No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

Archive for January, 2008

January 23, 2008

Does the conservative/libertarian blogosphere have any influence?

by @ 12:39. Filed under The Blog.

I know, I promised another look at the “Is conservatism out of gas/dead” question, but I have a bit more groundwork to lay before I get there. With the spectacular failure of the Thompson campaign, with its dependence and major source of support in the conservative blogosphere, I have to answer the question of whether we have any actual influence.

The question is properly answered with, “…with whom?” It is painfully obvious that, though we are by and large “Average Joes”, we have no influence with the larger populace of “Average Joes”. Because we are willing to put thoughts to electrons, we are by definition now different than the larger populace. It is an over-generalization, but we pay closer attention than the non-blogging Joe, and we put different weights on the various opinions and bits of news. Morever, we do not have nearly the reach of either the dead-tree/video media or the talk-radio media. Some sites may well reach beyond the “circular-fire” of like-minded bloggers to a larger audience; this place isn’t one of them.

The prime example of our, and the libertarians’, lack of influence with the larger populace is the 2008 elections. Without a doubt, the two candidates that have received the most blogger support are Fred Thompson and Ron Paul. However, neither candidate received more than 14% of the vote in any primary or caucus, and Flip’s unweighted average vote share for both of them is 18.1% (Thompson 11.2%, Paul 6.9%).

I would also be remiss if I didn’t mention a basic difference in blogging philosophy between my end of the blogosphere and the liberal end. We, by and large, see blogging as a way to vent our frustrations. The left, by and large, sees blogging as another means to the political end of total domination.

That leads me to the influence we do have with politicians and others in the political process. It is not, by and large, the reason behind the blogging. If it were, we’d be calling Ned Lamont “Senator”. Rather, the very things that make us different from the larger populace are the things that allow us to have influence. Specifically, the fact that we pipe up is why the pols and pros listen. On a given issue, there is surprisingly-little comment from the populace to the pols, and though we are by definition a bit different than the larger, silent populace, we’re closer to that populace than just about anybody else likely to get a politician’s ear, be they media or lobbyists. I don’t like to brag, but I know both from my stats and conversations I’ve had, I do have a not-insignificant readership in both Madison and Milwaukee’s courthouse.

The prime example of that influence was the torpedoing of amnesty. I have no doubt that, in a vacuum, we’d have something north of 10 million freshly-minted “Americans”. Most of the pols were for it, most of the pros were for it, outside of talk-radio media, the media was for it. Normally, that would be more than enough to have made it happen, even with 70% public opposition. However, we bloggers and talk radio climbed that wall, raised a ruckus, and knocked amnesty down.

I could also easily cite the end of President Bush’s dream to put Harriet Miers on the Supreme Court. Indeed, that was among the first things I blogged about, and that was the first “theme” I had.

Revisions/extensions (1:14 pm 1/25/2008) – Dean Barnett answers it far better than I could, only his focus is talk radio (H/T – Charlie).

January 22, 2008

The flawed FAN bill

by @ 17:02. Filed under Business, Politics - Wisconsin, Sports.

I was at the Assembly Committee on Energy and Utilities hearing for AB 604, which was carried on Wisconsin Eye (the archived video will be here when it does get archived), which would essentially require cable companies to carry The NFL Network and The Big Ten Network, as well as any other network that feels the slightest bit aggrieved, on whatever package those networks want, with merely the price to go before a binding arbitrator. Yes, you heard me right, and I believe I heard the Assembly Legislative Counsel right; whichever side calls for arbitration has every term of its “best, final” offer except the price accepted as unchangable and unchallengable. What is unclear is what happens if both sides call for arbitration.

That, however, was only one of the two bombshells dropped at the hearing. The other is that the NFLN is now willing to accept placement on “standard” digital cable rather than basic cable (BTN is still demanding both ESPN basic-cable placement and ESPN money “for the taxpayers’ sake”). In my humble opinion, Time Warner and Charter should jump at this offer.

As for the bill itself, why should government stick its fat snout into a private business dispute, especially with a bill guaranteed to not only force the NFLN/BTN on basic cable but also open Pandora’s Box for every other of the 430 potential cable networks not currently on basic cable to worm their way in? Wasn’t the big national push to get “a la carte” channels? Isn’t that preferable to a government-mandated 500-channel “basic” cable system?

Yep, it’s official

by @ 16:46. Filed under Politics - National.

