No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

Archive for May 19th, 2009

Live-blogging the death of useful, roomy cars

by @ 11:06. Filed under Envirowhackos, Politics - National.

I’ve got Fox News on now, and in the pre-show, Major Garrett noted that additional standards will be based on specific types of cars (i.e. bigger cars won’t quite be required to get 39 mpg). Unspoken, but assumed, is that smaller cars would be required to get more than 39 mpg.

It’s been a while since I did a live-blog the old-fastioned way. I don’t feel like firing up the CiL for this. Do hit refresh for the latest, as things are expected to kick off a bit after 11:15 am Central. BTW, I’m taking bets on how late Obama and company will be. I’ve got 9:13 after the appointed time.

11:19 – The captive and greedy automotive execs and the Gorebal “Warming” crowd is waiting. Tick. Tock.

11:20 – That was not a slip of the tongue by Jon Scott – Government Motors indeed.

11:22:44 – Obama finally shows up. Time for intros.

11:23 – First one is a shout-out to Plastic Pelosi (she’s going nowhere, folks). EPA chair, a near-snub of Ahnold in the governor’s intros (Granholm first). Senators missing because they’re screwing those that pay credit card bills on time.

11:24 – First “industry” shout-out to the head of the UAW. The rest of the cabinet now. Since when is HUD part of the “Green Team”? Oh, and where’s LaHood, the RepubicRAT who’s in charge of implementing CAFE?

11:26 – Another shoutout to the UAW before a general one to the cowed and craven. We are setting a national screw-industry-and-motorists standard.

11:27 – Amazing what a little Chicago Way Muscle can do to titans of industry. Oil is Teh Eeeeevil (side note – why not drill here, drill now, drill everywhere, dumbass?)

11:28 – “We’ve known since the oil crises of the 1970s” (and your fellow ‘Rats have been blocking all of the domestic production solutions since then).

11:29 – This is a harbringer of change – “We will not longer accept that government is too small”. (Them’s fighting words)

11:30 – Because of the tyrrany of the bipartisan Party-In-Government, each seeking to implement its own policy, we’re taking the worst of all possible policies. Because we’re giving in to the envirowhackos, they’re dropping their lawsuits.

11:32 – At a time when the domestic auto industry is in painful flux, we’re going to give it the certainty that it’s getting shoved off the cliff and under my bus.

11:33 – You can’t save money if you don’t spend (er, hybrids still don’t make sense).

11:34 – We’ll save 1.8 billion barrels of oil, equivalent to taking 58 million cars off the road (money says they’ll try to take 58 million cars off the road anyway).

11:35 – Mo’ spending money. Plug-in hybrids get a shoutout, as does electrical transmission (er, what about electrical production?)

11:36 – We’re going to break in 8 years what took 80 to build. Call to the ‘Rat version of bipartisanship (bull-fucking-shit)

11:37 – A third specific shoutout to the UAW. They bought the office.

11:39 – We’re not quite out – a shout-out for the only domestic SUV to make the 30 mpg grade – the Ford Escape Hybrid.

11:40 – Major Garrett pointing out that Congress has no role. Translation – the Goron won, and he’s going to ram it straight up the backside. Oh, and whatever we do will be overwhelmed by Red Chinese and Indian pollution.

NOW we’re done.

Paul Ryan – Please be alarmed

by @ 10:56. Filed under Politics - National.

Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI, and my Congressman) wrote the following for the Minneapolis Star-Tribune today regarding the entitlement crisis:

It has become a yearly drill: The Medicare and Social Security trustees sound a clear warning that, without reform, both of these programs will go bankrupt in the not-so-distant future. It has also become a yearly drill for those in Washington to respond to the alarm by hitting the snooze button.

This year’s trustees’ report makes clear the growing urgency of this problem — especially with the effects of the recession — and the severity of the repercussions should this avoidance habit continue.

Highlights of the report include:

SOCIAL SECURITY

  • In just seven years, Social Security’s benefit obligation will exceed its cash income from tax revenues, thus other programs will begin to be tapped for resources.
  • By 2037, the Social Security trust funds will be exhausted. As a result, future retirees will face an immediate across-the-board benefit cut of up to 24 percent.
  • Over the next 75 years, the trust funds have an unfunded liability of $5.3 trillion.

MEDICARE

  • This program, which finances health care for retirees, is also headed for bankruptcy, but at greater speed and with more severe consequences.
  • According to the trustees, the entire program’s unfunded obligations have risen to $37.8 trillion.
  • The Medicare Hospital Insurance Trust Fund, which is financed by a dedicated payroll tax, will this year begin running a cash deficit; by 2017, it will be bankrupt.

