No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

Archive for January 14th, 2009

Carol Andrews comes to town, tone of press relations to plummet

by @ 14:42. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin.

WisPolitics has a press release from Jim Doyle’s office that says he hired Carol Andrews as Communications Director. In the interest of being the cloud in the sky, I present a couple of Andrews’ greatest hits:

RedState illustrates just how negative the campaigns she is a part of are, specifically her last one (the Tom Allen-Susan Collins race last year).

– This short video from her 2006 work on Harold Ford’s Senatorial campaign shows what happens when the press doesn’t play ball like Maine’s media did last year…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hlqe6EbSnuY[/youtube]

– How bad is Andrews’ reputation? Liz Garrigan of the Nashville Scene stated, ‘Among Tennessee media (and now Maine’s), she is perhaps the most reviled political communications operative in recent memory.”

The gubernatorial race next year is shaping up to be even slimier than either the 2006 one or the 1998 Senate race.

Coming Soon To a Congress Near You?

by @ 5:15. Filed under Politics - Minnesota.

The Independent of the UK is reporting on a new social engineering program being considered by the British government.

The government has determined that:

Young people from poor backgrounds have less chance of landing a highly paid job than their parents did because some measures of social mobility have gone backwards.

According to the British government this is unfair and needs to be fixed.   Instead of leaving this to personal motivation or telling people to “work hard,” “apply themselves,”   the British have decided that a law would be the best way to solve the problem.

Ministers will consider imposing a new legal duty on the Government and the rest of the public sector to close the gap between people from different backgrounds in every policy decision they make.

Wow!   A law that requires the government to make sure that all of their decisions are focused on providing, not equal opportunity but, equal outcomes for all.

First, I’m not sure how you would contemplate equal outcomes in all government business.   Can you imagine the discussion of what the implications of say building a new bridge might be, under this bill?   Things like: What are the workers paid and what are their socioeconomic situations, who will use the bridge will there be as many poor people as wealthy people?   You can take this to its logical stupid conclusion.

More importantly, with a law like this, how does the government not become paralyzed?   It would seem like every decision that is made would be ripe for a lawsuit from someone claiming that they didn’t receive their economic equality out of the decision.

At least there’s one person in Britain that understands that you can legislate this kind of stuff:

Theresa May, the shadow Equality minister, said: “The Government thinks social inequality can be solved by passing a law. You don’t make people’s lives better by telling them they have a legal right to a better life.

You’re right Theresa, you can’t.   However, you can fill them full of hopeychange and promise that you’ll do this exact thing for them if   only they elect the messiah!

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]