define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true); define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true); No Runny Eggs » Politics

No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

Archive for the 'Politics' Category

July 16, 2007

Expect Breck Girl to head to Illinois presently

by @ 19:28. Filed under Politics - National.

(H/T – Sister Toldjah)

Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich (DUmmieRAT) has been running up the makeup and travel bills lately. Of particular note is a $600 bill from his makeup artist initially paid for by the taxpayers of Illinois for services rendered when he proposed his latest budget, as well as a mounting bill for shuttling between Chicago and Springfield, the capital on a plane (hmmm, I seem to remember a certain ex-governor being pilloried for a couple trips on the state air fleet, and a certain governor, who promised to get rid of the state air fleet, not quite pilloried for making questionable trips on the state air fleet).

July 14, 2007

Gilmore is the weakest link

by @ 16:04. Filed under Politics - National.

(H/T – William Smith)

The Politico has broken the news that former Virginia governor and RNC chair Jim Gilmore has dropped out of the Republican Presidential primary race. In proving that poor preparation causes piss-poor performance, he said, “I have come to believe that it takes more than a positive vision for our nation’s future to successfully compete for the presidency. I believe that it takes years of preparation to put in place both the political and financial infrastructure to contest what amounts to a one-day national primary in February.”

Who’s next? The Other Thompson? McShame? One of the ‘Rats?

July 13, 2007

Let the fear-mongering begin

by @ 8:55. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin, Taxes.

I’m surprised that the Journtinel didn’t split this into umpteen stories instead of the two they did split it into, or do this in a day-by-day drumbeat. Let’s explode this one by one:

“Wah! Milwaukee just can’t spend less than it did last year!” – NRE has issued a Crying River Flood Warning for Milwaukee City Hall and Milwaukee Public Schools headquarters. Since Milwaukee Public Schools doesn’t maintain old budgets online, let’s take a look at the city of Milwaukee budget between FY2003 (the year before the first Doyle budget took effect) and FY2006 (the last year population estimates are available for proper comparison). The city conveniently has a page on their site that summarizes the main budget numbers between FY1988 and FY2006, and that includes not only the amount of total authorized spending (the “Total City budget” line), but the amount of state shared revenue. Despite a drop in state revenue from $249,921,000 in FY2003 to $239,725,000 in FY2006 ($10,196,000 for the math-challenged among you, or 4.08%), and a drop in population from 585,059 in July 2003 (the day after FY 2003 ended) to 573,358 in July 2006 (11,701, or 2.00%), total spending increased from $1,062,827,429 in FY2003 to $1,211,186,519 in FY2006 ($148,359,090, or 13.96%). Inflation was 9.57% over the same period, so if one were to factor both inflation and population loss, if spending were to have remained constant per person, Milwaukee should have increased spending by only 7.38%. Instead, spending increases outstripped the combined effects of inflation and population loss at a 1.61% annual rate.

Somehow, I doubt that MPS showed any more restraint than the city between 2003 and 2006, and I know neither showed restraint last year. They could both use a trim, and a 3.5% trim to put them back at per-taxpayer/per-student FY2006 levels is a good start.

Oh, and Milk Carton. Where were you and your concern for the taxpayers of Milwaukee when your buddy Craps slashed and burned shared revenue to Milwaukee County to try and punish Scott Walker as he was contempating a gubernatorial run? Oh that’s right; unlike you, Walker knows how to live within his means, even as he gets sabotaged by a tax-and-spend County Board.

“Wah! Without massive state subsidies, we won’t have Ambert Alerts anymore!” – NRE has issued a Crying River Flood Warning for Wisconsin Public Radio and a Crying River Flood Watch for Dane County Public Safety Communications Center. While WPR is currently the main dissemination source of statewide activations of the Emergency Alert System, the main EAS system is designed to be quite robust. Indeed, WTMJ-AM/WKTI-FM (Milwaukee’s Local Primary-1 stations) have the same direct link to the state Emergency Operations Center, which creates the statewide activation of the EAS outside of Amber Alerts, that the WPR stations that are the State Relay stations have through WPR’s dedicated monitoring studio (I don’t know if Rhinelander’s SR station, a non-WPR station, has that link to WPR’s monitoring studio yet). All the other LP-1 and LP-2 stations monitor WTMJ, either through a dedicated ISDN line or through a satellite, and have a spare monitoring slot that can be hooked into the state EOC.

