No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

Archive for February 19th, 2008

Great night for Obama, not-as-great for McCain

I’ve covered it on the live-blog below, but in case you went into a cave at 8 pm, you know John McCain and Barack Obama took Wisconsin rather handily. However, there are a couple of interesting dynamics once one looks at the by-district results:

– Obama handily won every Congressional district except the 1st (for those of you outside of Wisconsin, that’s far southeast Wisconsin, and my district), and even there, he’s up by about 3,300 votes (51%-48%) with 69% reporting. By rolling big in the 2nd (Madison and surrounding areas) and 4th (Milwaukee), he will come out of Wisconsin with a 42-32 delegate advantage.
– There is a potential surprise out of western Wisconsin. While McCain handily took the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 8th districts by double-digit point margins, the 3rd (southwest Wisconsin) and 7th (northwest Wisconsin) are delivering a rather nasty surprise. Both districts are still too close to call as I type this, but Huckabee has slim leads in both. With 88% of the vote in the 3rd, he’s up 18,749 to 18,408 there, and with 87% of the vote in the 7th, he’s up 21,082 to 20,972. If that holds, McCain will only walk out of Wisconsin with 34 of the 40 delegates (it doesn’t matter whether the 3 party delegates were bound by the statewide primary results or not; they all endorsed McCain).

Revisions/extensions (7:12 am 2/20/2008) – Very quick update on the Huck-a-boomlet. The 3rd looks like a win for him; he’s up 19,649-19,028 with 90% in. In the 7th, McCain pulled ahead 23,494-23,363 with 96% in. That should leave the delegate count out of Wisconsin 34-3 in favor of McCain with 3 yet to be determined.

Meanwhile, there are 4 districts in Washington State that haven’t reported any results according to the AP, but the 5 that have have gone to McCain.

Kathy Carpenter moves on to the general

by @ 21:56. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin.

In case you forgot, Kathy Carpenter is running for alderman in Kenosha’s 5th District. She was in a 3-way primary today, and all the votes have been counted:

Kurt Sinclair 765
Kathy Carpenter 537
JoEllyn Storz 390

Congrats, Kathy. Now you have a very busy 6 weeks ahead.

Live-blogging the Wisconsin primary

The party begins at 7:45 (or thereabouts), and since I won’t be drunk-blogging (too many numbers to bounce and it will be on my corner hole in TownHall’s wall, now with a shiny new back end), you’re on your own for the alcohol. Trust me, you’re going to need it. A half-hour before the bell, the AP and the Green Bay Press Gazette come through with a by-district breakdown.

Joining in the live-blogging:
Michelle Malkin
RedState
Stephen Green at Pajamas Media
Sister Toldjah

McCain’s VP?

by @ 13:07. Filed under Miscellaneous.

Over the past couple of weeks there has been increased postulating about who McCain will pick for VP. On the short list and getting more press as of late, is Tim Pawlenty, Governor of Minnesota.

If you’re not from Minnesota you’re probably asking “who the heck is Tim Pawlenty” and “Should I be happy or scared?” I feel a little bit like Yenta when I say “You could do worse!”

You can see a bit more of Pawlenty’s history here. Of particluar note is that Pawlenty has come out of the southern ‘burbs. This area of Minnesota is known for being conservative’s conservative territory. We’ve elected John Kline (kicking out a longterm, embedded Democrat) for the past 2 terms and likely again this, and supported Bush 55%/45% in ’04 (don’t snicker, remember, this is Minnesota!).

Pawlenty’s political claim to fame includes:

  • Being the House Majority Leader that led tax cuts while surviving Jesse Ventura’s hubris.
  • Being a solid party person as he has twice stepped out of campaigns that he would have been a significant contender, if not winner in, because the Republican party preferred someone else. The most recent of these gave us Norm Coleman as Senator.

So where’s the downside? First, Pawlenty has been completely sucked in by Gorebal Warming. He established the Minnesota Climate Change Advisory Group. These folks have come up with all kinds of good ideas like: basing insurance on the number of miles you drive and adopting the California emmission standards (yeah, the standards that even California can’t adopt). Fortunately, Pawlenty has tossed most of this to the side but the fact that he is even dabbling here tells me that he just can’t avoid looking at the polls.

Second, taxes. Pawlenty has been OK on taxes. As I mentioned, he led the charge to reduce income taxes back when he was Speaker of the House. However, while he has thus far held the line on “no new taxes,” every time an issue of taxes comes up he appears to waffle. Following the collapse of the 1-35W bridge last fall, all people politic were scrambling to figure out how they were going to pay not only for this one but for replacing all a ridiculous number of bridges in the state as “don’t cha know, they’re all falling down.” As the Democrats looked to use the event as an opportunity to raise every tax they could get their hands on i.e. gas tax, sales tax, motor vehicle fees, Pawlenty “reached across the aisle” and intimated that he would be open to an increase in the gas tax. Fast forward to the current session and yes, the Democrats have it all on the board. Because the Democrats control both houses, the increases will pass. The question will be whether a: Pawlenty will veto them and b: whether he will actually rally the Republicans to sustain the veto. My thinking is that “A” will definitely happen and if he really wants to be McCain’s VP “B” had better happen. I don’t think McCain is going to pick someone who is questionable in an area where he is already considered mushy.