To his credit, President Obama has acknowledged the need to address these problems. But his budget actually makes the problem worse by expanding the already unsustainable growth of entitlement spending by $1.4 trillion over the next 10 years. The administration has also indicated it will ignore the trustees’ fourth consecutive Medicare funding warning (also included in the report), passing up the special procedure the warning provides: to force Congress to take action on critical Medicare reform.

We no longer have the luxury of waiting; with each year of delay, the problem gets exponentially worse, and the likelihood grows that Congress will be forced to react with deep cuts in benefits or increases in tax or debt burdens to intolerable levels. The programs will fail to meet their obligations, and in the process will put immense burdens on the economy and the budget, crippling our ability to compete in the global marketplace and shrinking future Americans’ standards of living.

We must steer a different course. If we act now, we can transform this problem into an opportunity — to make these important programs stronger, more responsive, more resilient, more sustainable and more in line with the way our economy really works.

That is why last year I introduced comprehensive legislation called “A Roadmap for America’s Future.” (Ed. link added) My bill not only addresses the Medicare and Social Security crisis, but also Medicaid, health care and our overly complex, anticompetitive tax code, to ensure America can regain its footing on the path to a secure, prosperous future.

Here are its key components:

  • It fulfills the mission of health and retirement security for all Americans by rescuing and strengthening Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. These vital programs will be made permanently solvent under my plan.
  • By reforming our tax code, it promotes solid economic growth and job creation here in America and puts the United States in a position to lead — not merely survive — in the international marketplace.
  • It lifts the burden of debt from the shoulders of future generations by returning federal spending growth to sustainable levels.

This is a real plan, with real proposals, real numbers to back them and real legislation to implement it. It is ambitious, and not everyone agrees with every aspect of it. That’s fine; we must have this debate. Inaction is no longer an option.

…And then they came for the radio ratings…

by @ 9:28. Filed under Business, Politics - National.

(H/T – Charlie Sykes, who stands to lose if the ObamiNation wins)

The Radio Equalizer reports that the same groups heavily invested in vote fraud and census fraud are attempting to get rid of an accurate measure of radio listening, Arbitron’s Portable People Meter, because it “…undercounts and misrepresents the number and loyalty of minority radio listeners.” The FCC, operating in the wishes of the group, which includes President Obama, has opened an inquiry into the use of the PPM.

The PPM system uses signals encoded into a radio signal and played back through a radio’s speakers to record to what stations a particular panelist is exposed on a portable device, which then transmits via landline the results. It currently complements the traditional diary system in select markets, including New York, Chicago and Los Angeles, with implementation in Milwaukee/Racine scheduled for spring 2010. Its main advantage over the diary system is that it is harder to lie about how long one actually listens to a program. Its main disadvantage is that it must be carried around, though its cell-phone size makes it easier.

In early results, talk radio, particularily conservative talk radio, has “gained” a lot of listenership compared to the diary system, while urban radio has “lost” a lot. This just won’t do for the usual suspects.

Funny read of the day – Doctor Dave

by @ 7:59. Filed under Miscellaneous.

The man has done it again with Car Whores Episode IV: A New Dope. An excerpt cannot do it justice, and I’m not in the business of just swiping, so you’re going to have to trust me on this one. After all, it is “(i)n a galaxy all too present, all too friggin’ near…”.

RIP useful, roomy vehicles

by @ 6:00. Filed under Envirowhackos, Politics - National.

(H/T – Sister Toldjah)

The Detroit News reports that, under a proposal by the Obama administration to be unveiled later today, not only will the CAFE standards increase above the 2020 mandate 4 years early, but that the proposed California emission standards will become the new nationwide standards. Specifically with regard to the CAFE standards, passenger cars (which will, as of 2011, include most 2WD SUVs) will be required to get 39 mpg by 2016 (up from 27.5 mpg this year), light trucks will be required to get 30 mpg by 2016 (up from 23.1 mpg this year), and the combined fleet will be required to hit 35.5 mpg by 2016.

Before I continue, I need to explain CAFE a bit, and deliver a good news-bad news combo. First, the good news is it is not based on the EPA estimates you see on the sticker. Rather, it is a laboratory number using testing methods set in the 1970s.

In fact, there is not a “CAFE mileage” number available from either the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (the entity that lords over the CAFE numbers) or the EPA. However, based on published reports that the CAFE mileage is roughly 30% higher than the EPA numbers, the unadjusted combined mileage in the datasets from the EPA appear to be close enough to the CAFE numbers for my purposes.