Why the lawmakers chose to bypass the state EOC and create a separate activation authority for Amber Alerts, and incorporate only one dissemination channel through WPR, is beyond a sane person’s comprehension. Further, seeing that there already is one private radio station that is a SR station, there needs to be no requirement that the remainder remain welfare radio stations.

“Wah! We won’t be able to make UWM/Wisconsin State University into a rival for the Madistan campus!” – NRE has issued a Crying River Flood Warning for UWM. News flash; we can’t afford two huge public universities, especially with UWM undercutting UW-Madison’s tuition.

“Wah! We can’t possibly make those getting into the most-lucrative business in Wisconsin pay anything approaching what their education is worth!” – NRE has issued a Crying River Flood Warning for the University of Wisconsin Law School. Lawyers, especially in Craps’ Wisconsin, stand to make a mint. Why in the hell can’t they pay $17,000 in tuition? And don’t give me the “It would make Madistan’s law school among the most-expensive in the Big 10.” Last time I checked, Northwestern was the only private university in the Big 10.

“Wah! We can’t possibly keep overpaying nutjob lecturers and offering everybody backup jobs on just a 3.1% annual increase in taxpayer subsidies!” – NRE has issued a Crying River Flood Warning for the entire University of Wisconsin system. In a high-tax, low-income state, we can’t afford the 8.7% annual increase in the subsidy to the money pit known as the UW system the ‘Rats want.

Revisions/extensions (10:17 pm 7/13/2007) – Corrected something related to how the EAS operates.

July 6, 2007

WisTAXsin – behind the numbers

by @ 8:33. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin, Taxes.

I’m a bit late to this party, but the Tax Foundation ran some interesting numbers on just the $15.2 billion-in-FY-2009 tax increase. I don’t particularily like the first chart they produced that had the tax increase representing 50% of the FY-2009 general fund revenue because it understates the actual increase. They also ignored the $1.6 billion increase in the rest of the taxes. Let’s redo that chart of top percentage tax increases between 2000 and 2006 (plus Wisconsin) to reflect the percentage increase and both the total tax increase passed by the state Senate and the portion that isn’t going to CubaCare:

(N/A) – Wisconsin proposes an increase in taxes by 110.5% in 2009 with the full monty tax increase
#1 – Nevada increased taxes by 16.4% in 2004
#2 – New Hampshire increased taxes by 15.7% in 2000
#3 – Tennessee increased taxes by 13.3% in 2003
#4 – Nevada increased taxes (again) by 11.6% in 2005 (making for a 29.9% increase from 2003 to 2005)
#5 – Indiana increased taxes by 11.1% in 2003
(N/A) – Wisconsin proposes an increase in taxes by 10.5% in 2009 with CubaCare taken out (essentially the Doyle increase)
#6 – Idaho increased taxes 9.7% in 2004
#7 – New Hampshire increased taxes by 8.1% in 2001 (making for a 25.1% increase from 1999 to 2001)
#8 – Oregon increased taxes by 8.1% in 2004
#9 – New York increased taxes by 6.6% in 2004
#10 – Ohio increased taxes by 6.5% in 2004

It gets worse. Again, the Tax Foundation neglected to take the Doyle increase into consideration when they considered the increase as a percentage of the gross state product, so let’s do that:
(N/A) – Wisconsin proposes a tax increase equal to 6.632% of the GSP in 2009 with the full monty increase
(N/A) – Wisconsin proposes a tax increase equal to 0.632% of the GSP in 2009 with just the Doyle increases
The previous #1 – Indiana passed a tax increase equal to 0.446% of the GSP in 2003

You read that one right kids. Even if you took out CubaCare, Wisconsin would still have the largest tax increase as a percentage of the economy in the recent history of the country. Specifically, it would be 42% larger than the next-largest tax increase as a percentage of the state’s economy. Keep in mind that is just the increase to the state.

