No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

Archive for September, 2009

September 17, 2009

Where’s Hope Now?

A week ago President Obama grabbed his final quiver of arrows and started firing the final efforts to save health care reform.  His first effort was a speech to a joint session of Congress.

After a month of highly attended and vocal town halls where it became apparent that many Americans knew more about Congress’ plans than the members of Congress did, it was anticipated that President Obama’s speech would reset the health care discussion.  It was hoped that President Obama might have the wisdom to publicly discard parts that had drawn clear public enmity, such as the public option and offer policies that could be supported on both sides of the aisle like opening insurance sales across state lines.  The President did neither.  Rather, the President dug his heels in for support of a public option, called those who opposed the legislation liars and proceeded to refrain several assertions that had been proven not to be true.

Expectations were high that President Obama’s speech would stop the slide of public support and regain support for his health care reform initiative.  At first, it appeared that he accomplished his goal. 

Hovering around its lowest level of public support just prior to Obama’s speech, in the week following the speech, Rasmussen recorded steady rebounds of support for Obama’s health care reform.  Along with it, Obama’s personal approval level which had been hovering around all time lows, also rebounded.  Ah, once again there was hope for change for Obama worshippers.  Unfortunately, the hope was short lived.

Yesterday showed the first crack in the Obama magic.  Rasmussen reported that the rebound in public support for health care reform had stopped and had slid back a bit.  Today, support for the health plan dropped below the levels that were seen immediately before Obama’s speech.  Coincidentally, Obama’s approval level is also dropping.

Compounding Obama’s attempt to save health reform is a tangent but highly relevant story; the investigative reporting showing ACORN in need of a visit from the RICO agents. 

As the townhalls were filling with anti big government folks in the first half of August, Obama called on ACORN to help balance the attendance.  While their tactics were suspect, there is no doubt that they balanced at least the volume if not the substance, of the meetings.  With the revelations of the past week, government contacts are showing ACORN more undersides of buses than a repairman in a Greyhound garage.  After having bragged about his strong connections with ACORN, President Obama will need to keep a wide berth of this group until the heat dies down, which I don’t expect to happen anytime soon.  Thus, for the time being, there will be far less public displays of affection for Obamacare.

With the House bill apparently unable to find a combination of Democrats that can get it passed, some Senate Democrats are trying to cobble a plan that could pass out of the Senate and give the House some cover.  One of those attempts was unveiled today by Max Baucus.  I’ll let others give you the detail of the plan.  Suffice it to say that it is missing the mark on all counts.  In fact, where it took several weeks for opposition to gather on the House bill, the Baucus bill hadn’t even had it’s first news conference before opposition formed:

AFSCME President McEntee: “Finance Committee Health Care Bill is Deeply Flawed” (Press Release, September 16, 2009)

Teamsters Oppose Baucus Plan to Tax Health Insurance Companies (Press Release, September 16, 2009)

AFL-CIO: Baucus bill ‘absolutely fails’ (The Hill, September 16, 2009)

HCAN calls bill a “failure” (Politico)

Unfortunately, for President Obama, the opposition this time was coming from within his own ranks.  Add to this reports that there are enough people unhappy for a variety of reasons, that there may not be enough votes to even pass Baucus’ bill out of his own committee and it leaves just one question; whatever happened to hope and change?

September 16, 2009

Video of the day – John Stossel destroys health insurance

by @ 11:38. Filed under Health Care Reform.

(H/T – Charlie Sykes)

Enjoy as ABC News (soon to be Fox News) correspondent John Stossel explains why health insurance makes health care a lot more expensive…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WnS96NVlMI[/youtube]

Those of you who went to AFP-WI’s Health Care Townhalls already know the specifics, but it doesn’t hurt to hear them again.

Uh-oh – 45% of physicians plan to depart early if ObamaCare passes

(H/T – Michelle Malkin)

Investor’s Business Daily reports that, in its latest IBD/TIPP poll, 45% of doctors surveyed said that they would consider leaving their practice or retiring early if a Democratic version of health care reform were passed. They also found that 65% oppose the plans the Democrats have out there, and 71% (or 72% whether one believes the graphic or the text) don’t believe that 47 million could be added to the insurance rolls under government control with higher-quality care for less money.

Let’s focus on those who would leave early. Early last year, The Monster took a look at what happens to the supply-demand curves when government interferes with prices. The same principle exists when supply is artificially-tampered with.

First, let’s restate what happens when the supply of a service and the demand of same are in harmony. The price and quantity are at an equilibrium, as shown by this graph from Monster:

Note where the supply curve (S) and demand curve (D) meet. That is the point of equilibrium, with a specific price (P) and quantity (Q).

Now, let’s take a look at what happens when the quantity is artificially-capped below the equilibrium point:

Because the supply does not meet the demand, there is a shortage. The red line connecting the supply curve and the demand curve represents said shortage, with a corresponding increase in price once the two meet.

Of course, that assumes that prices will be allowed to rise to meet the demand. What happens when both the quantity and the price are artficially-capped? Let’s take a look:

The blue line represents an unmet shortage. If you prefer to use a single word for that, “rationing” would be a good choice.

Revisions/extensions (9:58 am 9/16/2009) – Shoebox pointed out last month that even if no physicians departed early, we would be 13% short on the required number of physicians the day that ObamaCare goes into effect. Talk about your uh-oh moments.

Unraveling?

by @ 9:11. Filed under Obama worship, Politics - National.

Headlines from this morning’s Drudge Report:

U.S. RIFT WITH EUROPE OVER CLIMATE DEAL…

ObamaCare: Dem Senator Warns of ‘Big, Big Tax’ on Middle Class…

White House collects Web users’ data ‘without notice’…

Obama Admin: Cap And Trade Could Cost Families $1,761 A Year…

CLINTON CONCERN ABOUT NEW WEAPONS TO VENEZUELA; ARMS RACE…

Amongst other items, Obama ran promising that the bottom 95% of income earners would not see $.01 of tax increases. He also claimed that other countries would once again listen to and respect us. Funny none of that seems to be happening. Finally, Obama claimed that he would heal the country’s “racial divide” and be the first “post racial” president. Jimmy Carter doesn’t think so (video at the link)

I live in the south

Is Carter’s statement of credibility for being able to discern when people are opposed to someone’s race as opposed to someone’s destructive national policies.

