define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true); define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true); No Runny Eggs » Politics

No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

Archive for the 'Politics' Category

March 25, 2008

Re: Does Unity Trump Policy?

Carol Platt Liebau asks the question after Robin Toner of the New York Times openly wishes the populace has moved far enough to the left that Barack Obama could claim to be a “uniter” without abandoning any of his ultra-liberal roots. Short answer, “Hell no!”

I would be remiss if I didn’t take a whack or two at the pinata that is Toner’s screed. First, she places all the blame on Republicans. I have to question whether she doesn’t remember the mock funerals the House ‘Rats gave each and every Reagan budget or whether she considers that “good, clean, bipartisan fun”. How about the judicial filibusters, Toner?

Second, while she notes Bill Clinton claimed to be a uniter in 1992, I notice absolutely no reference to George W. Bush’s “I’m a uniter, not a divider” line in the 2000 campaign. I guess nothing short of unconditional surrender from Republicans is good enough for Toner, especially since Bush came pretty close to that and he got nothing but hate from the oh-so-tolerant Left.

And now, some good news (at least if you don’t live in Kenosha)

by @ 17:38. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin.

(H/T – Brian Fraley)

Assembly Minority Leader James Kreuser (D-Kenosha) will run for Kenosha County Executive in a special June election, and said that, if he wins, he will run for re-election to that office instead of his Assembly seat. Since he was the odds-on favorite to become the third-most-powerful non-judicial politician in Wisconsin (Assembly speaker) if the ‘Rats get a net of at least 3 seats in November, Brian says it’s safe to say that the Democratic Party of Wisconsin isn’t confident that Hillbama will have coattails that extend all the way down to Assembly races. One can dream that there is not any coattails, but that the 3-year-old conventional wisdom is completely wet.

March 23, 2008

And she wants to be your next Milwaukee County Executive?

by @ 12:46. Filed under Politics - Milwaukee County.

(H/Ts – Owen and Patrick)

Our friends in the Scott Walker campaign remembered to bring their cameras to one of the debates, where they caught this gem from his challenger, state Senator Lena Taylor (D-Milwaukee)…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iHqIFT4HtQ8[/youtube]

Mouth, meet foot. Foot, meet larynx.

The Nader Factor

by @ 7:00. Filed under Politics - National.

On February 24th, Ralph Nader announced his Presidential Candidacy.   I didn’t post it here but I made comments on other sites saying that this was going to be a positive for the Republicans.   I made the argument that the ideologicals of the left were likely going to look for an alternative when their particular candidate (either  Hillary or Barack)  ultimately was flamed.   I was heartily pooh poohed at the time being told that the 2000 impact of Nader was a once in a lifetime event and that he wouldn’t amount to more than a raindrop in the ocean in 2008.

Zogby International released a poll on 3/15 that has not received any airtime on a rather interesting item.   In that poll, where they find McCain beating either Clinton or Obama, they have Nader receiving 5% – 6% of the vote.   I guess folks were right when they said 2004 was a one time event, Nader only received 2.7% of the vote in that election!

5%, not much you say?   Generally you’d be correct if we elected President’s on a purely popular vote but we elect them essentially,  state by state.    A quick peak under the historical numbers show some pretty interesting possibilities.  

The following chart shows the states in 2004 that  John Kerry won with less than a 5% margin and Nader’s percent of vote in those same states from the 2000 election:

State

2004 Winning Margin 2000 Nader %
Michigan 3.4% 2.0%
Minnesota 3.5% 5.2%
New Hampshire 1.4% 3.9%
Oregon 4.2% 5.1%
Pennsylvania 2.5% 2.1%
Wisconsin .4% 3.6%

Assuming Nader could do again as well as 2000 and that he pulls predominantly from Democrats, this could mean that Minnesota, New Hampshire, Wisconsin and maybe even Oregon come into play.   Some of this is starting show as Rasmussen has released polls showing that McCain has pulled within the margin of error in both Minnesota and Wisconsin.