But wait, it gets EVEN WORSE! The Tax Foundation went and calculated what the total state-and-local tax burden would have been if we had these tax increases this year. While they assumed that both the $15.2 billion for CubaCare and the additional $1.6 billion would have been applied in full this year, I’ll assume a 3.3% annual inflation for the 2-year difference. Let’s run the 2007 state-and-local tax burden as a percentage of income chart again:

(N/A) – Average federal take 21.7%
(N/A) – Federal take from Wisconsin taxpayers 20.0%
(N/A) – Wisconsin 19.8% with the full-monty increase (increase adjusted downward for inflation)
#1 – Vermont 14.1%
#2 – Maine 14.0%
#3 – New York 13.8%
(N/A) – Wisconsin 13.0% with just the Doyle increase (increase adjusted downward for inflation)
#4 – Rhode Island 12.7%
#5 – Ohio 12.4%
#6 – Hawaii 12.4%
#7 – Wisconsin 12.3% (current)

Do note that this does not include either any out-of-state tax increases or any local tax increases in Wisconsin. If CubaCare and the rest of the tax increases pass intact, we’ll be paying nearly as much to Uncle Craps as we do Uncle Sam. That hasn’t happened since FDR rolled in with the SocSecurity Ponzi scheme. Even if we “just” get Doyle’s increases, we’re back within striking distance of #1.

Congratulations, voters. Congratulations, Dale Schultz and Mary Panzer. Thanks to your stupidity, we’re on our way to doing something we never have done; be the most-heavily-taxed state in the nation.

Revisions/extensions (4:42 pm 7/6/2007) – corrected a typo.

July 5, 2007

Since I didn’t get a response the first time…

by @ 19:58. Filed under NRE Polls, Politics - National.

…let’s see if throwing it up as a poll gets people to contemplate the folly of Nobody’s Senator’s “solution” to high oil prices, namely, attempt to apply the Sherman Anti-Trust Act to soverign nations. While I do give him a modicum of credit for placing the blame where it belongs, he has no concept of either market forces or soverignty.

Do you?

July 4, 2007

This is what it’s all about

by @ 7:27. Filed under Politics - National.

IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.–Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.
He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.
He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.
He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.
He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:
For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:
For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:
For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.
He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.
He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our Brittish brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

July 2, 2007

But, but, but I thought Apples were invulnerable

by @ 14:46. Filed under Business, Politics - National.

(H/T – Pete)

It sure looks like our friends across the pond will have the iPhone much earlier than Apple had intended. The Times of London reports that hackers have had theoretical success in untethering the iPhone from AT&T, which would allow, among other things, people in Europe to use the iPhone much earlier than the end-of-the-year release date intended by Apple. Like Pete and unlike The Times, I won’t give you links to the hackers, but they’re pretty easy to find.

Hack on!

June 29, 2007

Last blog standing

by @ 18:41. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin, The Blog.

(H/T – Owen)

It seems the hacks at the Wisconsin Department of Veterans Affairs got their collective panties in a wad when they found out one of their employees was reading blogs on state time, so they cut off access to no less than 202 websites (as compiled by Political Capital) for the employees of the DOVA and the residents of the veterans’ homes run by the state, spanning the spectrum of the Cheddarsphere and even some Wisconsin media websites. While the ancient Blogger version of NRE is on the banned list, I don’t seem to see the current version on that list. Of course, since DOVA has spent over $35,000 so far to replicate the ChiCom web experience, I wouldn’t be surprised if they did get this place on the banned list.

June 28, 2007

Amnesty dead, Volume 2

by @ 11:57. Filed under Immigration, Politics - National.

shamnestykillsm.jpg
(Pic courtesy Michelle Malkin, who would look good in that yellow tracksuit, via David Lunde)

I have good news and I have bad news regarding illegal immigration and the integrity of the southern border. The good news is that the amnesty/faux border security/faux anti-illegal-immigration bill failed to get final cloture 46-53 (no, that is not a misprint; 53 voted against allowing the final vote). That means the 12 20 however many million illegal aliens who are here plus however many million that would have snuck across the border between now and the end of the amnesty period and grabbed some forged documentation to claim their ill-gotten amnesty (H/T – Ace) because the detention-and-deportation process would have been shut down won’t get a path to citizenship. That means that a hideously-expensive microscopic “virtual” fence that would be not only easy to avoid, but almost certainly not defended (based on current lack of enforcement encouraged on the southern border) won’t be built. That means that hordes of “guest workers”, which has turned into the bane of Europe (side note, a lot of those Euro-Islamokazis instrumental in the slow-mo Caliphate-ization of Europe grew roots through that program) won’t be invited here to overstay their visas and become illegal again.