According to Rasmussen, President Obama was elected gaining nearly 53% of the popular vote.  On the day he was inaugurated, President Obama enjoyed a favorability rating of 65% and a net positive rating of 28%.  This morning, President Obama’s favorabilty rating is just 49% and he has a net unfavorable rating of 6%.  Obviously a change of this magnitude begs the question:  What has changed?  Does Jimmy Carter and the other Democrats who echo the “racism” charge believe that nobody noticed the color of President Obama’s skin on January 21st?  Does Carter and others, believe that Obama’s skin color has changed in the past eight months?

In this case, resorting to a charge of “racism” shows that the Democrats are short on ammo.  They are firing their final, desperate rounds in an attempt to prevent or forestall an over run of their positions by a populace backlash.

In the specific case of Jimmy Carter, it’s interesting that he relies on his southern heritage for his credentials.  It seems to me that rather than his heritage, Carter need no more reason than “it takes one to know one” for his charge of racism.

I think the words of the famous philosopher Mr. T sums up Carter’s take perfectly,

I pity the fool!

September 15, 2009

Roll bloat – the Pub is back

by @ 18:34. Filed under The Blog.

James Wigderson, blogger, Cowboys fan (though I don’t hold it against him…much), and columnist, has come back from his summer vacation and opened up a new version of the Wigderson Library and Pub. Welcome back James.

George W. Bush – “There is no (conservative) movement.” Me – “We’re back!”

by @ 18:20. Filed under Politics - National.

(H/Ts – Ed Morrissey and DrewM.)

Byron York retells the following episode from former Bush speechwriter Matt Ladimer’s new book, Speechless: Tales of a White House Survivor in today’s Washington Examiner:

Bush was preparing to give a speech to the annual meeting of the Conservative Political Action Conference, or CPAC. The conference is the event of the year for conservative activists; Republican politicians are required to appear and offer their praise of the conservative movement.

Latimer got the assignment to write Bush’s speech. Draft in hand, he and a few other writers met with the president in the Oval Office. Bush was decidedly unenthusiastic.

“What is this movement you keep talking about in the speech?” the president asked Latimer.

Latimer explained that he meant the conservative movement — the movement that gave rise to groups like CPAC.

Bush seemed perplexed. Latimer elaborated a bit more. Then Bush leaned forward, with a point to make.

“Let me tell you something,” the president said. “I whupped Gary Bauer’s ass in 2000. So take out all this movement stuff. There is no movement.”…

Now it was Latimer who looked perplexed. Bush tried to explain.

“Look, I know this probably sounds arrogant to say,” the president said, “but I redefined the Republican Party.”

What a seriously-ungrateful fucktard. Without that movement, specifically Free Republic, Al Gore would have successfully stole Florida and thus the Presidency in 2000, and that’s the thanks we get. News flash to Bush – you and the GOP may have co-opted the conservative movement between 2000 and 2006, but as the Year of the Tea Party is proving, we’re back, and we’re mad.

As for the redefinition of the Republican Party, Bush redefined it all right. The only differences of note between the Republicans and the Democrats became the willingness to fight wars and to whom the largesse of the Treasury would be kicked back, which has given rise to the bipartisan Party-In-Government.

Of course, we should have seen the lack of conservatism out of Bush coming a mile away…

  • The first seeds of doubt, mentioned by Ed, came from the compromising nature of Bush’s run as governor of Texas, and specifically his campaign-era “I’m a uniter, not a divider” line.
  • Also from that campaign, and noted by Drew, we got the disaster that is known as “compassionate conservatism”. Folks, you may not want to hear it, but it is not the job of government to guarantee equality or equity of outcome.
  • The 2001 tax cuts were weighted too far toward creating the 50% leech/50% taxpayer ratio that will destroy the country. At least the 2003 version was weighted more toward activities that actually grow the economy.
  • While, at least thus far, the prescription-drug benefit portion of Medicare has come in under budget, its creation was extra-Constitutional.
  • Speaking of extra-Constitutional acts, Bush signed the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Reform Liberal Protection Act.
  • On education, Bush made the same mistake Richard Nixon did with health care – he let Ted Kennedy write the bill, and predictably it expanded the role of and spending by the federal government far beyond the bounds of the Constitution.
  • Speaking of spending, it is not a coincidence that, prior to Barack Obama’s assumption of the office, the deficits under Bush were the highest ever.
  • While Byron mentions that conservatives are pleased with Justice Samuel Alito, his SCOTUS nomination came only after we revolted against Harriet Miers (some of which is in the earliest of the archives of this place).
  • Finally, there’s the subject of bailouts, for which Michelle Malkin deemed the final betrayal a perfect political epitaph – “I’ve abandoned free-market principles to save the free-market system.” Er, no; all it did, especially the loans to GM and Chrysler which became the means to create Government Motors and UAW Motors, was sow the seeds to destroy the free-market system.

The question is, can the conservatives keep up the momentum built since February for another 15 months? Ed Driscoll takes on that question in the current edition of Silicon Graffiti.

Revisions/extensions (10:20 am 9/16/2009) – Related coverage (H/T – Dad29) – Tom Macquire found that Bush didn’t know what TARP was supposed to do either. Brilliance; sheer unadulterated brilliance!

Down in the hole early

by @ 16:33. Filed under Sports.

