No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

Archive for the 'War' Category

December 27, 2007

Pakistan blowing up

by @ 7:47. Filed under Politics, War on Terror.

CNN is reporting former Pakistani Prime Minister Benzair Bhutto was assassinated earlier today following a suicide bombing that killed over a dozen of her supporters.

This is not good, folks.

Revisions/extensions (8:45 am 12/27/2007) – AKI is reporting Al Qaeda is taking credit…

"We terminated the most precious American asset which vowed to defeat [the] mujahadeen," Al-Qaeda’s commander and main spokesperson Mustafa Abu Al-Yazid told Adnkronos International (AKI) in a phone call from an unknown location, speaking in faltering English. Al-Yazid is the main al-Qaeda commander in Afghanistan.

Revisions/extensions part 2 (8:58 am 12/27/2007) – A couple places with better coverage than me: Hot Air and Free Republic (where I got the Al Qaeda claim from)

December 24, 2007

Why does government continue to insist on leaking secrets to the press?

by @ 8:51. Filed under Presstitute Follies, War on Terror.

First, we had ABC News telling us about the Transportation Security Agency’s Operations Center (H/T – Michelle Malkin). Now, we have Meg Jones of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, in a puff piece about how the FAA and NORAD track Santa, telling anybody with an Internet connection pretty much how to find the radar facility that tracks all planes flying above 8,000 feet around Lake Michigan, including O’Hare. At least ABC News didn’t tell certain “interested” parties how to find the facility within a roughly-20-mile drive up and down a single street busy enough to conceal drive-by surveillance or show a picture of the outside of said facility.

December 17, 2007

41 Taliban die of sleep depravation and airstrikes, but mostly airstrikes

by @ 13:24. Filed under War on Terror.

(H/T – Weasel Zippers)

I don’t know whether I should be complaining about the AoS commenting system since I hit the CPU Quota Exceeded error again, but since he isn’t on this one yet, I’ll jump in with the details from CTV:

Canadian military officials say they’re happy with a weekend raid carried out by coalition forces that reportedly caught the Taliban completely by surprise.

About 70 Taliban fighters were asleep in a compound when Canadian, Afghan National Army and British Ghurka soldiers attacked.

Forty-one Taliban died, with no coalition or civilian casualties reported in Operation Sharp Sword.

Airstrikes were used on the insurgents.

Good flying and hunting, men.

December 7, 2007

A date that still lives in infamy

by @ 9:45. Filed under History, War.

Hat-tip for the video – Jawa Howie. Now, watch and remember (or learn if you’re a recent product of public school education):

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAnOtWm5OrM[/youtube]

December 5, 2007

Light blogging – Target: NIE edition

by @ 17:56. Filed under Politics - National, War on Terror.

Ace has been laying lead on target all day today (I will not be responsible for the language in those links, but he’s on the mofo):

NIE Report On Iran Nuke Freeze Called Bullshit By… Hans Friggin’ Blix
*Bush* Lied? Architect of NIE Nonsense Testified *Five Months Ago* That Iran Was Pursuing The Bomb
Curveball: Defected Iranian General Source For NIE Claim of Nuke Freeze?

All that’s missing is the shot into Flock of Seagulls to break Brett’s concentration.

December 4, 2007

Q – Why do Islamists hate us? Half the Dem Presidential candidates – BOOOSH’S FAULT!

by @ 16:36. Filed under Politics - National, War on Terror.

Bryan at Hot Air has all the sordid details, including the audio, as well as a very thorough debunking of said loathing. I’ll “borrow” his summary:

"Because we are trusted so little" – Joe Biden
Because of "the bullying, selfish, abusive behavior" of President Bush and his administration. – John Edwards
"John’s point is right, but I want to broaden it a little. If you were a Muslim overseas listening to Rudy Giuliani saying they want to come over here and kill you, you would get the impression that we don’t want to talk." – Barack Obama
"This has been a vacuum for a long time. We don’t know their culture." – Chris Dodd

Allow me to offer a free bit of advice to the DhimmiRATs; it’s because we are not 110% like them that they want all of us, you, me, the guy down the street that doesn’t give a flying <expletive deleted only because I didn’t disable the pingback feature; it starts with ‘f’ and rhymes with ‘duck’> about politics, dead.

December 3, 2007

Iran stopped its nuclear program?

by @ 16:20. Filed under International relations, War.