The bad news is that we’re back to the status quo; the same almost-complete lack of enforcement of the current immigration laws and borders that led us into this self-made “crisis”. We’re still going to have millions of illegal aliens here, and millions more walking across an invisible border, with an executive branch more interested in persecuting those few border agents who believe there should be a southern border than pursuing those who flaunt said border. The Cheddarsphere’s blogfather, Charlie Sykes, just said on his show that there will be political blowback in the form of the Unfairness Doctrine (side note; the bipartisan members of the federal P-I-G would’ve found another excuse to try to bring it back, and amnesty’s failure will not increase the chances of them being successful). The Cassandra-ish Wall Street Journal thinks that amnesty’s defeat (written yesterday) will make the Republican Party a minority party again (Really? I’ll come back to this one in a while because it does deserve a full-court fisking).

As for me, I’ll take the Hattori Hanzo sword to the neck of this thing and take the tsunami for (hopefully) just another 19 months. The alternative was much worse. Allow me to explain said alternative, especially for the edification of those few of you who thought that the McShame-Swimmer-Bush Amnesty Act was a good idea:
– The immediate loss of somewhere north of 12 million voters for the Republican Party, especially for those that supported amnesty, because they would have seen this as the final betrayal. After the 2008 slaughter, we would re-enter the 1850s politically, when there was no credible challenge to the Democratic Party. Unlike the 1850s, and unlike the late 1970s, I doubt the Dhimms will repeat the mistakes of allowing an opposition party enough air to breathe and get traction.
– Eventual American citizenship given to the 12 million 20 million illegal aliens most of Mexico’s population plus assorted others. For those that think that Republicans can battle for their votes by running on conservative values, guess again. Even the “conservative” party in Mexico advocates a larger role of government, especially federal government, than what currently exists here. That the Mexican government fails to deliver on said pandering is one of the major reasons why they head north, and woe be the party that doesn’t pander.
– The eventual breakup of the Union. The removal of the Southwest from the United States is, after all, the stated goal of La Raza, the major “Hispanic” partner of El Jefe Jorge Bush, Swimmer Kennedy, and the leadership of both parties.

June 26, 2007

Senate Stupidity part 2 – the Dhimms, especially Kohl, want blood for oil

by @ 16:33. Filed under Politics - National, War.

No, I am not making this one up. Nobody’s Senator introduced an amendment to the “CLEAN Energy Act” to make OPEC “illegal” (scroll down for the text). The money line – A foreign state engaged in conduct in violation of subsection (a) shall not be immune under the doctrine of sovereign immunity from the jurisdiction or judgments of the courts of the United States in any action brought to enforce this section.

It flew through the Senate 70-23, and it’s part of the bill pending the conference committee. A question for Nobody’s Senator, Russ el-Slimeroad, Hitlery Rotten Von Der Schlikmeister, Osama Hussein Obama, and the other 66 who voted for this; what happens if this is found Constitutional, we seize the assets of OPEC’s members, and they shut off the spigot in retaliation? Or better yet, those international forums you’re so fond of says we can’t seize those assets because it violates “international law”? Are you going to accept $20/gallon gas, are you going to open up drilling to replace the 50% of oil we won’t get anymore, or are you going to send the military on a blood-for-oil quest?

Senate Stupidity, part 1 – the state Senate and double-plus taxes

by @ 16:15. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin, Taxes.

Or, if you prefer, “The state Senate wants to raise your taxes $1.74 billion $2.1 billion $2.6 billion more than $34 billion over the next 2 years”. By comparison, Doyle’s budget, which included that (not-quite-acknowledged) $2.6 billion 2-year increase, anticipated taking in $26.5 billion in taxes.

