define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true); define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true); No Runny Eggs

No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

August 9, 2009

White House not disavowing “disinformation” snitch-line

by @ 19:16. Filed under Politics - National.

Gabriel Malor has noticed that, unlike past acts that have caused a furor, the White House is not disavowing the 1984-ish health-care snitch-line and blaming it on a low-level staffer. He wonders, then, how high the approval went:

When I first heard that the White House was encouraging people to snitch on their neighbors, I assumed this was something cooked up by a low-level staffer in the communications office trying to justify his job. The Obama Administration has been plagued by staffers and advisers who speak in his name only to have him or Rahm Emanuel come along and correct their “inartful” statements later. (Some examples from the last year.)

Generally, it has been a failure of leadership. The Obama folks are running around without supervision and when they don’t have a minder looking over their shoulder their Far Left impulses tend to show. Hence, Snitch Central.

Or so I was assuming. But consider the Scare Force One fiasco. It should never have happened and was quickly disavowed as soon as people protested. A low-level staffer gets blamed and the whole thing is quickly forgotten–by the White House, at least.

But that hasn’t happened this time.

Do read the whole thing.

(Cross-posted from Public Secrets)

August 8, 2009

Yes Actually, We Would Like a Meeting!

Another town hall, another Democrat melt down. Watch as Georgia Congressman David Scott goes on a rant because one of his constituents happened to ask him a question about health care:

Apparently, only people who agree with Congressman Scott can be counted as his constituents!

In this extended version you can see Congressman Scott lean to his aide to ask whether the plan asked about is the one being considered by Congress…he’s told yes. Apparently Congressman Scott hasn’t read the legislation either.

August 7, 2009

People are not automatons….

by @ 22:50. Filed under Politics - National.

First time in years I’ve agreed with Peggy Noonan:

What has been most unsettling is not the congressmen’s surprise but a hard new tone that emerged this week. The leftosphere and the liberal commentariat charged that the town hall meetings weren’t authentic, the crowds were ginned up by insurance companies, lobbyists and the Republican National Committee. But you can’t get people to leave their homes and go to a meeting with a congressman (of all people) unless they are engaged to the point of passion. And what tends to agitate people most is the idea of loss—loss of money hard earned, loss of autonomy, loss of the few things that work in a great sweeping away of those that don’t.

People are not automatons. They show up only if they care.

And they’re not Nazis or insurance-company stooges, either. Read the whole thing. It’s a good one.

(Cross-posted at Public Secrets)

Flag or Flagg@WhiteHouse.gov?

by @ 10:20. Filed under Miscellaneous.

During this past week, the grass roots fervor against health care reform has stepped up. It’s no longer possible for a Congressperson or Senator to have a townhall meeting without this issue being at the forefront. If the particular legislature attempts to support the health care reform in any way, they are challenged directly. In some cases, the idiocy of their defense has been met with derisive and dismissive laughter.

This week, President Obama became very concerned that you’re not getting the straight scoop on health care reform.  He’s so concerned that he sent Linda Douglass out to tell you that just because the President said something at one time, it doesn’t mean he’d stand by it today. 

Because it’s not about him but about you, President Obama is asking you to help him identify and ferret out misinformation about his health care reform.  To that end, the White House has established an email address for you to send information; name, address, social security number, the normal stuff, about any website or email that has “fishy” information about health care reform.  The email address for reporting your friends and neighbors is Flag@whitehouse.gov.  Of course, the information is being gathered only so that President Obama can get you correctly educated.

When I heard about the “flag” email address, I immediately thought it was spelled “Flagg.”

Of all the various characters that came and went during the run of MASH, one that I really enjoyed was a character known as Colonel Flagg.

Colonel Flagg was an Army intelligence officer.  Overzealous and egotistical are just a couple of words that describe Colonel Flagg.  Each time that Colonel Flagg showed up he was on some mission that was required to preserve “The American way of life.” 

Flagg’s investigations were typically focused on some conspiratorial endeavor.  Typically, the conspiracy existed only in Flagg’s mind.  Flagg’s episodes often ended with Hawkeye or Trapper turning Flagg’s conspiracy theory against him, often sending him out of the camp as a likely target of some other intelligence officer’s investigation.

The Democrat’s health care reform efforts have been thrown so far off message and so taken aback by the notion that their subjects are not acquiescing to they omnipotence of Democrat leadership, they’ve resorted to name calling against those who dare to challenge them.  “Nazis,” “Astroturf,” “Brooks Brothers” are just some of the phrases being used in attempt to create the notion of a conspiracy of rightwingers as the source for the dissent on health care reform. 

Like Colonel Flagg, the only conspiracy that the Democrats have to fight is the one created in their own minds.  Like Col. Flagg, facts showing that there is no conspiracy are no stumbling block for the Democrats.  As Hawkeye and Trapper often did, I propose we turn the Democrat’s imagined conspiracy against them. 

