define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true); define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true); No Runny Eggs » Politics

No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

Archive for the 'Politics' Category

March 16, 2008

Pork, it’s what’s for dinner in the Senate

Is it any real surprise that Friday saw efforts to limit pork go down in flames in both the state Senate (via Rep. Zipperer’s office) and the US Senate (H/T – Wolking’s World)?

The state inaction was on Zipperer’s common-sense Earmark Transparency Act, something so non-controversial in the Assembly that it passed on a voice vote. I guess resurrecting Healthy and Depopulated Wisconsin is more important than shining the light of day on pork.

The federal rejection of a “1-year moratorium” on pork is even more egregious because we have names to attach to the pork-lovers. I’m not exactly surprised Russ Feingold and John McCain voted for the moratorium; that’s their “blind squirrel finds a nut” moment. I am also not exactly surprised that a majority of both RepubicRATs and DhimmiRATs voted against it; after all, they’re Senators, and “Senator” is Latin for “giver of pork”. I am, however, surprised that Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama both rolled back into town to vote with Feingold, McCain, 22 other Republicans, 3 other Democrats, and Joe Lieberman.

March 15, 2008

It’s time for the Man of Hope to Change

by @ 21:46. Filed under Politics - National.

Now that sermons from Barack’s Pastor, Jeremiah Wright, have come to surface:

"The government lied about inventing the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color. The government lied."

It’s time for Obama to update his rhetoric:

…And it just reminds me that we’ve got a tragic history when it comes to race in this country. We’ve got a lot of pent-up anger and bitterness and misunderstanding. But what I continue to believe in is that this country wants to move beyond these kinds of divisions. That this country wants something different.

Becuase it’s apparent that not Everybody wants to move “beyond these kinds of divisions,” and some of those who appear most challenged are those closest to him.

"Barack knows what it means living in a country and a culture that is controlled by rich white people," Wright said. "Hillary would never know that.

"The government gives them (African Americans) the drugs”

Jeremiah Wright

March 14, 2008

Obama and the Jeremiah Wright two step

by @ 20:16. Filed under Politics - National.

Now that it’s apparent that he can’t ignore the abhorent statements of his 20 year Pastor, Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obama is attempting to find a way to escape further damage.

Finally, he has removed Wright from the African American Religious Leadership Committee, a group that was advising the Obama campaign.

In an attempt to provide some explanation for why he didn’t know about Wright’s comments earlier, Barack, in a post on the Huffington Post wrote…  “The statements that Rev. Wright made that are the cause of this controversy were not statements I personally heard him preach while I sat in the pews of Trinity or heard him utter in private conversation.

Who is he trying to get by with that statement? If my Pastor said:

“The government gives them the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing ‘God Bless America.’ No, no, no, God damn America, that’s in the Bible for killing innocent people. God damn America for treating our citizens as less than human. God damn America for as long as she acts like she is God and she is supreme.”

during a Sunday morning sermon, it wouldn’t have mattered if I was there or not. I can assure you that that statement would have sent a fire storm through our congregation and been discussed by EVERYONE as we considered whether there should be some sort of disciplinary action taken on our Pastor.

So that leads me to one of two conclusions:

A. Obama is disingenuous at best and a flat out liar at worst when he says:

When these statements first came to my attention, it was at the beginning of my presidential campaign.

How would he or Michelle have missed the hubbub a statement like that would have created?

or

B. The rhetoric that has come to light from Jeremiah Wright was common place and because it was not unusual, it didn’t stir any controversy within the congregation when he said things like the above quote. If this is the case, then whether Barack was there on any particular Sunday is irrelevant because the type of speech would have occurred regularly and Barack would have been present for some and perhaps many sermons of similar content.

I kind of hope the answer is A because I can’t even imagine what kind of regular hate filled diatribes would get a congregation, that claims to be Christian, to excuse the language and statements that have now become public.

March 13, 2008

Assembly passes earmark reform

by @ 23:21. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin.