Item #1 – THE BIG ONE, the “universal health care” item (thanks to WisPolitics for the link to the document). This $30+ billion (over the 2 years) boondoggle is to be funded by a massive payroll/self-employment/income tax (depending on a person’s source of income):

– From employees who have Social Security taxes withheld and are under 65, 4% of the amount subject to the Social Security tax (the document says between 2% and 4%, published reports say 4%) unless they’re close to the poverty line (those earning under 150% of the poverty line pay nothing, those without dependents earning between 150% and 200% and those with dependents earning between 150% and 300% a sliding scale between 0% and 4%).
– From the self-employed, between 9% and 10% of the amount subject to the Social Security tax.
– From those who don’t pay Social Security taxes and are eligible for the boondoggle, 10% of their adjusted gross income up to the maximum amount that would be subject to the Social Security tax.
– From employers (which means, from employees), 10.5% of the portion of their payrolls subject to the Social Security tax.

Rick Esenberg has an excellent analysis of what this will do to the labor market. I’ll be back later to add to that.

Item #2 – A reinstituted “combined reporting” requirement that would raise business taxes $180 million over the next 2 years by making Wisconsin subsidiaries pay taxes on what their parent company makes outside of Wisconsin. The excuse from Judy Robson is that everybody else does it. Hey Judy, if everybody else was jumping off the bluff at the end of Oakwood Rd., would you be jumping too?

Item #3 – Remove the property tax exemption for ATM machines. Oh goody; now the fees at the ATMs will go up even more.

Item #4 – Increase heavy truck registration 10%, bring in an additional $53.4 million to the Craps Slus…er, Transportation Fund over the next 2 years, just because those taxes haven’t been jacked up in a decade.

Item #5 – Reward the Regional Transit Authority’s wasting of all but $50,000 of its $2 rental car fee on lobbyists by increasing that to $15.

The ‘Rats are well on their way to ensuring there is zero after-tax disposable income.

June 22, 2007

Mark this date on your calendars – 6/26/2007 (maybe) – UPDATE – or maybe not

by @ 21:02. Filed under Politics - National.

(H/T – Ian)

WSMV-TV out of Nashville is quoting an unnamed source close to the Fred Thompson exploratory committee saying that Thompson will announce his candidacy for the Republican Presidential nomination at the Fall School building on Tuesday. That building, according to that source, will serve as the campaign’s national headquarters, with the lease already signed. Meanwhile, other unnamed sources in that exploratory committee are denying this, and Tennessee Republican Party Chair (former Thompson chief of staff) Bob Davis said, “There will not be an annoucement Tuesday.”

Revisions/extensions (10:05 pm 6/22/2007) – Per RedState, it’s not THE announcement. That’ll learn me to trust a presstitute that trusts a single anonymous source.

Troha cuts a deal, multiple heads of executive branches sweating

WTMJ-AM just reported that Dennis Troha has reached a plea deal with US Attorney Steve Biskupic to plead guilty to a pair of misdemeanor charges of conspiring to violate federal campaign laws, admit to also violating state election laws, and cooperate with the FBI in exchange for the dropping of pending federal mail fraud and federal false statement charges and the non-pursuance of potential state charges against Troha. WisPolitics put up statements from both Biskupic’s office and Troha.

This brings up a few interesting questions:

– Why would Troha cut a deal when a quarter of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals is handing out “get out of jail free” cards to those engaged in political corruption?
– We know one of the potential targets now sweating; Jim “Craps” Doyle (WEAC/Potawatomi-For Sale). What we didn’t know until today is the other potential target; George Bush. You think that’s why the White House wanted Biskupic out? Oh, where’s the apologies for Biskupic being “partisan”?
– Related to that, how nice that the presstitutes have shown up to that party late, and are now loudly pronouncing their presence by putting Bush before Doyle.

June 21, 2007

Today’s Constitutional lesson

by @ 18:03. Filed under Immigration, Politics - National.

Revisons/extensions (6:10 pm 6/21/2007) – Since I did an unintentional pingback to the full post, I may as well add my two cents. Isn’t Mikey Chertoff one of those that called those of us who oppose the amnesty-first/enforcement-never bill racists? Pot, kettle. Kettle, black. With the introductions done, let’s carry on with the lesson, which should frighten Chertoff, McCain, Bush, Kennedy, Reid, and all the others that support amnesty.

