No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

Archive for October, 2008

October 15, 2008

RNC stops ad buy in Wisconsin

(H/T – Kevin)

WisPolitics reports that the Republican National Committee has not bought any ads in the Eau Claire, Green Bay and Milwaukee markets for the week of 10/15-10/21. I do not know whether they had or still have buys in the Madison (doubtful), La Crosse or Wausau/Rhinelander markets. WisPolitics also notes that the McCain campaign still has buys active through the 19th.

I can’t say I’m surprised. While Wisconsin was the closest state in 2004 and one of the 3 closest in 2000, the ‘Rat Fraud Machine has solidified its position here over the last 8 years. Worse, recent polls, whose internals appear to be heavily-skewed against Republicans, show Obama with a double-digit lead.

If you don’t find me here 11/5, I’ll be face down.

Revisions/extensions (2:55 pm 10/15/2008 and re-arranged 4:27 pm 10/15/2008) – Word on the ClearChannel news stations (somehow had WOKY on instead of WISN) is that McCain will keep buying through the 26th.

October 14, 2008

This place is now mobile-friendly

by @ 18:41. Filed under The Blog.

One of the things I discovered while in DC is that this place wasn’t exactly mobile web friendly. However, I discovered (quite by accident) a nice little plugin that does make it mobile-friendly – Alex King’s WordPress Mobile Edition. I don’t quite have it optimized yet for this place, but I do have the captcha integrated so you can comment remotely through it.

If you do have a mobile web interface and still get the full 3-column site, please let me know.

Paul Ryan for Congress energy ad

I saw this ad on Fox News this afternoon, and went to the Paul Ryan campaign site to see if they had an embeddable version to help spread it around. They didn’t, so I asked the campaign for permission to put it on my YouTube account. They said yes, so here it is.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DNMi5Nj5qfQ[/youtube]

It shouldn’t be a secret that I do support Paul Ryan. I have neither requested nor received any compensation for this ad.

The Scramble – 10/14/2008

by @ 17:26. Filed under The Morning Scramble.

Yes, I’ve been very negligent with this, but I proved the last time I did this it takes a very long time nowadays…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WxTWQD91b5c[/youtube]

  • No Compromises found out the Obamination Censorship Cabal extends to BlogTalkRadio.
  • Stephen Green predicts they’ll come for this end of the blogosphere next.
  • Brian C. Anderson outlines the plan of the Obamination Censorship Cabal.
  • Fred exposes the indoctrination into the ObamiNation that is already taking place in middle schools. That’s right; they’re already prepping the battlefield to protect The Missiah in 2012.
  • Matt Wolking explores the rabbit hole that is the Obama/ACORN connection. I don’t think he’s hit the bottom of it yet.
  • Maggie Thurber reports that a RICO action has been filed against ACORN in Ohio.
  • Mary Katharine Ham has what really happened (or more-precisely, didn’t happen) in Wilmington, North Carolina yesterday. Of course, because the LameStreamMedia has a vested interest in getting their man in the Oval Office, reality doesn’t matter to them.
  • Brian Fraley has the top 4 reasons the Democrats are pushing early voting.
  • Hugh Hewitt suggests a few questions for Barack Obama in tomorrow’s debate (which I will be either liveblogging or drunkblogging; I haven’t decided which direction to take yet).
  • Matt Lewis notes that federal judges are the unspoken 8,000-pound hippo in the room.
  • Nick Schweitzer explains why John McCain (and by extension, the Republican Party) is losing this election – lack of market differentiation.
  • Eric is tired of caring more about winning the White House than McCain.
  • Jim Geraghty wonders where the purple-finger legislation is. After all, it works in places like Iraq and Afghanistan.
  • Stephan Tawney reports that ACORN is 2,100 for 2,100 in Indiana – not one of the voter registrations they turned in and were checked were legitimate.
  • Meanwhile, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports that a third person has now been criminally charged in the growing voter registration scandal here in Milwaukee. No word on whether the Government “Accountability” Board (a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Democratic Party of Wisconsin) will reverse its decision to not check or allow to be checked mail-in and third-party voter registration forms turned in between January 1, 2006 and August 6, 2008.
  • Peter has the Obama Alphabet.
  • RightwingSparkle has the very first thing that Obama will sign as President – cement abortion on demand by every method out there.
  • John Hawkins has the oh-so-tolerant violent Left in quotes.
  • Erick Erickson caught a Democrat candidate for Congress saying that America is the greatest evil in the world.
  • Michael Yon explains Afghanistan. I have but three words – Read. It. All.
  • Michael Turk explains the Obama tax “cut”. It’s the final step in getting half of Americans to see the federal government as an ATM linked to the other half. Now, what was that about a democracy ceasing to exist once that happens?
  • For those that would rather have it in picture form, Tom McMahon pictures that for you. Somehow, I doubt the teachers will be satisified with that dime.
  • JammieWearingFool blows the Obamination defense of ACORN out of the water. Then again, they do have a point that we’re trying to get the fraudulent vote out of the system.
  • Speaking of fraud, Michelle Malkin found the Obama campaign benefiting from credit card fraud.
  • Conservative Belle pictures the currency as it is now.
  • Christian Schneider reminds us to get out of the Presidential Pool. Yes, I am serious, and don’t call me Shirley – in Wisconsin, one cannot vote if one gambles on the results of an election.
  • Since tonight is Drinking Right-Milwaukee, and because I need a kicker, crystalclearconservative has a reason to drink – white wine has the same cardiac benefits as red wine. My question; if beer has some, if fewer cardiac benefits as wine, shouldn’t hard liquor have more?