(H/T – LGF)

Or so says the unclassified version of a fresh National Intelligence Estimate. I’m certain the Left half of the blogosphere, like the media already has, is seizing upon the opening phrase of the ‘Key Judgements’ section – “We judge with high confidence that in fall 2003, Tehran halted its nuclear weapons
program;…”. Allow me to point out a couple of key equivocations.

The first is the footnote to that phrase – “For the purposes of this Estimate, by ‘nuclear weapons program’ we mean Iran’s nuclear weapon design and weaponization work and covert uranium conversion-related and uranium enrichment-related work; we do not mean Iran’s declared civil work related to uranium conversion and enrichment.” Given that the particular method of “declared civil work” selected by the Iranians is at the least approximating one of the popular methods used to create weapons-grade uranium rather than simply the much-less-militarily-useful reactor-grade uranium, I have to strongly question the claim that the program has been completely stopped.

The second is the phrase immediately following – “…we also assess with moderate-to-high confidence that Tehran at a minimum is keeping open the option to develop nuclear weapons.” That is an understatement. Judging by what the Iranians have claimed about that “declared civil work” noted above, Iran has transitioned the semi-open portion of its nuclear program to a “turn-key” nuclear weapons program, requiring upon full implementation simply a directive to assemble nuclear weapons.

Interestingly, the NIE notes that the Iranians had spent “considerable effort from at least the late 1980s to 2003 to develop such weapons.” I don’t exactly remember hearing too much about the Iranian nuclear weapon program until after the fall of 2003. Related to that time frame, I also remember another WMD program not in a country that started with an “I” that very-publicly stopped, rather than the covert “stop” the Iranian program supposedly had, right about that 2003 timeframe, and that stoppage was directly attributed to a unique certain event that happened in 2003.

This part is chilling; “We do not have sufficient intelligence to judge confidently whether Tehran is willing to maintain the halt of its nuclear weapons program indefinitely while it weighs its options, or whether it will or already has set specific deadlines or criteria that will prompt it to restart the program.” Given that a possible American pincers movement from Iraq and Afghanistan undoubtedly weighed in on the “cost-benefit approach” the NIE claims the Iranians are using, given the kick-the-can-down-the-road assessment of 2010-2015 for sufficient HEU uranium, and given the claim that Iran was spending “considerable effort” on its nuclear program through the 1990s, I’ll guess that the election of a Democrat or Ron Paul would be all the criteria Iran would need to resume a full “Manhattan Project” program.

The laugh of the day, however, comes from point F, which says that the Iranians might use covert facilities, had in fact used covert facilities in the past, and stopped using covert facilities in 2003. Wasn’t that the assessment of North Korea’s nuclear program between 1994 and 2002, which was completely invalidated by the discovery of said covert facilties and their use between 1994 and 2002?

Revisions/extensions (4:48 pm 12/3/2007) – There’s a lot more linkage to the Right half’s react over at Hot Air.

November 30, 2007

A-planting we will go (Day 2)

Word of warning revision (2:50 pm 11/30/2007) – The free-fire portion of the discussion is to be between each individual commenter and me, not between commenters. Just in case you forgot, this is my place; I pay the hosting bill.

A pair of updates that I waited until midnight to fly with (well, actually, I prepped this before midnight, but thanks to the magic of WordPress, they’re going out at the gong):

– When I last left this, we were at 8 plants. Well, Michelle’s upped the count to 9, though I don’t know whether to classify CAIR’s Yasmin as simply a fresh species or start a whole separate genus for groups merely aligned with the ‘Rats. Ah, tahellwitchit, since I call them DhimmiRATs, it counts. Since I remember 30 questions, we’re now at a full 30% of the questions being plants.

– Duncan Hunter, bless his soul, has a heart of a lion (and the money and support of a flea). My mailbox has a copy of a letter he sent head gardener Hillary Clinton:

November 29, 2007

Dear Senator Clinton,

Regarding the “plant”, retired Brig. Gen. Keith H. Kerr, that you sent to ask me the question at the CNN-YouTube debate last night in Florida "¦

Send more!!!

Merry Christmas,
Duncan Hunter

UUUURRRRRPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!

Revisions/extensions (11:20 am 11/30/2007) – Seems this place piqued the interest of a bunch of Salon types. If this place loads a bit slow; sorry about that, I don’t think I’ve had a serious crush of traffic before, so I don’t know exactly how my host handles a crush. Disagree with me all day long, but do try to find another line besides Jeff Gannon. Also, don’t piss me off. While I do enjoy the back-and-forth, I do have a hair-trigger.