Take one more twist and assume that Nader did in fact nearly double is vote percentage from 2000 and that it was distributed across the states in the same way that it was in 2000.   Those numbers would look like this:

State

2004 Winning Margin Adjusted, 2000 Nader %
Hawaii 8.7% 10.9%
Maine 9.0% 10.6%
Michigan 3.4% 3.7%
Minnesota 3.5% 9.7%
New Hampshire 1.4% 7.3%
Oregon 4.2% 9.4%
Pennsylvania 2.5% 3.9%
Washington 7.2% 7.7%
Wisconsin .4% 6.7%

 This would now have the potential to put 7 states in play.

OK, we don’t know how this is going to play out.   However, I’m willing to bet that the longer Obama and Clinton beat on each other, the more likely it will be that those who are on the losing side will want to find an alternative way to express themselves This should be  especially true if this is decided at the convention and there is little time to adjust. (Hey all you we “I’ll never vote for McCain” folks, remember how that feels?)

OK, it’s early yet and we don’t know how this will play out.   My point is now, as it was when he entered the race, Nader will impact this race and it will be a negative for the Democrats.

If you’re still not convinced consider this; it was likely Ralph Nader who caused George Bush to win the 2000 election. Florida was decided by approximately 540 votes.   Nader received 97,488 votes .   Who do you think those votes would have gone to?   Do you still think Nader can’t impact the 2008 election?

March 22, 2008

Isn’t having one a requirement to be a “Messiah?”

by @ 18:42. Filed under Politics - National.

I wonder if Richardson  knows that Judas never got to spend the silver he received?

PORTLAND, Ore. "” "I talked to Senator Clinton last night," Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico said on Friday, describing the tense telephone call in which he informed Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton that, despite two months of personal entreaties by her and her husband, he would be endorsing Senator Barack Obama for president.

"Let me tell you: we’ve had better conversations," Mr. Richardson said.

But Mr. Richardson stopped returning Mr. Clinton’s calls days ago, Mr. Clinton’s aides said. And as of Friday, Mr. Richardson said, he had yet to pick up the phone to tell Mr. Clinton of his decision.

The reaction of some of Mr. Clinton’s allies suggests that might have been a wise decision. "An act of betrayal," said James Carville, an adviser to Mrs. Clinton and a friend of Mr. Clinton.

"Mr. Richardson’s endorsement came right around the anniversary of the day when Judas sold out for 30 pieces of silver, so I think the timing is appropriate, if ironic," Mr. Carville said, referring to Holy Week.

Pawlenty about to rise in Veep Sweepstakes?

by @ 14:52. Filed under Politics - National.

Note:   I am not endorsing not hoping for Pawlenty as VP.    There are many people I would  rather see in that slot.   This blog is part of “calling ’em like I see ’em.”    

Rasmussen Reports has a new Minnesota poll that shows John McCain dramatically closing the gap with his potential Democratic candidates.   McCain now leads Clinton by 1 and trails Obama by only 4, both within the margin of error.

Obviously, Obama’s issues with Jeremiah Wright’s statements have led to these increases.   I believe that with McCain this close in  a state  that has been tough to impossible for Republican candidates, Tim Pawlenty moves to the top of McCain’s VP pick list.  

While simply putting Pawlenty on the ticket could well put McCain over the top in Minnesota, leveraging him with some  other internal Minnesota  would dramatically increase the Republican vote here. (more…)

Obama, meet Obama

by @ 13:30. Filed under Politics - National.

(H/T – JonJayRay)

Remember when Barack Hussein Obama said he could no more disown his (former) pastor than either the whole black community or his grandmama? He wasn’t nearly as conciliatory when it came to Trent Lott and his endorsement of Strom Thurmond’s 1948 Dixiecrat campaign at the latter’s 100th birthday party. It was nice of WorldNetDaily to pull that back from the memory hole.