I could go the rest of the afternoon, but I do have a good campaign ad from Paul Ryan to convert to YouTube format and post and Drinking Right to attend.

Drill Here, Drill Now Tuesdays – 10/14/2008

by @ 16:00. Filed under Energy.

Yes, I forgot to put one up last week in the rush to get to DC (I HATE flights that leave at 7 am), but I’m back this week.

My gas price (south-suburban Milwaukee, WI) – $2.979/gallon

Well, we’ve had the ban on offshore drilling expired for two weeks, and even though I haven’t been paying very close attention, I don’t seem to recall any news on new leases. Then again, we do have an election coming up in 3 weeks, and the party that seems poised to win has promised to shut off the spigot.

If that happens, we’ll look back at $4/gallon gas and $140/barrel oil, and whatever you were paying in your locale for electricity, natural gas, and heating oil at their peaks to date with nostalgia. Do recall their non-drill “drill” bill that would have put most of the OCS off-limits. Do also recall they snuck a tax increase on domestic oil production into the bailout bill.

Drinking Right – Milwaukee — Tonight

by @ 15:18. Filed under Miscellaneous.

Attention, your attention please. The original home of Drinking Right will be having its October edition tonight; usual place (Papa’s Social Club, 7718 W Burleigh in Milwaukee), usual time (7 pm). My liver may be damaged after drinking my way through DC last week, but I only live once.

Be there or be nowhere.

October 12, 2008

2008 NFL Week 5

by @ 0:32. Filed under Sports.

I’m still on the road (in fact, I’ll be above the road by kickoff unless the flight’s delayed), so no witty commentary or replays of last week. Besides, I think I blew chunks. No matter; it’s another week of NFL football, and there’s plays to be made.

Green Bay (+1.5) @ Seattle
Detroit @ Minnesota (-13)
Chicago (-3/under 43.5) @ Atlanta
Oakland @ New Orleans (-7/over 47)
Baltimore (+4) @ Indianapolis
Cincinnati @ NY Jets (-9.5)
Carolina (+1.5) @ Tampa Bay
Miami (+3) @ Houston
St. Louis @ Washington (-14)
Jacksonville (+3.5) @ Denver
Philadelphia (-5) @ San Francisco
Dallas @ Arizona (+5.5)
New England @ San Diego (-5)
NY Giants (-8) @ Cleveland

October 11, 2008

The Morning Scramble: Breakfast On The Go….

by @ 9:55. Filed under The Morning Scramble.

Another quick breakfast on the go folks. I’m taking the kids and the dog to the park. (Don’t worry….I’ll bring them home too….)

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTFD1C4tVIg[/youtube]

Ick’s birthday is today… HAPPY BIRTHDAY

I’ve got a James T. Harris update

Happy 3rd Blogiversary to Elliot

Lance give’s John McCain some advice

Bob Parks is looking for stones

AB is Hammered

Bruce…. Wishing he was Hugh….. Yeah, no kidding

The Obamarama

Jeni takes alook at the numbers

It’s a beautiful day people. Go have some fun!!!!

Roll bloat – DAD part 1

Just because I’m goofi…er, working doesn’t mean I don’t find some good blogs to add to the overloaded roll and feed reader. After all, you can sleep when you’re dead. There are a couple I want to get in before I completely blank like I did to Aakash Raut.