President Obama is looking for “fishy” information being dispelled about health care reform.  Might I suggest that each of us send an email to Flag with a link to the House bill being proposed.  I can’t think of anything more fishy than that smelly, rotting, pile of garbage.  To make it easy, here’s the link to the bill:  http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h3200/text.

Oh, an just in case you’re worried that the White House may be compiling some sort of an enemies list with the “flag” information, I don’t think you have to worry about it.  President Obama ascribes to the same practice as Colonel Flagg when he said, 

We’ve got files on people who haven’t even been born.

August 6, 2009

If the job is too tough, then quit

Now we have another congressman whining about actually having to read bills before voting on them. First it was Representative John “You gotta be kidding” Conyers, and now it’s New Hampshire Democrat Paul Hodes telling the editorial board of the Nashua Telegraph to get real:

Democratic Rep. Paul Hodes (NH-02) believes reading every bill in Congress “would slow down the business of Congress to a crawl and it would be hard to get done what needs to be done.”

Members of Congress who don’t read the bills they are voting on “is not necessarily the major problem with the way Congress functions,” he said.

Hodes, who is the sole Democratic candidate in the race to replace the retiring New Hampshire Sen. Judd Gregg, made the remarks during a recent editorial board meeting with the Nashua Telegraph.

“Hodes said it’s not realistic to expect members of Congress to read every bill word-for-word, as Congress took more than 2,000 votes in the session that ended in December,” the paper reports.

This year, Hodes voted in support of President Barack Obama’s stimulus package and for so-called cap-and-trade legislation. Both measures were finalized late in the legislative process and rushed to a vote before any individual member could read the bills.

I don’t know. Maybe I’ve got this whole representative democracy thing wrong. Am I silly to think someone I choose to run the government for me should actually understand the choices he makes, rather than push the voting buttons at random? By Mr. Hodes’ logic, why even show up at committee hearings to ask questions and hear witnesses? That’s got to be awfully hard, too, on the poor, overworked congresscritters.

Look, I don’t expect them to read every single bill that comes before the chamber, but on matters as consequential as a $787 billion “emergency” stimulus bill, or health-care reforms and cap-and-trade measures that aim to establish federal control over vast swathes of the economy… You’re damn right I expect Hodes & Co. to read and understand the bills, or recuse themselves from voting on it!

And maybe they should resign, too, if that’s too much to ask of them. Waiting

(via Hot Air)

On a related note, Iowahawk again turns over his blog to a guest-editorial, this time from Health and Human Services Secretary Secretary Kathleen Sibelius and Democratic Republican Democratic Senator Arlen Specter on a growing crisis in America – that America’s Government Losing Faith in Out-of-Touch Constituents:

Nowhere has this disturbing trend been more evident than in the recent debate over health care reform. Like hundreds of our fellow legislators and government officials, we recently traveled to a town hall meeting to distribute a grassroots press release explaining why this critical legislation is a done deal. Our advance staffs said that should anticipate a respectful, positive hearing from local media and bused-in union members. Instead we were greeted by a rude howling mob of idiot “voters” who refused to listen to reason, and ruined what should have been a killer photo op for our re-election ad campaign.

Have these arrogant ivory tower armchair quarterbacks ever had to live with the pressures of being a working stiff Senator or Cabinet Secretary in Washington DC? Have they ever had to juggle markup language on a supplemental appropriations bill, or deal with an incompetent Chief of Staff who constantly double-books fund raising dinners? Apparently not, if their whiny obnoxious chants are any indication. “Read the Bill! Read the Bill!” blah, blah, blah, as if we weren’t already exhausted from writing and voting for the damned thing.

Mockery. It’s what makes American politics great. Hee hee

(Cross-posted from Public Secrets, my usual home.)

August 5, 2009

Ouch! That’s Going to Leave a Mark

by @ 9:32. Filed under Obama worship, Politics - National.

Rasmussen Reports has the latest results of the generic Congressional Ballot.  The latest results show the Republicans with a 5 point spread:  Democrats 38%, Republicans 43%.

While the latest Rasmussen results are bad for the Democrats, it gets even worse:

Women who have consistently favored Democrats now prefer the GOP by a 40% to 39% margin. Men continue to favor Republicans over Democrats 47% to 36%.

 And:

Voters not affiliated with either party prefer Republicans two-to-one – 43% to 22%.

Weren’t women and independents the reason that Obama and the Democrats won in November?

Obama better hope that African Americans “stay solid.”  If not, Jimmy Carter will no longer be the worst President of modern times!

Ah, We Don’t Know That…

by @ 9:02. Filed under Economy, Politics - National.

Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood is cheerleading for the CARS program. As the Senate gears up to consider whether to pump more money into the bailout program, Lahood is crowing about the success of CARS:

“the government has proved we can get money out the door and sell almost 160,000 cars.”