November 29, 2007

Bin Laden’s disembodied voice pleading with the Europeans

by @ 17:04. Filed under War on Terror.

The Jawas have the details. To wit:

– The voice on the audio-only tape (guess the M-m-m-m-max bin Laden video machine’s out of commission) is whining that the Europeans aren’t stringing up Bush and Rumsfeld.
– Said voice once again claims responsibility for 9/11 (as if the video authenticated to have been shot October 2001 wasn’t enough proof).
– The Arabic version of the al Jazeera story exhorts the Islamokazis. Can we vaporize al Jazeera’s HQ now?

November 15, 2007

Do they make this in a man-portable size?

by @ 21:25. Filed under War.

(H/T – Ace, who will justifiably be in his bunk)

BAE Systems has delivered a 32-megajoule prototype rail gun to the US Navy. While this isn’t quite to the USN’s final goal of a 64-megajoule rail gun that can hurl a projectile 220 miles downrange with a muzzle velocity of better than Mach 8, it’s a hell of a weapon.

Armor has met its match.

November 13, 2007

Hasn’t the IAEA heard of Xerox?

by @ 18:22. Filed under War on Terror.

(H/T – Little Green Footballs)

In an attempt to stall the world from acting before it gains nuclear weapons, Iran turned over a copy of a 2-year-old set of blueprints on how to mold uranium into weaponized shapes to the IAEA. LGF notes that the IAEA, headed by Mohamed ElBaradei, has been claiming that Iran has nothing but piec…er, peaceful intentions with their nuclear weapo…er, power production plan. Iran claims that they ‘accidentally’ got the blueprints during other black-market shopping. I say that Iran was shopping for them, kept the originals, and has every intention on acting upon them and using the results.

Can we bomb them now?

November 7, 2007

The other shoe is set to drop in Pakistan

by @ 7:01. Filed under War on Terror.

(H/T – Curt/Flopping Aces))

I’m sure you’ve heard by now all the bloviating over Pakistani strongman Pervez Musharraf’s declaration of martial law, busting up their Supreme Court and muzzling the Pakistani press. What you’re probably not going to hear from the LeftStream Media is the semi-official reason why – he’s declaring war on Al Qaeda. Supporting that is a report that Pakistan has pulled many of its troops from the Kashmir region.

If this is true and not the same old tightrope walking Musharraf’s done since 2001, it’s a big development. Much of Pakistan’s elite, namely the lawyers and the presstitutes, which is caught up in the wake of the martial law, is solidly in the camp of Al Qaeda. Of course, so is Pakistan’s ISI, which is presumably what Musharraf would need to rely on to effectively combat any internal opposition to him.

In any case, it’s more complicated than simply Musharraf wanting to hold onto power, though that is undoubtedly his main goal.

November 1, 2007

Dhimm stragedy to lose WOT, African edition

Patrick Poole over at PajamasMedia reports on the latest attempt by the DhimmiRATs in Congress to systematically kill this country’s relationship with every country that continues to help fight against Al Qaeda and its affiliated Islamokazi groups. This week’s target, Ethiopia.

Ostensibly, the proposed prohibition of the American arming of Ethiopia as well as travel to the US by Ethiopian leaders is a delayed reaction to intimidation after Ethiopia’s 2005 elections. This ignores significant steps undertaken by the Ethiopian government to atone for that.

I strongly suspect the real reason was because the Ethiopians liberated Somalia from the Al Qaeda-linked Islamic Courts Union with a bit of backing from American air power. Not only did they dare oppose the Islamokazis successfully, but they succeeded where their hero Bill Clinton failed spectacularily.

October 31, 2007

Hey Keyboard Islamokazis, come get some

by @ 13:26. Filed under War on Terror.

Head Jawa Rusty has blown the lid off some games keyboard Islamists want to start on the 11th.

BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

October 23, 2007

Since I need the extra cash to pay for the extra taxes,…

I figure I ought to package up the assorted Paul-nuts that have shown up here and the TownHall version of this place and sell them. I’ve even ginned up a label (with all due apologies to Rebellion Brewing’s Roasted Nuts beer):

Maybe if the head Paul-nut would fight a tenth as hard for smaller government as he does for Dhimmitude,….

