define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true); define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true); No Runny Eggs » steveegg

No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

Archive for posts by steveegg.

March 13, 2008

Today’s bad news – Congressional edition

by @ 22:53. Filed under Politics - National.

Item #1 (H/T – Allahpundit) – The Hill reports on a very grim conversation with National Republican Senatorial Committee chair John Ensign. Selected lowlights:

– On the heels of not getting anybody for Mark Pryor’s seat in Arkansas, the NRSC had wealthy potential challengers in New Jersey and South Dakota balk.
– About half of the 49 existing Senators (which presumably includes the 5 retirements) are well behind in fundraising, with the incumbent Dems whose seats are up this year raising $1.2 million more than the incumbent Pubbies up for re-election.
– Related to that, the NRSC has less than $15 million in cash on hand, compared to the Dem counterpart’s $30 million.
– The money kicker; despite the RNC having a lot more cash on hand than the DNC, the RNC isn’t expected to help out any.
– The Virginia seat currently held by John Warner, one of those retiring, will almost certainly go to the ‘Rats.
– The only ‘Rat seat with “top-level” recruit with a realistic shot of winning is in Louisiana (seat currently held by Mary Landrieu), with the NRSC touting a long-shot in Massachusetts.

I guess the only question is, will the ‘Rats get to 60, or close enough, to not get rid of the filibuster?

Item #2 (H/T – see-dubya in the comments section of that thread, or you could look at the post before this one for Shoebox’s headline contest) – The Washington Times’ Fishwrap reports the National Republican Campaign Committee discovered its former treasurer filed fraudulent financial audits between 2001 and 2006. According to the House Republican campaign arm, Christopher J. Ward transfered several hundred thousand dollars without authorization from the NRCC to outside committees, and then transfered money from there to what appeared to be his personal and business bank accounts.

Boy, is that ever “great” timing. Of course, since the NRCC is in the business of protecting RepublicRATs like Tom Petri from even primary challenges like one being explored by Calumet County District Attorney Ken Kratz (H/T – Brad V. at Try to Focus), maybe the NRCC would be better if it were defunded.

Revisions/extensions (10:59 pm 3/13/2008) – I guess I should mention the NRSC sent over a fundraising letter today. Since see-dub wants to see the reply, I’ll dig it out of the trash, open it up, and craft a reply. Of course, since it is almost 11 pm, I’ll have to toss it over while I sleep.

R&E part 2 (11:39 pm 3/13/2008) – I don’t know what I’m still doing up, but see-dub says, “Give directly to the candidates, not the RNC/NRSC/NRCC".

March 12, 2008

What changed in the last 10 years?

by @ 11:39. Filed under Politics.

10 years ago, Bill Clinton survived a sex scandal that ultimately led to his impeachment and non-conviction thereof. Now, Elliot Spitzer is resigning his office of New York governor effective Monday at noon (Eastern) because of a sex scandal. In both cases, Republicans held narrow majorities in the legislative branch responsible for pursuing and trying impeachment, with one of the few substantive differences between New York’s version and the federal version being the 7 members of New York’s Court of Appeals (NY’s analog to the Supreme Court) being part of the jury.

Depending on how those 7 judges would have voted on any articles of impeachment, a flip of anywhere between 7 and 14 of the 30 Democrats would have ousted Spitzer. We know that the abandonment by one’s own party is what sunk Richard Nixon, and that lack of abandonment is what saved Clinton from conviction.

Meanwhile, the DNC stirred the pot a bit thicker by stating they would not be filling Spitzer’s superdelegate slot (H/T – American Princess). Spitzer was (well, is for a few more days) in the Hillary Clinton camp, and his Lieutenant Governor David Paterson, who is also a superdelegate and who will assume the office of Governor, is also in the Clinton camp. Clinton also won her “home of the week” state, but not by a real smashing majority (59%-40%).

So, is some sense of shame returning to the Democrats, is Spitzer a bit more honorable (relatively-speaking) than Bill Clinton, or are there enough Barack Obama supporters around Albany to sabotage the Hillary Clinton campaign by any means necessary?

March 11, 2008

Roll bloat – more news (and other errata)

by @ 14:02. Filed under The Blog.

First things first, I do have to point you to Neocon News. I know I’m already pushing well against the number of blogs one can keep track of, but, much like potato chips, I just can’t stop.