Really?

Congress and various news agencies have been requesting information about the CARS program.  To date, no information has been provided.  Over the weekend, when LaHood was asked whether and when, the transportation department would release information related to CARS he replied:

“I can’t think of any reason why we wouldn’t do it.”

Apparently LaHood and others also thought of any reason to or how to release information about CARS.

LaHood can continue to crow but at this point, we have nothing, other than the word of an Obama administration official, as to whether this program is successful or not.  I think we’ve all learned this week just how much we can trust the assertion of any Obama administration official!

While we don’t know whether the program is a success or not, under ANY definition, we can conclude that at least part of LaHood’s assessment is faulty:

“the government has proved we can get money out the door and sell almost 160,000 cars.”

Well, no, actually you can’t prove that nor have you been successful at it!  As simple as the CARS program is, the government was completely unprepared to administer the program.  To date, there is still a significant number of applications for CARS that have not been processed and confirmed.  This is probably part of the reason why they can’t  get reports to Congress!

In case you didn’t notice…

by @ 6:00. Filed under The Blog.

…and given the lack of posts from me, you probably didn’t, I’m out canoeing the wilds of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. I leave you in the capable hands of Shoebox and all the guest-bloggers over on your left (or in the Authors section if you’re viewing this on mobile).

I will technically be back in comms sometime late on the 13th, but I have a very-short turnaround to a weekend trip to Pittsburgh. Most-likely, you won’t see much of me until Monday. However, I do invite you to enjoy the rest of the gang propping me up (as usual).

Evidence of North Korea Torturing Captives!

by @ 5:16. Filed under Miscellaneous.

Euna Lee and Laura Ling, two American journalists were sentenced to 12 years of hard labor after being accused of illegal entry and engaging in “hostile acts” by the government of North Korea.

After a brief personal visit and plea by former President Bill Clinton, the North Korean leader Kim Jong Il pardoned the women from their 12-year prison sentences.

Following their pardons, the two women were reported to have left North Korea accompanying former President Clinton on his private flight to Los Angeles.

Based on the events of the past 48 hours we now know that North Korea tortured these women with some form of mind incapacitating drugs or techniques.

How else would you explain two women volunteering to be confined for over 20 hours in an inescapable metal tube with Bill Clinton?

August 4, 2009

Must-read while I’m on vacation – Michelle Malkin’s Culture of Corruption

by @ 23:07. Filed under Miscellaneous.

I wanted to finish Michelle Malkin’s latest book, Culture of Corruption, before I went off canoeing. Instead, various things intruded, and I made it to Ray LaHood, Earmark Man. Still, I highly recommend you heading over to Amazon or your favorite local bookstore, and ordering it while I’m on vacation.

She chronicles many of the players in the most-corrupt beginning of an administration in recent memory, starting with describing Obama Nominee Withdrawal Syndrome, going through the Bitter Half, blasting through Plugs, skewering the members of the Cabinet that didn’t withdraw, dances through the czars (or more properly, the commissars), runs down the Mad Money Men, hunts the union label, pops some ObamACORN, and closes with some fresher Clinton stuff.

Some random quotes to whet your appetite:

  • (Following a list of those “Achievatrons” who withdrew their nominations after problems) – And those were just some of the bodies thrown under the bus before the 100-day mark. Heckuvajob, Obama vetters!
  • You never get a second chance to make a first post-inaugural impression. Less than three weeks into his first 100 days, Barack Obama left indelible marks on his nascent presidency: the marks of incompetence and hubris.
  • (A subtitle in the chapter on “The other Michelle”) – Earmarks and Edifice Complex
  • (A ditty to the tune of something from Sesame Street at the end of that chapter) – Oh, these are cronies in Michelle and Barry’s neighborhood.
    They’re the people that they met (and did business with, and socialized with, and traded favors with) each day,…. (note; we need to get The Ventilators back together)
  • Like the Naked Emperor of Hope and Change in the Oval Office, the Court Jester of Reform in the vice president’s office has no clothes.

There will be a test when I finally get back in normal comms (just kidding, I think). I could cheat and speed-read in the couple hours I’ll be conscious between the canoe trip and RightOnline, but I definitely will be taking it with me to Pittsburgh.

Listen to What I Say, Not What I Said!

I pointed out yesterday the video in which President Obama states that he fully believes private insurance will be eliminated, in time, by the public insurance he is advocating.  Apparently this video caught the White House’s attention.

Later yesterday, the White House released a video intended to counteract the earlier video.  In this video, Linda Douglass tells us that the previous video was put together by people who are “trying to scare us” about health care reform.  She also tells us that because President Obama talks to sooooooo many people about health care it is easy to take a snippet here or a snippet there and present them “out of context.”

Hmmmm, “out of context.”