Meet the new race pimp, same as the old race pimp.

March 21, 2008

Bloated government

by @ 14:42. Filed under Business, Politics - Oak Creek.

(H/T – Clint)

The Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development has a sortable list of various “top 25” employers. One can specify either private enterprise, government, or both, various industry groups, and even narrow a search down to either a county or municipality level. While Clint took a look at the larger picture, I’ll go local. With the caveat that some of the information does not appear to be accurate as to locale, I’ll roll through some selected highlights (or should that be “lowlights”):

– In Milwaukee County, no Oak Creek entity, on its own, is among the top 25 employers among both public and private employers.
– Again in Milwaukee County, among school districts, the Oak Creek-Frankin School District only trails Milwaukee Public Schools, West Allis-West Milwaukee and Wauwatosa, and is larger than any municipal government other than the city of Milwaukee.
– Among Milwaukee County municipalities, the city of Oak Creek trails only the cities of Milwaukee, West Allis and Wauwatosa. That’s right; there are more city of Oak Creek employees than city of Franklin employees or city of Greenfield employees despite a smaller population.
– In the city of Oak Creek itself, the school district trails only Midwest Airlines, Bechtel Construction (which should drop to nothing when the power plant is done), UPS and Delphi (which, the last I heard, is on the chopping block). I do have to note that the DWD numbers for Oak Creek-based employees of We Energies appears to be off.
– Meanwhile, the city also trails PPG, Reinhart/County Market, and the Postal Service. I do have to note that, if all three Pick ‘N Save locations were combined (the Ryan Rd. one is owned by Ultra Foods, the other two by Mega Foods), Pick ‘N Save should jump ahead of the city.

Is it any wonder why taxes are out of control?

The definitive commentary on Wright and Obama

by @ 11:32. Filed under Politics - National.

I defer to James T. Harris. He too brings up his grandmother, but the takeaway is in the last two paragraphs:

When I asked my grandma about how she felt about the interracial marriage, she looked up at me with a perplexed expression; “What’s the matter with you?” she asked. I reminded her of what she had told me a few years back. Her response was: “James, people change. That was a long time ago." She was in her late 80’s.

Now that’s the audacity of hope.

Go, read.

“But the truth is, that isn’t all that I know of the man.”…He should’ve paid more attention!

by @ 11:17. Filed under Politics - National.

Many church’s are known to be giving organizations.   In the case of Barack Obama’s church, they just keep giving support to the thought that Barack Obama is an opportunist who will say and do anything that will serve his personal purpose.

Reported at Worldnetdaily.com, Jeremiah Wright reprinted a Hamas terror manifesto as his “Pastor’s Page” in the church newsletter.  

How much more does Barack need to know about Wright’s views before he goes beyond simply denouncing them and separates himself from this person?  

On this Good Friday we are reminded  that the Gospels are ultimately a story of  forgiveness, hope and salvation.     This  does not appear to be the gosple  of Jeremiah Wright.   His gospel appears to  be a gospel of hate!

March 20, 2008

Ahmadinejad – Obama’s other crazy Uncle?

by @ 15:18. Filed under Politics - National.

I read the transcript of Barack Obama’s speech on race.   As I was reading it, I was struck that this speech while intended to address race relations,  gave great incite as to how Obama would handle international relations, especially with countries like Iran.  

In his speech , Barack Obama said about Jeremiah Wright’s abominable comments:

Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country — a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America, a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam.

As such, Rev. Wright’s comments were not only wrong but divisive, divisive at a time when we need unity; racially charged at a time when we need to come together to solve a set of monumental problems — two wars, a terrorist threat, a falling economy, a chronic health care crisis and potentially devastating climate change; problems that are neither black or white or Latino or Asian, but rather problems that confront us all.

(more…)

The folly of Kelo v City of New London

by @ 8:25. Filed under Business, Politics.