With all the bad news, I guess I should report on some good news. The Assembly passed the Earmark Transparency Act (AB 739) late last night on a voice vote. If it makes it thorugh the Senate and past Jim Doyle’s veto pen, it would:

– Prohibit state agencies from requesting earmarks when making their budget requests to the Department of Administration.
– Require the Legislative Fiscal Bureau to prepare an “Earmark Transparency Report”, including cost, location, beneficiary and sponsoring representative/senator, to be released to the public at least 48 hours before any action on a budget bill is taken by the Joint Finance Committee, the Assembly or the Senate.
– Prohibit a conference committee from “airdropping” earmarks or other non-fiscal policy items into the budget that were not previously part of an approved version of the budget.

Do note that this passed through the Assembly on a voice vote. That usually doesn’t happen with a controversial bill, so the ball is squarely in the Senate’s court.

Today’s bad news – Congressional edition

by @ 22:53. Filed under Politics - National.

Item #1 (H/T – Allahpundit) – The Hill reports on a very grim conversation with National Republican Senatorial Committee chair John Ensign. Selected lowlights:

– On the heels of not getting anybody for Mark Pryor’s seat in Arkansas, the NRSC had wealthy potential challengers in New Jersey and South Dakota balk.
– About half of the 49 existing Senators (which presumably includes the 5 retirements) are well behind in fundraising, with the incumbent Dems whose seats are up this year raising $1.2 million more than the incumbent Pubbies up for re-election.
– Related to that, the NRSC has less than $15 million in cash on hand, compared to the Dem counterpart’s $30 million.
– The money kicker; despite the RNC having a lot more cash on hand than the DNC, the RNC isn’t expected to help out any.
– The Virginia seat currently held by John Warner, one of those retiring, will almost certainly go to the ‘Rats.
– The only ‘Rat seat with “top-level” recruit with a realistic shot of winning is in Louisiana (seat currently held by Mary Landrieu), with the NRSC touting a long-shot in Massachusetts.

I guess the only question is, will the ‘Rats get to 60, or close enough, to not get rid of the filibuster?

Item #2 (H/T – see-dubya in the comments section of that thread, or you could look at the post before this one for Shoebox’s headline contest) – The Washington Times’ Fishwrap reports the National Republican Campaign Committee discovered its former treasurer filed fraudulent financial audits between 2001 and 2006. According to the House Republican campaign arm, Christopher J. Ward transfered several hundred thousand dollars without authorization from the NRCC to outside committees, and then transfered money from there to what appeared to be his personal and business bank accounts.

Boy, is that ever “great” timing. Of course, since the NRCC is in the business of protecting RepublicRATs like Tom Petri from even primary challenges like one being explored by Calumet County District Attorney Ken Kratz (H/T – Brad V. at Try to Focus), maybe the NRCC would be better if it were defunded.

Revisions/extensions (10:59 pm 3/13/2008) – I guess I should mention the NRSC sent over a fundraising letter today. Since see-dub wants to see the reply, I’ll dig it out of the trash, open it up, and craft a reply. Of course, since it is almost 11 pm, I’ll have to toss it over while I sleep.

R&E part 2 (11:39 pm 3/13/2008) – I don’t know what I’m still doing up, but see-dub says, “Give directly to the candidates, not the RNC/NRSC/NRCC".

Headline Contest

by @ 20:03. Filed under Politics - National.

Here’s a story that’s too good to pass up.   I propose we start a contest to come up with the best title/headline for this story:

WASHINGTON (AP) – The committee in charge of running House Republican campaigns said Thursday that a former treasurer “deceived and betrayed” the group, which is missing hundreds of thousands of dollars"”and possibly more"”due to fraudulent acts conducted over the past several years.

Complete story here.

Here’s a couple of headlines to start the fun:

NRCC Treasurer makes personal earmark!

or:

Deceit and Betrayal: Doing to them what they do to us.

The Veneer is Wearing Thin

by @ 13:50. Filed under Politics - National.

There have been a number of recent articles suggesting that Barack Obama has reached his peak and will likely see declines in his popularity.   A review of the Rasmussen Presidential Tracking Poll seems to confirm this.

In today’s poll, Barack Obama is shown as having a favorable rating of 52%.   His rating has dropped from a high of 56% of just 3 weeks ago.   During that same time frame, John McCain’s favorability rating has remained flat or up slightly at 53%.   While these are the numbers that generally get the headlines, it’s the underlying numbers that tell me that Obama has hit his peak. (more…)

March 12, 2008

What changed in the last 10 years?

by @ 11:39. Filed under Politics.