October 11, 2007

Pic of the day

by @ 19:44. Filed under War on Terror.

From militaryphotos.net via head Jawa Rusty

Militaryphotos.net has it in full 2048×1536 glory. I don’t care to know whether that’s a Photoshop (though I suspect it is).

September 30, 2007

It’s a clean sweep of the DhimmiRAT Presidential candidates

by @ 9:23. Filed under Politics - National, War on Terror.

I’m still playing catch-up from the move, so I’m a few days late. However, on Thursday, the House had a vote to recommit with instructions on the continuing appropriations bill to add a resolution supporting Gen. David Petraeus and condemn MoveOn.org (scroll a bit for the text). Dennis “The Menace” Kucinich couldn’t resist cozying up to George Soros and company, and neither could Tammy Baldwin or Gwen “Crybaby” Moore (H/T – Mary).

Incredibly, the rest of the ‘Rat delegation from Wisconsin, including Steve Kagen, elected by MoveOn, voted for the resolution. Guess David Obey and Ron Kind feel they’re fossilized untouchables, and Kagen feels he can spend as much as Herb Kohl to stifle any challenges. Heck, Obey had the line of the day – “I’ve got an obligation to be equally upset when that kind of juvenile debate emanates from the left.”

Equally-incredible, Ron Paul voted for this. Guess there really is a bright line between the Dhimms and the Pubbies, even if the latter spends almost exactly like the former or adopts their language vis-a-vis the military.

While the ‘Rat House leadership that was there (paging Queen Speaker, paging Ms. Pelosi, your votes are overdue) had a bit more savvy than their Senatorial counterparts when the vote finally came down, don’t let the vote fool you. There is a reason why the Pubbies had to pull a parliamentary move to get this through a week after a resolution went through the molasses pit known as the Senate.

September 20, 2007

The DhimmiRAT leadership stands behind MoveOn/NYTimes attack

by @ 17:12. Filed under Politics - National, War on Terror.

(H/T – Allahpundit)

Usually “Sense of the Senate” resolutions are meaningless. However, this is what Senate Majority Leader Dingy Harry Reid, Senate President pro tempore Robert “Sheets” Byrd, DhimmiRAT Whip Dick Durbin, DhimmiRAT Presidential candidates Hiliary Clinton and Christopher Dodd, and Russ el-Slimeroad (Moonbat-Al Qaeda), along with 19 of their fellow traveller DhimmiRATs voted against, and what DhimmiRAT Presidential candidates Barack Hussein Obama and Joe “Plugs” Biden, along with fellow Dhimm Maria Cantwell, ran away from:

(b) Sense of Senate.–It is the sense of the Senate–
(1) to reaffirm its support for all the men and women of the United States Armed Forces, including General David H. Petraeus, Commanding General, Multi-National Force-Iraq;
(2) to strongly condemn any effort to attack the honor and integrity of General Petraeus and all the members of the United States Armed Forces; and
(3) to specifically repudiate the unwarranted personal attack on General Petraeus by the liberal activist group Moveon.org.

That is your DhimmiRAT Party, condoning and applauding attacks on successful members of this country’s military. But don’t question their patriotism; after all, they have none toward this country. Of note, nobody either in leadership nor in the race had the balls to stand up to Kommisar Markos and tell him to go to hell.

How far out there is the leadership of the DhimmiRAT Party? Herb Kohl, voted for this resolution. Guess he figures that even Kommisar Markos doesn’t have enough money to unseat him.

Revisions/extensions (5:17 pm 9/20/2007) – Added Dick Durbin and his “nay” vote to make it a clean sweep of the DhimmiRAT leadership.

September 12, 2007

Digitial analysis – M-m-m-m-m-max bin Laden

by @ 19:44. Filed under War on Terror.

(H/T – Allahpundit)

Dr. Neal Krawetz, who is good enough to get a C|Net story, did some video/audio and image analysis of the “new” Osama bin Laden video. The money quotes:

The big question is: is the audio from Bin Laden? I’m not an audio expert (yet) and since I don’t know Arabic, I cannot tell if there is an accent or if the accent changes. I do know that the room echo and background sounds change during different audio clips. And there are so many splices that I cannot help but wonder if someone spliced words and phrases together. I also cannot rule out a vocal imitator during the frozen-frame audio. The only way to prove that the audio is really Bin Laden is to see him talking in the video, but all references to current-events come during the frozen-frame section.

