define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true); define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true); No Runny Eggs » steveegg

No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

Archive for posts by steveegg.

October 11, 2009

Odd NFL fact of the day

by @ 8:58. Filed under Sports.

Despite the presence of five 4-0 teams (four of which are playing today), there are only 3 games where both teams are above .500:

– Cincinnati (3-1) at Baltimore (3-1)
– Atlanta (2-1) at San Francisco (3-1)
– New England (3-1) at Denver (4-0)

There is also only one game where both teams are under .500 – Cleveland (0-4) at Buffalo (1-3), despite all six teams that are winless (Cleveland, Tennessee, Kansas City, Tampa Bay, St. Louis, and Carolina, which already had its bye) playing this weekend.

BTW, take the Packers over the Bye because they are getting 3.

October 10, 2009

Weekend Hot Read – Anita MonCrief’s “How This Ex-Liberal Found Fortitude and Her Way Home”

by @ 19:28. Filed under Miscellaneous.

I cannot say enough how honored I am to have met Anita MonCrief, first at RightOnline in Pittsburgh in August, then again at the Defending the American Dream Summit last weekend. She is as down-to-earth as can be even after she became a main target of the Left for abandoning them and blowing one of the first whistles on ACORN.

She wrote down a brief history of her journey from being a liberal to a self-thinking person. The close:

Putting political ideology aside for a moment, I will tell anyone that there has been a certain amount of inner peace that I have never had before and I have noticed more harmony in my family. For the first time in my adult life I can honestly say that I am not at war with myself or the world. I never knew that by changing my political beliefs that I would find my faith, change the course of my life and end a self destructive pattern of victimhood.

October 9, 2009

Guest-blogging over at Sister Toldjah

by @ 15:25. Filed under The Blog.

Since Sister Toldjah has gone down with a nasty bug, she hung out the guest-blogger sign, and invited Phineas and me to cover for her while she gets healthy again.

Get well soon, ST, and the rest of you stop on in over there. Once again, I’ll try to do some exclusive content for her and hopefully remember to repost it here when the comments time out, while doing some other stuff here. In fact, I’ve just put up a look at the media poll question from the WPRI/UW poll from the weekend.

The appropriate award for the Norwegian Nobel Committee

Charlie Sykes of 620 WTMJ here in Milwaukee named the Norwegian Nobel Committee the winner of this week’s Almost-Somewhat-Not-Quite-Deep-Enough Tunnel Award.

For those of you not familiar with the Deep Tunnel Award, it’s named after Milwaukee’s not-quite-deep enough Deep Tunnel, which was sold as a couple-million-dollar solution preventing sewage overflows into Lake Michigan and the local rivers during all except the 100-year rainfall while allowing portions of Milwaukee and Shorewood to keep combined sewers, and which turned out to be a $1 billion+ boondoggle that doesn’t even stop overflows from a twice-yearly rainfall and which is causing parts of downtown Milwaukee to sink into the ground. As Charlie says every Friday about 11:40 am when he awards it, it’s awarded to “the person, politician or institution who…is the most full of it”.

The Nobel Committee did beat out some stiff competition from:
– Wisconsin State Senator Jim Sullivan (D-Wauwatosa), who is using a toughening of the drunk-driving laws to raise taxes.
– Congressman Steve Kagen (D-WI), who doesn’t want you or his fellow Congressmen to be able to view bills before they’re voted upon.
– Milwaukee County Board Chair Lee Holloway, who doesn’t let little things such as Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker explicitly telling David Duke to his face that he has no place in the Republican Party get in the way of comparing Walker to Duke.

Roll change – the main street man is back

by @ 12:07. Filed under The Blog.

I haven’t been able to keep up with all the moves Alexander/Rabbit has been doing, but at least this time he only changed the name. Of course, since I didn’t keep up with the previous move, I had to do both in the bloated roll. In any case, a Little off Main is back in business.

In related news, the ultimate expiration date

by @ 11:06. Filed under Politics - National, War on Terror.

I’ll simply let Jim Geraghty deliver the kicker (note; I somehow missed this yesterday, as did the rest of you given the lack of notes in Open Thread Thursday, so “today” is actually “yesterday”)…

The New York Times, today:

President Obama’s national security team is moving to reframe its war strategy by emphasizing the campaign against Al Qaeda in Pakistan while arguing that the Taliban in Afghanistan do not pose a direct threat to the United States, officials said Wednesday.