Would that be “out of context” like the President who told us that he didn’t agree with the positions of Jeremiah Wright’s black theology but when presented with a case in which he knew none of the facts he said that the white Cambridge police sergeant acted “stupidly?”

Or, would that be “out of context” like the President who told us that all important legislation would be posted on the Internet for several days before his signature so that everyone could read it.  Except that none of the important legislation has been posted before signature because everything in this administration is an emergency.

Or, would that be “out of context” like the President who told us he would not have any lobbyists in his administration and now the fastest growing segment of job growth seems to be back filling positions for lobbyists that have been hired into his administration?

Or, would that be “out of context” like Summers and Geithner increasing taxes even though Obama says no one under $250K will get an increase?  Oh, wait, that one hasn’t happened……YET

Or, would that be “out of context” like members of Congress and the President himself, telling us that many of the things that we read in the health care reform bill aren’t really in there but when those items are specifically addressed with amendments they are wholly rejected.

Folks, we went through an entire campaign with Obama telling us that what he said in his past is not who he was today.  Many people bought into that theory.  Some bought into it to the point of deluding themselves to believe that Obama would govern as a centrist rather than the far left ideologue he had always been.

If the video was really cherry picked and out of context, wouldn’t it be pretty easy for the White House to get the original video and release.  America has tired of Obama’s takeover attempt but still remains a country that understands a set up when it sees one.  Don’t hold your breath, the video won’t be coming.

I guess when it comes to what Obama really believes about private health insurance in comes down to that old saying:

Who are you going to believe, Linda Douglass or your lying eyes?

Update:  8/4 2:10 PM by ShoeboxSo, out of context huh?  They can make him say anything they want if they just take snippets huh?  How about a full uncut version?

H/T Drudge

Hide and Seek with Obama Care

As the protests heat up a new tact has been taken by several of the offending electing officials.  When confronted with specifics about the bill circulating in the House some members of Congress and President Obama himself, attempt to claim that because the bill is final the interpretations that people are making of the language are invalid because they aren’t based on “final language.”  “Things could change” seems to be the line that these Congressional folks want to hold to.

Not hardly.

Heritage.Org goes through the recent mark up by the House Ways and Means Committee.  As a part of their review they look at several amendments that were proposed, their potential impact on the legislation and the result of the vote on the amendment.  Each of the amendments were intended to specifically address one of the issues that the offending Congressional folks are trying to tell us “isn’t in there.”  Let’s have a look at a few.

  • An amendment was offered that would eliminate Obama care if people on the public plan had average wait times for medical procedures that were longer than for people on private plans.  The amendment was defeated by the Democrats on a straight party-line vote.
  • An amendment was offered that would ensure that illegal immigrants would not gain access to Obama care.  The ammendment was defeated by the Democrats on a straight party-line vote
  • An amendment was offered that would require members of Congress to forfeit their coverage under the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.  This amendment was defeated by the Democrats.
  • An amendment was offered that would guarantee that HSA plans would be private plans that would be eligible for future enrollment.  The amendment was defeated by the Democrats
  • An amendment was offered that would keep abortions from being mandated as required coverage in Obama care.  A separate amendment was offered that would prevent tax money from being used to provide abortions.  Both amendments were defeated by the Democrats.

There were several other amendments offered, all defeated by the Democrats.

Funny, when challenged with their own language the Congressional cowards hide behind the notion that the language “could change.”  When challenged in committee to clarify the language and say specifically what they mean, they just hide.

What Else to Learn From CARS

I posted last week and Steve followed up here with things we could learn from “The Keystone Cops sells autos,” also known as CARS.  Today, another painful lesson is being learned in the CARS fiasco that can be directly applied to the health care take over.

CARS started July 25th, by last Friday it had been essentially halted.  The CARS program ran an entire 7 days.  Since last Friday government bureaucrats have been pontificating, arguing, pointing fingers, chest puffing and all the other things that bureaucrats do.  Bureaucrats have been doing everything except fixing the program.  The bureaucrats have now spent 50% as much time as the program actually ran debating whether the program should continue, in what form, how to fund it etc.  In the meantime, automobile dealers and potential purchasers are wondering when, if and how they may be able to get their deal done.

Roll forward five years.  Obama national health has been passed and we are in the second full year of its implementation.  Eighteen months into the full implementation of Obama care it becomes apparent that the budget Congress has allotted for Obama care is inadequate.  Let’s say that the amount needed to fund the program is double the original estimate (like what happened to Massachusetts Care) which means Congress needs to debate additional funding.   

Because the “solution” to the funding problem is not obvious on the horizon hospitals, doctors and other health care providers don’t know what will happen to their payments and reimbursements.  Because they don’t know how they will be paid they start slowing work or delaying admissions, a perfectly logical response and one which Medicaid patients have lots of experiences with to say that it does happen.