I’m shocked, SHOCKED that there would be so many splices in the audio-only portion of the M-m-m-m-max bin Laden tape. How about the under-4 minutes of video?

There are some very obvious places where the video has been spliced. Here’s some examples:

  • 1:39 — A little more than a minute and a half into the video is a splice. He goes from looking out to looking down in less than 1/25th of a second.
  • 13:13 — The second splice. Not as big, but definitely there.

There are actually six splices in the video as far as I can tell.

The video itself was filmed in two takes. The first section opens the video and ends at 1:56. The second section begins at 12:29 and continues until 14:01. That’s right: the entire 26 minute video has less than four minutes of animated footage. The rest of the video just shows a still-frame of Bin Laden. The two sections are clearly from different recordings because the desk is closer to the camera in the second section.

Let’s see; 3:28 of live video, 6 splices. They couldn’t get more than 35 seconds out of “ObL” before they had to cut. M-m-m-m-max Headroom got more than that. Let’s continue with the video analysis, with my note that Krawetz believes the 2004 video was made in 2004 (I have my doubts on that):

Yet here is Bin Laden in the same clothing, same studio, same studio setup, and same desk THREE YEARS LATER. In fact, his stack of papers that he reads are moved between the exact same stacks. If you overlay the 2007 video with the 2004 video, his face has not changed in three years — only his beard is darker and the contrast on the picture has been adjusted.

What are the chances of nothing changing (except his beard) in three years? Virtually zero. The clips appear to have been recorded three years ago.

Or longer. However, I do not put as much stock in the sameness; a studio in Milwaukee can be made to look exactly the same as one in New York City. Morever, others have noted differences in the face between the 2004 video and the 2007 one. On to the image analysis:

As far as my tools can detect, there has been no image manipulation of the Bin Laden portion of the image beyond contrast adjustment. His beard really does appear to be that color. (I’ve asked another graphics researcher to also look at the image I analyzed, as a cross-check.)

One of the limitations of image analysis is that staged environments are not digital fakes. For example, when China Airlines painting over their logo on crashed planes, the pictures did not analyze as being faked — because they were not. In the case of his beard, it could be a costume mask, or a trimmed and dyed beard.

Let’s stop for a moment. It could also be a look-alike. Do recall that the late Saddam Hussein reportedly employed up to 25 look-alikes to try to prevent his assassination.

Another limitation concerns image size and resaves. If you make a picture small enough or resave it many times, then the fine details vanish. A picture that looks obviously like a fake cannot be detected as being a fake.

Neal goes on to note that the bin Laden frame and border were both saved at least twice and not at the same time, and that the various elements of the video came from different sources. The conclusion:

So is Bin Laden still alive? I see no proof of his existance that is newer than three years ago. Bin Laden is as alive as Elvis.

It is a lot easier to hide a corpse than a living body.

September 11, 2007

Never forget

by @ 8:35. Filed under War on Terror.

Six years ago today, a bunch of Islamists decided to snuff out the lives of 3,000 people because they wanted a worldwide Caliphate full of nobody except their kind. Though they haven’t managed another attack on American soil, they are still as committed to that goal now as they were then.

Fortunately, we’ve been taking the fight to them, slowly but surely eliminating those that hold that murderous view. We need to stay at least as committed to defeating them as they are to killing us.

September 8, 2007

“New” Bin Laden tape…or is it?

by @ 10:59. Filed under War on Terror.

If you haven’t heard the news that al Qaeda has issued a “new” videotape of Osama bin Laden, you’re not paying attention. Howie at The Jawa Report has the full video, and there’s something quite “curious” that Allahpundit pointed out. At the 1:55 mark, the image of Blackbeard bin Laden becomes a freeze frame. Interestingly, that is before the first reference to events past December 2001.

Guess al Qaeda’s Max Headroom technology isn’t perfected (or is it the Left’s; after all, “ObL” rails on Global “Warming”, corporations and neocons as well).

Revisions/extensions (7:58 am 9/9/2007) – I should’ve watched the whole thing; Dr. Rusty Shackleford (founding Jawa) notes that there also is motion on the “Osama”-cam from 12:30 to 14:00, when the figure channels Breck Girl, Barack Hussein Obama, and Alpha Algore Goracle. It makes it a bit more likely the video is somewhat-fresh; however, Osama has expressed admiration for the Vietnam-era defeatists among the Dhimms in the past, and the envirowhacko/anti-business plank has been part of the Dhimm policy since the 1960s, and there is no concrete references to events beyond December 2001.