Once again, I proved that picking NFL games straight-up is easier than taking candy from a baby, but picking against the spread is the hardest thing in the universe. Let’s review the carnage:

Tennessee 10 @ Pittsburgh 13 (-6.5-LOSS) – The Hines Ward fumble as Pittsburgh was headed in for a touchdown was the appropriate start to the season. Oh, did I mention I hate overtime?
Chicago 15 @ Green Bay 21 (-3.5) – Both offensive lines were, in a word, offensive. Fortunately, the Bears’ o-line problems extended to their punt unit. Oh yeah; the under hit too.
Minnesota 34 (-4.5) @ Cleveland 20 – Or at least it was an easy picking.
Detroit 27 @ New Orleans 45 (-13.5) – TIIIIMBEEEEEEERRRRR!!!!!
Miami 7 @ Atlanta 19 (-4) – What did I say about the Wildcat on Thursday?
Kansas City 24 (+13) @ Baltimore 38 – I saw the scores. Now I’m a believer!
Philadelphia 38 @ Carolina 10 (+2.5) – …and boy did that object move.
Denver 12 @ Cincinnati 7 (-4) – It figures that the Game of the Weak would feature the Play of the Week.
New York Jets 24 (+5) @ Houston 7 – The Barking Dog is back, and he is HUNGRY!
Jacksonville 12 (+7-WIN) @ Indianapolis 14 – Mirror, mirror on the wall, what’s the closest rivalry of all?
Dallas 34 (-6) @ Tampa Bay 21 – I may not know my spreads, but I know my overs.
San Francisco 20 @ Arizona 16 (-6) – …but passing to Gore plus the Super Loser Curse equals disaster.
Washington 17 @ New York Giants 23 (-6.5-LOSS) – It’s a good thing the Giants don’t play in New York City; Eli fired the shotgun 18 timees.
St. Louis 0 (+8.5) @ Seattle 28 – I’m sure there’s a couple of high school teams can beat the Lambs.
Buffalo 24 @ New England 25 (-11-LOSS) – That was a collapse of historic proportions from the first and only team to lose 4 Championship Games That Cannot Be Named™ in a row.
San Diego 24 (-9-LOSS) @ Oakland 20 – And then there was one running back worth taking in the first round of a fantasy draft.

That leaves me 7-9 ATS, 13-3 straight-up, and 2-0 on the over/under bonus plays. All in all, not a bad Weak One considering my historical suckitude on this.

Don’t Look Now…

In case you missed it, there was a rather large social gathering in Washington D.C. over the weekend.  If you read about it in the New York Times, there were merely “thousands” of people at the event. If you read about it at an objective source there was something north of 1 million people on and around the mall.

Regardless of the actual number that appeared on the mall, David Axelrod, a senior advisor to President Obama had this to say about the mall denizens:

I don’t think it’s indicative of the nation’s mood,” Axelrod said on CBS’ “Face the Nation.” “You know, I don’t think we ought to be distracted by that. My message to them is, they’re wrong.”

David, Robert Gibbs had some advice for you last week and you really should heed it!

Mr. Axelrod, you’re wrong!  In a poll released today from Zogby, it turns out that the majority of America agrees with the Tea Party participants at least on the major issues:

Asked if they agree or disagree that the federal government should require all Americans to purchase health insurance or face a fine — a provision favored by Democrats — 70.2 percent said they disagree, and only 18.5 percent agree. The rest are not sure.

Mr. Axelrod, you’re wrong again:

A resounding 75 percent of respondents said that taxes should not be raised to fund a government-run health insurance program for Americans who do not have health insurance.

Oh, and Mr. Axelrod, you’re wrong again:

The pollsters stated: “President Obama is promoting a new government agency called the ‘Independent Medicare Advisory Council,’ and some people believe this agency should use its powers to deny payment for procedures it deems unnecessary or futile.”

Critics say such power would interfere with the doctor-patient relationship, the pollsters noted, and many consider it a form of healthcare rationing. Nearly 59 percent said they oppose the creation of the council, and just 30.6 percent support it.

May I say, Mr. Axelrod, You’re wrong again:

Some Republicans have called for provisions allowing Americans to purchase health insurance from providers outside their state as an alternative to Obama’s proposed government-supported “public option” insurance plan. Respondents said they favor such provisions by an overwhelming margin, 82.8 percent to 6.9 percent.

And one last time, Mr. Axlerod, you are wrong!

Also, 78.5 percent of those polled believe tort reform is needed to lower the cost of medical malpractice insurance, an issue that Obama has not seriously addressed. And 77.3 percent oppose plans to tax employer-provided healthcare benefits.

Would people like to see some reform, I believe the answer is yes.  however, do people want the reform that the Democrats are offering?  The answer to that is a resounding no!

Stay on target, stay on target!

Hey Dems, What’s Your Problem?

According to House Republicans the Democrats don’t have the votes to pass health care reform out of the House.  You see, the problem is that they lose at least 44 votes if there is a public option included and 57 if it’s not included.  Huh, last I looked there were 256 Democrats in the House.  What happened to the other 155?  Can they not make up their mind?

For you Minnesota readers, I noted that Betty McCollum and Tim Walz are not on either list.

For the rest of you, I noted that the Democrat leadership including Nancy Pelosi, James Clyburn and Steny Hoyer are not on either list.

Is this really so hard?  Either you believe that the government is best capable of running health care or you don’t.  There is no “kind of.”  There is no fractional amount.  You’re either in or not.  It’s pretty simple. 

Folks, if your representative is not on one of these lists, you ought to be asking why they are equivocating.  If they are on the “we must have a public option” list, they can no longer hide as a “blue dog” and should be called out.

The lines are drawn.  Obama risks losing all credibility if he doesn’t get this billed passed out of the House.

Stay on target, Stay on target!

September 12, 2009

Well Decide, Which Way Do You Want It?

The Coast Guard ran a training exercise today.  It was routine in every way except that President Obama was involved in a 9/11 memorial in the same general area as the exercise.  Oh, and nobody told CNN that it was a training exercise.