(H/T – Jon Ham)

Remember the Kelo decision almost 2 years ago, giving the city of New London, Connecticut and developer Corcoran Jennison carte blanche to force out a bunch of homeowners for the sole purpose of gentrifying the Fort Trumbill area? It looks like that gentrification won’t happen anytime soon, even in a reduced role:

Faced with a tight lending climate, the Corcoran Jennison company has asked the Federal Housing Authority to back an $11.5 million loan to fund the long-delayed construction of housing on the Fort Trumbull peninsula.

Corcoran Jennison applied for the mortgage insurance last Friday, said Kristine Foye, spokeswoman for the New England Regional Office of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

The request was filed three months before a crucial May 29 deadline for the Boston-based developer to secure financing and sign a construction contract for an 80-unit complex of rental apartments and townhouses.

City officials and residents have closely watched the progress of the project, which would be the first new construction since eminent domain cleared portions of the peninsula for redevelopment.

Newsbusters notes the New London Day (the source of the blockquote) couldn’t bring itself to remember Sue Kelo. Between the legal bills and the extended time the land has sat vacant, I wonder if that apartment complex will ever replace the tax money that Kelo and her fellow former residents were paying.

I know it’s not quite the same, but I have a question for the folks at Milwaukee City Hall; how’s that Park East footprint looking? Do we have any construction going on that land?

March 19, 2008

Democrats and the Irony of Race

by @ 11:52. Filed under Politics - National.

Of the two major parties, the Democrats are the party of race.

Exit polls in 2004 showed that John Kerry won 88% of the African American vote.   In the same race, Zogby claimed that Kerry out drew Bush in Hispanic voters  by 65%/34%.

In the 2008 primaries there has barely been a Democratic contest that didn’t have stories talking about how Obama or Hillary were likely to win or lose a particular state due to the presence, absence or mix of race included in the state.
(more…)

March 18, 2008

Obama – “I don’t want to be an enabler”…Uh huh!

by @ 22:37. Filed under Politics - National.

Barack Obama has yet to explain why, when he knew about Jeremiah Wright’s hateful speech, he remained a part of Wright’s congregation for 20 years.   Maybe he just has a tin ear for hateful speech?   Maybe he has a heart larger than any of us and is able to forgive heinous comments that you and I would recoil at?

Apparently not.  

Take a look at this video of Barack commenting on the Imus’  remark about female basketball players.


Obama imus
by dollarsandsense123

In case you missed it or don’t want to watch the link, here are the relevant questions and Obama’s answer:

David Gregory – "¦Do you think (Imus) should be fired?

Barack Obama – I don’t think MSNBC should be carrying the kinds of hateful remarks that Imus uttered the other day.   He has a track record of making those kinds of remarks"¦

David Gregory"¦will you or would you be a guest on his show in the future?

Barack Obama – no I would not"¦.he was fine when I was on that show.   I don’t want to be an enabler or be encouraging in any way of the kind of programming that results in the unbelievably offensive statements that were made just a few days ago.

So….Obama believes appearing on another Imus show, a show that Barack says has a track record for hateful remarks would be enabling or encouraging that kind of behavior.

Wow!   1 appearance or 20 years, 1 appearance or 20 years, 1 appearance or 20 years, 1 appearance or 20 years.

Revisions/extensions (11:24 pm 3/18/2008, steveegg) – Attempted to fix the embedded video.

Mandatory YouTubage

by @ 21:44. Filed under Politics - National.

(H/T – Cuffy via doubleplusundead)

Correct me if I’m wrong, but I didn’t exactly hear a specific repudiation of the post-9/11 sermon from Rev. Wright…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9HUdF9OZa8[/youtube]

…by Barack Hussein Obama today.

Is the NRE Spring Hill campaign about to backfire?

by @ 18:18. Filed under Politics - National.