The bad news is that the average uses the harmonic mean based on the CAFE mileage and the number of each type of vehicle produced. That is because what is actually being measured is the number of gallons being burned over a set distance.

So, what 2009 models would cut it in a 2016 world? That’s the ugly news. Here are the 34 passenger car models (which, effective 2011, will include most 2WD SUVs/CUVs) and 12 light-truck models that will meet the standards:

  • Toyota Prius
  • Honda Civic – hybrid, 1.8L manual, and 1.8L gas automatic only
  • Nissan Altima – hybrid only
  • Toyota Camry – hybrid only
  • Volkswagen Jetta – TDI manual and TDI 6-speed automatic only
  • Volkswagen Jetta Sportwagen – TDI 6-speed manual and TDI 6-speed automatic only
  • Ford Escape – hybrid 2WD (car) and hybrid 4WD (light truck) only
  • Mazda Tribute (corporate twin to the Escape) – hybrid 2WD (car) and hybrid 4WD (light truck) only
  • Mercury Mariner (corporate twin to the Escape) – hybrid 2WD (car) and hybrid 4WD (light truck) only
  • Mini Cooper – naturally-aspirated manual only
  • Mini Cooper Clubman – naturally-aspirated manual only
  • Toyota Yaris – both manual and automatic
  • Toyota Corolla – 1.8L manual and 1.8L automatic only
  • Honda Fit – all three engine/transmission combinations
  • Kia Rio – both manual and automatic
  • Hyundai Accent – manual only
  • Chevrolet Aveo – manual only
  • Pontiac G3 (corporate twin to the Aveo) – manual only
  • Chevrolet Aveo 5 – manual only
  • Pontiac G3 5 (corporate twin to the Aveo 5) – manual only
  • Chevrolet Cobalt – XFE only
  • Pontiac G5 (corporate twin to the Cobalt) – base manual, XFE, and GT manual only
  • Scion XD – manual only
  • Toyota Highlander – Hybrid 4WD only (light truck)
  • Jeep Compass – 4WD manual only (light truck)
  • Jeep Patriot – 4WD manual only (light truck)
  • Mazda 5 – both manual (light truck) and automatic (light truck)
  • Toyota RAV4 – 2.5L 4WD only (light truck)
  • Nissan Rogue – AWD only (light truck)
  • Ford Ranger – 2.3L 2WD manual only (light truck)
  • Mazda B2300 (corporate twin to the Ranger) – 2.3L 2WD manual only (light truck)

I remember Car and Driver doing a 40-mpg CAFE special way back when. I wonder if they’re ready to revisit that.

Revisions/extensions (6:50 am 5/18/2009) – I did the post last night, so there were a few typos. Also, there’s a couple of additional thoughts.

If one takes out the different engine/transmission combinations (which I did above) and the corporate twin duplicates, there are 25 distinct models. That leaves three midsized cars (the Prius, Altima and Camry), five different compact cars (Jetta, Corolla, Aveo/G3, Rio and Accent), two small station wagons (Jetta Sportwagen and Fit, though the latter probably fits better into the subcompact category), six different subcompact cars (Civic, Yaris, Clubman, Aveo 5/G3 5, Cobalt/G5, and XD), a minicompact (Mini), five SUVs (Escape/Tribute/Mariner in both 2WD and 4WD form, Highlander 4WD, Compass 4WD, Patriot 4WD, RAV4 4WD and Rogue AWD, with all but the Highlander compactl-to-micro-sized), one micro-minivan (Mazda 5), and one compact pickup (Ranger/B2300). That also leaves only 15 automatics in the bunch.

All I can say is I’m glad I’m single and know how to drive a stick.

R&E part 2 (8:41 am 5/19/2009) – Welcome readers of The Other McCain.

R&E part 3 (11:00 am 5/19/2009) – Truesoldier asked a very good question over at Michelle Malkin’s post on this:

Ok that is on new vehicles, but what about the cost of retrofitting old vehicles to meet the “California” emission standards? I know when I used to live in California back in the 90’s if you brought a car from out of state you had to pay a fee , I believe it was around $500, if your car did not meet California’s emmision standards to get your car retrofitted. So is there going to be forced retrofit to meet the testing standards?

I believe that requirement is to retrofit out-of-state cars to the level of emissions required of that model year in California, not to retrofit older cars to current standards. Still, I wouldn’t put it past Obama’s EPA to pull that stunt to get the current crop of cars off the road.

Housekeeping item – I will be liveblogging the self-congratulatoin up above, so if you came directly to this post, please click the big “No Runny Eggs” at the top of the blog to get there.

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]