10 years ago, Bill Clinton survived a sex scandal that ultimately led to his impeachment and non-conviction thereof. Now, Elliot Spitzer is resigning his office of New York governor effective Monday at noon (Eastern) because of a sex scandal. In both cases, Republicans held narrow majorities in the legislative branch responsible for pursuing and trying impeachment, with one of the few substantive differences between New York’s version and the federal version being the 7 members of New York’s Court of Appeals (NY’s analog to the Supreme Court) being part of the jury.

Depending on how those 7 judges would have voted on any articles of impeachment, a flip of anywhere between 7 and 14 of the 30 Democrats would have ousted Spitzer. We know that the abandonment by one’s own party is what sunk Richard Nixon, and that lack of abandonment is what saved Clinton from conviction.

Meanwhile, the DNC stirred the pot a bit thicker by stating they would not be filling Spitzer’s superdelegate slot (H/T – American Princess). Spitzer was (well, is for a few more days) in the Hillary Clinton camp, and his Lieutenant Governor David Paterson, who is also a superdelegate and who will assume the office of Governor, is also in the Clinton camp. Clinton also won her “home of the week” state, but not by a real smashing majority (59%-40%).

So, is some sense of shame returning to the Democrats, is Spitzer a bit more honorable (relatively-speaking) than Bill Clinton, or are there enough Barack Obama supporters around Albany to sabotage the Hillary Clinton campaign by any means necessary?

March 10, 2008

Rules for hiring hookers

by @ 19:37. Filed under Politics.

Since New York governor Elliot Spitzer (D) failed to keep his hooker finances in sufficient order to not attract the unwanted attention of the IRS and the FBI (H/T – ABC’s Blotter via Allahpundit), I think it’s time to spell out some rules of the street:

1. Do NOT mess with hookers. It’s illegal in 49 states, and even if you are where it’s legal, it’s not worth it especially if you’re married.

2. If you’re stupid enough to ignore rule #1, always pay cash. ALWAYS!

3. In order to come up with the cash, do not exceed the $10,000 limit that automatically triggers a report to the IRS. Similarily, do not think that multiple transactions at the same bank that are just below that $10,000 will not trigger that report.

4. When making your nom de action, don’t use the good name of a political contributor.

Kentucky RepubicRAT wants no anonymous posting

by @ 12:25. Filed under Politics, The Blog.

This is the Emergency Blogging System. It has been activated because some Kentucky dickweed by the name of Rep. Tim Couch doesn’t like anonymous assholes posting shit on the Intertubes. To quote Ace, where we got this pile of horse maure from, “You Stupid Dick.”

March 9, 2008

Why are the ‘Rats are against Voter ID?

by @ 8:22. Filed under Elections, Politics - Wisconsin.

A friend of Kathy Carpenter’s decided to put the question to all 18 ‘Rat State Senators. You can head to Kathy’s site to read all of the responses, but I’ll do some summarizing here (the numbers will not add up because some Senators fall into more than 1 category):

– Against voter ID on general principles: 7
– Following Doyle’s instructions: 3
– Unavailable for comment: 5
– Staff unaware of their bosses’ position: 4
– Claims there was no public hearing, but too chickenshit to call for a public hearing: 2
– Would rather have a law, but too chickenshit to author one: 2
– Admitted (s)he would rather have vote fraud: 1

March 8, 2008

The Maverick lives no more, Long live the Maverick!

by @ 9:29. Filed under Politics - National.

It’s official, John McCain is no longer adoringly  referred to as  “The Maverick.”

In another “Are we living in Bizzaro world or what?” story, the AP reports several Dem blasts of John McCain as the person responsible for Boeing’s loss of the Air Tanker contract.   Somehow McCain’s work to uncover corruption that included a former Boeing CFO and a former Air Force official being jailed and a $6B overcharge to the US taxpayers is now a bad thing!
(more…)

March 7, 2008

If the RepubicRATs can’t support the “R” nominee,… (language warning)

by @ 20:28. Filed under Politics.

