No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

Archive for August 26th, 2008

Scott Walker on Jim Doyle and the Vice President nominees

Revisions/extensions (11:37 am 8/27/2008) – As noted below, WisPolitics was there, and filed this report. They also rolled video (yes, the sound quality isn’t the greatest, but my low-budget equpiment wouldn’t have done any better, and I don’t see anything up at WISN-TV’s site) –

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIqJG5DXhUI[/youtube]

Due to poor timing on my part, I was a bit too late for the meat of Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker’s press conference on Gov. Jim Doyle’s speech before the Democratic National Convention, so I don’t have audio. WISN-TV and WisPolitics were there on-time, the former with a camera, so they’ll have more extensive coverage.

First, allow me to post Walker’s pre-buttal, with an additional note from something from Doyle’s 2003 State of the State address that Walker stressed at the press conference:

"Jim Doyle will address the Democratic National Convention today with the theme of Renewing America’s Promise. Let’s take a look at Jim Doyle’s promises.

Before the last election, Jim Doyle told the people of Wisconsin in his State of the State address that, "˜We should not – we must not – and I will not – raise taxes.’ After the last election, he introduced a state budget that raised taxes and fees by more than $3 billion.

Now he’s pushing Senator Barak Obama for president. In his three short years in the United States Senate, Senator Obama has voted against tax cuts and for tax increases 94 times.

He says he’s for the middle class, but Senator Obama voted to raise taxes on those making just $42,000 per year. He wants higher taxes on income, investments, savings, businesses, Social Security and energy. He promises a better economy but taxing our way to prosperity just doesn’t work.

Jim Doyle’s failed slogans and broken promises have not worked for Wisconsin. Voters should remember that when they hear Senator Obama’s promises as well."

Walker also contrasted the following statement from Doyle’s 2003 State of the State address with the actions of both Doyle and Obama – “Obviously, raising taxes is not the answer. Holding the line on taxes helps our businesses grow, makes us more competitive with other states, and creates job opportunities for our families.” (emphasis in the original)

I did get to talk with Walker a few minutes on both Democratic Vice Presidential nominee (presumptive) Sen. Joe Biden and the field for the Republican Vice Presidential nominee. Repeating a theme that I first noted with Asian Badger, Walker called the choice of Biden “manna”. We shared stories of gaffes on Biden’s part, from the plagiarism that forced him out of the 1988 Democratic Presidential primary race, to the multitude of attempts to appease Iran. During an interview with the WisPolitics reporter I overheard, Walker was thinking that Obama would choose Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius (I won’t go further than that; it wasn’t my interview).

On the Republican side, Walker believes that Governors Tim Pawlenty and Mitt Romney would make a good fit for Sen. John McCain, as they’re both outside of the Washington power structure, and both have executive experience. Indeed, he sees little chance that McCain can mess up the choice as badly as Obama did.

Solar wind more responsible for temperature change than carbon dioxide

by @ 11:41. Filed under Global "Warming".

(H/T – Quaking Conservative via DPUD’s Link Pimping)

CNSNews.com reports on a study authored by atmospheric/space scientist Fred Singer that states that solar-wind variability, specifically, its effect on cosmic rays, is the primary factor in Earth’s climatic change on a decadal scale. Of course, since we can’t control either solar wind or cosmic rays, the Gorebal “Warming” acolytes are ignoring the 800-pound gorilla in the room in their zeal to return us to the 13th Century.

Well, At Least She’s Consistent!

by @ 11:18. Filed under Politics - National.

In her Monday night address, Michelle Obama told the audience that she loves America.   In the twelve hours since, the MSM has been carrying the issue as if it was some kind of great revelation.   They point to this comment as if it should silence concerns about her patriotism.

From a recap by Brent Baker:

NBC’s Chuck Todd decided "this is definitely a response in some ways to that whole kerfuffle that she created for herself, six or eight months ago, about being proud to be an American."

CBS’ George Stephanopoulos gets the “suck up of the night” award with his take on Michelle:

"Tonight, there was no doubt. The money line in this speech was that line when she said, ‘that is why I love this country,’ and she lingered."

My question is: Why is any of this remarkable? Wouldn’t we expect the possible First Lady to “Love America?” After all, didn’t Michelle mark for us the exact time she began loving America when in a speech in February she said:

For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country, because it feels like hope is making a comeback.

Wouldn’t it be expected that she still loves America?   Why would the media be making a big deal of her love for America?

The reason Michelle Obama’s line of “I love this country” is newsworthy  is not because it settles any concerns about her patriotism.   The reason it is  newsworthy is that she is the only Obama we’ve seen that has managed to maintain consistency on  a core  issue in the past six months.

Roll bloat – Two-for-Tuesday

by @ 10:53. Filed under The Blog.