That’s right; Obama is preparing to hand Afghanistan back to the people goat-fuckers whose wholescale destruction of non-Islamic religious symbols, use of soccer fields as mass public execution venues, and subjugation of women that would make even Iran’s Mad Mullahs blush made Afghanistan the number one place for Al Qaeda to relocate after they got kicked out of Somalia.

Your 2009 Nobel Piec…er, Peace Prize Winner is…

(H/T – Allahpundit)

Barack Hussein Obama II

No Runny Eggs has obtained the first draft of the award resolution:

Whereas Barack Hussein Obama II took the office of United States President on January 20, 2009 on the promise of Hope and Change, and…

Whereas Barack Hussein Obama II promised surrender to the Islamokazis, and…

Whereas Barack Hussein Obama II gave new hope to Communists worldwide, and…

Whereas Barack Hussein Obama II has encouraged Iran to pursue nuclear weapons with which it will wipe out the biggest threat to the Religion of Pieces, Israel, and…

Whereas Barack Hussein Obama II has ended American Exceptionalism,…

Therefore, we the idiots of the Nobel Piece Committee award Barack Hussein Obama II the Nobel Piece Prize.

I wish I were kidding about either the award or the reasoning, but the only thing that is semi-tongue-in-cheek is that first-draft resolution.

Revisions/extensions (7:19 am 10/9/2009) – Hot Air commenter reaganaut answers the inevitable baseball question – “Well, now we know Obama will win the AL Cy Young for throwing out that pitch.” What other undeserving awards will Obama get?

R&E part 2 (8:56 am 10/9/2009) – (H/T – Doug Mataconis) Daniel W. Drezner did one better by getting into the final deliberations of the Norwegian Nobel Committee. It is a must-read.

R&E part 3 (9:07 am 10/9/2009) – Read about just some of the nominees that lost out to President Present. What didn’t they do that Teh Won did? They didn’t support Communism and Radical Islam. In fact, several of those who didn’t make the final cut oppose Communists and Islamokazis.

R&E part 4 (9:26 am 10/9/2009) – Dr. Dave lists the new qualifications for the Nobel Piec…er, Peace Prize.

R&E part 5 (10:50 am 10/9/2009) – Steve Padilla over at the Los Angeles Times’ Top of the Ticket blog came through with the full text of the Nobel announcement:

The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided that the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009 is to be awarded to President Barack Obama for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples. The Committee has attached special importance to Obama’s vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.

Obama has as President created a new climate in international politics. Multilateral diplomacy has regained a central position, with emphasis on the role that the United Nations and other international institutions can play. Dialogue and negotiations are preferred as instruments for resolving even the most difficult international conflicts. The vision of a world free from nuclear arms has powerfully stimulated disarmament and arms control negotiations. Thanks to Obama’s initiative, the USA is now playing a more constructive role in meeting the great climatic challenges the world is confronting. Democracy and human rights are to be strengthened.

Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world’s attention and given its people hope for a better future. His diplomacy is founded in the concept that those who are to lead the world must do so on the basis of values and attitudes that are shared by the majority of the world’s population.

For 108 years, the Norwegian Nobel Committee has sought to stimulate precisely that international policy and those attitudes for which Obama is now the world’s leading spokesman. The Committee endorses Obama’s appeal that “Now is the time for all of us to take our share of responsibility for a global response to global challenges.”

Oslo, October 9, 2009

Damn if that isn’t close to my exclusive first-draft resolution.

R&E part 6 (12:46 pm 10/9/2009) – A couple more for the linkage:
Phineas put up a few more of Obama’s “accomplishments”, as well as the “qualifications” of a few recent Piec…er, Peace Prize winners.
Slublog broke out the Slushop. I’ll give you just one of them; you’re going to have to go to Ace’s place for the rest.

R&E part 7 (12:57 pm 10/9/2009) – I bow to the master of Teh Funny, Iowahawk, who got a copy of Obama’s invitation to the Nobel Peace Player’s Club.