(H/T – Bill Quick)

I’ll give the standard warning for language in my response (on page 2) now. The Daily Times of Salisbury, Maryland is reporting that a bunch of RepublicRATs who are pissed that RepubicRAT Representative Wayne Gilchrest got ousted in the primary are lining up to support the DemocRAT nominee rather than the winner of the Republican nomination, Andy Harris:

Republicans unhappy with the outcome of last month’s congressional District 1 primary are wasting no time becoming activists and fundraisers for the Democratic nominee.

Queen Anne’s County State’s Attorney Frank Kratovil, who won the district’s Democratic nomination last month with 40 percent of the vote, will attend a fundraising breakfast in Chestertown on March 11 sponsored by Republicans for Kratovil. The members of this group comprises a large disenfranchised group of U.S. Rep. Wayne Gilchrest supporters, such as longtime Gilchrest aide Karen Willis.

“I’m deeply saddened that Wayne didn’t make it through the primary,” Willis said. “I’ve found lots of people who feel the same way. I’m just trying to get behind Mr. Kratovil to continue to have 1st District representation from a thinking person.”

This isn’t fleeting support from Willis. She’s worked for Gilchrest for nearly his entire career in Congress, and she doesn’t support Baltimore County Sen. Andy Harris’ more conservative views, whether the issue be Iraq or the economy.

Again, for those with weak eyes, don’t turn the page. The rest of you, please, read on.

Revisions/extensions (9:06 pm 3/7/2008) – I need a copy editor, one that doesn’t mind the occassional expletive :-)

60-seat ‘Rat majority in the Senate?

by @ 16:49. Filed under Politics - National.

(H/Ts – Sister Toldjah and Matt Lewis)

The NYT reports the ‘Rats are salivating over the prospects of getting a filibuster-proof majority in the 111th Congress to go along with the Oval Office. The numbers seem to suggest that it’s possible; while they hold a 51-49 advantage now for the purposes of caucusing, there are 18 Republican incumbents (including 2 freshly-minted ones) and 5 Republican open seats up for election, while there are only 12 Democratic incumbents up for election. It currently is unlikely they’ll actually get to 60, though it is likely they will pick up 3.

Matt says that a filibuster-proof majority would really change things. Versus the current political/philosophical situation, perhaps a bit, though I tend to believe that is more a function of whether they (or the Pubbies) get a clean sweep rather than whether one party or another gets a filibuster-proof majority. What would really change the operational dynamic is if they fail to get to 60, especially if they get the White House. Unlike the Republicans of the 109th Congress, they may well not hesitate to jettison the filibuster in order to push their agenda through, especially if they do get an absolute majority without Joe Lieberman’s caucusing help.

Conversely, if they do get to 60 (or depending on how the chips fall, simply get close), they won’t need to get rid of the filibuster to get their agenda through. Therefore, they would keep it around as a hedge against the next time things don’t go their way.

Re: Not Suffering Fools Gladly

by @ 16:16. Filed under Politics - National.

Jim Geraghty has the perfect response to the NYT/McCain spat Shoebox highlighted below:

Call me when McCain drops the F-bomb or recommends anatomically difficult forms of mating.

To that I say, that would probably make me more inclined to insert the noseplugs and vote for McCain.

I guess one legal vote per legal voter is not the ‘Rats goal

by @ 16:06. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin.

Fresh from their shoutdown of a press conference held by Senate Republicans asking for a final legislative vote on a constitutional amendment that would require voter ID, all 18 ‘Rat Senators voted to keep said final vote from happening. Given that no less than the Milwaukee Police Department asked for this as one of their two recommendations to remove much of the odor of tainted elections, and nobody is talking about taking up the other one (elimination of same-day registration), I can only believe that the Democratic Party of Wisconsin is in favor of vote fraud.

What is exceptionally troubling is Jeff Plale, who owes his continued presence in the Senate to the fact that his opponent was accused of and ultimately convicted of fraudulent voting, is marching in lock step with the rest of the fraudsters.

I have a message for the DPW – when the worm finally does turn, and you lose power despite your desperate attempts to hang onto it, payback will be a cast-iron bitch.

Not Suffering Fools Gladly

by @ 14:41. Filed under Politics - National.

