No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

Archive for February 5th, 2008

My little corner of the world

by @ 20:59. Filed under Elections, Miscellaneous.

I just got back from my precinct caucus.   According to those that have been a part of this process over the past many years we had more people at the caucus tonight than they have had in the last 5 or 6 caucuses (we caucus every 2 years) combined.   Rumor has it that throughout MN caucus locations are overflowing with people at both R and D locations (haven’t heard anything about the I’s).

 After electing a president a secretary, talliers etc. etc. we finally got around to the straw poll.   Surprising to me the results of the straw poll was that Romney accumulated more votes than the Huckabee, McCain and Paul together.   Being we are a caucus state and this is a straw poll it’s hard to say how this will translate into actual delegates when all is said and done.

So other than being reaffirmed about the general quality of my neighbor’s thinking, what does all this mean?

 First, while MN nice was in full force (over crowded caucus building, shortage of supplies etc.) there was defnitely a passion in the group.     People weren’t there just doing their civic duty.   The large turnout was driven by people who are genuinely concerned about this election.   This was NOT a group of Republican zombies.

Second, I was really encouraged by the age demographics within the group.   With all the talk about young folks scrambling toward BO you’d think there would not be any R folks under the age of 30!   I’m happy to report that about 15% of our caucus were folks that were 25 or younger.

Third, I think the McCain folks anticipated getting whacked at least in this area of the burbs.   We have been strong Bush supporters and have House representation that is VERY conservative.   We had one (likely) McCain supporter who made a speech telling each of us that we needed to support the R party nominee whoever that ultimately was!   Sitting out the election, according to this person, was never acceptable.  

I’ll wait and see but it sounds like MN might go for Romney.   However, I don’t know if that’s going to matter in the end.   I just don’t know that he can overcome McCain especially if you assume that Huckabee’s delegates are likely going his way also.  

I’ll end with a piece of advice for the McCain campaign that comes from my experience tonight….Rush and Ann Coulter are not the only two people who have no confidence in you as a conservative.   In fact, I’m no longer the only person in my little corner of the world that agrees with them.   There are lots of R people out here who have grave concerns about electing you President.   Remember  that we got our “You must vote for the nominee” lecture?   At the end of that lecture a lady looked back at the party zombie and told him politely but directly, “There are breaking points for me which I can not go beyond.   I will not vote for a candidate who goes beyond that breaking point.   I will either sit it out or I may even vote for the other candidate.”  

My advice for McCain is that there are many people who believe you have gone beyond the breaking point.   Maybe you don’t care.   Maybe you think that you can get enough of the I’s, the middle R’s and a few D’s  to get you elected.   If you’re interested in those of us who believe you’ve passed on, don’t tell us how we need to support the R, don’t tell us what a great conservative you are, don’t invoke Reagan’s name EVER again.   If you’re interested in us, show us, between now and November show us by your action that you value our vote.   If you show us, there’s a lot of people out here who are really concerned about this election and will help you.   If you don’t show us, don’t be suprised when a large group of us just sit this one out.

 Update……

 McCain ought to be taking my advice but it appears he isn’t:

By Jed Babbin at HumanEvents.Com                     http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=24859

 According to my source, McCain has prepared a video featuring President Ronald Reagan to make the introduction. If McCain uses this video, it is very likely to backfire badly.   This is the group before which Ronald Reagan said in 1975 that, "A political party cannot be all things to all people. It must represent certain fundamental beliefs which must not be compromised to political expediency or simply to swell its numbers."  

Romney and the Bear

by @ 15:15. Filed under Politics - National.

There’s an old story about two guys who are out hiking in the woods.   Long into their hike, in the deepest part of the woods, they stumble upon a bear.   The startled bear turns and begins to growl at the two men giving every indication that it  is about to charge.   Immediately, the first of the two men sits down, takes a new pair of high quality running shoes out of his backpack and starts putting them on.   The second man looked incredulously at the first man  says, "What are you doing?   You can’t out run that bear!"   The second man replies matter of factly, "I don’t have to, I just have to out run you!"  

