Michael King’s employer, 11alive.com, is having a multi-day poll on which fictitional President would be best. The primaries started today, with the A-D group.
I hereby endorse Thomas “Tug” Benson.
The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.
Michael King’s employer, 11alive.com, is having a multi-day poll on which fictitional President would be best. The primaries started today, with the A-D group.
I hereby endorse Thomas “Tug” Benson.
The NFL season is just around the bend, and I’ve got a few housekeeping items to take care of:
– First things first, I wil be back to defend my over-.500 regular season record against the spread from last year (123-120-2, with a 20-13-1 on the two-picks-weekly over/unders). As always, they’ll be cross-posted at The Wisconsin Sports Bar.
– Fred will once again be running at least 1 Cheddarsphere fantasy league, and possibly 2. The Spiraling Colby is already in the air.
– Ick has a pair of items lined up for us; a fantasy league and a pick-’em contest.
I know mhking from the days back at Free Republic, and was saddened when he had to give up the original Ramblings Journal. There is good news; it’s back, and though it isn’t updated as often as the old place, it is still a must-read.
It’s Thursday; you know what that means (blues and Open Thread Thursday)…
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e1fT-J5WKbE[/youtube]
I was hoping to keep this small so as to not intimidate you into not playing along, but there’s too much good stuff out there. Oh well; let’s light this candle.
I saw in my Twitter feed that doubleplusundead was complaining about having 200 unread items in his reader. I think I have something north of 200 unread items right now, and I know I’m still missing stuff.
In case you missed Shoebox’s post below, go read it. There is an expansion or two based on what Ed Morrissey found, including a confirmation of the veracity of the YouTubed conversation Shoebox and Erick Erickson embedded:
Guy Benson not only tracked down the audio to the Chicago Tribune, but he came up with this little gem from the transcripts of the Illinois Legislature (specifically, pages 32-34, from the 4/22/2002 session):
[T]he only plausible rationale, to my mind, for this legislation would be if you had a suspicion that a doctor, the attending physician, who has made the assessment that this is a nonviable fetus and that, let’s say for the purposes of the mother’s health, is being "” that "” that labor is being induced, that that physician (a) is going to make the wrong assessment and (b) if the physician discovered, after the labor had been induced, that, in fact, he made an error, and in fact this was not a nonviable fetus but, in fact, a live child, that the physician, of his own accord or her own accord, would not try to exercise the sort of medical procedures and practices that would be involved in saving that child.
Now, if "” if you think that there are possibilities that doctors would not do that, then maybe this bill makes sense, but I "” I suspect and my impression is, is that the Medical Society suspects that doctors feel that they would already be under that obligation, that they would already be making these determinations, and that essentially adding a "” an additional doctor who the has to be called in an emergency situation to come in and make these assessments is really designed simply to burden the original decision of the woman and the physician to induce labor and perform an abortion.
Now, if that’s the case –and "” and I know some of us feel very strongly one way or the other on that issue "” that’s fine, but I think it’s important to understand that this issue ultimately is about abortion and not live births. Because if these children are being born alive, I, at least, have confidence that a doctor who is in that room is going to make sure they’re looked after.
Ed goes on to point out that the above statement came after it was revealed that the doctors at the mis-named Christ Hospital were allowing babies born alive during abortion procedures to die without any care.
To steal from another movie…
Denver, we have a problem. We have a main bus B undervolt. We’ve got a lot of thruster activity here, Denver. There’s another master alarm, Denver. We’ve got a computer restart. We’ve got a ping light. We’ve got multiple cautions and warnings, Denver. We’ve gotta reset and restart.
On March 30, 2008, at a townhall meeting in Johnstown, PA, Barck Obama made the following statement:
“When it comes specifically to HIV/AIDS, the most important prevention is education, which should include — which should include abstinence education and teaching the children — teaching children, you know, that sex is not something casual. But it should also include — it should also include other, you know, information about contraception because, look, I’ve got two daughters. 9 years old and 6 years old. I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby. I don’t want them punished with an STD at the age of 16. You know, so it doesn’t make sense to not give them information.”
At the time I wrote about the callousness Barack Obama had towards a life and how there was a difference between “punishment” and “consequences” of our actions and decisions.
Since the Saddleback Civil Forum, Barack Obama has had to reexplain his position on abortion, especially late term abortion. Since Saturday, I’ve counted at least 3 different explanations for Barack’s inability to support a bill in the Illinois legislature that would require doctors to provide medical care for babies who survived abortions. At different times I have heard:
The Obama campaign has continued to try to obfuscate the issue, dancing from one excuse to the other. All along Obama has claimed “as he has repeatedly said” that the claim that he supports infanticide is a lie and ridiculous to even consider.