Finally, imagine you have a surgery scheduled.  Oh, it’s not life threatening.  You don’t have cancer, your heart isn’t about to stop.  No, it’s not life threatening, it’s just a kidney stone that needs to be removed.  How many days will you be willing to wait while Congress debates how they will pay your doctor to do your removal?

None?  Yeah, me neither.  That’s one more reason I like to have say in my health care.

August 3, 2009

Schizophrenic or Flat Out Liar?

President Obama continues to campaign for the health care reform bill.  He continues to tell people that he won’t get in between them and their doctor.  He tells people that this isn’t a government take over of health care. 

Just as the left can’t look at a simple document like the Constitution and understand the implication of plain language, The Kool-aid drinkers continue to argue about what the definition of is is rather than understanding the implications of the plain language of the health care bill.  Note the comment exchange on this post as evidence of the blindfolded obedience the Obamabots have given The Won in support of owning health care.

So, is The Won looking to take over health care or not?  The Bots say no, we say yes.  How about we let The Won himself tell us:

Huh, at one time he said definitely yes, today he says no. In my view that leaves him either as a schizophrenic or just your common, every day, garden variety liar. The sad part is that just like all of the numerous issues raised during last year’s campaign, the media will yawn and say “nothing to see here. Move along!”

Health Care Reform – Arguing Inconsistently

A day hasn’t gone by in the past two weeks, and likely won’t for several weeks to come, where the President or some other proponent of “health care reform” speaks to constituents about their plan.  While the specific arguments for reform that are highlighted may vary from group to group, an argument included in each presentation that by implementing health care reform, health care costs will be reduced.

In economic terms a “cost” is:

Valuation in terms of money of (1) effort, (2) material, (3) resources, (4) time and utilities consumed, (5) risks incurred, and (6) opportunity forgone in production and delivery of a good or service.

in other words, a “cost” is something that goes into making a product or service.  By definition, because a “cost” is a component of a product or service, the only entity that can make a determination as to what “costs” to include in a particular product or service is an entity that has control over the production of that product or service.

If you think about it for just a minute, the fact that you can only control costs if you control the production of the particular product or service is common sense.  If I want to buy a boat I can negotiate with the seller about the price I will pay for the boat.  However, no matter how hard I negotiate, I can’t impact the amount that it cost to produce that boat.  If I want to hire an accountant I can negotiate the price I am willing to pay for their service but I can’t impact what that person paid for their education or the opportunity value of their specialized knowledge.

Just as it is true that you must have control over the production of a product or service in order to impact its cost, it is also generally true that the greater control you have over an item the greater ability you have to control the final cost of that item.  If you make a component for the boat we discussed earlier you have an ability to impact the cost of the boat by making your component less expensive.  However, no matter how large or small the component you make you will never have as much control over the cost of the boat as the company who does the final assembly of the boat. 

Again, if we think for a moment, the reason the final assembler of the boat has the greatest amount of control over the cost of the boat is common sense.  If one of the component makers adjusts the price of their component to a point where the boat assembler believes the price to be uneconomic, the boat assembler can choose from several options including finding another component maker, developing the ability to make the component themselves or even eliminate the component from the boat.  Each of these options has the ability to change the cost of the boat and in each case the assembler has final veto power over which of the options will be chose and its impact on the final cost of the boat.

Along with reducing costs, there is another argument that gets made in an effort to sell the health care reform program; the government won’t get between you and your doctor.

Let’s think about that for a minute.

Earlier we determined that you can’t impact or reduce the price of something unless you have some control over it.  We also know that the ability to control the cost of something is relational to the amount of control you have over that something.  How is it then that the government will reduce health care costs but not have control over health care?

It’s not possible.

The only way for the government to “bend the curve” on health care costs is to exert control over health care.  There is no way for the “reformers” to reduce costs without control.  Oh, they may not employ doctors and nurses directly but they don’t have to.  The government can control health care by controlling how, how much and for what, health care providers get paid.  Worse, with an additional 10% – 15% being added to total expenditures, “bending the curve” will not get the job done.  In order to have a meaningful change there will have to be significant reductions in costs.  The only way to make significant changes on costs is to have significant control.

Two arguments; reduce costs and not control.  The two can’t happen together.  Whether it’s specified in the current bill or not, which of the two do you think will give?  I have my choice!

August 1, 2009

What can we learn from CARS, Part II

by @ 11:47. Filed under Business, Politics - National.

Yesterday, Shoebox explored the early drain of the “Cash for Clunkers” program. Allow me to take it a slightly-different direction.

Last week, Edmunds estimated that car/light truck sales for July would be roughly 950,000. Given that the “Cash for Clunkers” program was designed to get 250,000 new cars into the hands of those that were driving “clunkers”, does anybody really believe that one out of every four car sales this month involves a vehicle traded in surrendered to the government shredding machine that would both qualify for the program and make economic sense?