The AP, amongst others, is trying to drum up a story about John McCain and his temper.

A New York Times reporter attempted to ask John McCain questions about his conversation with John Kerry re: the possibility of being his VP for the 2004 election.   From what I can see, the reporter was trying to do a “got ‘cha” over some dates.

I’m no John McCain acolyte.   I’ve watched this, I’ve listened to it without the video and I’ve read the transcript.   Maybe there is a story here, I don’t know.   But if the reporter isn’t able to frame the question in a way other than “let me try and trip you over dates,” she needs to find another occupation.   Other than another attempt to create a front page piece over nothing, I don’t see any HERE, HERE. I’ve seen more pointed responses in church meetings.  

I think this is one time I’m glad McCain doesn’t suffer fools gladly!

March 6, 2008

Not all polls are created equal

Jim Geraghty sniffed something wafting from a Washington Post poll that had John McCain down nationally by 6 to Hillary Clinton and 12 to Barack Obama. He took a look at the crosstabs, and found that 15% weren’t even registered to vote.

Ed Morrissey dug a bit deeper and found a serious flaw in the identification. Self-idenitying party idenfitication in the WaPo poll was 40% Democratic, 28% Republican, 28% independent, which isn’t exactly what Rasmussen recently found (38.7% D/33.1% R/28.2% I). Worse, when WaPo pushed the independents and folded it into the results, it turned into 55% Dem, 36% Pubbie.

The takeaway paragraph from Ed is worth archiving:

The result is an unreliable poll, but one hell of a headline. McCain trails by twelve! And when McCain beats Obama or Clinton, we’ll hear once again that the election had to have been stolen "” because all of the polls showed McCain behind.

Just how inaccurate? Rasmussen’s tracking poll has had McCain up on Clinton since the start of the track on February 7, and McCain up on Obama since February 23.

Of course, we don’t do a national election, but 51 individual state-by-state-by-federal-district contests. I believe you know how much salt should be taken with any national poll; the question is whether you have enough left after The Winter That Won’t Die™.

March 5, 2008

The nightmare ticket

by @ 20:49. Filed under Politics - National.

We might have a slight problem with the NRE Spring Hill campaign, which finally yielded fruit last night in Ohio and Texas. It seems Hillary Clinton, fresh off those wins, is talking a unity ticket with Barack Hussein Obama. While a quick stroll through Memeorandum and my feed reader (those not showing up in the Memeorandum “instant reaction” links include Freedom Eden, Ace of Spades and bRight & Early, with obligatory links to Michelle Malkin and VodkaPundit) shows both the right end and the Obama half of the left end poo-poohing the prospect, the Clinton half of the left is openly cheering it. Even though it didn’t sound very serious as she only discussed the possibility of her at the top of that, it was enough for Fox News to get Michelle and Kirsten Powers together to chew this over (once again, thanks for being the blogosphere’s DVR, AP).

I’ll ignore that it probably isn’t serious on her part, and that Obama isn’t ready to discuss it yet, and cash in my E ticket. A Clinton/Obama or Obama/Clinton ticket would be a nightmare for the country. The modern Democratic Party is, at its core, a group of aggrieved constituencies united only by their hatred of uniquely-American aspects of America (i.e. conservatism and Republicans), and they represent the two largest of those constituencies. Given there are rather few in the voting pool that truly are non-partisan, and given there is a not-insignificant portion of that undecided that can be persuaded to particiapte in identity politics, a “unity ticket” would be more than enough to push them over the top.

Another consideration is preserving the Dems’ money advantage. With the Republican race for all intents and purposes over, John McCain can now conserve whatever money is left for the general election and the Democrat nominee. Meanwhile, we’ve got at least 6 more weeks of Democratic winter after Clinton saw her shadow in the bright spotlights of Ohio and Texas, and Pennsylvania has a couple of rather expensive media markets.

However, preventing that “unity ticket” is one of the goals of the NRE Spring Hill campaign. As Amanda Carpenter pointed out, Clinton has been throwing the kitchen sink at Obama. It’s just going to get uglier, and while politicians have an innate ability to forget personal attacks in the primary, there is an upper limit to that ability.

An argument for term limits?

by @ 10:20. Filed under Politics - National.

