Item #1 – Jim Geraghty reminds us that Eric Holder, Barack Obama’s choice as Attorney General, wanted to use 9/11 to crack down on gun shows. I’ll point out that those focusing on Holder’s role in the pardon of Marc Rich are barking up the wrong tree; look at Holder’s record, which also includes hyper-targeted enforcement of civil rights laws against the right.
Item #2 – Jim Hoft reports Henry Waxman was successful in ousting John Dingell from the chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee. What is significant about that is Dingell is a supporter of the auto industry, while Waxman is a Gorebal “Warming” acolyte and thus is opposed to the auto industry. As Jim said, “Say good-bye to new oil and nuclear energy development.”
Item #3 – Marc Sheppard caught Obama prostrating himself at the altar of the Goracle, repeating and expounding on the essential lies of the religion of Gorebal “Warming”. No wonder he said that his policies would bankrupt the coal industry and cause electric rates to skyrocket.
someone who uses terms like “‘Rats” and who denies global warming calling someone else too partisan? Puh-lease.
I’m all for nuclear power, though. I hope Obama moves forward on it.
I never said I wasn’t partisan. Maybe if the Dems hadn’t made so much out of a 1/30 second CGI artifact when they were playing the same games, I wouldn’t have twigged onto that.
The science simply isn’t there to support Gorebal “Warming”, much less the manmade or carbon dioxide portions of it.
I do like nuclear power as well. It is cheap, safe (unless one uses Russian designs), and once they figure out where to put the long-lasting waste, a great way to manufacture electricity, which we need a lot more of.
We agree on nuclear, that\’s something. But to hear someone–an intelligent someone–say that the science \”isn\’t there\” to support global warming… I\’m sorry, you\’re simply misinformed or the entire world\’s scientific community is conspiring to deceive us all. Guess which one i think is more likely.