Based on what they had heard on scanners that overheard the Coast Guard communications, CNN began reporting that the Coast Guard was pursuing a boat on the Potomac and that shots had been fired.  Needless to say, the reporting caused a bit of a stir.

Commenting on the incident, Press Secretary Robert Gibbs chided CNN:

“My only caution would be that before we report things like this, checking would be good,” Gibbs said.

Sage advice from Mr. Gibbs, to be certain.  I wonder when Mr. Gibbs would have liked CNN to have begun “checking” before “reporting?”

Should CNN have done some “checking” before they “reported” that John McCain’s endorsement by John Haggee was the equivalent of Barack Obama sitting in Jeremiah Wright’s church and listening to his sermons for 20 years?

Should CNN have done some “checking” before they “reported” this puff piece on the self proclaimed communist, Van Jones?

Or, perhaps, just maybe, CNN should have done some “checking” before they “reported” that following President Obama’s most recent infomercial for health reform, 67% liked Obamacare based on significantly oversampling democrats?

It’s not very often I agree with Robert Gibbs.  In fact, I’m not sure I ever have before.  On this issue, I wholeheartedly agree with Mr. Gibbs.  I would like to see CNN doing some real checking and some real reporting.  I suspect though, that if they did that, Mr. Gibbs would not be happy at having lost a compliant media lapdog.  That leaves a quandary for Mr. Gibbs; which way do you want it?

September 11, 2009

9/11 Hot Read – Allahpundit remembers 9/11

by @ 6:54. Filed under History.

Revisions/extensions (8:52 pm 9/11/2009) – After multiple requests to post it on Hot Air, Allahpundit has done so. Thanks again AP.

Allahpundit, one of the two main bloggers at Hot Air, ran the following on his Twitter stream starting a bit before midnight Eastern (reposted in its entirety in chronological order as Twitter posts Tweets in reverse-chronological order):