Related to that, I wonder how many people are going to flip their new cars and buy something they really want. Prime example – you’re ready to move up from a 1996 Honda Passport EX 4WD (private-party value of $1,817, trade-in value of $1,194; all numbers from Edmunds and, other than a mileage adjustment for the Aveo5 trade-in, unadjusted) for a 2004 Honda Pilot EX (private-party value of $12,886, dealer-retail value of $13,914). Normally, if you’d go through the dealer process, you’d have to come up with, before tax/title/etc., $12,730.

Thanks to the “Cash for Clunkers” deal, there’s a money-saving way to do that. First, you walk into a Chevrolet dealer, divest yourself of the Passport, and pick up a new 2009 Chevrolet Aveo5 1LT (MSRP $14,820, “True-Market Value” price of $14,315, less an existing $1,000 rebate makes it about $13,315 before the $4,500 “Cash for Clunkers” credit). That means, again before tax/title/etc. (which is a bit more this time in most states because they add more fees to new-car transactions), you’re ponying up $8,815. You then drive to the used-car dealer with that 2004 Honda Pilot EX, give your $11,010 for trading in the Aveo and $2,904 in cash (plus tax/title again) to the dealer, and drive out with the Pilot. Thanks to the bipartisan Party-In-Government and us the suck…er, taxpayers, you’re paying roughly $1,000 less for that two-step transaction than you would otherwise have paid. It just gets worse for the taxpayer if you’re willing to do the second part yourself rather than going through the dealer.

Exit question that I’m sure nobody in the House bothered to ask before they authorized another $2 billion to be thrown down this hole – what’s going to happen in a few months when a lot of these people stop making their monthly payments? After all, there is a reason why they were driving “clunkers” rather than buying a nice $10,000 used car – they couldn’t afford even that.

Atta Boy Al!

The three greatest lies ever told:

  1. Barack Obama is a centrist. Um no!
  2. I’ll love you in the morning
  3. Al Franken has the demeanor to be a Senator.

Good ol’ Al.  It took him less than a month to confirm for all the world that he is the egotistical bore.  This is something  that people who actually take note of candidates and don’t just look for an “R” or a “D” behind a name on a voting ballot, knew quite some time ago.  

Here’s the account from the Politico:

Five years after he put his money behind the Swift Boat ads that helped tank John Kerry’s presidential campaign, Senate Democrats gave T. Boone Pickens a warm welcome at their weekly policy lunch Thursday.

Or at least most of them did.

Kerry skipped the regularly scheduled lunch; his staff said the Massachusetts Democrat “was unable to attend because he had a long scheduled lunch with his interns and pages.”

Sen. Al Franken managed to make time for the lunch — but then let Pickens have it afterward.

According to a source, the wealthy oil and gas magnate and author of “The First Billion Is the Hardest” stepped up to introduce himself to Franken in a room just off the Senate Floor after the lunch ended

Franken, who was seated talking to someone else, did not stand when Pickens said hello. Instead, Franken began to berate him about the billionaire’s financing of the Swift Boat ads in 2004.

According to a source, the confrontation grew heated.

The incident highlights not only Franken’s inability to control his emotions but also his lack of intellectual capability.  While his emotion may have led him to despise the methods that Picken’s supported, a minuscule amount of intellect would have told him that if John Kerry isn’t able to disprove the facts of the Swift boat ads then he ought to keep his nose out of it.  The problem with Al is like all folks on the Left who’s ability to reason facts ends with “this is how I want it to be,” Al couldn’t let the facts get in his way.

I remember cringing the night that Jesse Ventura was elected Governor of Minnesota.  I knew, having looked into Jesse’s history as mayor that his ego and inability to control his emotion, was going to make his term fun to watch.  However, I also knew that these same items were going to severely his ability to be any kind of an effective leader for the state.  Seeing Al Franken sworn in as Senator is Jesse Ventura Deja Vu all over again!

July 31, 2009

The LA Police Acting “Stupidly”?

Or the natives are even more restlesser?

Police called on retirees at senator’s LA office

What can we Learn From CARS?

I learned a lot working on the cars of my youth.  Through experiences, some coached by my Dad, I became a pretty fair diagnoser and mechanic  parts replacer.  I worked on them through the 80’s model years as things started getting more complicated.  By model years of the mid 90’s there was hardly anything I could get at without highly specialized tools, arms that had no less than 4 joints or an MBA in autos.  I realized that the job had gotten more complicated than what I could focus on or had time for so I turned it over to the professionals.

This morning it’s being reported that CARS, Car Allowance Rebate System or the “Cash for clunkers program” has likely run out of money and will be shut down. 

Didn’t the CARS program just get launched?  Yes it did!