Fred Thompson is out. I’d have more fresh react (instead of the not-sofresh), but after a long day in Madison (1 hour from 30/151 to the Capitol; doesn’t Madison know what salt is?), I’m wiped out. I missed most of Judge Gableman’s appearance at the Center-Right Coalition (somehow, I beat Mark Block, who never got off of Washington), and I do have a couple of interesting side notes on the “FAN” bill before the Assembly (that very-quick recap will be up momentarily).

Malkin’s Snow Cream – two spoons up

by @ 6:35. Filed under Miscellaneous.

I didn’t have enough snow to try Michelle Malkin’s snow cream recipe when she posted it the other day

Large bowl full of fresh, clean snow
1 cup of whole milk
1/2 tsp. of vanilla extract
1/2 cup of sugar

Mix milk, vanilla, and sugar until dissolved. Add to snow, stir until consistency is thick and creamy. Serve immediately.

Fortunately, enough snow fell yesterday to make it happen. I have but one word to say…

Mmmmmmmmmmm….

January 21, 2008

Roll bloat – stay on target

by @ 16:02. Filed under The Blog.

That’s exactly what Fred Keller, late of the FranklinNOW-osphere, is doing with Bullseye.

Cold, hard reality check to The Corner

As long as I’m delivering (or is that reflecting?) cold, hard reality checks, I have to deliver one to The Corner’s Ramesh Ponnuru. As much as I want to believe a Republican can carry Wisconsin, I know that as long as the current power structure is here, no Pubbie will. Allow me to explain why:

– First, we’re the state that foisted Russ Feingold on the rest of the country. Even in a year when Tommy Thompson carried the state with nearly 60% of the vote, and after 6 years of federal liberalism out of Feingold, he won re-election.

– Similarily, our corrupt, lying ‘Rat of a governor, Jim Doyle, handily won re-election last year. Heck, we even tossed out our long-time Republican state treasurer for a part-time department store clerk.

– We’re the state that gave the country “smokes-for-votes” and slashed tires. With nothing of consequence done after the 2000 and 2004 elections, and the opportunity to oust the only prosecutor even remotely-interested in vote fraud present, all of the stops will be pulled out to ensure yet another tainted, yet certified ‘Rat win.

Video of the day

by @ 14:29. Filed under Politics - National.

(H/T – MKH)

This video of the various Presidential candidates belting out David Bowie’s “Changes” ought to keep you from playing Russian Roulette with all the chambers loaded (I’ve gone back to the safer practice of leaving one chamber empty):

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJtgEfIla0A[/youtube]

Presidential Pool – What went wrong for Fred Thompson?

by @ 13:57. Filed under Politics - National.

It’s either this or reflection on the end of the Packer season, and this happened first (besides, I’m more-apt to put the latter over at TheWisconsinSportsBar, and my fellow bartenders pretty much already summed it up complete with expletives). First, let me state for the record that I’m nowhere near a professional political operative (the rambling nature of this post ought to be a dead giveaway), and that while the anticipated pronouncement that the boat is below the waves is tomorrow, it isn’t official yet.

A lot of people are saying and are going to say that Fred Thompson got into the race too late. If by late, you mean he got in later by an “absolute” calendar standard than successful candidates got in previous cycles, no. If by late, you mean he got in after everybody else did, yes. The “buzz” in politics, specifically press coverage and fundraising, is much like the time near the end of a race at Darlington, with only one green-flag pit stop left to go (I’ll ignore that Darlington tends not to have a lot of long green-flag runs). For those of you not familiar with NASCAR or Darlington Raceway, the surface at Darlington is very abrasive, and cars with a fresh set of tires turn laps that tend to be at least 2 seconds faster than cars that are at the end of their runs.

Yet, that was not nearly the fatal blow. Thompson did get a lot of buzz, especially in the conservative blogosphere, and more than enough cash to compete with at least John McCain and Mike Huckabee once he got in the race. Morever, all of the states had significant moves in support well after Thompson got into the race, so the “late” argument doesn’t exactly hold a lot of water for me.

That “late” argument does not explain why Duncan Hunter and Tom Tancredo, both of whom ran credibly on what was supposedly the number one conservative issue in 2007 (opposition to illegal immigration) and both of whom entered the race at the same time as everybody else, never gained more than token support and ultimately dropped out. It also does not explain why Mitt Romney, who poured a lot of money and time into every pre-Florida state and who ran to the right of Rudy McCabee for much of the pre-primaries/caucii portion of the campaign, essentially collapsed in every state contested by any third of that three-headed monster. I know, Romney did take a contested Michigan; however, there are a pair of mitigating circumstances. First, the Romney name is still remembered fondly in the state across the lake. Second, Romney went away from his previous broad-based conservatism message, especially in the economic department.