OK this is an old joke but it seems to sum up John McCain’s approach to winning the Republican nomination.   McCain’s shenanigan’s in WV show that if he can’t win outright he’ll do whatever he needs to make sure that Romney gets eaten by the bear!  

Some of you folks may find McCain’s tactic in WV surprising although I can’t imagine why.   McCain has shown on numerous occasions that his need to be in the MSM spotlight far outweighs any sense of team or camaraderie, at least with anyone that would be considered conservative.   Off the top of your head, can you name any legislation that McCain sponsored that didn’t include one of the most liberal of liberals as a cosponsor?   McCain/Kennedy, McCain/Lieberman, McCain/Feingold?  

Anyone who thinks that a "President" McCain will reach across the aisle (to the right!) or move towards the right are living with greater H.O.P.E. than the staunchest Obama supporter.

New NRE poll – Is conservatism dead?

by @ 14:41. Filed under NRE Polls, Politics - National.

Since Mike Huckabee teamed up with both John McCain and Ron Paul (Nick? Chris? Flashy? Care to explain?) to take West Virginia from Mitt Romney, I’m going to be taking the rest of the afternoon to write my answer to the question.

I’ll let you guys in on the vomit-enducing fun a bit early, however, with a new NRE poll:

Is conservatism dead?

Up to 1 answer(s) was/were allowed

  • No (68%, 63 Vote(s))
  • Yes (32%, 30 Vote(s))

Total Voters: 93

Loading ... Loading ...

No Super-Duper Tuesday coverage here (at least from me)

by @ 12:53. Filed under Politics - National.

I’m working on a couple of divergent things, and I am preparing for the Fat Tuesday Drinking Right, so I will not be offering coverage of Super-Duper Tuesday. I can’t speak for any of my guest-bloggers (except for Fred, who will also be face-down in beads before the night is over; just don’t tell Mrs. RDW).

If you are looking for coverage, I highly recommend the following places (hopefully I remembered to shut off the pingbacks for those few who I’m putting links to posts instead of the main blog for; since this place will likely be silent tonight, I don’t need the traffic of those looking for SDT coverage):

Michelle Malkin
Mike’s America (he’ll have a live chat going)
American Princess (E.M. will be a bit late)
Hot Air
TownHall
Pajamas Media
VodkaPundit (who is also part of the PJM coverage)
Free Republic
Sister Toldjah
Suitably Flip
Little Green Footballs
Ace and the fellow moronbloggers
The Campaign Spot
bRight & Early

If I forgot you, I apologize; this one’s going up early. Leave a comment/pingback/trackback, and hopefully a few people will find their way into your place from the comments section (no, I will not be updating this; I don’t feel like having to check and uncheck the auto-notification option).

HamNation – Mav v Ice

by @ 12:27. Filed under Politics - National.

It’s been way too long since a HamNation has come down the pike, but this one’s worth it. Since I don’t want to steal from The Hammer, go, watch, and marvel at the genius that is MKH.

Snow? Did someone say snow?

by @ 11:20. Filed under Weather.

10-14″ total, starting about the time of the afternoon rush, may keep the rank amateurs away from alcohol-related Fat Tuesday parties, but if you’re here, I doubt you’re a rank amateur. Therefore, if you’re in the Milwaukee area, I do believe you’ve been invited to a very special Drinking Right tonight.

On a semi-related note, I may not be a Catholic, but I don’t believe snow cream is something you have to give up for Lent. Heck, I might even try it with a chocolate twist this time around. A word to the wise; you may want to mark where you leave the collection bowl tonight and secure it; there will be a lot of snow and wind.

Please upgrade your WordPress installations

by @ 10:34. Filed under The Blog.

Apparently, there was a flaw in previous versions of WordPress that allowed a subscriber to assume more control over a blog than intended. For those of you with your own WordPress installations, please upgrade to 2.3.3 now. I do not know if this also affects stand-alone WordPress MU installs (Jim, you might want to check on this one), but those blogging through WordPress.com should be safe.

Also, if you’re running the WP-Forum plugin (I’m not), it is highly recommended you disable it until a major security flaw is fixed.

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]