Crystal Clear Conservative
Katy’s Conservative Corner

October 10, 2008

Roll bloat – Your One-Stop York/Trouser/Schneider Stop edition

by @ 20:35. Filed under Miscellaneous.

Christian Schneider has consolidated his work at one place. Unlike his previous two private efforts, he showed no real wit with the name of his new place, Christian Schneider Blog.

That means Atomic Trousers is closing down. Get your feeds and rolls fixed ASAP.

Roll bloat – correcting a major oversight

by @ 17:28. Filed under The Blog.

I remember promising Aakash Raut I’d put University Blog on the roll a couple months ago, but until I ran into him at the Capitol rally at the Defending the American Dream Summit, I forgot. Even though he’s on the Blogs 4 Bauer blogroll, I do need to add him to the main roll.

On a related note, I’ll eventually get everybody in my feed reader, Facebook and Twitter taken care of. Sounds like a winter project. (Un)fortunately, winter starts in a few short weeks in the land of cheese and beer.

The Morning Scramble

by @ 9:34. Filed under The Morning Scramble.

Kind of a mini scramble….

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=foMNiug0WGc[/youtube]

Stop by my house for a MOAB update

Kate seems to be a bit homesick...

Playin’ Pacman with Ick

Phelony Jones is having more fun than us

RDW has the video of Calypso Louis endorsing the messiah

Michelle Malkin points out that the Obama campaign is all racist, all the time.

Gandpa Old Soldier sees dead people

Todd’s got issues.

Jay Weber thinks Obama’s a frying pan

Dad29 exposing Obama’s New Party in Wisconsin

Short and sweet……….

Off to the main reason I came to DC – Defending the American Dream Summit

by @ 6:57. Filed under Defending the American Dream.

Drinking my way through DC with Sean Hackbarth, Kevin Binversie and various others was fun, and seeing some sites (most of the pics are up at Flickr) was good, but now it’s time to do what I came to do; attend Amercans for Prosperity’s Defending the American Dream summit. I don’t know exactly how much I’ll cover versus actually attend this time, but I’ll do as much of both as I can.

Since I doubt my coverage will even begin to cover it, there is also a Twitter hashtag set up – #AFP08.

Right Angles – your one-stop ACORN news shop

by @ 6:19. Filed under Elections, Politics - National.

I don’t know if I could keep up with the ACORN sprouts if I were back at the bunker, but I definitely know I can’t on the road. Fortunately, Jon Ham over at Right Angles has, even though he’s termed the explosion of ACORN stories as growing faster than kudzu.

Let’s Take a Deep, Cleansing Breath

by @ 5:34. Filed under Miscellaneous.

As I head for a week of being incommunicado, I’m going to lay my blogging neck on the line with a topic that has a lot of emotion attached to it. I’ll give you 10 days to tee off on this and we’ll see if Steve will have changed the locks while I’m gone;


We had a spirited debate during the debate livedrunkblog about the disclosure in the Congressional hearings that AIG spent approximately $400K for a trip, a week after they received $85 billion in government loans to avoid their failure.

The trip has been described in most media similar to this from the Washington Post:

And just last week, about 70 of the company’s top performers were rewarded with a week-long stay at the luxury St. Regis Resort in Monarch Beach, Calif., where they ran up a tab of $440,000.

Other reports refer to the trip as “An Executive Retreat.”

That sure sounds bad doesn’t it? Sounds like the company is just carrying on like a college student spending their parent’s money without regard for the effort to earn it.

It’s not.

Here is the description from AIG:

The event, mischaracterized as an “Executive Retreat,” was held by one of AIG’s insurance subsidiaries for independent life insurance agents, not for AIG employees. These agents were top business producers for the company, and of the more than 100 attendees, only 10 were employees of the AIG subsidiary who were there to represent their company. No AIG executives from headquarters attended. The meeting was planned months before the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s loan to AIG.

So what’s the difference?

First, the retreat was not for AIG executives. The retreat was a recognition trip for their top (and this next word is really important) Independent agents. Independent agents are just that…Independent. They get to chose what insurance products they sell. There are many ways to provide incentive for sales people to sell your products, compensation is one, contests are another. However, from my experience, incentive trips are a huge deal for many sales people. The ego boost of the “top achiever” recognition can do as much or more than any other temporary incentive programs to build sales loyalty and spur agents to higher sales achievement.

Second, while there were some AIG executives there, that would be expected. When you have a recognition trip for agents you will typically have the people responsible for managing those people and programs, at the event to emcee, be hosts and build comraderie with the agents.