R&E part 8 (7:20 pm 10/9/2009) – I called this one even before I posted it here (see my first comment at the Hot Air thread) – The Wall Street Journal agrees with my assessment that it was an award for the end of American exceptionalism:

The Norwegians are on to something. In a mere nine months, the President has promulgated a vision for the U.S. role in the world that breaks with both Republican and Democratic predecessors. Madeleine Albright, Bill Clinton’s Secretary of State, called America the “indispensable nation” a decade ago. Ronald Reagan called it a “city on the Hill,” an example to the world.

Mr. Obama sees the U.S. differently, as weaker than it was and the rest of the planet as stronger, and so he calls for a humbler America, at best a first among equals, working primarily through the U.N. The world’s challenges, he emphasized yesterday, “can’t be met by any one leader or any one nation.” What this suggests to us—and to the Norwegians—is the end of what has been called “American exceptionalism.” This is the view that U.S. values have universal application and should be promoted without apology, and defended with military force when necessary.

October 8, 2009

The doctors who don’t need to play dress-up

by @ 14:54. Filed under Health Care Reform, Politics - National.

Once again, the two doctors of the Senate, Sen. Tom Coburn, M.D. and Sen. John Barrasso, M.D, will be taking to the Ustream airwaves at 4 pm Central (5 pm Eastern, 3 pm Mountain, check your watches on the Left Coast). They’ll likely be talking about the Baucus non-bill and the CBO’s scoring of said non-bill.

If you missed it; here’s the show courtesy YouTube…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PNdmGFzF-ME[/youtube]

Revisions/extensions (6:13 pm 10/8/2009) – Replaced the Ustream video of the previous show with the YouTube video of the current show.

Why does the world hate Robert Stacy McCain?

by @ 13:20. Filed under Miscellaneous.

The short version of why they hate Robert Stacy McCain is – “They’ve gone mad”. Slightly-longer version:

– He’s figured out how to make the transition from the oldest of media (specifically, the still-good Washington Times to the newest of media, the blogosphere.
He’s still doing actual shoe-leather journalism.
He throws out links better than anybody, and I mean ANYBODY, I’ve seen (especially in the mirror).

Despite that, or probably, because of that, Rachel Maddow brought back an old and false charge of racism (funny how that always seems to be the prefered card of the Left), which a West Virginia paper repeated like any good parrot (never mind said paper has gone to the mat time and time again to defend their former-Klansman Senator).

I had the privilege to run into R. S. a couple months ago. He is simply a great person.

Open Thread Thursday – winter is coming edition

by @ 12:51. Filed under Open Thread Thursday.

Well, Shoebox is likely going to get an inch of snow between Friday night and Saturday, and a wintry mix is slated to fall on top of the bunker Sunday night, so it’s a winter song…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7aWRdXoxlEA[/youtube]

Have at it.

October 6, 2009

Slight change in the look

by @ 19:10. Filed under The Blog.

Since Shoebox has finally started Twittering (do follow him at @Shoeboxnre), I needed to shoehorn a second Twitter badge on the right sidebar. It’s not a perfect solution because, except at the largest resolutions, you’ll need to scroll to get to the bloated roll, but it works for now.

Welcome to the party ‘Lanche arrivals

by @ 15:07. Filed under The Blog.

I have to thank a few high-profile people for linking here the last couple days:

Ed Morrissey over at Hot Air for the video I shot of him at the Defending the American Dream Summit.

Robert Stacy McCain for me trying to steer you to Part 1 of his reporting from Clay County, Kentucky.

John Hawkins for naming me the Blog of the Day over at Linkiest. For those of you who don’t know what Linkiest (formerly known as Conservative Grapevine) is, it is an aggregator of who’s who in the conservative blogosphere.

Thanks for stopping in, and do stick around and enjoy the posts from Shoebox and me (and the occassional guest-blogger).

A housekeeping note; I hadn’t realized that John had changed the name of Conservative Grapevine. I’ve updated the bloated roll to the right.

Poll-a-copia – something for everyone edition

by @ 14:58. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin.

The Wisconsin Policy Research Institute and the UW-Madison Political Science Department released a joint poll of 700 Wisconsinites with landline phones polled between September 27 and September 29. A summary of the poll, complete with charts comparing the current poll with previous polls is here, while the full and raw crosstabs are here.