Summary, like I said, you could do worse. I view Pawlenty as very McCainesque; he’s a conservative but gee, I wish he was an unquestionable conservative.

Update: Yet another article about Tim Pawlenty.

Who caused the Subprime problem?

by @ 10:34. Filed under Miscellaneous.

The gubmint or the gubmint?

 The “Law of Unintended Consequences” is the only law that seems to be universally enforced. It has no party affiliation!

Does anyone disagree with Mike…….Anyone????

by @ 9:28. Filed under Miscellaneous.

Mike Huckabee thinks he may be killing his political career.   But Huckabee tries to argue that his continuing candidacy is no different than those in history that were decided at the convention.

Huckabee tries to compare his action to Regan’s push against Ford in ’76. Only problem with that is that Ford wasn’t able to get a decisive delegate commitment prior to the convention. Also, Ford won that nomination  ultimately because he was the incumbent. I don’t remember Huckabee being incumbent of the Presidency.

Some of the “Nutcakes for Paul” want to draw an analogy to Lincoln’s ability to win the nomination as a dark horse. No prize their either. The convention of 1860 had no less than 4 viable candidates. Going into the convention the delegates were split along extreme geographical and ideological lines. I suppose Huckabee could claim a sort of a geographical mandate in the south except that McCain has won Florida, Virginia and South Carolina. As to ideology, it’s really hard to see any mandated difference between he and McCain on that front.

Maybe killing your political career? Mike, listen carefully here…

If you’re hope was to be VP, that’s dead. If McCain is consistent on anything it’s that he doesn’t suffer fools gladly. Nor does he suffer those that oppose him gladly. Yes I know you were there to help him in West Virgina but don’t take that as fondness. McCain used you just like he uses conservatives to get what he wants and than toss them aside.

If you’re hope is to take a run a Pres. in ’12 you can forget about that too. You’ve shown you have no more conservative credentials than McCain so you can get the true conservatives. You stand on a psuedo theocratical perspective which tosses the moderates out. The only folks who find you attractive are people who believe the “Baptist Pastor” part of your resume is important.   While it is important for some occupations and many avocations, becoming President isn’t among them.   You don’t have a big enough group to work from.

Finally, here’s the real problem with your future political career. The Rats are eating their own young. Even if one of their candidates gets a majority of delegates prior to their convention there will be a continuing split among them that should allow a unified Republican candidate to drive through. You’re dangerously close to becoming the person viewed as gumming the works for a party unification prior to the Republican convention. If the Republicans remain split going into the convention and lose the general election you will be remembered as key reason for that. People have long memories for folks they think are in it only for their own selfish purposes. If you want to be remembered along side Tonya Harding, as a person who kneecaps their rival because you couldn’t win straight up, keep at it. The only future you will have will be as the answer to a trivia question!

Late predictions

I think my knuckles and knees have healed enough after the January from Hell, so I’ll go out on a limb. As I put up on Hot Air’s prediction thread, I see things shaking out as such:

1st Congressional (far southeast Wisconsin):
Dems – Obama 51%, Clinton 48% (each gets 3 delegates)
Pubs – McCain 54%, Huckabee 44% (McCain gets 3 delegates)

2nd Congressional (Madison and surrounding areas):
Dems – Clinton 50%, Obama 50% (each gets 4 delegates)
Pubs – McCain 52%, Huckabee 42% (McCain gets 3 delegates)

3rd Congressional (southwest Wisconsin):
Dems – Clinton 51%, Obama 48% (each gets 3 delegates)
Pubs – McCain 50%, Huckabee 47% (McCain gets 3 delegates)

4th Congressional (city of Milwaukee and selected high-union suburbs):
Dems – Obama 74%, Clinton 22% (Obama gets 5 delegates, Clinton gets 1)
Pubs – McCain 53%, Huckabee 43% (McCain gets 3 delegates)

5th Congressional (north and northwest suburbs of Milwaukee; includes 2 of the most-Republican counties in the country):
Dems – Clinton 52%, Obama 47% (Clinton gets 3 delegates, Obama 2)
Pubs – McCain 56%, Huckabee 42% (McCain gets 3 delegates)

6th Congressional (east-central Wisconsin):
Dems – Clinton 56%, Obama 42% (Clinton gets 3 delegates, Obama 2)
Pubs – McCain 52%, Huckabee 46% (McCain gets 3 delegates)

7th Congressional (northwest Wisconsin):
Dems – Obama 50%, Clinton 49% (each get 3 delegates)
Pubs – McCain 49%, Huckabee 40%, Paul 10% (only district Paul gets anywhere near double-digits, McCain gets 3 delegates)

8th Congressional (northeast Wisconsin):
Dems – Obama 51%, Clinton 49% (each get 3 delegates)
Pubs – McCain 52%, Huckabee 46% (McCain gets 3 delegates)

Statewide:
Dems – Obama 52%, Clinton 46% (Obama gets 14 at-large delegates to get 39 total, Clinton gets 12 at-large delegates to get 35 total)
Pubs – McCain 53%, Huckabee 43%, Paul 4% (McCain gets 16 at-large delegates to get all 40 total)

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]