Third, these were Independent agents. Independent agents generally represent insurance products of multiple companies. If AIG wants to make sure that the agents continue to sell their products (an important thing if we want the company to survive and actually pay back their loans), it’s important to keep the agent’s “head in the game.” Cancelling a recognition trip that they had worked for all year, because of your financial problems (not theirs) does not garner confidence amongst your most valued and highest producing agents.

Fourth, unlike the notion you get from most of the articles that AIG got their money and then booked a spa get away, this program had been in place for some extended time. It’s not unusual for these types of programs  to be  announced a year in advance so that the efforts of that year are what earn you a ticket to the event.

Finally, yes, loaning them $85 billion (and I heard another $35 billion tonight) is a lot of money. However, implicit in the fact that it is a loan and not a complete takeover, is that the intent is for the company to survive…likely smaller, simpler but still survive. At the end of June, AIG had assets of $1.50 trillion dollars.   If that is the intent, AIG will need to continue to execute and grow their non investment business lines.   If you’re concerned about this expenditure, would you like to adjust the commissions they pay?   Would you like to look into   their office supply expense?

My point is this:

Was it the best move?   In hind sight, maybe not.   But please note I said “hind sight.”   However I will maintain that it wasn’t the “let’s spend Dad’s money trip” that it’s been made out to be.   Additionally, like so many other events that have occurred during these difficult times, the press and others have condemned others, without getting facts, while failing to admit their own failures that contributed to the failure of many of these companies.

The problem I see in this environment is that many smart, well intentioned people are getting caught seeing a boogieman behind every action that any of these government assisted companies make.   Are there crooks out there?   Yup, no doubt some of these folks ought to be put in jail.   However, most of the people in companies like AIG, a company that employees 110,00 and has many more independent agents that work for it, are people like the rest of us, trying to make a living and do a good job.   Most of the people at AIG are not making decisions based with the intention of “how do I screw the taxpayers!”

Still not convinced?   Let me try another way.   $400K is .04% of $85 billion.   In perspective, if you made $50K each year, that would be equivalent to you spending $.25.   If you have a $300,000 mortgage, it would be the equivalent of $1.41.   I know $400K and $85 Billion are really large amounts of money but do you really think that something that is less than the equivalent of a cup of Starbucks should be the focus right now?

Yes, I know it “looks bad.”   Yes, there are bad people out there, no doubt.   However, we need to make sure, especially now when it is very easy to be overwhelmed with negative news, that we have complete facts and we hold individuals, not entire companies to account for their actions.   If not, how much better are we than the people who cry “Buuuuuuuuuush” every time something happens that they don’t like?   We’re smarter than that group.  

We need to make sure to step back, get the facts and  take a deep cleansing breath.   After doing all that, we should pursue every last one of the cheating, lying, scumbags that turned their heads while they feathered their own nests and put us all at risk.   Those individuals need to be rooted out and dealt with with extreme prejudice.   The rest of the folks in AIG and companies like them, are just like us and deserve our prayers and support.

The dead rising from the grave (to vote) – Texas edition

by @ 5:25. Filed under Elections.

Texas Watchdog has the details on how at least 4,000 dead people in Houston, Texas are on the rolls, with some of “them” casting ballots. The three instances with the most dead voting were the November 2004 election, the November 2006 election, and the 2008 Democratic primary. I’m not at all surprised; after all, the Dems have 105% of the zombie vote.

Do read the entire thing. There is a nugget from someone who lost in that Democratic primary for those of you who thought that groups like ACORN would actually turn in the registrations of those they thought were not planning on voting for their former employee, Barack Obama.

Revisions/extensions (5:27 am 10/10/2008) – Corrected the city. I blame the 3 days’ of drinking.

October 9, 2008

Indy’s voter registration goes to 11

by @ 7:01. Filed under Elections.

(H/T – Say Anything via Emperor Misha I)

Paul K. Ogden of Odgen On Politics does the math on voter registrations in Marion County, Indiana (that would be the county that includes Indianapolis), and discovered there are 5% more voters registered than there were those 18 years or older in 2007. Specifically, Paul states there were 644,197 adults and 677,401 registered voters. The former number is likely slightly high (because Paul added up the number of juveniles in 2006 and subtracted that from the 876,804 people estimated to be in the county in 2007), while the latter comes to us from the Indianapolis Star.