Before I go into the numbers, I did ask WPRI for clarification on whether any pre-determined factors, such as party ID or income, were used to “smooth” the results, and was told that none was used.

  • While those who consider themselves Democrats outnumber those who consider themselves Republicans 33.3% to 25.6% (which moves to a 47.0% D-42.3% R advantage once leaners are included), former Republican governor Tommy Thompson would win a hypothetical matchup against Democratic Senator Russ Feingold 43.1%-39.1%. The summary also notes that the number of self-described Democrats have been declining since last year.
  • While President Barack Obama remains popular in Wisconsin (57.4% at least somewhat approve of his job performance, 40.5% at least somewhat disapprove), the Rasmussen-style Presidential Approval Index (those who strongly approve less those who strongly disapprove) is -0.2. That compares very favorably to Rasmussen’s national daily tracking poll over that same period of 49% approve, 50% disapprove and a Presidential Approval Index of -6.
  • That approval flies in the face of the national “right/wrong track” question. Not only does “wrong track” beat “right direction” 53.7%-36.6%, the summary notes that that Wisconsin is more pessimistic than the nation as a whole.
  • Another contra-indicator of Obama’s “popularity” is the failure of health care “reform” – 34.9% oppose the Democratic plans of Placebocare, while only 28.3% support it.
  • Meanwhile, Governor Jim Doyle is rather unpopular, with 43.2% at least somewhat approving of his his job performance, 52.3% at least somewhat disapproving, and a Rasmussen-style Gubernatorial Approval Index of -23.7.
  • None of the presumptive candidates for governor (Mark Neumann and Scott Walker on the Republican side, Barbara Lawton and the unannounced Tom Barrett on the Democratic side) achieved 51% recognition even among those who say they are ideologically part of that party. Therefore, I won’t comment further on the poll questions relating to the race (general favorability ratings and the primary matchups).
  • The generic Assembly ballot shows a 40.0% Democrat to 35.0% Republican split. However, again there are contra-indicators galore:
    • Contra-indicator #1 – 57.6% say that Wisconsin is on the wrong track, while 32.4% say that things are going in the right direction. Of note, the “wrong track” crowd has increased since last year.
    • Contra-indicator #2 – A plurality of 32.7% of those surveyed say that “improving the state’s economy and protecting jobs” should be the top priority of the Legislature and the governor (I’ll come back to this in a bit), and the 17.9% say that “holding the line on taxes and government spending” is the most important issue represents the second-largest group, ahead of, in order, “more-affordable” health care, other unnamed issues, improving education, fighting crime, protecting the environment, campaign finance reform, affordable electricity and gas prices.
    • Contra-indicator #3 – 57.4% say that they can trust the state government to do the right thing only some of the time, and another 10.7% say that they can never trust the state government to do the right thing.
    • Contra-indicator #4 – 45.6% say that the policies of the state government over the last year have made the economy worse, 34.1% say that they have had no effect, and only 13.4% say that they have made it better.
  • Back to the economy; there is a significant contra-indicator there. 47.6% would rather protect the environment than protect jobs, 38.7% would rather protect jobs than protect the environment, and 9.0% consider both equally-important. However, going back to the most-important issue for the Legislature and governor, while the economy garnered a 32.7% plurality, protecting the environment ranked 6th of 9 issues listed at 1.0%.

As I said, there’s something for everybody.

Revisions/extensions (4:28 pm 10/6/2009) – How could I forget the “Where do you get most of your news” question? There are several interesting items in that:

– Television dominates across most of the categories (49.3% overall, 52.8% of Democrats, 49.2% of Republicans, 46.2% of independents, over 50% of those over 35 years old).
– The Internet (which covers both blogs and online versions of the traditional media) is a distant second overall at 19.6%. However, it has made strong inroads among those under 36 years old (40.0%, which is a plurality in that group), independents (24.0%) and males (23.0%).
– At 15.0%, newspapers barely beat radio (14.7%). Its adherents are mostly old (25.9% of those over 64 years old) and Democrat (18.5%). The bad news for publishers is only 7.5% of those under 36 years old see them as their primary news source.