I’ve also done some rearrangement of the sidebars, adding a few politicians I back as well as a stat for the FeedBurner feed. I’ve tried to solve the slow load of the StatCounter counter by reinstalling the code, but it doesn’t seem to be helping right now. Sorry about that.

Why don’t more blogs succeed? – Reloaded

by @ 12:26. Filed under The Blog.

Revisions/extensions (12:41 pm 3/11/2008) – Now that Neocon News is back up, I added a bit from that site. I also threw in a couple of parting thoughts.

I probably should just do a revision and extension to yesterday’s piece on the 10 reasons blogs don’t succeed, but since John Hawkins decided to do a fresh post on it, and because I’ve got too much to stick in a revision, I’ll do so as well. Before I get to the meat, I recommend checking out the sites John highlighted today; after all, linkage is the currency of the blogosphere (no, that phrase isn’t mine; my hazy memory says it’s Sean Hackbarth’s).

I guess the initial post was fortuitous timing on John’s part. One could definitely use it as an explanation of how relatively insignificant blogs are according to Harris Interactive, which released that survey late yesterday.

I probably should have been clearer yesterday that “success” was “potential financial success”, not simply being around for a few years. Billiam from View from the cheap seats reminded me in yesterday’s post that most of those that blog do so because they simply want to vent. That’s good because I remembered something that Mark Cuban said at BlogWorld last year; if one isn’t drawing 1,000 hits a day, it doesn’t pay to even try to monetize the blog.

ALa at blonde sagacity makes much the same point. Simply put, do it because you want to. Things are too crowded right now to expect a huge audience, but if you put in your time, you’ll get an audience.

Neocon at Neocon News has a few words of encouragement for the bloggers-to-be. Yes, it can get daunting to provide a fresh perspective by the time you sift through your feed reader, but in the main, the blogosphere is not a “good ol’ boys club”. That reminds me; Drinking Right is tonight, 7 pm at Papa’s Social Club (7718 W Burleigh in Milwaukee).

Kate at small dead animals adds an 11th reason blogs fail – too much vulgarity. I try not to swear, but sometimes my inner Rottweiler/AoSHQ takes over, and I unleash Hell. I generally try to not have that show up on the feed, but each new version of WordPress tends to scramble the hacks I use to bury the vulgarities some. Besides, Ace, the Emperor, and Bill Quick have made names for themselves with a “few” choice words (not that I recommend it; the market is pretty much full-up).

I’m definitely violating Robbie Cooper from UrbanGround’s Rule 2A about not blogging about blogging right now. Oh well; I’m probably also violating the interesting rule (again), but sometimes this has to be done.

If I were a better blogger, I would have gone back to Charlie Sykes‘ old Rule of Five at some point here yesterday (unfortunately, the WTMJ archives for April 2007 got wiped, so the original post got lost). While most of those I know do read more than the 5 blogs Charlie said he read at the time (I’m somewhere north of 150 blogs in the reader) there still is a valid point to the rule. One has to be pretty good and consistent to be read regularily because there just are so many hours in the day.

There’s a couple more suggestions I can add. Don’t make your home page so busy people can’t follow it or load it quickly. There is a certain elegance to simplicity of design. Besides, some people are still on dial-up, so huge graphics will kill the load speed.

Unless you’re doing advertising, please offer full-text feeds. While in many situations you won’t know how many people are viewing the feed (I’ll plug FeedBurner because it does track that), most people keep up with blogs through feed readers, and most feed readers do not offer the option to bypass the excerpt without an additional click.

March 10, 2008

Ego-buster of the day

by @ 20:40. Filed under The Blog.

(H/T – Allahpundit)

56% of those surveyed by Harris Interactive say they never read political blogs. There’s also a few other eye-popping numbers, at least if you can trust the pollsters after their collective performance thus far this year:

– The over-62 crowd is actually the most-likely to read political blogs at least several times a month (26%), with each younger age group less-likely to read them.
– 76% of those that read blogs at least once a week read less than 5 political blogs, with Republicans most-likely to read 5 or more (26%).
– 69% of those that read blogs at least once a week didn’t comment in the week prior to the poll. I can definitely believe that one; it’s closer to 85% here.
– On the accuracy question, while pluralities of all 3 political groups (Republicans, Democrats, and Independents) believe blogs are about as accurate as the mainstream media, only among Democrats is there more respect for the MSM’s accuracy than for the blogs’ accuracy. 32% of Dems belive the MSM is more-accurate and 21% of Dems believe blogs are more-accurate, while the split among Republicans is 14%-37% and among Independents is 19%-36%.
– Even with their distain for the blogs’ accuracy, more Democrats see blogs as more valuable than the MSM than the other way around (26%-24%).