One could try to make the argument that Marion County’s population did increase by 5%, but the recent census numbers don’t bear that out. While the Census Bureau does not offer the breakdown by age as STATSIndiana does, they do offer a chart estimating the population every year since 2000. I’ll reprint that here:

April 1, 2000 (Census official number) – 860,454
July 1, 2000 (beginning of the estimates) – 860,958
July 1, 2001 – 865,068 (+0.4% from 7/1/2000)
July 1, 2002 – 864,900 (drop of less than 0.1% from 7/1/2001)
July 1, 2003 – 865,820 (+0.1% from 7/1/2002)
July 1, 2004 – 866,917 (+0.1% from 7/1/2003)
July 1, 2005 – 868,735 (+0.2% from 7/1/2004)
July 1, 2006 – 872,986 (+0.5% from 7/1/2005)
July 1, 2007 – 876,804 (+0.4% from 7/1/2006)

In short, the population of Marion County increased by only 1.9% between July 1, 2000 and July 1, 2007, with a highest year-to-year change of 0.5%. To put it in annual terms, that’s less than 0.3% per year. Yet we’re supposed to believe that the adult population in Marion County increased by something north of 5% between July 1, 2007 and a couple days ago? Sorry, but I’m not buying that.

Yet This is “The One” They Want to be President

by @ 5:21. Filed under Politics - National.

Dean Reynolds from CBS news writes an interesting article. In it he provides comparisons between working and traveling with the Obama campaign and the McCain campaign. Under normal circumstances this wouldn’t be material worth a post but then, this isn’t a normal Presidential race.

After painting Obama as the campaign master with a full, aggressive schedule, he goes on to the comparisons.

Reynolds complains that the Obama campaign is so full that it has a tough time making and sticking to schedules:

Obama’s campaign schedule is fuller, more hectic and seemingly improvisational. The Obama aides who deal with the national reporters on the campaign plane are often overwhelmed, overworked and un-informed about where, when, why or how the candidate is moving about. Baggage calls are preposterously early with the explanation that it’s all for security reasons.

If so, I would love to have someone from Obama’s campaign explain why the entire press corps, the Secret Service, and the local police idled for two hours in a Miami hotel parking lot recently because there was nothing to do and nowhere to go. It was not an isolated case.

About McCain’s scheduling he says:

The McCain folks are more helpful and generally friendly. The schedules are printed on actual books you can hold in your hand, read, and then plan accordingly. The press aides are more knowledgeable and useful to us in the news media. The events are designed with a better eye, and for the simple needs of the press corps. When he is available, John McCain is friendly and loquacious. Obama holds news conferences, but seldom banters with the reporters who’ve been following him for thousands of miles around the country. Go figure.

Reynolds makes specific examples of how the campaigns work to accommodate and make best use of the press traveling with them. About Obama:

Nor is there much sympathy for those of us who report for a newscast that airs in the early evening hours. Our shows place a premium on live reporting from the scene of campaign events. But this campaign can often be found in the air and flying around at the time the “CBS Evening News with Katie Couric” is broadcast.

In comparison, regarding McCain:

The other day in Albuquerque, N.M., the reporters were given almost no time to file their reports after McCain spoke. It was an important, aggressive speech, lambasting Obama’s past associations. When we asked for more time to write up his remarks and prepare our reports, the campaign readily agreed to it. They understood.

Even the plane environment is different between the two campaigns:

The McCain campaign plane is better than Obama’s, which is cramped, uncomfortable and smells terrible most of the time. Somehow the McCain folks manage to keep their charter clean, even where the press is seated.

Some may dismiss this as the whining of a broadcast ego having to do actual work. While I can’t rule that out, it doesn’t really matter to the larger issue I note in his writing.

In Reynolds description I see the definition of the two men that Reynolds has been following. Knowingly or not, of Barack Obama Reynolds writes that he is:

  • Egotistic – He sees no reason to keep the folks responsible for supporting him informed.   People appear to be required just to assume that “The One” has a good reason without need for explanation.
  • Self Centered – yea I know running for President is important but don’t you think a could at least let people know what the plan is for the day?
  • Insensitive to other people’s needs and issues – unwilling to let the people who are trying to get him elected attend to the jobs that will help that cause?   Can’t even provide for common cleaning and

Reynolds’ article describes McCain as, well, the exact opposite.

There’s nothing really new in what Reynolds describes of Obama.   The traits that come to the forefront are traits that we’ve known about him for awhile.  

If Reynolds’ assessment is typical of other reporters who have traveled with both campaigns, I find it odd that while the MSM wants Obama to be President, they find no qualities in him that would make him a friend.

To paraphrase an old adage:   Character is what people see in you when the camera lights are off!  

