweden announced last week that it was revoking a 1980 referendum decision to phase out nuclear power. Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt and the leaders of the three other parties in the coalition described the deal as “historic.”

The European Union gets nearly 30% of its electricity from nuclear plants.   It has 147 active nuclear power plants.   They have 2 under construction with 20 proposed plants.

Isn’t nuclear so, what’s the phrase, 1970’s?   I thought nuclear was anti green, anti new world order.   Why the sudden interest in nuclear?

With gas and oil prices rocketing and fears about global warming growing, however, nuclear power seems to be experiencing a global renaissance.

Funny thing, we’ve got all the same issues and concerns.   The one advantage we do have is that we have more coal than anywhere else in the world, but that’s bad too.

I’ve looked through the entire stimulus bill and can find no reference to nuclear energy in it.   That’s kind of odd considering that President Obama continues to tout all of the green jobs that will be created.  

Europe’s decided that being anti nuclear is “historic.”   Looks like contrary to all of Obama’s talk about leading we’re just going to be plain old history.

How Green Is Your Ethanol?

by @ 5:12. Filed under Corn-a-hole, Energy.

With apologies to the New Christy Minstrels:

Green Green it’s green they say
on the far side of the hill
Green green I’m goin’ away
to where the gas is greener still

a Well I told those Greenies when they said "use the corn!"
Dontcha know it’s a fool’s game you play?
You’ll up food prices, need a huge subsidy
And not supplant one barrel of oil
a-singin"¦.

Remember all those ethanol commercials?   They used to tell us about how efficient it was because we grow it and how much greener it was than using fossil fuels.

We saw the folly of the first “benefit” a year plus ago as ethanol use contributed to a doubling of corn prices which resulted in dramatic increases in all food that contained corn or corn products.   Now we have the University of Minnesota throwing cold water on the latter.

In a study to be fully released later this week, The U of M concludes:

The researchers found that depending on the materials and technology used in production, cellulosic ethanol’s environmental and health costs (19 to 32 cents per gallon) are less than half the costs of gasoline (71 cents per gallon), while corn-based ethanol’s costs (72 to about $1.45 per gallon) range from roughly equal to about double that of gasoline.

Gosh, that’s odd.   I thought gas was the evil, anti green fuel.   Who would have thought that ethanol was a horribly ungreen fuel?   The answer is anyone who would do a little research past seeing the word “green!”   The problem with corn based ethanol has always been in what it takes to grow the corn and turn it into fuel.   Unfortunately, few people want to educate themselves and look only at the core product and what they believe comes out of a tailpipe.   Even the authors of the research see the myopia:

“To understand the environmental and health consequences of biofuels, we must look well beyond the tailpipe to how and    where biofuels are produced. Clearly, upstream emissions matter,” Hill says.

“Green” has become a pixie dust that changes anything it touches into something no longer questionable as to its economic quality or its usefulness.   Putting doggie doodoo into a bag and calling it “green” may make some folks feel good but it has no value to me as a pillow.

H/T Glenn Beck

February 9, 2009

Hey, Mr. Transparency………

by @ 8:55. Filed under Economy, Politics - National.

Bloomberg chronicles how the US government has put itself on the hook now for $9.7 trillion!   That’s enough to pay off 90% of all mortgages in the US!

$9.7 trillion spent or guaranteed, most of it controlled by the Federal reserve.   Besides being an unelected body, there’s one other little bitty issue with all of this…the Fed doesn’t want to tell us where they’ve used all the money.

In December, Bloomberg sued under the Fed under the Freedom of Information Act.   At the time, the Fed had lent $2 trillion that they were unwilling to tell anyone who it was lent to.

Well, that was under BUUUUUUUUUUUUSSSSSHH, who we know was responsible for bringing down the twin towers, lying about intelligence to get a war going and spying on Americans.   We wouldn’t expect any better from that administration!