Rules for hiring hookers

by @ 19:37. Filed under Politics.

Since New York governor Elliot Spitzer (D) failed to keep his hooker finances in sufficient order to not attract the unwanted attention of the IRS and the FBI (H/T – ABC’s Blotter via Allahpundit), I think it’s time to spell out some rules of the street:

1. Do NOT mess with hookers. It’s illegal in 49 states, and even if you are where it’s legal, it’s not worth it especially if you’re married.

2. If you’re stupid enough to ignore rule #1, always pay cash. ALWAYS!

3. In order to come up with the cash, do not exceed the $10,000 limit that automatically triggers a report to the IRS. Similarily, do not think that multiple transactions at the same bank that are just below that $10,000 will not trigger that report.

4. When making your nom de action, don’t use the good name of a political contributor.

Roll bloat – more black flags, please

by @ 18:49. Filed under The Blog.

I have no idea why I didn’t do this before now, but since that right column isn’t quite overloaded enough, and because William Teach is that damn good, please add Pirate’s Cove to your rolls and readers.

Roll bloat – the replacement edition

by @ 16:16. Filed under The Blog.

Replacing the dearly-departed Still Spinnin’ Blog is Dan’s solo effort, The D Spot. Please fix your readers and rolls accordingly.

Why don’t more blogs succeed?

by @ 14:16. Filed under The Blog.

John Hawkins has the top 10 reasons. I’ll ignore the fact that I don’t do this for a living (or even any compensation whatsoever; no ads here) and see which ones I definitely fail on a routine basis (do note I’m not talking about Shoebox or the guest-bloggers):

1) They’re just not very good. Damn if John didn’t nail me. Most days, I’ll be the first one to tell you I suck.

2) They don’t cover interesting material. That speaks to the fact that I’m a boring person.

5) They don’t promote their work. That’s a big-ass failing of mine. I almost never send out promotional e-mails, prefering to let the trackbacks do the talking. I just don’t have that huge an ego.

6) They’re not consistent enough. They take days off. Oh, you mean like the break I took between the 28th and the 4th? Somehow, I got Shoebox as a co-blogger to take the pressure off.

I fail most of the rest of them as well. Oh well; it’s a good thing I don’t have a huge ego.

March 9, 2008

Housekeeping – sorry, NZBear

by @ 20:13. Filed under The Blog.

TTLB is slowing things down some at the moment, probably because the Bear threw on a whole heap of blogs, and that’s really messing up the whole works, from rankings (the widget had me as a rodent, the TTLB NRE homepage had me as a human, and the acutal rankings have me as a marsupial). I had to deactivate it for the moment.

Revisions/extensions (8:21 pm 3/9/2008) – A longer search gives the current problem as the embedded video, and it’s intermittent. Oh well; that’s the price of a multimedia blog.

Tell me again why Milwaukee is a sanctuary city/county

by @ 19:38. Filed under Immigration.

(H/T – Michelle)

Revisions/extensions (9:06 pm 3/9/2008) – Also on the case: Patrick, Peter, HeatherRadish and Jessica. Also, I agree wholeheartedly with Dad29 in the comments. I think the ammo will be coming in more-powerful calibers and grains than just the .40 S&W.

Jessica’s girls at Frontpage Milwaukee committed what Charlie would call a flagrant act of journalism. Elizabeth Bolin and Megan Schmidt found that 188 previously-deported felon illegal aliens went through Milwaukee County Jail on fresh charges over the last 4 years, that 9 of those went through a second time despite having federal detain holds placed on them (though it is not clear whether they were deported and returned yet again or whether they never left the US), and that at least 108 of them were not charged with illegal re-entry after deportation (80 people were charged with that federal crime over that period, though it is not known whether those 80 are part of the 188 FPM focused on, or how many of those 80 were actually re-deported).

That’s just the tip of the iceberg, because previously-deported felons are the only class of illegal aliens the county tracks. That pretty much mirrors the city of Milwaukee’s “don’t ask” policy. As a result, nobody knows how many illegal aliens have passed through either the county jail or through police custody.