If only people saw more of Obama without the Hollywood wrapping.   If they did, this would be a far different race.

October 8, 2008

Open blog

by @ 13:16. Filed under The Blog.

Forgot to mention before I went to DC that I would be pretty much incommunicato. Worse, Shoebox is headed on vacation starting tomorrow.

We’ll be providing you with the usual guest-bloggers, as the word went out to them that the always-open door is a wee bit more open.

Talking to Four Year Olds – Tough Love Edition

by @ 5:49. Filed under Economy.

One of the surest ways to ensure that you will raise children who will be known as “brats” by the parents of all their friends, is to be your child’s “Best Friend.”   I’m not saying that parents should not have very positive relationships with their children, relationships that foster open communication and enjoyment of each other’s company.   I am saying that there are times in a parent/child relationship where a parent needs to be a parent and implement discipline.  

It’s easy to identify families where parents want to be “friends” and not apply discipline.   The children are “uncontrolled” and whine incessantly when they don’t get their answers.   The worst trait of a child that has a parent who won’t parent is repeatedly throwing tantrums in very public places.   They do that because the parent has trained them that it is more important for them to “get along” than it is to hold to principles.

The tantrum of an undisciplined child is what we are now seeing in the stock markets.

It has now been nearly a month since Secretary of the Treasury, Paulson, told us about the impending financial crisis and that “something must be done!”   Since then, Wachovias has failed, AIG has been saved, $700 Billion + has been allocated for asset purchases, the Fed has started to issue short term commercial loans (commercial paper) and international governments have followed suit with their own versions of all of the above efforts.

But it isn’t enough.

For at least the past 6 years, being a financial institution of nearly any kind, was easy.   Interest rates were low, the economy and in turn company profits were moving with unprecedented growth and assets, especially homes, appeared to have no limit to their value.   You  had to be a complete buffoon to not make money as a financial institution during this time.   In fact, with the exception of some hiccups during the .com bust, the same argument could be made back to the early 90’s.

Now the financial world has changed (OK, admittedly, that is an understatement).   No longer can money be leant just because “I like you” or “I know you.”   This doesn’t mean that stocks are worth zero or that no loans should be made.   Rather, we’re back to a time where real work needs to be done.   Financial institutions, and markets, need to get back to the fundamental work of assessing risk and pricing it into stock prices, interest rates or bond yields.   That’s what they should be doing but they aren’t there yet.   Like the child who has been coddled by their parent for far too long, the markets and  financial institutions are now throwing public tantrums in an effort to get the FED and other governmental institutions to give them even more to placate their tantrums.

I’m recommending that Paulson, Cox, Bernanke  watch a marathon of “The Nanny.”   If they do, they will find that even the worst behaved child can be regain socially appropriate behavior once the parent sets firm boundaries and show the child that behavior outside of those boundaries is unacceptable and will not get further placating.  

How do I know I’m right?   Read this article at CNNMoney.com.   Here’s the money quote from the article:

“It’s another step in the right direction, but it’s hard to get too excited about this because nothing yet has worked,” said Bill Stone, chief investment strategist at PNC Financial Services Group.

“Eventually, if they [the government] stack up enough things, something will work,” he said.

Until Paulson, Cox and Bernanke quit giving in and teasing that more “goodies” may yet come, the markets will not get to the work of analyzing and dealing with facts.   Until some firm boundaries are established, the markets will continue to hope for more and throw public tantrums when more is not forthcoming.

It’s time for Paulson, Cox and Bernanke to establish some tough love.   It won’t change the behavior overnight.   However, in time, the petulant child will once again learn to be a positive member of the family.   Until then, expect to see more and increasingly violent tantrums.

October 7, 2008

Drunkblogging The Presidential Debate

by @ 16:10. Filed under Miscellaneous, Politics - National.

While Steve is off drinking in a public establishment, I’ll be here handling the drunkblogging responsibilities and drinking by myself at home!   We should start about 7:30 or whenever I get cleared by Mrs. Shoe.   Come join me for what should be a very animated debate.   Bring your best Snark!

R&E (4:11 pm 10/7/2008, steveegg) – Embed code added and post bumped to the top.

Bring Out Your Dead!

by @ 10:01. Filed under Economy.

In an offline conversation with one of our regular readers, Dad29, this bit came to mind. Many of you have seen this umpteen times. Watch it once more. When you do, imagine that the guy banging the gong is the FDIC, the guy with the body is a short seller and the knight riding through at the end, oblivious to all going on around him is SEC chair Cox.