Now we have President Obama, the man who campaigned on and signed with his very own hand, a requirement that government would be fully transparent, all above board, nothing hidden!

Not so much.

Bloomberg is still in the courts, waiting for the information.   In the meantime we continue to shovel money out the door.

Hey, Mr. Transparency, how about putting all the documents out BEFORE you  put another $1 trillion  on the “to be paid later” pile!

Multi-What?

by @ 5:37. Filed under Economy, Politics - National.

Let me take you back in time……

Imagine clouds, swirling optics.   You know, the kind that TV uses to indicate a dream sequence…..

It’s September, 2008.   The Barack Obama and John McCain are going toe to toe attempting to be the next President of the United States.   The US stock market has just seen a drop to approximately DOW 11,100 and the markets are nervous.   Report after report is out from banks and investment institutions that are writing down assets due to the loss in the value of highly leveraged debt instruments.   Bear Stearns was the first institution that got coined “too big to fail,” and other followed suit.   However, Lehman Brothers had somehow fallen below the threshold and was the first highly visible investment firm allowed to fail as a result of its poor choices.   What no one knew is that the markets were more than just a little nervous and within the next few weeks the DOW would drop from the 11.100 level to approximately 7,000.

In the middle of the above scenario, Hank Paulson, with President Bush’s blessing, went to Congress with  the detail of a  whole  three page outline and demanded that  Congress provide him $700 billion without which, the banking  system would collapse.   In spite of the dire predictions of the collapse of the banking system, the Paulson bail out plan received mixed reviews in Congress.    

In the House, the debate went back and forth on whether the plan should be passed.   It looked like the plan would pass the House up until the last minute.   Immediately before the vote, Nancy Pelosi decided to deride Republicans over their lack of bipartisanship.   It’s hard to say whether Pelosi had the votes to pass the bill initially.   However, after her insults, any Republican who was on the fence had been given fair license to vote against her, and they did.   The bill failed in the House.

Over the next few days, there were a number of accusations back and forth on why the House vote failed.   Amongst Conservatives there was a desire to at the very least to  strip the pork that Pelosi had put into the bill.   They complained that Pelosi had shut them out of the process entirely.   In any event, the bill was going no where in the House, the Senate didn’t appear to be fairing any better.

Because he was “The Maverick” and had the reputation of “reaching across the aisle,” John McCain determined this was an opportunity that he could use to his advantage.   He announced that he would suspend his campaign and immediately head back to Washington.   His stated purpose was to focus on the bail out bill and provide leadership on the issue.   He added that he was considering not participating in a debate with Obama that was scheduled to occur within a few days.

When Barack Obama heard that McCain had suspended his campaign and considering opting out of the debate, he took the opportunity to ridicule McCain.   He made a note of how he, Obama,  was able to multi-task, not stopping one thing to focus on another:

"Part of the president’s job is to deal with more than one thing at once. In my mind it’s more important than ever."

Of course, the MSM and the left blog picked up on the multi-task meme.

This event stuck in many voters minds and while the polls had McCain within strking distance up until now, Obama regained momentum that would carry him through the election.

Mist and swirling optics again, we’re coming out of the dream, back to the present.

Yet today, the left blogs continue to extol the legend of Obama’s ability  to multi-task.

Sunday it was announced that for at least the  second time, the Treasury department would delay the promised release of plan to handle the toxic debt still in the banking system:

“We’re focused on working with Congress to pass an economic recovery bill so we can create the jobs and make the investments necessary to get our economy moving again,” Treasury Department spokesman Isaac Baker said.

What?

During the campaign, it was cool, young and even “Presidential” to be able to multi-task especially on issues that were of extreme importance to the US’ future and economy.   Now, we need to “focus!”

Since the inauguration, Obama’s administration seems unable to vet cabinet members, has emboldened potential enemies and failed to effect leadership in the largest single piece of non budget legislation ever.