If it’s Tuesday, and it’s time to bloat the roll, it must be Two-for-Tuesday. First up, Blogs of War. I’ve been following John Little on Twitter for a while, so it’s only natural to add his blog to the roll.

Next, it’s Right Voices. Pam somehow found one of yesterday’s Scrambles, which allowed me to find her blog.

Both are worthy additions to the over-bloated roll and feed reader. Guess doing the Scrambles are going to take a bit longer now. Oh well; that’s the price of reading too many good blogs.

Drill Here, Drill Now Tuesdays – 8/26/2008

by @ 10:04. Filed under Energy.

This idea was started by Jessi at Wake Up America. It will appear here every Tuesday (whether I’m here or not; the only difference is I won’t be able to update the current gas price while on vacation) until Congress wakes up and allows a lot more domestic drilling (I’m not talking about just ANWR, or just off the Florida coast where Cuba, Red China and Brazil are preparing to drink our milkshake, or just the shale fields in the Rockies).

My Gas Price (south suburban Milwaukee County, Wisconsin): $3.779/gallon

America needs to drill here drill now. America is having a energy crisis, and we need to do something now!

Urge Congress to pass a bill to drill in America, where the United States has vast oil and gas resources onshore and offshore that are currently illegal to develop and therefore inaccessible.

U.S. law prohibits the development of approximately 38 billion barrels of undeveloped oil resources (19 billion barrels onshore and 18.92 billion offshore).

U.S. law prohibits the development of approximately 180 trillion cubic feet of undeveloped natural gas resources (94.5 trillion cubic feet onshore and 85.7 trillion cubic feet offshore).

Also…

CONGRESS RECENTLY VOTED TO MAKE IT ILLEGAL TO DEVELOP U.S. OIL SHALE RESOURCES

With oil prices at an all-time high, Americans are facing escalating gas, diesel, and aircraft fuel increases. Oil prices are projected to increase further.

Congress, however, has made it illegal to develop vast domestic oil resources in large parts of the United States.

The most startling Congressional prohibition on domestic oil production concerns the recently enacted ban on the development of oil shale resources in parts of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming in the Green River Formation. According to a Rand Study estimate, this reserve contains over one trillion barrels of oil, with 800 billion barrels fully recoverable, or three times the current oil reserves as Saudi Arabia.

If you haven’t already done so, first sign the petition to call for more drilling, then sign the one to get Congress back to DC so they can allow more drilling faster.

The Morning Scramble, Part 2 – 8/26/2008

by @ 9:05. Filed under The Morning Scramble.

We have Hurricane Gustav, and since it’s not an immediate threat to the US (it will be by the end of the week though), let’s break out the Scorpions for the fun portion of the Scramble…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dn8u-Sto5Yc[/youtube]

  • Matt Lewis reports John McCain is thinking about throwing away the picture-perfect timing of his VP announcement. NOOOOOO!!!!
  • Rich Lowry props up Mike Huckabee’s case for VP. Oh HELL NO!
  • JammieWearingFool found another potential new player in the McCain Veepstakes – Gen. David Petraeus. I can definitely live with that, especially as we would get the All-Warriors ticket against the All-Gaffe/Rezko/Appeasement/Pacifist ticket.
  • Lady Logician delivers today’s history lesson.
  • Kate explains politics in a rich-family setting (there is, however, a language warning for a minor expletive near the end).
  • Ace reports the New York Times Sedition Slimes Intelligence Wrecking Tour has gone global, as they out Swiss agents who outed various Islamokazi nuclear programs.
  • The Borderline Chris has the envirowhacko/Commie quote of the day. Do remember that the Soviets funded the European Green Party.
  • Dad29 found some useful idiots in the State Department endorsing the master plan to restore the Soviet Union.
  • J.R. Dunn makes the case for a forceful repudiation of the restoration of th Soviet Union.
  • Neocon found the Wimpy (the character from Popeye, not the Webster’s definition) Edition of Mad Vlad’s playbook.
  • Patrick McIlheran crunches the numbers and finds that boycotting the Islamist portion of OPEC won’t have much of an effect on Al Qaeda and affiliated groups.
  • J. Gravelle is running a funny fill-in-the-blank contest – "The officer struck the subject near ______, drove him into ______, where he was found under ______." Do play along, even if he took all the side-splitting ones.
  • Benjamin passes the remote so those of us with Time Warner Cable can watch the Big Ten Network. How long before they cave on the NFL Network?
  • Thomas Sowell labels his thoughts as “random”. I humbly disagree; they’re brilliant.
  • Wendy is running her own DNC convention. If she would only do to her children what the Obamas are doing to theirs, it would get higher ratings.
  • Shoebox begins a new feature – Educating Four Year Olds – with a smackdown of Nancy Pelosi’s ideas of Catholic doctrine.
  • Patrick found the latest fashion trend; Soviet military uniforms. Well, since Mad Vlad and the State Department are bound and determined to resurrect that failed country from the ash heap of history, it doesn’t surprise me.