Cross-posting from the TownHall version

That’s pretty much what Shoebox is saying in stating we are going to see a Clinton/Obama ticket on the Dem end. I’m not yet quite sold on that inevitability, either as a ticket or as the next occupants of the Oval Office and the Naval Observatory. At this point, all that ticket is guaranteed to do is prevent the collapse of the Democratic Party that the various campaigns to keep Clinton alive, from MKH’s efforts to Rush Limbaugh’s quite-successful Operation Chaos to my own Spring Hill campaign, was designed to bring about.

It definitely is (I am not ready to say “was”) a high-risk/high-reward effort. I can’t speak for anybody else, but my hope is that things would get so caustic, the Nightmare Ticket would not happen and a major core constituency would take November off. Unlike Shoebox, I believe things are that caustic, though like him, I doubt that we will see John Edwards or Bill Richardson on the ticket for much the same reason he believes that ticket is inevitable. Even at that, most of those on that short list have the same “racialism” problem, only that would be in the open.

If the Nightmare Ticket does happen, I am counting on so many panders to the left being made that it would be rather difficult for them to return to the center. Fortunately, Obama made that job a bit harder with today’s speech. I’ll also state that neither we nor the middle were Obama’s target audience. Ed Morrissey believes it was the superdelegates. I humbly disagree; they’re looking for electability in the general election, and on that front, this speech sure seems sorely lacking. Rather, I believe it was to reunite the various colors of the radical wing of the Dems behind him, the general election be damned.

That speech, and the reaction to it, also plays into something Shoebox put up yesterday on Obama losing Generation Y. Because The Hammer is a Gen Y’er, I’ll point in the general direction of her take on that speech. The $192,000,000 (or whatever is going to be spent on the general election) question is whether the Gen Y’ers and the middle are simply going to be turned off to Obama or turned off to politics entirely. If it simply is to Obama, the election will be John McCain’s for the taking regardless of his missteps with conservatives and regardless of whether the Dems heal themselves between now and November.

If, however, the trend of the middle to disappear from politics entirely continues, it will be a “base turnout” election. If there is the Nightmare Ticket or “Son of Nightmare” Ticket, the various portions of the Dem base will be united, the middle will be pretty much out of play, and it will be up to McCain to actually heal his rift with conservatives to come out on top. Unfortunately, for every step McCain takes to heal that rift, he takes one to reopen it.

I haven’t said it enough, but I would be remiss if I didn’t say I thank God I got him blogging. Very short story – he was a regular commenter over at Michelle Malkin’s place, and stumbled into a few of my debate liveblogs from my pingbacks to her liveblogs. Eventually, I recognized just how good he was and he eventually agreed to try blogging as a guest-blogger. I’ll say he took to it like a duck to water; he’s bailed me out of a couple of blogging funks I’ve been in, and he’s improved the discussion here a lot.

The “Dream Team” is now guaranteed!

by @ 16:47. Filed under Politics - National.

WARNING: What you are about to read could cause black helicopters to hover over your house.   Read with extreme caution!

To steal a style from Glenn Beck:

What you need to know:

Barack Obama’s implosion over Jeremiah Wright has guaranteed that the Democratic ticket will include both Barack and Hillary.
(more…)

Congress calls for the end of DC’s gun ban

by @ 16:24. Filed under Guns, Politics - National.

Matt Lewis, among others, noted that John McCain joined a rather extraordinary amicus brief on District of Columbia v. Heller. It is rather extraordinary for a couple of reasons. First, it is extraordinary in its conclusion:

In sum, historically Congress has interpreted the Second Amendment as recognizing the right of law-abiding individuals to keep and bear arms. This Court should give due deference to the repeated findings over different historical epochs by Congress, a co-equal branch of government, that the Amendment guarantees the personal right to possess firearms.

The District’s prohibitions on mere possession by law-abiding persons of handguns in the home and having usable firearms there are unreasonable per se. No purpose would be served by remanding this case for further fact finding or other proceedings. This Court should affirm the decision below, Parker v. District of Columbia, 478 F.3d 370 (D.C. Cir. 2007).