Wait, watch it again and imagine that the guy with the gong are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the guy with the body is a mortgage broker who knows the applicant can’t make the payments and the Knight is Barney Frank.

There are probably numerous other analogies that can be drawn to this bit from the current problems…take your try at it and leave a comment.

Government Knows Best

by @ 5:31. Filed under Economy.

As the economic events of the past few weeks have unfolded we’ve heard continuing cries from the Democrats that unregulated markets are bad and that the reason this “melt down” has occurred is that there wasn’t enough government intervention.   Now I know our regular readers are smart enough to know this not to be the case.   However, if pressed, could you provide specific examples where excess government interference has actually been a negative?  

Throughout this crisis, the government has taken an unusual role in picking winners and losers.   The picked Bear Stearns to be a loser and JP Morgan to be a winner.   The chose Lehman to be a loser but picked AIG to be a winner by virtue of the guarantees it provided to keep AIG afloat.   Most recently, the government chose Wachovia to lose and Citi bank to win….except it didn’t.

After determining that Wachovia was about to implode, the FDIC negotiated a deal for Wachovia to be sold to Citi for $1/share.   Along with the sale, the FDIC agreed to provide loss protection for anything in excess of $42billion, on Wachovia’s $312 Billion dollar mortgage related securities.   This approach had been similar to how the FDIC and other government agencies had been operating since May so no one questioned their logic, until……

Wells Fargo looked at the Wachovia assets and said “We’d like some of that!”   Wells Fargo liked it so much that they offered a stock transaction originally worth $7/ share.   How the heck did that happen?

The “funny” part about this is that Citi is now suing to get their governement approved deal.   I’m sure they view Wachovia as getting a $12 billion gift from the government!

Every one of the governments actions in this financial crisis has been as the weak side of a negotiation.   Imagine negotiating for the purchase of a house where you have cash, are ready to close and the seller is on the verge of losing the house to the bank.   I’ve done that a few times personally and I can tell you that you will find the lowest price possible on that house at that time because the seller has few, if any, options.   That is the situation that the government has been in, they’ve been negotiating forced sales and those will always garner the lowest bid.

It’s fairly obvious that the “crisis” we were all warned of in the last two weeks has not been  abated by securing the magic elixir of the bailout plan.   If anything, the markets have either laughed or yawned at the effort and have returned taking their ques from other stimuli, real and imagined.   Wells Fargo showed us that if the government stays out, there may be temporary pain but ultimately, quality assets will find buyers.

Oh, and did I mention that with the Wells Fargo deal, the government isn’t guaranteeing $280 billion dollars of mortgages?   Wells Fargo is buying Wachovia “As Is.”   Tell me again what good the government is doing in these deals?

October 6, 2008

Don’t Know Much About History

by @ 5:28. Filed under Politics - National.

The “News agency who shall not be named,” along with others, is reporting that the last few weeks of the campaign could get VERY personal.

On Saturday, Sarah Palin finally led the campaign in whacking Obama with his Bill Ayers connection:

“This is not a man who sees America as you see it and as I see America,” Palin said today. “We see America as the greatest force for good in this world. If we can be that beacon of light and hope for others who seek freedom and democracy and can live in a country that would allow intolerance in the equal rights that again our military men and women fight for and die for, for all of us.”

She then continued, “Our opponent though is someone who sees America, it seems, as being so imperfect that he’s palling around with terrorists who would target their own country.”

Of course, the MSM quickly ran to Obama’s aid with retorts along the line of the following:

But as the New York Times reported today, Obama was never “palling around” with Ayers. “A review of records of the schools project and interviews with a dozen people who know both men, suggest that Mr. Obama, 47, has played down his contacts with Mr. Ayers, 63. But the two men do not appear to have been close. Nor has Mr. Obama ever expressed sympathy for the radical views and actions of Mr. Ayers, whom he has called ‘somebody who engaged in detestable acts 40 years ago, when I was 8.'”

Those vapidity of that retort has been covered time and again so no need to rehash that. Now that Palin has taken up the line of attacking Obama about the company he keeps, the Obama campaign, responding as if this is a second grade playground fight says: “Oh yeah, well, so are you!” The Obama campaign threatens to drag out the Keating 5 history as their retort of “bad associations.”

Bring it on!

No one of the MSM outlets have spent ANY time investigating Obama’s links and involvement with Ayers, Rezko or the Chicago Political machine. On the other hand, they have spent inordinate time trying to dig up dirt on Palin, to no avail, creating false scandals for McCain….and, they’ve looked into the Keating 5 and have already tried to do McCain in with an attachment to McCain!