If this grows any more, I’m going to have to hire a staff to do this.

The Morning Scramble, Part 1 (‘Rat edition) – 8/26/2008

by @ 8:33. Filed under The Morning Scramble.

Michelle Malkin provided the tune for Part 1 with news that Hillary Clinton is letting her delegates go her own way –

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNM6IuA87eM[/youtube]

Once again, there’s too much goodness out there for a single shot.

  • Alice H is providing on-the-scene reports from the Recreate ’68ers. She was in the middle of last night’s tear-gassing.
  • Speaking of being in the middle of CHAOS, Jim Hoft reports friend of NRE Michelle Malkin was the target of an ugly midday episode.
  • Stephen Green provides some more local color.
  • William Teach wonders where the presstitute coverage of this is. Answer – it doesn’t meet their “One vision, one purpose” meme.
  • USCitizen has some fun with colors and dubs the O’Biden ticket “Bad Men”. Yep.
  • TexasFred reveals the secret to starting each day with a positive political outlook.
  • Christian Schneider makes the case that Joe Biden’s selection is a great leap for gender equity.
  • Jim Geraghty remembers who Biden wanted as John “Flipper” Kerry’s running mate in 2004. Hint; he’s on a major-party ticket this year. Thank you Tom Daschle for winning the battle of this year’s VP nominee.
  • Peter explores the Biden/Tony Rezko connection. I hereby propose that all future O’Biden commercials have the following disclaimer – “Paid for by Tony Rezko.”
  • Rick Moran deconstructs Biden’s foreign policy “experience”. Possible new slogan: Biden – Screwing Up Foreign Policy Since 1979.
  • See-dubya notes that Biden is more than a bit like Chevy Chase.
  • Jon Sanders sums up ‘Rat Presidential politics with one story from The News Organization That Cannot Be Quoted™.
  • Back to The Indispensible One – Jim Geraghty found Barack Obama sandwiched between a pair of rock acts. But, but, but I thought the Obamination was the headliner.
  • Continuing with Jim, – he notes that the John Edwards’ Two Americas is alive and well for Obama’s big donors; they will get Secret Service escort through the perimeter on Thursday.
  • One more Geraghty nugget (for now, at least) – he caught Obama in the wrong city. At least he didn’t make it a state like he did Eau Claire.
  • Let There Be CHAOS, Part I – GayPatriotWest wonders whether it’s the fact that the Clintons are the Clintons or whether it’s Obama’s treatment of the Clintons that’s keeping the Obamination Express stuck in the mud.
  • Let There Be CHAOS, Part II – Ed Morrissey notes that both Hillary Clinton and her advisers are skipping out on the Invesco Field coronation.
  • Let There Be CHAOS, Part III – Wyatt Earp found Bill Clinton unhappy with his role. He should put some ice on that.
  • Let There Be CHAOS, Part IV – John McCormack says that the 3 am texting was no mistake, even as the presstitutes were getting confirmation 2 hours prior to the “first-in-the-world-to-know” messages.
  • Or Maybe There Won’t Be CHAOS – Allahpundit reports that Clinton will be part of the plan to nip it as the first flower starts blooming and ask for a unanimous blessing of the Obamination.
  • Pejman Yousefzadeh found Obama economic adviser Warren Buffet praising the wonders of 1% economic growth. Talk about your low expectations.
  • Gaius discovered a plan to ensure that; target TV networks and stations that dare speak up against the Obamination.
  • American Pundit marvels at Obama’s “so <expletive deleted>ing what” defense of his lifelong friendship with domestic terrorist Bill Ayers.
  • CDR Salamander created the perfect Maoist Obamination poster.
  • JammieWearingFool reports the Denver plot against Obama was deemed by the authorities as “not credible”. Well; they are druggies.
  • Andy McCarthy notes that it was a traffic stop that broke up this plot. And here I thought there was no use in doing roadside searches </sarcasm>.
  • Dad29 sums up the ‘Rat platform in ART form.
  • Zip discovered the ‘Rats rank the Peanut Farmer and Algore Goracle (in order, no less) as their favorite leaders not named Obama or Clinton. No wonder why they’re cheering the O’Biden ticket as the second Peanut Administration.

    Shock item out of that – Joe Lieberman ranks higher on the “Very Favorable” meter among ‘Rats than Harry Reid.

  • Jim Geraghty wonders where the complaints from the presstitutes about having to use port-a-potties are.
  • Caledonia Unplugged pictures the answer; they’re so wrapped up in the Obamination Express they don’t care.

