Wasn’t the New York Times all heated up about John McCain writing a letter to the FCC? As I recall, that letter didn’t suggest to the FCC how to decide the issue but rather to JUST DECIDE? So………how come, after the article that the New York Time’s wrote about John McCain, an article that had no facts and tried to create a controversy from something that didn’t rise to the level of hear-say, they haven’t had a chance to write a front page store on Obasmic securing $855,000 in fees for a political contributor who wasn’t even a constituent?
At the risk of asking a rhetorically squared question (that’s a question that is so rhetorical it hurts to ask):
Am I missing something? Obviously the New York Times is; an ability to investigate NEWS!