In case you forgot, the New York Times tried to resurrect McCain’s involvement to the Keating 5 back during the primaries, February, 2008 to be exact. They tried to derail McCain’s primary run. Not for a lack of effort, they were unable to make the charges stick. In fact, Bob Bennett (Bill Bennett’s brother) came to McCain’s defense, both during the original Keating 5 investigation and again in February:

ROBERT BENNETT, DEFENSE ATTORNEY: Well, Senator McCain did not want a repeat of what occurred years ago in South Carolina, namely a real smear campaign, and asked me to assist them, and I have been assisting him. And this — I’m just — I think what the “New York Times” did here was shameless, just shameless. As you pointed out in the lead, it’s almost entirely unsourced.

You know, I’m in a pretty unique position to talk about John McCain. First, I should tell your listeners I’m a registered Democrat, so I’m not on his side of a lot of issues. But I investigated John McCain for a year and a half, at least, when I was special counsel to the Senate Ethics Committee in the Keating Five, which, by the way, this “New York Times” article goes back to and discusses, goes back years and years.

And if there is one thing I am absolutely confident of, it is John McCain is an honest and honest man. I recommended to the Senate Ethics Committee that he be cut out of the case, that there was no evidence against him, and I think for the “New York Times” to dig this up just shows that Senator McCain’s public statement about this is correct. It’s a smear job. I’m sorry.

and

BENNETT: Well, you know, maybe I was prophetic. I wrote that chapter a long time ago. If your listeners want to know about the Keating Five case, I have a whole chapter on it. What happened was that I had recommended that John McCain be cut out of it and not go forward. And, you know, I call it the way I see it. As I said, I’m a Democrat. And I recommended they go forward against Senators DeConcini, Senator Cranston and Senator Riegle.

But if you cut out John McCain, you would have had 28 days of public hearings with just Democrats in the dock. So, it’s probably the first time in the history of the Senate that they rejected the advice of their counsel to exonerate a senator.

Obama has shown time and again a lack of understanding about history. That’s a trait that should be a concern to many people. However, in this case, I’m happy that Obama has no awareness of history. If he had, he would know that Keatin 5 has been beat to a pulp by all of his best historical corrupters. Despite their best efforts they haven’t been able to twist the facts far enough to indict McCain.

If “associations” become the issue during the last 4 weeks, expect the Obama bus to be hitting a lot of road bumps!

October 5, 2008

2008 NFL Week 5

by @ 10:30. Filed under Sports.

If at first you don’t succeed in busting .500 (29-29-2), try, try again (especially since I need an over/under sweep to snap the 3-4-1 slump I’m in). As always, the point spreads come from Bodog, and if you use these picks to gamble, you didn’t get them from me.

Atlanta (+3.5) @ Green Bay – The Packers have a serious problem stopping the run, and the Falcons have a serious running back.
Chicago (-3.5) @ Detroit – Meet the new GM, same bad players and coaches as the old GM.
Minnesota @ New Orleans (-3.5) – All the Saints have to do is stop the run, and they’ve managed to do that pretty effectively.
Indianapolis @ Houston (+3.5) – What’s with all these 3 1/2-point lines? There’s no place like home.
Tennessee @ Baltimore (+3) – The name of the game is defense. Take the under-33.5.
San Diego (-7) @ Miami – We knew that LT was a good-throwing running back, but who knew Ronnie Brown could throw? No matter; Miami can’t otherwise run, and San Diego knows how to stop trickery.
Kansas City @ Carolina (-10) – I hope you didn’t pick up Larry Johnson after last week’s performance.
Washington @ Philadelphia (-6.5) – There’s no respect for the Redskins. Of course, the return of Brian Westbrook may have something to do with that.
Seattle (+7.5) @ NY Giants – You may like the points, you may want the points, and if you’re scared, you’ll get the points…BUT YOU’RE NOT GONNA NEED ‘EM! There’s too many wideouts in Seahag Green.
Tampa Bay @ Denver (-3.5) – It’s the battle of ex-Al Davis employees. It’s all about the altitude.
New England (-3) @ San Francisco – Ask the Texans what happened to the last team to face the Pats after they lost to the Dolphins.
Buffalo (+1.5) @ Arizona – There’s nothing like playing the weakest division in the NFL to get one rolling.
Cincinnati @ Dallas (-17.5) – What we got here is a failure to communicate.
Pittsburgh @ Jacksonville (-6) – The Injury Discount has become a fire sale. Take the under-37.

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]