Um, yeah.
I can’t vouch for this audio clip but it has been placed on Redstate and if it passes their muster, it works here. Here is Barack Obama on the Illinois floor explaining why he is against the bill:
In the audio Obama claims that having two doctors help the baby after a botched abortion would be a “BURDEN!”
When Obama made his March comment about “punishment” his sycophants (of which a couple chimed in on my post) tried to argue that he wasn’t talking about the baby as punishment but the subsequent effort to raise and provide for it. Nice Try!
Anyone, subsequent to the corroboration of this audio, who wants to argue that Barack Obama does not advocate the most self centered, arrogant positions on the issue of infant life may as well be arguing that the Bigfoot recently “discovered” wasn’t really a rubber gorilla suit but a uniquely mummified specimen.
If this audio is corroborated, Obama is toast. In fact, if this audio is corroborated, keep a close eye on the Democrats convention. With my apologies to Mad Max:
Two Dems enter, One Dem leaves. Two Dems enter, One Dem leaves.
Be careful as to who you assume will be the one leaving!
We Shoe’s have become Olympic junkies! Mrs. Shoe and I like to see the skill required for each event, even the more arcane like trampoline or ping pong. Thing 1 and Thing 2 have been taking in every minute they are allowed to watch. This is really the first Olympics they’ve paid attention to. They are mesmerized by the sports that they’ve never seen before.
Monday night’s broadcast had an event that we, and many of you, will remember for a long time to come. Lolo Jones ran in one of the 100 meter hurdle heats. She was a heavy favorite, expected to take gold in the Event. While slow out of the block, Jones quickly caught and passed the other competitors. She was about to blow the field away when at the second to last hurdle, her foot hit the hurdle, she lost stride and finished seventh, out of the finals.
After the event, NBC stuck a camera in Lolo Jones’ face and asked “How do you feel?”
Jones was obviously numb from the event. With her mind reeling, Jones managed a response that applies not only to an Olympic hurdler but to many, many situations in life:
“It’s the hurdles. If you can’t get over all 10, you can’t be the champion.”
Wednesday, Zogby released a poll showing John McCain with a 5 point lead amongst likely voters. The poll shows Barack Obama losing significant ground in all of his core groups; Democrats, under the age of 35, women and voters with incomes under $50K.
After taking body blows for the past two weeks over his response to the Russian invasion of Georgia and his performance at the Saddleback Civil Forum, Barack Obama seeked maintain the Marquess of Queensberry rules and reassure his acolytes while warning McCain and said that McCain:
doesn’t know what he’s up against!
A month ago Barack Obama was ahead by 7 points and in Germany finishing his “World Tour.” He was the toast of Europe. Today, Barack Obama may need to look over his shoulder just to ensure he gets out of the Democrat convention with the nomination.
Rather than touring Europe as if he was already the President of the United States, Barack Obama could have benefited from Lolo Jones’ wisdom. From here on out Barack should remember:
“It’s the hurdles. If you can’t get over all 10, you can’t be the champion.”
Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the Democrats have been telling us for weeks now that they don’t want to increase drilling because it won’t help reduce oil prices even if they did. Amongst their favorite talking points is a US EIA report that stated that drilling in ANWR and generating 1,000,000 barrels of oil each day, would only reduce the price of a barrel of oil by $1.44.
At heart, I’m a very simple person. While I will dig into the complex if necessary, I prefer to use the simpler answers to a problem. I’ve had enough On the Job Training (OJT) for various life issues, that I think I can safely say that the answers to many issues lie right in front of my face if only I stop to look. I think the same holds for oil pricing.
I won’t go into debunking how the Dems have used the EIA report, plenty of other folks have done so expertly so there’s no need to retread that ground. Besides that, rebutting the EIA report requires a complex answer. No, I found an explanation of oil pricing that is much simpler.
This morning, oil prices were headed north again anticipating that US inventories were going to increase about 1.7 million barrels. Prices had moved from just under $115/barrel to over $116/barrel in anticipation of this report. As has been happening a lot lately, the “Experts” were wrong in their estimates and inventories increased by 9.4 million barrels, a 7.7 million barrel difference. Following the report, oil not only dropped below it’s opening price, it zipped right past it dropping $3 from its high.
The US uses about 20 million barrels of oil each day according to the EIA. The “excess” inventory of 7.7 million barrels announced this morning, amounts to about 1/3 of a days need or .1% of the annual needs of the US. If an increase in inventory of .1% of the annual US usage causes oil prices to drop by over $3 per barrel, does it make sense to you that producing the equivalent of 5% of the US needs (50 times more than the “excess” inventory)….OVER A LONG TIME, would only decrease the per barrel price by $1.44?
Nope, it doesn’t to me either.
[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]