Eight years ago, I remember opening my eyes at 8:46 a.m. in my downtown Manhattan apartment because…
…I thought a truck had crashed in the street outside
I remember pacing my apartment for the next 15 minutes thinking, stupidly, that a gas line might have been hit in the North Tower…
…and then I heard another explosion. I hope no one ever hears anything like it.
All I can say to describe it is: Imagine the sound of thousands of Americans screaming on a city street
It was unbelievable, almost literally
I remember being on the sidewalk and there was an FBI agent saying he was cordoning off the street…
…and then, the next day, when I went back for my cats, they told me I might see bodies lying in front of my apartment building (I didn’t)
We held a memorial service in October for my cousin’s husband, who was “missing” but not really…
He worked for Cantor Fitzgerald. They found a piece of his ribcage in the rubble not too long afterwards.
This is the guy who conspired to murder him: http://is.gd/38h7y
Had a friend from the high school speech and debate team who disappeared from the 105th floor
Had another friend of a friend who worked on the 80th floor or so, married six weeks before the attack…
Speculation is that he was right in the plane’s path, and was killed instantly when it plowed through the building
Did a bit of legal work for a couple whose son worked in the upper floors. Was dating someone else up there at the time…
I was told that she managed to call her parents while they were trapped up there and that the call “was not good”
Never found out if it was cut off by the building collapsing or not
I remember opening my eyes at 8:46 a.m. thinking “I hope that was just a pothole.” Then I heard a guy outside my window say, “Oh shit”
Opened the window, looked to my left, saw huge smoke coming out of the WTC
Left at around 9:30, decided to walk uptown thinking that the buildings would never collapse and that…
…I’d be back in my apartment by the next night. I never went back. It was closed off until December.
I remember thinking when I was a few blocks away that the towers might collapse, and so I walked faster…
…although I sneered at myself later for thinking that might be true and for being a coward. Although not for long.
To this day, you can find photos of thousands of people congregated in the blocks surrounding the Towers, seemingly…
…waiting for them to fall that day
When I got to midtown, rumors were that Camp David and the Sears Tower had also been destroyed. I remember looking around…
…and thinking that we had to get out of Manhattan, as this might be some pretext to get us into the street and hit us with some germ
I callled my dad — and somehow miraculously got through — and told him I was alive, then headed for the 59th street bridge
To this day, the scariest memory is being on that bridge, looking at the Towers smoking in the distance,
and thinking maybe the plotters had wired the bridge too to explode beneath us while we were crossing it.
I remember talking to some guy on the bridge that we’d get revenge, but…
…you had to see the smoke coming from the Towers in the distance. It was like a volcano
I remember being down there two months later. There was a single piece of structure…
…maybe five stories tall of the lattice-work still standing. It looked like a limb of a corpse sticking up out of the ground.
They knocked it down soon after
At my office, which I had just joined, I was told that…
…some people had seen the jumpers diving out the windows to escape the flames that morning
There was a video online, posted maybe two years ago, shot from the hotel across the street,,,
…and it showed roughly 10-12 bodies flattened into panackes lying in the central plaza
Maybe it’s still online somewhere
You have to see it to understand, though. You get a sense of it from the Naudet brothers documentary hearing…
…the explosions as the bodies land in the plaza, but seeing it and hearing it are two different things
I remember after I got over the bridge into Queens, I heard a noise overheard…
…that I’d never heard before. It was an F-15, on patrol over New York. Very odd sound. A high-pitched wheeze.
I remember on Sept. 12, when I got on the train to go downtown and try to get my cats out of the apartment…
…the Village was utterly deserted. No one on the streets. Like “28 Days Later” if you’ve seen that
We made it to a checkpoint and the cop said go no further, until my mom intervened. Then he took pity…
…and agreed to let me downtown IF I agreed that any exposure to bodies lying in the streets was my own fault.
Didn’t see any bodies, but I did see soldiers, ATF, FBI, and so on. The ground was totally covered by white clay…
…which I knew was formed by WTC dust plus water from the FDNY. It look like a moonscape.
There was a firefighter at the intersection and I flagged him down and asked if I could borrow his flashlight, since…
…all buildings downtown had no power. He gave me a pen flashlight.
The doors to my building at Park Place were glass but had kicked in, presumably by the FDNY, to see if there were…
…survivors inside. When I got in there, all power was out. No elevators, no hall lights…
…I had to feel my way to the hall and make my way up to my apartment on the third floor by feeling my way there…
…When I got there, the cats were alive. There was WTC dust inside the apartment, but…
…for whatever reason, I had closed the windows before I left to walk uptown that day, so dust was minimal. I loaded them…
…into the carrier and took them back to Queens. That was the last I could get into the apartment until December 2001,…
…and then it was only to get in, take whatever belongings were salvageable (i.e. not computer), and get out. I lived…
in that apartment from 7/2001 to 9/2001, but given the diseases longtime residents have had…
…I’m lucky I decided to move
My only other significant memory is being in the lobby of the apartment building on 9/11…
…and trying to console some woman who lived there who said her father worked on the lower floors of the WTC. I assume…
…he made it out alive, but she was hysterical as of 9:30 that a.m. Who could blame her?
I do remember feeling embarrassed afterwards that…
…I initially thought the smoke coming out of the North Tower was due to a fire or something, but…
…it’s hard to explain the shock of realizing you’re living through a historical event while you’re living through it.
For months afterwards, I tried to tell people how I thought maybe the Towers…
…were going to be hit by six or seven or eight planes in succession. Which sounds nuts, but once you’re in the moment…
…and crazy shit is happening, you don’t know how crazy that script is about to get.
When I left at 9:30, I thought more planes were coming.
I left because I thought, “Well, if these planes hit the building the right way, it could fall and land on mine.”\
I remember getting to 57th Street and asking some dude, “What happened?”
And he said, “They collapsed” and I couldn’t believe both of them had gone down. Even after the planes hit…
…I remembered that the Empire State Building had taken a hit from a military plane during WWII and still stood tall
So it was never a serious possibility that the WTC would collapse. I assumed…
…that the FDNY would get up there, put out the fire, and the WTC would be upright but with gigantic holes in it
It took an hour for the first tower to go down, 90 minutes for the second.
Even now, despite the smoke, I’m convinced most of the people trapped at the top were alive…
…and waiting, somehow, for a rescue. The couple whose legal case I worked for told me that…
…their son and his GF contacted her father very shortly before the collapse. Which makes sense. As much smoke as there was…
…if you have a five-story hole in the wall to let air in to breathe, you’re going to linger on.
So for many people, the choice probably quickly became: Hang on, endure the smoke, or jump
If you listen to the 911 calls, which I advise you not to do, some of the chose “hang on”
Although needless to say, if you ever saw the Towers…
…you know how dire things must have been up there to make anyone think the better solution was “jump”
They were ENORMOUS.
Another weird memory: Shortly after I got my apartment in lower Manhattan, on Park Place…
…I remember taking my brother to see “The Others,” which had just opened.
And afterwards I remember taking him up to the rooftop of my building to admire the Towers. According to Wikipedia…
“The Others” opened on August 10, 2001, so this must have been within 10 days or so afterwards. Very eerie.
And I remember we also went to Morton’s and Borders right inside the WTC complex to celebrate my new job
That Borders was gutted, needless to say, on 9/11. You could see the frame of the building in the WTC lobby after the attack
I was reading magazines in there the week or two before
One of the weirdest feelings, which I’m sure everyone can share, is that I remember distinctly feeling…
…in the month or two before the attack that “important” news no longer existed. It was all inane bullshit about…
…shark attacks and Gary Condit and overaged pitchers in the Little League World Series. To this day…
…I try never to grumble about a slow news day because the alternative is horrifyingly worse
After the attack, maybe a month after, I remember going to see “Zoolander” in Times Square and…
…coming up out of the subway tunnel having the distinct fear that…
…the sky would light up and a mushroom cloud would appear instantly above my head in my lost moment of consciousness. No joke. In fact…
..I ended up going to bed around 6:30 p.m. for maybe three months after 9/11.
Even when I ended up working downtown for years after that, with a luxurious view of upper Manhattan from the top floors…
…I always feared looking out the window because I was paranoid that at that precise moment, the flash would go off…
…and that’d be the last thing I see. And in fact, for a moment in 2003 when the power went out city-wide,
…I did think that was what was happening. The wages of 9/11.
I leave you with this, my very favorite film about the WTC. If you’re a New Yorker, have a hanky handy. No. 3 is golden http://is.gd/38qsT
One more note: If you’ve never seen a photo of the smoke coming from the Trade Center after the collapse, find one.
Watching it from the 59th bridge, it looked like a volcano. There was so much smoke, it was indescribable. Just *erupting* from the wreckage

For the benefit of those who haven’t seen the photo AP was talking about, here’s one from the United States Coast Guard (hosted on Flickr):

Reading them as they came in had me reliving all the emotions I experienced that day.

Never forget.

Also collating the entire stream:
Snark and Boobs
BigFurHat at iOwnTheWorld
(Added 8:15 am 9/11/2009) Andy Levy in the HotAir Greenroom

September 10, 2009

2009 NFL Season – Week 1

by @ 17:05. Filed under Sports.

My joints are healed up after a disastrous 2008 and a meeting with Vito the Pipelayer. I can smell fall in the air, the first tree near the bunker is turning colors, and we’ve got the king of sports starting up tonight. As always, the lines come from Bodog, the nose picks are against the spread, and if you decide to bet using them, the management of No Runny Eggs cannot be held responsible for any legal, illegal or medical bills incurred.