September 6, 2007

Dhimms do not like to hear good news

by @ 1:08. Filed under Politics - National, War on Terror.

(H/T – HotAir Headlines)

Guess it’s time to bring back an oldie-but-good HamNation. As predicted, the DhimmiRATs are already dismissing the not-yet-delivered Petraeus report, prefering their own self-commissioned and -ordered “the war is lost” conclusion.

September 5, 2007

Freefly is back and kicking ass

by @ 14:03. Filed under Presstitute Follies, Sports, War on Terror.

Uncle Jimbo and Kev take whacks at Katty Katie Couric, Mark Cuban, and the NBA. Let me say that if I didn’t hate the Dallas Mavericks before, I sure as hell do now.

September 3, 2007

I didn’t think that my use of DhimmiRATs would be literal

by @ 8:17. Filed under Politics - National, War on Terror.

(H/T – JammieWearingFool)

DhimmiRAT National Committee Chairman Howard Dean was among the Dhimms that made the pilgrimage to the Labor Day weekend gathering of the Islamic Society of North America in Rosemont, Illinois, and he endorsed their political takeover of America:

Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean told American Muslims gathered in Rosemont to think beyond voter registration drives.

“You need to run for political office,” Dean said Saturday. “The only way you can achieve your goals is to stand up and say who you are and be proud of it.”

Considering that Dean is a doctor, I don’t think he can claim ignorance that the Islamokazis’ goal is a worldwide Caliphate by every means necessary.

September 1, 2007

Who should we retaliate against if the Islamokazis nuke the US (part 2)?

by @ 15:58. Filed under Politics - National, War on Terror.

The question is out there again courtesy Allahpundit, so it’s time to bring the old poll back, but with a twist. Since WP-Poll now supports multiple answers, let’s run it again. This time, you get up to 3 options, and if I still haven’t hit your sweet spot, pipe up.

Who should we retaliate against if the Islamokazis nuke the US (part 2)?

Up to 3 answer(s) was/were allowed

  • After determining which group it was, send the B-52s in for the nuclear Grand Tour of their bases of operations. (21%, 32 Vote(s))
  • We nuke Islam's "holy" sites, no questions asked. (19%, 30 Vote(s))
  • We nuke the supplier(s) of the nukes. (17%, 27 Vote(s))
  • We nuke Waziristan, or wherever the current home of Al Qaeda is at the time, no questions asked. (17%, 26 Vote(s))
  • After determining which group it was, we send the B-52s on a conventional Grand Tour of their bases of operation. (7%, 11 Vote(s))
  • We lay waste to Islam's "holy" sites with conventional weapons, no questions asked. (6%, 9 Vote(s))
  • We wage conventional war on the supplier(s) of the nukes. (6%, 9 Vote(s))
  • No one because that would be "wrong". (4%, 6 Vote(s))
  • No one because we're waving the French battle flag (aka white flag of unconditional surrender). (3%, 4 Vote(s))
  • Something I missed (please explain in the thread). (1%, 2 Vote(s))

Total Voters: 156

Loading ... Loading ...

If you’re wondering what happened last time, let’s review:

Who should we retaliate against if the Islamokazis nuke the US?

Up to 1 answer(s) was/were allowed

  • We nuke Islam's "holy" sites, no questions asked. (32%, 7 Vote(s))
  • After determining which group it was, send the B-52s in for the nuclear Grand Tour of their bases of operations. (23%, 5 Vote(s))
  • After determining which group it was, we send the B-52s on a conventional Grand Tour of their bases of operation. (18%, 4 Vote(s))
  • We nuke Waziristan, the current home of Al Qaeda, no questions asked. (14%, 3 Vote(s))
  • We nuke the supplier(s) of the nukes. (5%, 1 Vote(s))
  • We wage conventional war on the supplier(s) of the nukes. (5%, 1 Vote(s))
  • Something I missed (please explain in the thread) (5%, 1 Vote(s))
  • We lay waste to Islam's "holy" sites with conventional weapons, no questions asked. (0%, 0 Vote(s))
  • No one because that would be "wrong". (0%, 0 Vote(s))
  • No one because we're waving the French battle flag (aka white flag of unconditional surrender) (0%, 0 Vote(s))

Total Voters: 22

Loading ... Loading ...

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]