Travis McGee, commenting at Michelle Malkin’s blog, provides it (emphasis in the original):

U.S. Constitution, Article 4 Section 4:"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion;"
Invasion: \In*va"sion\, n. [L. invasio: cf. F. invasion. See Invade.] [1913 Webster] 1. The act of invading; the act of encroaching upon the rights or possessions of another; encroachment; trespass.

Protecting the border is part of protecting the States from invasion. Assimilating countless millions who will turn around and attempt to take the Southwest, especially without ensuring that countless millions more with the same goal don’t come here, is not.

What Congress thinks of us

by @ 17:14. Filed under Politics - National.

(H/T – Instapundit)

Before I begin, allow me to give the customary warning – due to adult language, reader discretion is advised.

Brian C. Ledbetter at Snapped Shot dug up a certain web site that is exclusive to Capitol Hill types (warning; very strong language) to allow them to vent anonymously. Let’s start off with something moderately-innoculous:

Yes, the Metro in July. Honestly, is there some kind of charter that says that you must be 50 lbs overweight, dress in clothes that don’t fit, and reek to high hell from all the sweat generated by walking five feet before you are allowed to tour this city. Also, don’t flock like lemmings to the one escalator that is working, walk up the stairs, to the left at all times, and don’t crowed around the doors, the rest of us would kike to get on as well.

6/21/2007 – 10:21 am

That’s one of the tamer ones. Here’s what they think of us exercising our First Amendment rights to petition Congress:

Senate staffers: Please tell your members to vote in favor
of the immigration bill"¦.so these ignorant fuckers will stop calling us!!!!

6/21/2007 – 9:35 am

I’ll wager the same is being said about Owen at the state Capitol. I can only hope to get that kind of notoriety (though today was a good step).

This sequence of three almost-consecutive posts is illuminating, especially since the bosses of these asshats get free access to the mail and can only get fired if they get voted out (italics in the original):

letters, letters, letters–lets raise stamp prices to 5 bucks a pop–that’ll stop people from writing to their reps!

6/19/2007 – 9:50 am

lets raise stamp prices to 5 bucks a pop–that’ll stop people from writing to their reps! Good idea. Now how do we deal with emails?

6/19/2007 – 10:01 am

lets raise stamp prices to 5 bucks a pop–that’ll stop people from writing to their reps!Hear, Hear. Now if only we could stop people from voting, we might have something!

6/19/2007 – 10:08 am

No rant is complete without the obligatory pro-Islamokazi post:

God bless Dennis Kucinich. I’m glad someone has the balls to go down to the House floor and defend the much maligned and misunderstood President of Iran, whatever his name is. Good peeps defending the honor of other good peeps. That’s what it’s all about.

6/18/2007 – 4:42 pm

Let’s see; a racist bigot who wishes you, me, the dumbass staffer, and everybody who isn’t a Shi’ite-flavored Islamokazi dead with delusions of being the second coming of Xerxes, who likely had a hand in the Iran hostage crisis. Yeah, he’s just “misunderstood” </sarcasm_moonbatty>

This is just screaming for a Friday Freefly.

Gallup polls (that’s right, POLLS with an “S”) revisited

by @ 16:21. Filed under Politics - National.

I don’t know how so many people somehow got the 2007 Confidence in Institutions poll and the June 2007 Congressional approval poll mixed up. Maybe it was the same-day release of the Congressional numbers for both; maybe it was the focus on the former poll, and maybe it was wishful thinking. I can only hope it wasn’t me; I did put both in the same post and then focused on the Confidence poll. We need to tighten up before the mid-20s approval July numbers come out; otherwise, you’ll be wondering how Congress got its groove back when it didn’t, and I’ll be out here spitting into the hurricane.

Let’s go over the approval numbers again. 24% of those surveyed by Gallup approved of the job that Congress is doing a good job, and 71% disapproved. That spread was not matched by the Pubbies until after the November election. Surprisingly, nay, shockingly, approval among fellow Dems was only 29%. That’s right; not even 1 in 3 Dems support their own party. That is not exactly a new phenominon either; at no point this year did a majority of Dems support their own party’s performance in Congress.

Sliding polls, federal style

by @ 0:33. Filed under Immigration, Politics - National.