Tennessee @ Pittsburgh (-6.5) – This is oddly reminiscent of when the Tennesseans were in Houston and known as the Oilers. If only this were in January in the snow, it would be a perfect game.
Chicago @ Green Bay (-3.5) – Meet the new boss; same as the old boss. For the life of me, I can’t figure out why the over/under is 46, so run, don’t walk to your local bookie and limbo the under.
Minnesota (-4.5) @ Cleveland – It’s going to be easy pickings for the Vikings’ defense (side note; I’m trying to not drive away the Minnesota readership this year, at least before Week 4).
Detroit @ New Orleans (-13.5) – Let there be lumber!
Miami @ Atlanta (-4) – Now that we’ve had the Wildcat for a full season, it can be stopped. Without that, the Dolphins are nothing.
Kansas City (+13) @ Baltimore – I know the Chefs are on the menu, but I am not at all convinced that the OldBrowns can score.
Philadelphia @ Carolina (+2.5) – It’s the case of the resistable force (Eagles with a 1-3 road opener record in the last 4 years) meeting the movable object (Panthers with a 1-4 home opener record over the last 5 years).
Denver @ Cincinnati (-4) – This is the Game of the Weak. My sympathies if you are forced to watch this one.
New York Jets (+5) @ Houston – If you had a 401(k) left, I’d recommend raiding it for this barking dog. Having a mobile MASH unit going into Week 1 like the Texans have is hazardous to a team’s season.
Jacksonville (+7) @ Indianapolis – There is one certainty about this rivalry; the game will be closer than it appears in the mirror.
Dallas (-6) @ Tampa Bay – The only thing I can figure is the bookies flip-flopped the over/under with the Packer/Bear game. Take the over-39 and RUN like Marion Barber.
San Francisco @ Arizona (-6) – All Gore and no passing makes the Niners very beatable.
Washington @ New York Giants (-6.5) – I wonder if Eli Manning will use the shotgun.
St. Louis (+8.5) @ Seattle – I know a few college teams that could probably beat what either of these teams will be trotting out of the trainers’ room.
Buffalo @ New England (-11) – History will be made as the Bills will become the first team to lose 12 straight to one opponent.
San Diego (-9) @ Oakland – For extra cash, take LT -9 against the Raiders.

Revisions/extensions (5:18 pm 9/10/2009) – If you’re a wimp and simply want the winners, head on down to Ick’s Corner for them, and to enter Ick’s straight-up contest.

The 2009 NFL preview

by @ 16:23. Filed under Sports.

The NFL kicks off tonight, so it’s time once again to crack out the crystal ball. Let’s see if the tape-and-glue job holds up any better this year…

NFC North
Green Bay (10-6) – The good: The starters look dominant, especially that new-fangled 3-4 defense. The bad: If ANYBODY gets hurt, this season is lost. The ugly: Turkey Day in Detroit. The takeaway: A third-place schedule is just what the Packer faithful ordered.
Minnesota (9-7) – The good: AP, a stifling defense, and a serious upgrade at QB. The bad: That upgrade involves a head case. The ugly: Favre is suggesting that he won’t play the entire year, and Jackson/Rosenfels at 100% are not as good as Favre at 50%. The takeaway: It’s a yo-yo year.
Chicago (8-8) – The good: A shiny new QB. The bad: The defense is yet another year older. The ugly: Sophomore Slump is scheduled for Matt Forte. The takeaway: Bears fans; be thankful you get to play the Lions twice.
Detroit (1-15) – The good: No more curses, no more Millen, nobody has ever gone winless for two straight seasons in the NFL. The bad: No improvement on the field. The ugly: They’re so bad The Onion made fun of them. The takeaway: Their best chance of beating somebody is the trap game on Turkey Day.

And the rest of the NFL, with the minimalist approach:
NFC East:
New York Giants
Philadelphia (Wild Card)
Dallas
Washington

NFC South:
Atlanta
Carolina (Wild Card)
New Orleans
Tampa Bay

NFC West:
Arizona (by default)
San Francisco
Seattle
St. Louis

AFC North:
Pittsburgh
Baltimore (Wild Card)
Cincinnati
Cleveland

AFC East:
New England
Miami
New York Jets
Buffalo

AFC South:
Tennessee
Indianapolis (Wild Card)
Jacksonville
Houston

AFC West:
San Diego
Denver
Kansas City
Oakland

The Championship Game That Cannot Be Mentioned™:
Pittsburgh over Atlanta

The Week 1 picks will be up shortly.

Video of the day – Moolah for Medicine edition

by @ 12:30. Filed under Health Care Reform.

My friends from the Sam Adams Alliance, who run the Health Administration Bureau (at least until Congress takes it over), have introduced a new program called Moolah for Medicine. I’ll let the video explain:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gC3nZO71zhk[/youtube]

Get yours before the ObamiNation gets you!

Thursday Hot Read Part 2 – Karl Rove’s “Obama’s Big Political Gamble”

by @ 11:00. Filed under Health Care Reform, Politics - National.

It is good to have one of the best political operators in the business back up my impression that President Obama’s actions this week are nothing more than a series of pep talks to his far-left base. Karl Rove writes in today’s Wall Street Journal:

Millions of Americans watched President Barack Obama’s speech last night to a joint session of Congress. Much of it was familiar, having been delivered in at least 111 speeches, town halls, radio addresses and other appearances on health care. But his most revealing remarks on the topic came on Monday, at a Labor Day union picnic in Cincinnati.

There Mr. Obama accused critics of his health reforms of spreading “lies” and said opponents want “to do nothing.” These false charges do not reveal a spirit of bipartisanship nor do they create a foundation for dialogue. It is more like what you’d say if you are planning to jam through a bill without compromise. Which is exactly what Mr. Obama is about to attempt.

Rove goes on to point out that the last time we tried to go down this road to socialized medicine, the Democrats lost the majority in both Houses of Congress because they tried to go down this road.

Milwaukee Tea Party – 9/19

by @ 10:38. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin.