Since I will undoubtedly trigger a pingback to Michelle’s site, and I’m pissed enough to unleash more than a few choice words, I’ll put the rest of the commentary on page 2.

Sunday reading – the fastest trip in the fastest jet

by @ 9:55. Filed under Miscellaneous.

(H/T – Gaius)

Major Brian Shul (ret.) talked about the fastest trip the SR-71 Blackbird ever took. Xformed over at Chaotic Synaptic Activity has an interesting sea story about that flight.

I’ve just put Shul’s book, Sled Driver, on my short birthday list. Of course, since it is $427, that is going to be a very short birthday list :-)

Why are the ‘Rats are against Voter ID?

by @ 8:22. Filed under Elections, Politics - Wisconsin.

A friend of Kathy Carpenter’s decided to put the question to all 18 ‘Rat State Senators. You can head to Kathy’s site to read all of the responses, but I’ll do some summarizing here (the numbers will not add up because some Senators fall into more than 1 category):

– Against voter ID on general principles: 7
– Following Doyle’s instructions: 3
– Unavailable for comment: 5
– Staff unaware of their bosses’ position: 4
– Claims there was no public hearing, but too chickenshit to call for a public hearing: 2
– Would rather have a law, but too chickenshit to author one: 2
– Admitted (s)he would rather have vote fraud: 1

It’s way too early for Daylight Savings

by @ 3:35. Filed under Miscellaneous.

That’s right; if you’re reading this this morning without the aid of electric lights and the clock says 6:30 am, you’re likely an hour behind everybody else (either that, or you’re in one of the places that doesn’t do Daylight Savings).

Tech note for those with WordPress blogs, you’ll want to check that time offset in the General Options. WordPress does not automatically correct for Daylight Savings, so if you’re in the Central Time Zone, you’ll want to change that offset to -5 hours.

March 7, 2008

If the RepubicRATs can’t support the “R” nominee,… (language warning)

by @ 20:28. Filed under Politics.

(H/T – Bill Quick)

I’ll give the standard warning for language in my response (on page 2) now. The Daily Times of Salisbury, Maryland is reporting that a bunch of RepublicRATs who are pissed that RepubicRAT Representative Wayne Gilchrest got ousted in the primary are lining up to support the DemocRAT nominee rather than the winner of the Republican nomination, Andy Harris:

Republicans unhappy with the outcome of last month’s congressional District 1 primary are wasting no time becoming activists and fundraisers for the Democratic nominee.

Queen Anne’s County State’s Attorney Frank Kratovil, who won the district’s Democratic nomination last month with 40 percent of the vote, will attend a fundraising breakfast in Chestertown on March 11 sponsored by Republicans for Kratovil. The members of this group comprises a large disenfranchised group of U.S. Rep. Wayne Gilchrest supporters, such as longtime Gilchrest aide Karen Willis.

“I’m deeply saddened that Wayne didn’t make it through the primary,” Willis said. “I’ve found lots of people who feel the same way. I’m just trying to get behind Mr. Kratovil to continue to have 1st District representation from a thinking person.”

This isn’t fleeting support from Willis. She’s worked for Gilchrest for nearly his entire career in Congress, and she doesn’t support Baltimore County Sen. Andy Harris’ more conservative views, whether the issue be Iraq or the economy.

Again, for those with weak eyes, don’t turn the page. The rest of you, please, read on.

Revisions/extensions (9:06 pm 3/7/2008) – I need a copy editor, one that doesn’t mind the occassional expletive :-)

60-seat ‘Rat majority in the Senate?

by @ 16:49. Filed under Politics - National.

(H/Ts – Sister Toldjah and Matt Lewis)

The NYT reports the ‘Rats are salivating over the prospects of getting a filibuster-proof majority in the 111th Congress to go along with the Oval Office. The numbers seem to suggest that it’s possible; while they hold a 51-49 advantage now for the purposes of caucusing, there are 18 Republican incumbents (including 2 freshly-minted ones) and 5 Republican open seats up for election, while there are only 12 Democratic incumbents up for election. It currently is unlikely they’ll actually get to 60, though it is likely they will pick up 3.