The program launched July 25th and was expected to last until November 1st.  It appears that the money has been used so fast that what was supposed to last 90+ days, won’t last 9 days!  In typical government response, rather than saying “oops, we screwed up” they say:

“assess the situation facing what is obviously an incredibly popular program. Auto dealers and consumers should have confidence that all valid CARS transactions that have taken place to date will be honored.”

In other words, “we screwed up and are looking for a way to put lipstick on this pig!”

So what can we learn from CARS?

First, the government has no ability to guage, estimate and appropriately fund, even a simple program like CARS.  They had $1 billion slated for this program to support the sale of 250,000 cars.  There are 23,000 auto dealers.  That means that each car dealership was alloted the average of 11 cars to be sold under this program.  With $4,500 going out for each vehicle does it even pass the smell test that it would take longer than 3 months for the average dealer to sell 11 vehicles under this program?  Actually, I’m surprised the program has lasted 6 days with all of the advertising and pre notice their was on this program.

Second, the government really doesn’t know if they are out of money or not.  They know that about 25,000 cars have been sold under this program, they are estimating the remainder.  The estimation is required because there are:

large backlogs in the processing of the deals in the government system.

This is incredible!  how difficult is it to track these sales?  Beyond name, address, vin of the vehicle you traded in and the one you bought and verification of the qualifying vehicles (another story to be told as the list changed daily), how much is required? 

Finally, the solution, as with all government programs is not to say “we screwed up.”  The solution being proposed is to throw even more money at the government screw up:

Lawmakers said they would try to find additional funding for the program, which under the legislation could grow to $4 billion for the funding of up to 1 million new car sales.

The government can’t successfully administer a program like CARS but continue to insist that they can run the entire medical industry. 

The government can’t manage a budget of $1 billion but claim to be able to manage a budget that is at least 16% of our entire economy.

Finally, the government can’t develop a demand curve for a few vehicles, missing it by a factor of multiple X, but assuredly tell us that they know that they will only spend $1.6 Trillion extra to take over all of health care…Yeah right!

I learned through my experiences, that there is a time for amatures to step aside and let the professionals handle the job.  During this recess we need to be telling our Congressional amatures to step aside and medical professionals handle their job!

Ouch!

When even the New York Slimes can ‘t jury rig a poll to get the results close to favorable you know your plan is in trouble….BIG trouble!

The New York Times/CBS poll shows:

  • Sixty-nine percent of respondents believe Obama’s plan will hurt the quality of their own healthcare. 
  • Seventy-three percent believe it would limit their access to tests and treatment. 
  • Sixty-two percent believe Democrats’ proposals would require them to change doctors. 
  • Seventy-six believe healthcare reform will lead to them paying higher taxes. 
  • A whopping 77 percent expect their healthcare costs to rise.

Not only is this not close, this is a landslide against The Won’s policy.  This explains why Barry has been a bit off his game and testier than normal as of late.

July 30, 2009

Good-bye FeedDemon, hello RSS Bandit

by @ 21:15. Filed under The Blog.

I started using FeedDemon as my RSS reader shortly after I signed up for NewsGator to help Sister Toldjah troubleshoot some problems she had with NewsGator Online. For a long time, it worked rather well. Lately, FeedDemon, actually its underlying NewsGator Online interface, had not been updating nearly as often as it should. I stuck with it because that was still the best RSS reader I knew.

Now, however, a pair of items has caused me to dump FeedDemon entirely. First, NewsGator Online is disappearing. That means that FeedDemon will instead be synchronizing with Google Reader, and if I ever bothered to fire up the NewsGator Go on the “smart”phone, that would be no more.

That’s all well and good because Google Reader updates far more reliably than NewsGator has lately, except the second change as part of FeedDemon caused me to dump it entirely. There is now a rather large and obtrusive rotating ad as part of the new software, with no real plans to take it out (supposedly the creator of FeedDemon is considering removing it from a paid version, but with these economic times, I’d rather not pay).

Fortunately, there is an answer that will allow me to keep things synched between at least between the desktop and the laptop – RSS Bandit. It’s not quite as convenient as FeedDemon was, but it gets the job done. Bonus item that I missed when I finally abandoned SharpReader – it shows link relationships.

Yes, the internal browser uses the IE engine rather than the Firefox one, but that’s the breaks.

Embargoed!

by @ 14:08. Filed under Obama worship, Politics - National.

One of the advantages of working with a blogging powerhouse like No Runny Eggs is the vast number of relationships that NRE has throughout all levels of the Federal and various State’s governments.  One of the benefit of these relationships is that on occasion, we receive advance copies of press releases, speeches and prepared statements.  Typically when we receive one of these advance copies they will be embargoed.  Embargoed simply means that we can’t share the information with the public until after a date and time that is specified on the document.