The following came in from my friends at Americans for Prosperity – Wisconsin:

Be Part of History!
Americans For Prosperity – Wisconsin Chapter
& The Wisconsin GrandSons of Liberty
Present:
A Taxpayer Tea Party/Milwaukee Constitution Day Celebration

WHAT: Wisconsin’s Largest Tea Party
WHEN: Saturday, September 19, 2009, 3:00 – 5:00 PM
WHERE: Veterans Park, 1010 N. Lincoln Memorial Drive
Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Confirmed Speakers
Rachel Campos-Duffy
Blogger at AOL Parent Dish & Author:Stay Home, Stay Happy
Willie Soon, Ph.D
Astrophysicist Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Marc Marano
Former Spokesman for Senator James M. Inhofe of Oklahoma
Web site: ClimateDepot.com.
David Clarke
Milwaukee County Sheriff
Mark Block
Wisconsin State Director, Americans for Prosperity
Pastor David King
Founder, Milwaukee God Squad
Rebecca Kleefisch
Conservative Correspondent at Midday With Charlie Sykes
Linda Hansen
Wisconsin Prosperity Network

Major speakers will be announced on this web site as soon as they are confirmed. This will be the largest Taxpayer Tea Party in Wisconsin history. Be part of it. Watch for details.

Two words – BE THERE!

Thursday Hot Read – Ed Morrissey’s “Declaration of Dependence”

by @ 10:22. Filed under Health Care Reform, Politics - National.

Ed Morrissey’s latest column for American Issues Project deals with the “moderate” health-care “reform” that Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT) has. Let’s pick up at the second departure of the governed-government relationship:

The second departure is more subtle and insidious. Baucus has proposed that the federal government supply subsidies to needy individuals and families for the purchase of the now-mandated insurance. However, the definition of needy defies both math and common sense. The Baucus plan proposes those subsidies be available to households at up to 300% of the poverty level of income – or about $66,000 per year income.

If that sounds like a pretty good annual household income, you’d be right. In fact, the 2007 median household income in the US was $50,233. Roughly half of all households in America are above this income level, and half below it. It is a solidly middle-class income by definition.

How many people make $66,000 per year or less, and therefore would be eligible for federal health-insurance subsidies? According to the Census Bureau’s 2007 survey, 72.1 million of the nation’s 116.8 million households earned $65,000 or less. The Baucus plan would make 61.7% of American households dependent on government assistance, far more than half and well on the way to two-thirds.

Ed goes on to note that ObamaCare Heavy (aka H.R. 3200) would put close to 3/4ths of the population on the dole. What was that quote about the republic surviving only until half the people figure out they can rob the other half dry through the power of government?

How to turn 350 new jobs into a permanent $7 million/year tax increase

by @ 8:42. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin, Taxes.

(H/T – Brad Van Lanen)

Last night, the Fond du Lac County Board overwhelmingly passed a 0.5% countywide sales tax ostensibly to help finance a $50 million, 12-year, low-interest loan for Mercury Marine to help it move the 350 manufacturing jobs it currently has in Stillwater, Oklahoma to Fond du Lac. As Brad said, the devil is in the details:

  • While there is no mention of whether a sunset provision was actually included in the final vote in the Fond du Lac Reporter story linked to above, an earlier Milwaukee Journal Sentinel story noted that there was no sunset provision in the version on the Board’s agenda.
  • Why, you may ask? Let’s go back to the Fond du Lac Reporter. The total annual tax take is expected to be somewhere between $6.5 million and $7 million. The less-than-half of that that could potentially go to Mercury Marine goes out the door as follows:
    • $500 per job “retained” per year, or a total of $763,000 per year for all 1,526 jobs considered as the “baseline”.
    • $1,000 per job “created” per year, up to a total of 2,900 total employed by Mercury Marine (a maximum of 1,374 new jobs), for a maximum of $1,374,000 per year.
    • $863,000 per year to cover the difference between the 2% being charged Mercury Marine and the market rate that the county has to pay.

So, where’s the other $3 million-$3.5 million per year going? If the intent of the Fond du Lac County Board were to simply help out Mercury Marine, that excess money would be set aside for payment of the second 6-year period of the loan subsidy, and the sales tax would be sunsetted after 6 years.

Rather, it’s going into the general coffers to be burned on, in order, “economic development”, overall county debt reduction, and property tax relief. If you believe that there will be anything meaningful left for property tax relief, even after the loan is paid off, I’ve got a bridge to sell you.

Revisions/extensions (9:16 am 9/10/2009) – Given Mercury Marine is talking about adding only about 350 jobs, the subsidy would be worth about $1.98 million. That would make the spread between the subsidy and what the tax is taking in closer to $4 million-$4.5 million. Again, I don’t expect any real property tax relief, and though there might be a real effort to reduce the debt load which would lessen the tax load somewhat, I expect there to suddenly be $4 million per year in new spending in Fond du Lac County.

I would also like to address another element of the Fond du Lac Reporter FAQ – specifically the “how much per job” question. They counted the total maximum subsity to Mercury Marine over all 12 years, as well as included the existing employees, to get to the $12,400 per job estimate. It actually would be less per job if Mercury Marine only added the 350 jobs from Stillwater, but it would be far more than either that or the $20,000 per job that is supposedly the standard in these deals if one included just the “new” jobs ($67,900 per “new” job if only the Stillwater jobs were added, $23,600 per “new” job if Mercury Marine maxed out and added 1,374 “new” jobs).

Worse, since the other $3 million-$4.5 million per year sales tax collected by the county will most likely not be seen by the public in the form of tax relief, and the total $7 million per year will never be repealed as the scheme currently contemplates, it would be fair to include that number in the cost/benefit analysis. No matter how it is sliced, that would make the deal a raw one for the residents of Fond du Lac County.

Open Thread Thursday – Are you ready for some football?

by @ 7:42. Filed under Open Thread Thursday.

It’s not Sunday or even Monday, but we’ve got NFL football. There is only one song for this one (and no, it is not Hank Williams)…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37-AlmNdESg[/youtube]

I am still hung over from last night, so there won’t be a lot of posting from the Wisconsin end. Good thing it’s Open Thread Thursday. I will have my NFL season and Week 1 previews up later for you gambling degenerates.