Matt says that a filibuster-proof majority would really change things. Versus the current political/philosophical situation, perhaps a bit, though I tend to believe that is more a function of whether they (or the Pubbies) get a clean sweep rather than whether one party or another gets a filibuster-proof majority. What would really change the operational dynamic is if they fail to get to 60, especially if they get the White House. Unlike the Republicans of the 109th Congress, they may well not hesitate to jettison the filibuster in order to push their agenda through, especially if they do get an absolute majority without Joe Lieberman’s caucusing help.

Conversely, if they do get to 60 (or depending on how the chips fall, simply get close), they won’t need to get rid of the filibuster to get their agenda through. Therefore, they would keep it around as a hedge against the next time things don’t go their way.

Re: Not Suffering Fools Gladly

by @ 16:16. Filed under Politics - National.

Jim Geraghty has the perfect response to the NYT/McCain spat Shoebox highlighted below:

Call me when McCain drops the F-bomb or recommends anatomically difficult forms of mating.

To that I say, that would probably make me more inclined to insert the noseplugs and vote for McCain.

I guess one legal vote per legal voter is not the ‘Rats goal

by @ 16:06. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin.

Fresh from their shoutdown of a press conference held by Senate Republicans asking for a final legislative vote on a constitutional amendment that would require voter ID, all 18 ‘Rat Senators voted to keep said final vote from happening. Given that no less than the Milwaukee Police Department asked for this as one of their two recommendations to remove much of the odor of tainted elections, and nobody is talking about taking up the other one (elimination of same-day registration), I can only believe that the Democratic Party of Wisconsin is in favor of vote fraud.

What is exceptionally troubling is Jeff Plale, who owes his continued presence in the Senate to the fact that his opponent was accused of and ultimately convicted of fraudulent voting, is marching in lock step with the rest of the fraudsters.

I have a message for the DPW – when the worm finally does turn, and you lose power despite your desperate attempts to hang onto it, payback will be a cast-iron bitch.

March 6, 2008

Not all polls are created equal

by @ 20:03. Filed under Politics - National, Presstitute Follies.

Jim Geraghty sniffed something wafting from a Washington Post poll that had John McCain down nationally by 6 to Hillary Clinton and 12 to Barack Obama. He took a look at the crosstabs, and found that 15% weren’t even registered to vote.

Ed Morrissey dug a bit deeper and found a serious flaw in the identification. Self-idenitying party idenfitication in the WaPo poll was 40% Democratic, 28% Republican, 28% independent, which isn’t exactly what Rasmussen recently found (38.7% D/33.1% R/28.2% I). Worse, when WaPo pushed the independents and folded it into the results, it turned into 55% Dem, 36% Pubbie.

The takeaway paragraph from Ed is worth archiving:

The result is an unreliable poll, but one hell of a headline. McCain trails by twelve! And when McCain beats Obama or Clinton, we’ll hear once again that the election had to have been stolen "” because all of the polls showed McCain behind.

Just how inaccurate? Rasmussen’s tracking poll has had McCain up on Clinton since the start of the track on February 7, and McCain up on Obama since February 23.

Of course, we don’t do a national election, but 51 individual state-by-state-by-federal-district contests. I believe you know how much salt should be taken with any national poll; the question is whether you have enough left after The Winter That Won’t Die™.

Finally, somebody’s not blaming Scott Walker

by @ 19:34. Filed under Miscellaneous.

Of course, we have to go to Maine to find Slublog, who blames his cold on winter and George W. Bush.

Safe Text streets?

by @ 15:31. Filed under Miscellaneous.

I have no idea who to give this hat tip to, so I’ll go to that after I deliver the news from Britain and the Daily Mail:

Britain’s first ‘Safe Text’ street has been created complete with padded lampposts to protect millions of mobile phone users from getting hurt in street accidents while walking and texting.

Around one in ten careless Brits has suffered a “walk ‘n text” street injury in the past year through collisions with lampposts, bins and other pedestrians.

The 6.6million accidents have caused injuries ranging from mild knocks and embarrassing cuts and bruises through to broken noses, cheekbones and even a fractured skull.

Now, let’s see. Fred is running a caption contest, Nick wonders how they won WWII, Mary Katharine says that state-issued helmets and elbow pads are up next, and John Hawkins relates a story one of his college buddies had about walking into a pole while observing a Brazilian heartbreaker. Naturally, I won’t have anything nearly as good as that, but I’ll try anyway.