(H/Ts – Ace for the Zogby Interactive, Jessica for one of the Gallup polls)

Normally, I wouldn’t touch the Zogby Interactive polls with a 2,000-mile pole because it is a flawed sample of self-selected Internet users, but when you see 3% approval of Congress’ handling of immigration “reform” and 9% approval of El Jefe Bush’s handling of it, as well as incredibly-low approval and confidence numbers for Congress (more on that in a bit), it’s news. Of course, you could say that the self-selected group is more-representative of those that care enough to vote, but the limiting factor is the fact that it is an Internet-only service.

The remainder of the poll is quite interesting. McShame-Swimmer-Bush Amesty is supported by only 38% (not surprisingly, mostly by those that see amnesty and “guest”-workers as the most-important elements of immigration “reform”), while 64% want “reform” to be more-restrictive than current law. In the “what first” question, 42% want enforcement of current laws first, 29% want border security first (tied with enforcement at 44% among self-identied Republicans), and 23% want amnesty first (tied with enforcement at 37% among self-identified Democrats). 69% want to compel states and local governments to help enforce the border (I presume this includes no “sanctuary cities”), 37% want mass deportations, and only just one in four (don’t have a specific percentage) favor allowing the illegals to stay if they have jobs and pass background checks.

Now, on to Gallup. Hit number 1 – the 24% approval rating for Congress, the lowest since the lame-duck December 2006 poll (21%) and early October poll (23% and 24%). Of particular note is the 71% disapproval (the only higher number in the past 11 months was that lame-duck December 2006 poll), and the fact that only 29% of Dems and 19% of independents approve of Congress.

Hit number 2 from Gallup – confidence in Congress is at an all-time low (since 1973, at least) at 14% (sum of those that have “a great deal of confidence” or “quite a lot of confidence”. We’ll have more info on this later today (or tomorrow if you’re in or west of the Rockies), but the tidbits are mighty intriguing. That is the lowest of the rankings this year, dropping below HMOs, and slipping to the second-lowest performance in the history of the poll (the record is 13% set by HMOs in 2002). I guess we’re getting more cynical; the top-ranking institution, the military, slipped from 73% last year to 69% this year (which still is higher than any year prior to 2002 except 1991 and 1992).

June 20, 2007

If it speaks, tax it? 6 members of the JFC say so

by @ 17:48. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin, Taxes.

(H/T – the lovely, talented, and blogging again Jenna)

In what is likely the only victory for Wisconsin taxpayers, the Joint Finance Committee voted 10-6 to continue to exempt cell phone users from the state Universal Service Fund, as they have since 2001 (not to be confused with the federal Universal Service Fund; side note, the federal USF does tax cell phone users). Predictably, the tax-and-spenders at The Capital Times took exception to that. Let’s see what the state USF does:

  • Give telecommunications equipment to non-profits – Golly, isn’t it nice that the state is so damn generous with my money. Of course, if they didn’t take over 10% of what the Wisconsin economy produces, maybe those non-profits would get enough donations to cover the expense.
  • Give telecommunications equipment to “non-profit” and rural health care providers – The rural portion is duplicated by the feds. The “non-profit” portion is answered above.
  • Help subsidize telecommunications equipment for the deaf – I can’t argue with the general premise; however, this is not means-tested.
  • Low-income assistance – This is also duplicated by the feds. Further, there are some pretty damn cheap cell phone plans that don’t require credit – as an example, Net 10 offers 60 days/300 minutes of service for $30 (plus sales tax), phones for less than $40, and those unused minutes do roll over.
  • Pay-phone subsidies – This is pretty much a self-limiting “problem” as more people get cell phones. Of course, if it becomes more expensive to get cell phones, then more people are going to need pay phones.
  • “High rate” assistance – Again, duplicated by the feds. One of the main reasons for high rates is the level of taxation, including the duelling USFs.

It sure looks like it’s time to consider getting rid of the state USF, and I wouldn’t be opposed to dumping the federal USF as well.

June 19, 2007

Thompson on top

by @ 11:42. Filed under Politics - National.

(H/T – RedState)

No, it’s not Tommy “The Other” Thompson. He got less than 1%.

Instead, in the freshest Rasmussen national poll, it’s Fred leading the pack with 28%, ahead of Rudy Giuliani’s 27%. This is only the second time somebody not “from” New York has led a Rasmussen poll; Barak Obama led Hillary Clinton at the end of April (4/30), only to lose the lead the next poll (5/7).