President Obama, Henry Gates and Officer Crowley will be meeting this evening.  They’ll be having a beer and discussing race relations.  The White House staff has already sent out a press release as a follow up to the meeting.  This piece has been embargoed until 7:30 PM Eastern but with the increased concern that President Obama has with race relations I think it’s important for you to get this information sooner rather than later:

Press Release

Office of the President of the United States

Embargoed until July 30, 2009  7:30 PM Eastern

Following his meeting with the distinguished professor Henry Gates and Sargent James Crowley, President Obama had the following comments:

“Today I met with the distinguished professor Henry Gates and Sargent James Crowley.  We each had a beer.

Professor Gates had a Red Stripe, Sargent Crowley had a Blue Moon and I had a Bud Lite.

We talked about the incident that Professor Gates and Sargent Crowley were involved in.  We talked about my comments on the incident.  Each of us agreed that the other two could have done a better job.

We all feel good about our discussions and I am particularly pleased with how my Presidency has been able to move the discussion of race relations to this point of closure.  In fact, I’m so pleased with our progress, that as it regards my goals of solving race relation problems during my Presidency, I am happy to declare:”

Mission Accomplished

Beer, Brilliant!

by @ 10:13. Filed under Obama worship, Politics - National.

Today’s the day that President Obama, Henry Gates and Officer Crowley will sit at a picnic table on the White House lawn and sip beers.

This may be the biggest risk of Obama’s young administration.

As I posted yesterday, Rasumussen Reports shows that a plurality of Americans believe that President Obama sees our society as something other than the fair, open society that most Americans believe it is.  President Obama reinforced that perception in his original response to the Gates situation.  As a result of this perception, President Obama will walk a very very fine line during his meeting.

If President Obama is perceived to have gone “over the thin blue line” as he addresses Officer Crowley he will further reinforce people’s perception that he ascribes to the vitriolic rhetoric of Jeremiah Wright and as we’ve now learned, statements made by Henry Gates himself.  If Obama is perceived to have not supported a “brotha in the struggle” he risks putting a chink in the solid support the African American community has provided him thus far. 

As an aside, the last group Obama can’t afford losing support from is the African American community.  As Rasmussen reports Obama now has his lowest favorability and highest negative ratings to date.  The only group who hasn’t started to defect from him are African Americans.  If they start to slide, hello 40% favorability rating, goodbye Obama agenda!

If Obama comes out of his beer bash with nothing but “we laughed, we cried, we drank beer,” he will be seen as having responded to his own stupid gaff with nothing more than another self focused media moment. 

Regardless of what does or doesn’t happen at this meeting, this was a dumb idea.  In the world of politics you need to look at the value of each engagement asking “What is the upside” and “What is the downside”.  In the case of this meeting, there is very little, if any upside and more than a modest opportunity to further harm his polling numbers.

Obama has proven time and again that he believes his personality and persona can save him from any real challenge or difficulty.  Responding, “Beer?  Brilliant!” when this meeting was suggested may be a response he’ll look back on and wish he hadn’t said.

Open Thread Thursday – EAA edition

by @ 6:43. Filed under Open Thread Thursday.

I’m headed up to EAA AirVenture with a few good friends, Asian Badger, Chad Hohner and Nick Schweitzer. If everything doesn’t get completely soaked, I should have some pics up either at the end of the day or (more likely) tomorrow.

Good thing it’s Thursday; that means it’s Open Thread Thursday where I try to get you to call the shots and pick up on what Shoebox and I have missed.

July 29, 2009

Wednesday Hot Read – Michelle Malkin’s “Bully boys: A brief history of White House thuggery”

by @ 14:32. Filed under Politics - National.

Michelle Malkin has a lengthy overview of the ways the ObamiNation has tried to shut up its critics. The open regarding the Congressional Budget Office illustrates what the Chicago Way really is:

Six months into the Obama administration, it should now be clear to all Americans: Hope and Change came to the White House wrapped in brass knuckles.

Ask the Congressional Budget Office. Last week, President Obama spilled the beans on the Today Show that he had met with CBO director Douglas Elmendorf – just as the number-crunchers were casting ruinous doubt on White House cost-saving claims. Yes, question the timing. The CBO is supposed to be a neutral score-keeper – not a water boy for the White House. But when the meeting failed to stop the CBO from issuing more analysis undercutting the health care savings claims, Obama’s budget director Peter Orszag played the heavy.

Orszag warned the CBO in a public letter that it risked feeding the perception that it was “exaggerating costs and underestimating savings.” Message: Leave the number-fudging to the boss. Capiche?

With a tip of the cap to Dafydd ab Hugh, we can add one more item – the stripping of diplomatic visas from members of Honduras’ government (which Ed Morrissey notes was done at the urging of the dictator-wannabe Mel Zelaya), while at the same time considering diplomatic outreach to the Taliban. Dafydd also has the motto of the ObamiNation – “Keep your enemies close, and your mortal enemies actually in bed with you.”

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]