I guess when basic health care is rationed, and the populace becomes too stupid to walk and chew gum at the same time, preventative measures are a must. At least they’re not talking about banning “walk ‘n texts” yet.

Open Thread Thursday – It’s been too long

by @ 9:17. Filed under Open Thread Thursday.

Let’s see some chatter out there; Shoebox can’t do it all himself :-)

March 5, 2008

The nightmare ticket

by @ 20:49. Filed under Politics - National.

We might have a slight problem with the NRE Spring Hill campaign, which finally yielded fruit last night in Ohio and Texas. It seems Hillary Clinton, fresh off those wins, is talking a unity ticket with Barack Hussein Obama. While a quick stroll through Memeorandum and my feed reader (those not showing up in the Memeorandum “instant reaction” links include Freedom Eden, Ace of Spades and bRight & Early, with obligatory links to Michelle Malkin and VodkaPundit) shows both the right end and the Obama half of the left end poo-poohing the prospect, the Clinton half of the left is openly cheering it. Even though it didn’t sound very serious as she only discussed the possibility of her at the top of that, it was enough for Fox News to get Michelle and Kirsten Powers together to chew this over (once again, thanks for being the blogosphere’s DVR, AP).

I’ll ignore that it probably isn’t serious on her part, and that Obama isn’t ready to discuss it yet, and cash in my E ticket. A Clinton/Obama or Obama/Clinton ticket would be a nightmare for the country. The modern Democratic Party is, at its core, a group of aggrieved constituencies united only by their hatred of uniquely-American aspects of America (i.e. conservatism and Republicans), and they represent the two largest of those constituencies. Given there are rather few in the voting pool that truly are non-partisan, and given there is a not-insignificant portion of that undecided that can be persuaded to particiapte in identity politics, a “unity ticket” would be more than enough to push them over the top.

Another consideration is preserving the Dems’ money advantage. With the Republican race for all intents and purposes over, John McCain can now conserve whatever money is left for the general election and the Democrat nominee. Meanwhile, we’ve got at least 6 more weeks of Democratic winter after Clinton saw her shadow in the bright spotlights of Ohio and Texas, and Pennsylvania has a couple of rather expensive media markets.

However, preventing that “unity ticket” is one of the goals of the NRE Spring Hill campaign. As Amanda Carpenter pointed out, Clinton has been throwing the kitchen sink at Obama. It’s just going to get uglier, and while politicians have an innate ability to forget personal attacks in the primary, there is an upper limit to that ability.

New NRE Poll – Who will be the Republican Presidential nominee in 2012?

by @ 7:08. Filed under NRE Polls, Politics - National.

It’s never too early to think about 4 years from now, especially since things are officially wrapped up on the Republican side. For the eternal optimists, I’ve included John McCain and the sitting VP (I didn’t want the more-or-less optimists who think McCain will be a 1-termer but think that Mike Huckabee or Mitt Romney will be the sitting VP to get pigeon-holed with the pessimists, so I broke them out). For the pessimists, I’ve thrown in the two people most-likely to lay claim to the “next in line” title (Huckabee, who will finish second in delegates if he doesn’t release them all, and Romney, who will finish second in the popular vote but released all his delegates) and the field (note for those that want the field, 4 months ago, we all thought the 56-year streak of “next in line” would finally be broken this time around). For the nihilists, I’ve even thrown in the Whig-ing of the GOP.

Who will be the 2012 Republican Presidential nominee?

Up to 1 answer(s) was/were allowed

  • Nobody as the GOP will not be in existence in 2012 (26%, 66 Vote(s))
  • John McCain (22%, 56 Vote(s))
  • Mitt Romney (as the sitting VP/President) (22%, 56 Vote(s))
  • Mitt Romney (not as the sitting VP/President) (11%, 29 Vote(s))
  • Mike Huckabee (as the sitting VP/President) (8%, 19 Vote(s))
  • Whoever else is the sitting VP/President (you can name the person in the thread) (5%, 13 Vote(s))
  • Whoever else is not the sitting VP/President (you can name the person in the thread) (4%, 9 Vote(s))
  • Mike Huckabee (not as the sitting VP/President) (2%, 5 Vote(s))

Total Voters: 253

Loading ... Loading ...

March 4, 2008

RIP, Wisconsin

by @ 20:18. Filed under Miscellaneous.

Jib has the obit.

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]