That in itself is a rather stunning and refreshing change from the official position of the executive branch, which in essence is that, while there is an individual Second Amendment right, all existing gun controls, including the DC gun ban, do not run afoul of that.

The second is who else joined this brief. At the top is Vice President Dick Cheney, who joined in his capacity as President of the Senate. I guess that blows the notion of him actually running the country out of the water. There are also a smattering of Democrats, some of whom I would never have guessed would say that an outright ban on handguns is unreasonable.

Specifically, those in the Wisconsin delegation that signed on are Senator Russ Feingold and Representatives Steve Kagen, Ron Kind, Tom Petri, Paul Ryan and Jim Sensenbrenner (the latter 3 I would expect as they are what remains of the Republican half of the delegation).

Hey Doyle. Hey Decker. You mopes listening?

Is this “Change” we can believe in?

by @ 13:56. Filed under Politics - National.

Talking constantly about change, I wonder if this is the kind of change Barack Obama refers to:

Regarding his knowledge of Jerimiah Wright’s sermon content:

Huffington Post Blog  3/14/08

The statements that Rev. Wright made that are the cause of this controversy were not statements I personally heard him preach while I sat in the pews of Trinity or heard him utter in private conversation.

In Barack’s “speech on race” 3/18/08

Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes.

Regarding funds he received from Rezko:

From the Chicago Sun-Times June, 2007

Obama has collected at least $168,308 from Rezko and his circle. Obama also has taken in an unknown amount of money from people who attended fund-raising events hosted by Rezko since the mid-1990s.

But seven months ago, Obama told the Sun-Times his “best estimate” was that Rezko raised “between $50,000 and $60,000” during Obama’s political career.

From the Politico  3/14/08

Obama’s acknowledgment that Rezko raised as much as $250,000 for earlier campaigns, initially made in an interview with The Chicago Tribune and confirmed later to Politico, came after a year-and-a-half-long trickle of admissions about Rezko’s fundraising role and more than a month after Obama’s aides contended that they had identified and jettisoned all Rezko-linked cash. It also came as Rezko’s trial on corruption charges, underway in Chicago, brought increased scrutiny of Obama’s ties to the real estate developer, fast-food magnate and political insider.

Democratic Presidential Candidate, Barack Obama, seems to have a problem getting his arms around the facts!

Obama speech – live thread

by @ 9:16. Filed under Politics - National.

Even though I’m also on the Hot Air live thread, I may as well do one as well. I won’t guarantee the dignity lamp will remain lit; that depends on Barack Obama.

Roll bloat – more oppressor vs. oppressed

by @ 6:45. Filed under Politics, The Blog.

First, I have to give a shout-out to Free Whitewater. The proprietor, who goes by the nom de blog John Adams, has been rather controversial in local politics, so much so that the police chief of Whitewater, James Coan, with the blessing of City Manager Kevin Brunner, used city resources to try to unmask and silence Adams.

Needless to say, Messrs. Coan and Brunner, along with Whitewater Police Detective Tina Winger, have earned their departments not-exactly-honored spots on the Harrassers In Government portion of the roll for ignoring Article I, Section 3 of the Wisconsin Constitution.

March 17, 2008

The NRE Spring Hill campaign bearing fruit

by @ 15:13. Filed under Politics - National.

I’ve been strangely silent on the Barack Obama/Jeremiah Wright bomb; fortunately, Shoebox hasn’t been. All I really have to add is, if the fine conservatives in Texas and Ohio had not listened to Rush Limbaugh and joined what he calls Operation Chaos and what I call the NRE Spring Hill campaign, this would have continued to be buried by the media. It isn’t like Wright all of a sudden started going off the deep end a couple weeks ago.

Has Obama created a problem for Conservatives?

by @ 12:19. Filed under Politics - National.

The “consensus” thinking has been that as McCain moved into the general campaign, he would need to make overtures to We conservative folks.   The argument is that the pick of a VP may well show us that he is “listening” and “reaching out.”