I really need to make a longer statement on the state of the media, but I will note a couple of things:

– Television is extremely weak in pursuing local and state issues.
– Newspapers, which traditionally have taken the lead in local/state issues, have not only become rather cozy with certain local/state politicians, but have cut their ability to cover local/state politics beyond the bone because of their aging and shrinking readership.
– Nobody has figured out how to consistently make money with a ‘net-based operation.

Tuesday Hot Read – WaPo’s “If We Lose Afghanistan”

by @ 9:00. Filed under War on Terror.

(H/T – House Minority Leader John Boehner)

The Washington Post makes the case for trying to win in Afghanistan. That’s right; the Washington Post. The takeaway:

That doesn’t mean the Taliban or al-Qaeda would suddenly get hold of Pakistan’s nuclear weapons — though that is the ultimate danger. It does mean that the larger “Afpak” region that the administration has defined as a focus would be destabilized, along with much of the rest of south and central Asia. As long as the Taliban were a dominant force in Afghanistan, Pakistan would be in danger of succumbing to radical forces. In the likely event that Afghanistan was plagued by an endless civil war — as it was during the Taliban’s last ascendancy — the country would again become a place of proxy conflict among Pakistan, India, Iran and other nations. Not those countries, but the United States would be blamed for the horrendous humanitarian cost — including the brutalization of women that would occur wherever the Taliban gained authority.

Defeating the Taliban and fostering an Afghan government and army that can stabilize the country are daunting tasks that will require years of patience. It could be that even a concerted effort, along the lines proposed by Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal, would fail. There should be no mistaking, however, what the stakes of this conflict are. Whether or not al-Qaeda regains its pre-9/11 haven, a Taliban victory would be a catastrophe for the United States and its allies.

The reason Al Qaeda was drawn to Afghanistan is that the Taliban actually implemented their idea of a caliphate. The destruction of all non-Islamic artifacts and the mass executions that happened in Afghanistan when the Taliban took over predated Osama Bin Laden’s arrival.

Moron math – How many 16-0 teams can there be?

by @ 7:46. Filed under Sports.

Notropis asked this question in last night’s Ace of Spades HQ MNF open thread:

Here’s a fun math question (or not):

Examine the NFL schedule, and determine what the maximum number of undefeated teams could be, at any point in the season.

Ex: after week 1, I’d guess it’d be 16, unless someone had a week 1 bye.

Since the order of the NFL schedule is too random to properly assign victories between Weeks 2 and 16 (e.g., a team that won in Week 1 may or may not face another 1-0 team in Week 2), it is impossible to answer that without a Cray supercomputer.

However, since the content of the NFL schedule is entirely predictable, we can figure out how many teams can finish 16-0. The schedule of every NFL team is made up of the following:
– A home-and-home series against each of the other three division rivals.
– A game apiece against the four teams of a single division in the other conference.
– A game apiece against the three teams in the same conference that finished in the same divisional order the prior season (i.e. the NFC North champion will face the NFC East champion, the NFC South champion, and the NFC West champion).
– A game apiece against the other three teams of a single division in the same conference.

A single team that goes 16-0 (Team A) eliminates from a 16-0 possibility the other three teams in its division, all four teams of its “interconference” division schedule, the three teams that finished in the same divisional spot the prior season, and the other three teams of its “intraconference” division schedule. That leaves 6 teams in that same conference and 12 teams in the other conference that could go 16-0.

A second team in the same conference that goes 16-0 (Team B) eliminates from a 16-0 possibility its two division rivals that didn’t face Team A, all four teams of its “interconference” division schedule, the two teams that finished in the same divisional spot the previous season that didn’t face Team A, and the team of its “intraconference” division schedule that didn’t face Team A. That leaves just 8 teams in the other conference that could go 16-0.

The first team in the other conference that goes 16-0 (Team C) eliminates from a 16-0 possibility, at a minimum, its three division rivals and the team that finished in the same divisional spot the previous season that didn’t face Team A or Team B. If the “intraconference” division opponents for Team C are not the same as the “interconference” division opponents for Team A or Team B, Team C also eliminates the other 3 teams of that division.

If, however, they are the same, a fourth team (Team D) could go 16-0.

Roll bloat – Let there be change

by @ 0:00. Filed under The Blog.