The (mostly-)non-‘Rat-infested portion will be up shortly.

Talking to Four Year Olds

by @ 5:19. Filed under Talking to Four Year Olds.

Steve has started (restarted) his Ask Egg series which provides insightful advice to the lost souls of politics.   Similar to Steve, I will start a column today and it will be focused on teaching simple truths to Liberals.   Liberals have a penchant for taking obvious truths and making them complex by adding multiple levels of relativism and obfuscation to the discussion. Part of my purpose is to help these lost souls regain control of simple, concise thinking. Today I start recurring column titled “Talking to Four Year Olds.”

First the Democrats had the presumptuous presidential candidate.   Now, they appear to have the presumptuous Pope in waiting.

In an interview this weekend on “Meet the Press,” Nancy determined she had an appropriate pay grade to determine when life began. This account from William Donohue:

"I would say that as an ardent, practicing Catholic, this is an issue that I have studied for a long time. And what I know is, over the centuries, the doctors of the Church have not been able to make that definition." Responding, moderator Tom Brokaw told her that the Catholic Church "feels very strongly" that life begins at conception. Pelosi said, "I understand. And this is like maybe 50 years or something like that. So again, over the history of the Church, this is an issue of controversy."

I’ll let Mr. Donohue give the slap down response:

"Here is what the Catechism of the Catholic Church says: "˜Human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception.’ It also says, "˜Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable.’ Looks like Pelosi didn’t study the subject long enough. But not to worry: We are sending her a copy of Catholicism for Dummies today (the Catechism is like maybe a bit advanced).

My first attempt at educating a four year old:

I understand. And this is like maybe 50 years or something like that. So again, over the history of the Church, this is an issue of controversy.

A simple; “You’re wrong!” should suffice but ,I’ll give a bit more evidence. Donohue provides the Catechism answer. It’s source, if you claim Christianity, is authoritative, The Bible.

From Isaiah 49:

1 Listen to me, all you in distant lands!
Pay attention, you who are far away!
The Lord called me before my birth;
from within the womb he called me by name.

and

5 And now the Lord speaks"”
the one who formed me in my mother’s womb to be his servant,
who commissioned me to bring Israel back to him.
The Lord has honored me,
and my God has given me strength.

(Emphasis mine)
Isaiah made a claim of God personally knowing him while he was in the womb! He didn’t say “you named me at my birth,” or “You developed me from birth to manhood.” He specifically referred to activity while in the womb and he referred to “me” and not ” a pile of plasma.” And, just for the record, most of the Bible was written a bit more than 50 years ago.

OK, if Bible talk is a bit too advanced for your four year old try this one:

The basic argument of the “pro choice” crowds is that abortion is a women’s choice and it’s OK because it’s not a life. Let’s deconstruct that a bit:

Let’s stipulate that if you can survive outside of the womb, you are a life. I think we can also stipulate that you are a life even if you have to use extraordinary means. Even four year olds believe that people who have horrible diseases should get the benefit of extraordinary means to extend their lives.

When I was born if you weren’t nearly a full term baby, your chances of survival were very low. In fact (not that you’d know it now) but I was a full term baby and the story goes that my Great Grandmother told my Grandmother, out of earshot of my mom, that I was too small and wouldn’t survive. To the disappointment of many, I fooled her! Today, babies at 24 weeks are considered viable and the shortest gestation which the baby survived was about 21 weeks.

So what’s changed in the past (mumble, mutter, harumph, harumph) half a century? Well obviously, the medical community has gotten a lot smarter and technology has gotten much better. What’s not changed? Conception still occurs the same way (sperm fertilizes egg) even though we’ve found ways to help that and babies still develop in the same way and the same rate that they always have. In other words, what God designed hasn’t changed a bit but what Man understands about it continues to evolve.

Which brings me to a simple question:

If the only thing that is changing is our understanding and ability to define “viable,” doesn’t that mean that the fetus is viable and therefore a life from the day of conception and the only thing that prevents it is that we aren’t smart enough to successfully intervene…..YET?

Who’s The More Evolved?

by @ 5:05. Filed under Politics - National.

Who Knew?

From Reuters:

Monkeys experience joy of giving, too, study finds

Tests in capuchin monkeys showed the animals consistently chose to share food with another monkey if given the option, suggesting they are capable of empathy, the team at the Yerkes Research Center at Emory University in Atlanta found.

“They seem to care for the welfare of those they know,” Frans de Waal, director of the Living Links Center at Yerkes, said in a statement.

Capuchin monkeys are capable of sharing and are deemed to get joy from the experience.

Apparently capuchin monkeys have higher evolved concerns for their family than the presumptuous presidential candidate has for his half brother.

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]