All of that “thinking” held while there was concern that a general election would be a close, hard fought affair where McCain would need to not just get, but enthusiastically motivate conservatives in order to get enough turn out to win against a movment force like Obama.  

Then along comes Jeremiah Wright…..

I know a couple of days does not a trend make but….the polls have shifted hard, quickly.   There will certainly be the hard cores who believe the stuff that Wright is saying and will continue to support Obama.   However, I think there is a larger group, particularly those who consider themselves “moderates” that will find it impossible to support Obama with Wright in tow.  

If the polls continue to show McCain with a growing lead over either Democratic candidate he may not be concerned about getting the Conservative vote. I’m afraid that any hope (not the Obama kind) that conservatives had of McCain feeling motivated to “show us some love” and throw us a bone could go out the window along with Obama’s liklihood of being elected for anything more than just another lying, graft receiving Senator.

Obama creates a Lost Generation

by @ 10:55. Filed under Politics - National.

Update:    Wow!  I just discovered  a national article that cover this same concept.   Apparently  those black helicopters I keep hearing might be real after all!  

I wrote here  about the potential loss of an entire generation of Democratic voters.   I postulated at the time, that the  cause would be Hillary “stealing” the Democratic nomination and thereby crushing the hopeful acolytes of Barack Obama.   By crushing their hope I argued that Hillary would drive the 30 and under crowd out of the ’08 election.

Prescience isn’t always 20/20!

10 days later and Barack Obama creates an environment that could cause Generation Y to fore-go politics all together.
(more…)

March 16, 2008

New player in the VP sweepstakes – Bobby Jindal

by @ 9:06. Filed under Politics - National.

(H/T – Michelle Malkin via Sean Hackbarth)

James P. Lucier makes a pretty good case for Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal being John McCain’s VP nominee over at The American Spectator. I will admit, he makes a very good case. However, it would be a very high-risk/high-reward combination for Jindal. If McCain wins, whoever his Vice President is would be “next in line”. I’ve pointed out a couple times that since 1956, the “next in line” has won the Republican nomination.

However, if McCain loses, whoever his Vice-Presidential nominee is will be doomed to never see the Oval Office. Over at Michelle’s place, I asked the question of who the last person (besides Walter Mondale, who was also Vice President) was that came back from being on the bottom half of a losing ticket to become a Presidential nominee on a major-party ticket. Rather than depend on somebody else to do the research, I decided to do it myself. Since 1804, when the election of Vice President was officially separated from that of President by the 12th Amendment, there have been 4 people who failed as a major-party VP nominee (Democrat-Republican, Federalist, Democrat, Whig, Republican) who came back to become a Presidential nominee:

– Rufus King (Federalist): Lost on bottom half of the Charles Pinckney/King ticket in 1804 and 1808, became the Federalist Presidential nominee in 1816, lost the election.
– Franklin D. Roosevelt (Democratic): Lost on the bottom half of James Cox/Roosevelt ticket in 1920, became the Democratic Presidential nominee in 1932, won the election and 3 more.
– Bob Dole (Republican): Lost on the bottom half of the Gerald Ford/Dole ticket in 1976, became the Republican Presidential nominee in 1996 (after Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush took their turns as “next in line” and after finishing second in the 1988 Republican nomination to secure his own “next in line” claim),
– Walter Mondale (Democratic): Lost on the bottom half of the Jimmy Carter/Mondale ticket in 1980 (was for re-election), became the Democratic Presidential nominee in 1984, lost the election.

Let’s see. Only 4 times in 204 years has a failed VP candidate become a Presidential candidate, and only once has that person become President on his own merit. I must note John Tyler did become President in 1841 after William Harrison died in office and after being one of the failed VP candidates of the Whig Party in 1836; however, he ultimately did not run for his own term as he was tossed out of the Whig Party and the Democrats didn’t want him.

I’d rather let Jindal season a bit in Louisiana and finally break the “next in line” chain in 2012.

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]