There’s nothing common about Common Cents Blog. Now only if they would enable the feed, even if it’s just an excerpt, it would be easier to follow.

October 5, 2009

The Do Not Disturb sign is lit

by @ 19:30. Filed under Sports.

My allergies are acting up too much to head out for the game, but I’ve got the not-so-big screen tuned into Channel 12.1 (or 34.1 if your PSIP is not working right) here in Milwaukee. I’ve got the iPod Touch fired up to keep up on Twitter, but the main focus will be on the Packers whupping up on the Vikes.

Shoebox undoubtedly has a different take on that since he’s on the other side of the Mississippi (BTW, I see 3 picks, including a pick-6).

Quick NRE poll – Who will win tonight?

by @ 11:48. Filed under NRE Polls, Sports.

It is the Battle of the Mississippi River, Part I tonight, as the Minnesota Vikings storm Lambeau Field to take on the Green Bay Packers Packers storm the Metrodome to take on the Vikings. First place in the NFC North will be on the line.

Who will win tonight?

Up to 1 answer(s) was/were allowed

  • Vikings (57%, 8 Vote(s))
  • Packers (43%, 6 Vote(s))

Total Voters: 14

Loading ... Loading ...

Vote quickly – I’m ending this at 7 pm.

I’m reeling in the years

by @ 9:20. Filed under The Blog.

I honestly don’t know why I’m acknowledging my 4th blogiversary because I missed the first three. It could be because a couple of good friends, Ed Morrissey and Sister Toldjah, celebrated their 6th blogiversaries over the weekend. Of course, we need some music…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vyaYXwoXpeM[/youtube]

I first have to thank you, the loyal readers of this place. You’re why I keep on churning out the inane ra…er, high-qual…er, I was right the first time with inane rants.

I definitely wouldn’t have made it to year four without Shoebox. I lost count of how many times he’s bailed out this place from my blogging dry spells. Besides, even though he’ll deny it, he is better than I am.

I have to give a special shout-out to all my guest-bloggers; Fred, Patrick, Aaron, Leslie, silent E, Big G, the aforementioned Sister Toldjah and Phineas. I owe all of you drinks.

I am deeply humbled when I recall all the people I’ve met because I’ve been blogging. There are too many to name, and even though I probably don’t belong in the same room as many of them, they are all great people.

I tried to put together a “best-of” list of posts, but there’s a couple problems with that. There’s just so many posts that have gone up over the years that I would sound narcisstic. Besides, most of those that I wrote aren’t exactly “best-of” material.

God willing, the posts will keep coming for many more years, and they’ll hopefully be good enough to keep you coming into this little corner hole in the wall.

October 4, 2009

Ed Morrissey talks taxes at Defending the American Dream Summit

Because of various technical issues, I was pretty much limited to covering the 2009 Defending the American Dream Summit on Twitter. However, I did get some not-quite-great-quality video of Ed Morrissey talking about the tax system and especially the ill-named HAPPY Act, which would create a tax deduction for pet expenses. He explains why both halves of the bipartisan Party-In-Government likes the current tax code.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jtRkBcN0ebg[/youtube]

I wish I had more, but those tech issues completely threw me off my game. However, Kyle Maichle picked up the slack.

Revisions/extensions (5:19 pm 10/5/2009) – Changed the link to the Hot Air post Ed put up. Thanks again, Ed.

Weekend hot read – R.S. McCain goes to Big Creek, Kentucky

by @ 20:38. Filed under Law and order.

I didn’t really follow the story of Bill Sparkman. Fortunately, Robert Stacy McCain took several days out of his life to try to find out what really happened in Big Creek, Kentucky about September 23rd.

Even though the first part of the series he worked up is 4,000 words, or perhaps because of it, I cannot do justice with an excerpt. You’re just going to have to go read the whole thing.

One housekeeping item – do hit his tip jar. If I can send some money his way, you can.

October 3, 2009

Support the 0%-tax-increase 2010 Milwaukee County budget

by @ 9:33. Filed under Politics - Milwaukee County, Taxes.