Multi-tasking generally means the ability to do accomplish more than one thing at a time.   The only multi-tasking ability I’ve seen from the President Obama, is his ability to talk out of both sides of his mouth.

Well, Which Is It?

by @ 5:09. Filed under Economy, Politics - National.

First, it was 2.5 million jobs:

Obama outlines job-creation plan

Followed by,  3.0 million jobs:

Obama ups jobs goal to 3 million on bad economic news

Next, 3.5 million jobs:

Obama: Stimulus will create 3.5 million jobs

Followed by:

Obama: Plan would create 4.1 million jobs

Earlier last week, President Obama claimed that without his plan 5 million jobs would dissapear:

“each day we wait to begin the work of turning our economy around, more people lose their jobs, their savings and their homes. And if nothing is done, this recession might linger for years. Our economy will lose 5 million more jobs. Unemployment will approach double digits. Our nation will sink deeper into a crisis that, at some point, we may not be able to reverse.”

By Saturday, he had reversed that claim.   In fact, he had reversed out of nearly all the claims he had made and was back to merely:

save or create 3 million jobs over the next two years.

One of the first things that detectives look for when interviewing a witness is consistency in their answers.   When a witness provides inconsistent answers to the same, repeated question, it typically indicates one of two things.   Either,  the witness never saw the event and thus, doesn’t know what they are talking about or, they are lying.

I’ll let you decide why President Obama can’t find the same answer twice.

February 8, 2009

Obama moves the Census under direct White House control

by @ 10:29. Filed under Politics - National.

(H/Ts – Jon Ham and Moe Lane)

Color me shocked, SHOCKED that the Obama White House would strip control of the Census Bureau the Commerce Department, set to be run by Sen. Judd Gregg (R-NH). The Census Bureau, as everybody should be aware, is responsible for conducting the census, which forms the basis of every representative district.

Allow me to take just one aspect of that; the by-state apportionment of Representatives in the House of Representatives. That is, by law, set at 435, which means if one state gains a sufficient number of residents (legal and otherwise) to gain a seat, another state must lose one. For this exercise, I’ll run with the July 2008 Census Bureau estimates of population, take the 8-year rate of growth between July 2000 and July 2008 and extend that until 2010. The formula for determining the number of Representatives, once the population of the states is known, is pretty simple; divide a state’s population by the total population of the 50 states (excluding the District of Columbia, which does not have representation), and multiply by 435, rounding as necessary to get a total of 435.

Here’s where things get a bit interesting. Just like 2000, rounding at .5000 would yield only 433 Representatives. Therefore Since there are no states that would otherwise have no representation, the 2 states closest to but not over the magic .5000 also get bumped up, like California and Utah did in 2000. Currently, the projected states are (in descending order):
Rhode Island (currently 2 Representatives, both Democrats) – 1.477614508 projected Representatives
South Carolina (currently 6 Representatives, 4-2 Republican edge in the delegation) – 6.470898967 projected Representatives

Just missing the cut would be Oregon (currently 5 Representatives, 4-1 Democratic edge in the delegation, 5.463832819 projected Representatives). Given the estimate I used, Oregon would miss by roughly 5,026 residents.

South Carolina has a Republican Legislature and a Republican governor, and they last voted for a Democrat Presidential candidate in 1976. Oregon and Rhode Island both have a Democratic Legislature and a Democratic governor, and they both last voted for a Republican Presidential candidate in 1984. Which is more likely to magically “find” a net few-thousand-resident difference between South Carolina and Oregon, while not “finding” that net few-thousand-resident difference between Rhode Island and Oregon, so Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama get an ill-gotten buffer; a Census Bureau reporting to Commerce Secretary(-designate for the moment) Judd Gregg or White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel?

Revisions/extensions (10:44 am 2/8/2009) – Clarified that no state could have zero Representatives. The closest to that would be Wyoming, with a projected 0.763284928 Representatives.

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]