September 9, 2009

Patriot

Joe Wilson, Representative from South Carolina was the voice you heard shouting “liar” during the President’s speech tonight.  The look on Pelosi and Plugs faces are priceless.

If President Obama thought this issue was just going to go away with a few lofty words, he was mistaken. I commented in the live blog tonight that if this had been a real “house of the people” meeting, the tepid response for Pelosi and others would likely have been replaced with the throwing of rotten tomatoes.

My hat’s off to Joe Wilson.

The original intent of the Obama school address?

by @ 21:30. Filed under Health Care Reform, Politics - National.

(H/T – Soapbox Jill)

While Obama more-or-less restrained his hyper-partisan tendencies in the national address to The Young Skulls Full of Mush (© Rush Limbaugh) yesterday, he wasn’t quite as restrained before the cameras rolled with the students at Arlington, Virginia’s Wakefield High School. He was busy trying to recruit said skulls full of mush into the full-blown socialization of health care he has been pushing for the last several years.

I wonder if pressuring the parent(s) into supporting higher taxes for lower-quality care was one of the things the children were supposed to say they were going to help Obama with.

Paul Ryan response to Obama

by @ 21:03. Filed under Health Care Reform, Politics - National.

I need a sober analysis of the ObamaCare rah-rah speech. Fortunately, my Congressman, Paul Ryan (R-WI), provided one:

WASHINGTON – Wisconsin’s First District Congressman Paul Ryan tonight issued the following statement in response to President Barack Obama’s health care address to a joint session of Congress:

“Tonight marked the President’s 28th major health care address this year. As thousands of Wisconsinites made clear to me at my health care town halls in August, we don’t need another speech; we want a fresh start on real reform – patient-centered, fiscally-responsible reform. The President delivered an articulate speech, but his plan fails to fix what’s broken, and instead breaks what’s working.

“The Washington-centric health care overhaul being pushed through Congress is not the only way to tackle this issue. Wisconsinites know better; Wisconsinites deserve better. Democrats, Republicans, and Independents alike continue to offer substantive alternatives – proving that we can have universal access to health coverage in America without the government taking it over, without trillions in new taxes, spending, and debt. If President Obama is sincere in asking for better ideas – ideas that can garner bipartisan support – he must be willing to consider them.”

For the latest on the health care debate from Congressman Ryan, including details on Ryan’s comprehensive health care reform alternative – H.R. 2520, The Patients’ Choice Act – please visit: http://www.house.gov/ryan/healthcare.

You’re All Liars

President Obama stood before the joint Congress this evening and said everyone who has read the actual words of HR 3200 were succumbing to “bogus claims”.  From his speech:

Some of people’s concerns have grown out of bogus claims spread by those whose only agenda is to kill reform at any cost. The best example is the claim, made not just by radio and cable talk show hosts, but prominent politicians, that we plan to set up panels of bureaucrats with the power to kill off senior citizens. Such a charge would be laughable if it weren’t so cynical and irresponsible. It is a lie, plain and simple.

There are also those who claim that our reform effort will insure illegal immigrants. This, too, is false – the reforms I’m proposing would not apply to those who are here illegally. And one more misunderstanding I want to clear up – under our plan, no federal dollars will be used to fund abortions, and federal conscience laws will remain in place.

My health care proposal has also been attacked by some who oppose reform as a “government takeover” of the entire health care system. As proof, critics point to a provision in our plan that allows the uninsured and small businesses to choose a publicly-sponsored insurance option, administered by the government just like Medicaid or Medicare.

I won’t dissect each of these issues as it’s been done numerous times across the net.

The only thing I learned during tonight’s speech is that it’s not a good idea to play a drinking game where you drink each time Nancy Pelosi blinks.  It’s a good think I was already home!  Obama could have saved us all a bunch of time and just told us to reread HR 3200.

For the past several weeks, each time President Obama attempted to refute provisions of the plan, favorability ratings for both himself and support of the plan dropped.  I’m left with just one question after tonight’s speech:  After calling more than half of America liars, is it possible to have a favorability rating less than zero?

Drunkblog – sloshing through the pitch for the Chappaquiddick Memorial ObamaCare bill

by @ 15:41. Filed under Health Care Reform, Politics - National.

Since I haven’t done a drunkblog for a while, I may be a bit out of practice. Oh well; I figure I may as well double-barrel things, with the vulgarities here and a presence over at the Hot Air liveblog. I’ll have that link and others up when they become available.

Revisions/extensions (6:55 pm 9/9/2009) – And here they are…
Ace of Spades HQ
Vodkapundit
– Hot Air (Part 1 run by Allahpundit/Part 2 run by Ed Morrissey

As always, I must remind you that I paraphrase a lot. Since I’m not anticipating press questions, stuff from Obama will be in italics and my thoughts will be in plain text.

Cap-and-tax would hurt Wisconsin says…Russ Feingold?

WisBusiness.com reports that Sen. Russ Feingold (D-WI) admits at a WisPolitics.com (sister web publication) luncheon that the cap-and-tax (H/T for the term – the muzzled Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, R-WI) scheme before the Senate would hurt Wisconsin:

I’m not signing onto any bill that rips off Wisconsin,” Feingold declared, arguing the bill’s mandatory caps on greenhouse gas emissions could put the coal-dependent Badger State at an economic disadvantage compared to other regions and nations….

At the same time, Feingold said he’s “troubled” by some of his constituents’ refusal to accept the principles of global warming, but agreed with some critics who have said the bill could stifle job growth in the industrial sector and increase energy prices.

“Western Wisconsin is particularly strong in being concerned about this because of their reliance on coal,” Feingold said of the bill, which has already passed the House. “There is a real possibility … that it will be unfair to Wisconsin and Wisconsin ratepayers.”

As the selected excerpt shows, it is not all rainbows and roses. Feingold merely wants to spread the pain of “dealing” with a non-problem around, not remove the pain. There is no such thing as man-caused global “warming”, or even man-caused climate “change”.

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]