My friends at Citizens for Responsible Government are holding a rally at Serb Hall (5101 W Oklahoma Ave in Milwaukee) on Sunday between 2 pm and 4 pm to support Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker’s 8th consecutive 0%-tax-levy-increase county budget. Since there is no Packer game on Sunday, unless you’re out of town (like me; I won’t be back until about 5 pm), there is no reason you can’t attend.

In addition to Walker, there will be several citizens who have been forced out of business or their homes because of out-of-control tax increases at other units of government and by an uncaring County Board. It is time to demand that government live within the means that the rest of us have to live within.

I do recommend getting there early; the unions who only care about themselves will be showing up about 1:30.

September 30, 2009

From DC hot read – House Budget Committee Republicans’ “Bigger Government”

by @ 19:13. Filed under Politics - National.

I almost had the Emergency Blogging System do this post because the news is that dire. The House Budget Republicans compared and contrasted the growth of the federal payrolls to the shrinkage of the private-sector payrolls. I’ll give you the meat of the piece (the emphasis is in the original):

While private-sector employment has continued declining, government has expanded. Federal jobs have increased by 43,000 since the start of the year, 25,000 of which followed enactment of the ARRA. But this figure vastly understates the government’s employment growth, because it includes the workforce reduction at the Postal Service. If the USPS is excluded, Federal employment has increased by more than 65,000.

By next year, Federal employment will have risen by 15.6 percent since 2006, the period of Democratic control of Congress – an increase of about 286,000 full-time equivalents [FTEs], according to administration figures (see Table 1 and Table 2 in the appendix of this document). The growth of non-defense agencies has been larger, at 20.5 percent. Even if the Defense and Commerce Departments are excluded – the latter to account for the large force of temporary hires for next year’s census – Federal civilian employment will have expanded by nearly 12 percent since 2006. The vast majority of this growth – 102,800 positions – will occur in 2009 and 2010; and this does not include the additional Federal employees who will be needed as a result of cap-and-trade legislation, the planned government takeover of health care, financial regulation, and other components of the President’s agenda.

In other words, while the economy has been shrinking, the government has expanded in absolute terms. Since the beginning of the recession, the economy has lost 7 million jobs, while the Federal Government has added 75,000 jobs.

A bonus item from the “Change in Civilian Federal Employment” table on the last page – the only agencies (other than the USPS) that will see a decrease in employment rolls in 2009-2010 will be the Department of Agriculture (800 FTEs, or 0.8% of the workforce) and the Small Business Administration (also 800 FTEs, but 20% of the workforce). Somehow I don’t think that’s a coincidence given Obama’s hostility toward farmers and small business owners.

September 27, 2009

Eggs on the road – Fall DC edition

by @ 18:42. Filed under Miscellaneous.

If it’s about the first week in October, it’s time for Americans for Prosperity’s Defending the American Dream summit. Once again, I will be dropping in a couple days early, specifically on Tuesday.

Do consider this your 42-hour warning.

September 24, 2009

Forbes weighs in on the business climate

R&E part 2 (10:38 pm 9/24/2009) – How can I forget my hat-tips? Patrick and Huckleberry Dumbell were all over this before I got to it.

Shoebox reported on the Tax Foundation’s 2009 Business Tax Climate report, which put both Wisconsin (43rd) and Minnesota (44th) in the Doghouse Ten. Forbes has some relatively-good news for one of those states, and some really-bad news for the other:

– Minnesota, buoyed by its 6th-best quality-of-life and top-10 labor rank, ranked as the 17th-best state for business. However, the news isn’t all good; its growth potential was the only other of Forbes’ 6 criteria to rank in the upper half (20th), with its regulatory climate (30th), business costs (32nd) and economic climate (35th) below par. Worse; it slipped from 11th just last year.

– Wisconsin, on the other hand, is the third-worst state for business, behind only Michigan and Rhode Island. The only above-average item in Wisconsin is quality-of-life (11th), with business costs ranking 35th, labor rank 36th, regulatory climate 37th, economic climate 41st and growth prospects 45th. Like Minnesota, Wisconsin slipped from last year; unlike Minnesota, the fall was from 43rd to 48th.

Why do I get the feeling that weighed in on Ron Kind’s decsion to stay in Congress?

Revisions/extensions (10:35 pm 9/24/2009) – Corrected the 2008 Wisconsin rank.

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]