You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time. Abraham Lincoln

Apparently you can fool a majority of the people every two years!

Both Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich won thier primaries last night. Kucinich won with 50% of the vote. Paul got 70% of the vote in his primary.

Both of these guys have held office since 1996.

With folks like these (and I could list a number of others) is it any wonder there is such a division in American politics?

McCain’s VP

by @ 8:57. Filed under Politics - National.

It’s still way early but why not join in the fun of speculation about who John McCain will pick for VP.

A new name on the list is Senator John Thune.   John who?   Well for starters, he’s reportedly a good friend of John McCain’s

John Thune is the junior Senator from South Dakota.   As far as Republican politics though, he’s no junior.
(more…)

New NRE Poll – Who will be the Republican Presidential nominee in 2012?

by @ 7:08. Filed under NRE Polls, Politics - National.

It’s never too early to think about 4 years from now, especially since things are officially wrapped up on the Republican side. For the eternal optimists, I’ve included John McCain and the sitting VP (I didn’t want the more-or-less optimists who think McCain will be a 1-termer but think that Mike Huckabee or Mitt Romney will be the sitting VP to get pigeon-holed with the pessimists, so I broke them out). For the pessimists, I’ve thrown in the two people most-likely to lay claim to the “next in line” title (Huckabee, who will finish second in delegates if he doesn’t release them all, and Romney, who will finish second in the popular vote but released all his delegates) and the field (note for those that want the field, 4 months ago, we all thought the 56-year streak of “next in line” would finally be broken this time around). For the nihilists, I’ve even thrown in the Whig-ing of the GOP.

Who will be the 2012 Republican Presidential nominee?

Up to 1 answer(s) was/were allowed

  • Nobody as the GOP will not be in existence in 2012 (26%, 66 Vote(s))
  • John McCain (22%, 56 Vote(s))
  • Mitt Romney (as the sitting VP/President) (22%, 56 Vote(s))
  • Mitt Romney (not as the sitting VP/President) (11%, 29 Vote(s))
  • Mike Huckabee (as the sitting VP/President) (8%, 19 Vote(s))
  • Whoever else is the sitting VP/President (you can name the person in the thread) (5%, 13 Vote(s))
  • Whoever else is not the sitting VP/President (you can name the person in the thread) (4%, 9 Vote(s))
  • Mike Huckabee (not as the sitting VP/President) (2%, 5 Vote(s))

Total Voters: 253

Loading ... Loading ...

March 4, 2008

Huck to finally drop – UPDATE – Huck has dropped.

by @ 20:14. Filed under Politics - National.

Mike Huckabee dropping tonight is the word on the Hot Air open thread. Fox and CNN have called the nomination for John McCain as he swept all 4 states.

Revisions/extensions (8:20 pm 3/4/2008) – Huck quotes George Brett wanting to bounce weakly to 2nd for his last at-bat, calls for party unity.

R&E part 2 (8:34 pm 3/4/2008) – I did not hear him release his candidates, so we’re safe from Ron Paul being #2 there once we get to the convention.

R&E part 3 (8:47 pm 3/4/2008) – The hot rumor is that he will run for Senate. Shoe, guess you will be paying for those tattoos after all.

Last revision/extension (6:23 am 3/4/2008) – As always, Allahpundit has the video

Really, last R&E (8:17 pm 3/9/2008) – It seems sevenload.com is a major performance hit, so I pulled the video. You can watch it over at Hot Air.

March 3, 2008

Iran developing nuclear weapons? Say it ain’t so!

by @ 14:53. Filed under Politics - National.

Today, the UN Security Council voted to increase sanctions on Iran over their nuclear program and concern that it is being used to develop weapons.   I thought the National Intelligence Agency said they weren’t a threat anymore?

Looks like another instance where Hillary voted to support  President Bush, but was duped to do so! Or was she duped and then reduped?

March 2, 2008

A must see!

by @ 17:13. Filed under Politics - National.

Cue the cherubs, cue heaven opening, cue the music…now watch:[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4_X0ZwwJDY8[/youtube]

Something to think about….is it time to consider somekind of a mass intervention for these people?   This looks like they’ve moved past messiah and have arrived at deity!

Hattip The American Mind

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]