There are, of course, several caveats. The first is that Thompson has not yet announced, even though he now has an exploratory committee. The second is that this is a national poll, and the primaries (as well as the general election) are a series of state-by-state contests. Has anyone seen current numbers for Iowa, Nevada, New Hampshire, Wyoming, Florida and South Carolina (the first 6 GOP contests)?

June 15, 2007

You wouldn’t know this one from the media

by @ 12:25. Filed under Law and order, Politics - Wisconsin.

But you would from somebody like Jessica McBride. She’s not letting her tombstoning from the radio stop her from digging for the real story. You didn’t read this in the local paint-catcher’s lionization of one Kimberly Prude, but the unanimous 7th Circuit decision upholding her conviction on charges of voting in the 2004 fall general election while under state supervision for a felony found that she knew from multiple sources that she could not vote while still on probation, including signs at the polls that informed felons still under state supervision they could not vote.

One of the things that came out in the original trial was that she was working the polls that election, and that she engaged in activities that were less than above-board. Why did I have to wait for the decision to find that one out? Oh, and one more question (also asked by Jessica); why in the hell was she working the polls?

Red China is NOT our friend, part 234,122,935

by @ 10:42. Filed under Politics, War on Terror.

(H/T – JammieWearingFool)

File this one under “The enemy of my enemy is my friend”. Bill Gertz’s current “Inside the Ring” feature from The Washington Times provides some illuminating reading:

New intelligence reveals China is covertly supplying large quantities of small arms and weapons to insurgents in Iraq and the Taliban militia in Afghanistan, through Iran….

Some arms were sent by aircraft directly from Chinese factories to Afghanistan and included large-caliber sniper rifles, millions of rounds of ammunition, rocket-propelled grenades and components for roadside bombs, as well as other small arms.
The Washington Times reported June 5 that Chinese-made HN-5 anti-aircraft missiles were being used by the Taliban.

According to the officials, the Iranians, in buying the arms, asked Chinese state-run suppliers to expedite the transfers and to remove serial numbers to prevent tracing their origin. China, for its part, offered to transport the weapons in order to prevent the weapons from being interdicted.

As if that weren’t enough, Iran has added ChiCom-made high-speed catamarans with ChiCom optically-guided anti-ship missiles to its fleet, presumably in preparation for closing the Strait of Hormuz, the major chokepoint of oil coming out of the Middle East.

Not-so-suprisingly, the Bush White House is trying to minimize Red China’s involvement in all this. After all, they did nothing when the ChiComs snatched that EP-3 back in 2001.

June 13, 2007

Roll bloat – the political edition

by @ 17:48. Filed under Politics - National, The Blog.

Fred Thompson has joined the blogosphere. Seeing I’m a Fred!-head (pretty much by default), and he and his campaign are using WordPress, I’ll give him some blog love.

June 12, 2007

Victims of Communism Memorial dedication

by @ 11:28. Filed under Politics.

If it weren’t for Charlie and Mary Katharine, I wouldn’t have known about this. First, I have to thank Charlie for carrying the speech by President Bush live (no audio yet the White House came through on the audio, but the White House has posted the transcript).

Next, I have to thank MKH for attending, and bringing her cameras. She’ll have the videos up later, but we can enjoy the stills now.

Now, we have to finish stamping out Communism.

Revisions/extensions (6:09 am 6/13/2007) – Added the audio

June 11, 2007

Monday videos

Video #1 comes to us from Ace. He dug up a clip of Algore Goracle ripping HW Bush for ignoring Saddam Hussein’s extensive terrorist connections and ongoing attempts to get nuclear weapons. Follow-up question for Algore, when did Saddam become an upstanding member of the international community? It certainly wasn’t immediately after the impeachment-delay bombing of 1998.

Video #2 is today’s Vent, in which Michelle Malkin presents the first annual Open Borders Oscar awards.

June 9, 2007

Picture time – the failed premiere cover of “Edwards”

by @ 16:01. Filed under Politics - National, War on Terror.

“Borrowed” from Rob (who was so kind as to put it on Flopping Aces so I could find it)…

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]