I’m left asking the same question the Wisconsin Policy Research Institute asked last April in “Wisconsin Interest” (Volume 16, Number 2), “Is conservatism out of gas?” I’m now leaning more toward my very-pessimistic Wisconsin-specific answer than my somewhat-more-optimistic national one, with the further revision that there are no gains to be had by focusing solely on social conservatism. Indeed, I’m almost ready to ask the follow-on question of whether conservatism is dead.

I’m also just about ready to ask and answer the question on whether the right-of-center part of the blogosphere has any actual influence. That really deserves its own missive, but I’ll give the upshot now; whatever influence we have is with the politicians themselves, not with the masses.

Ultimately, it was a combination of the cumulative effects of 70 years of almost-unchecked liberalism and complete chaos that was the Thompson campaign that doomed Thompson to the scrap heap of political history.

Roll bloat – beautification edition

by @ 11:39. Filed under The Blog.

I probably would have done this yesterday had I not the need to unleash an expletive (which through an unusual amount of self-restraint did not turn into a long string of them), and I should have done this long before today, but the combination of conservatism and a nom de plume of Vivian Lee (along with a comment left yesterday) gets Conservative Belle added to the roll. What can I say; I have a weakness for good-looking conservative women.

This was declared “Blue Monday” before the events of the weekend

by @ 11:28. Filed under Miscellaneous.

Charlie points us to a British study that declared that the third Monday in January, today, is the gloomiest day, “Blue Monday” if you will.

Despite the fact that this year has already turned into a disaster, both in sports and in politics, there is a mitigating circumstance on this side of the pond that doesn’t exist on the other side – we’re more-likely to have a vacation (or as the Brits call it, holiday) long before August. Collegiate spring break is less than 2 months away, Easter is early this year, we have Memorial Day that, in addition to its intended role as a remembrance of those that sacrificed all so we are free, serves as the start to summer, and scholastic summer vacation begins within a couple weeks of Memorial Day.

Attached to the end of the article is what James Taranto would call a “What would we do without researchers?” moment. Those same researchers found Friday night was the best night of the week. Well, duh!

Revisions/extensions (11:41 am 1/21/2008) – Yet another reason to declare this Blue Monday; today is the 35th anniversary of Roe v. Wade (H/T – Conservative Belle)

January 20, 2008

The NFL is now dead to me

by @ 21:59. Filed under Sports.

I was going to post a expletive-filled tirade, but the title says absolutely, positively every fucking thing I have to say. 0-2 ATS, 1-1 O/U, 1-1 straight-up (with the -1 part in the game I cared about). The Inveterate Gambler will be back in September, minus a couple knees.

Bring on Spring Training!

NFL Conference Championship weekend

by @ 11:09. Filed under Sports.

We’re at the penultimate Sunday in the NFL season, and we need a sweep to end either half of the formula above .500 after a 2-2 week ATS (and straight-up) and an extra-chunky 1-3 on the over/unders. Oh well; let’s hit Bodog one more time…

NY Giants @ Green Bay (-8/over-41.5) – The forecast is in; cold and not windy. The Game That Cannot Be Named, here we come! Bonus prediction; your final will be Green Bay 31, New York 13.

San Diego @ New England (-14/over-47.5) – Injuries are going to catch up to the Bolts this weekend as the Cheating Pats set a record for most consecutive wins in a season.

Reality check – by the numbers

by @ 8:38. Filed under Politics - National.

Time for some cold, hard facts of life to intrude on some delusions beyond my own (I’ll get back to those shattered dreams in a while, and I’ll come back here):

– Cold, hard fact #1A (from Bruce): John McCain’s vote total in the 2000 South Carolina Republican Presidential primary – 238,000. John McCain’s vote total in the 2008 South Carolina Republican Presidential primary – 143,000 (with 3% of the precincts left to report)

– Cold, hard fact #1B (same source): Total number of votes cast in the 2000 South Carolina Republican Presidential primary – 556,000. Total number of votes cast in the 2008 South Carolina Republican Presidential primary (again, with 3% of the precincts left to report) – 431,000.

– Cold, hard fact #2 (from Jim Geraghty; a special for the gang at On the Borderline) – Mitt Romney’s non-Mormon vote total in Nevada – 12,524. Ron Paul’s vote total in Nevada – 6,077.

Somewhere in my feed reader, there’s a compilation of the total number of votes to Romney, McCain and Mike Huckabee. Let’s just say that the leader isn’t who the presstitutes would lead you to believe.

January 19, 2008

Presidential Pool – What now?

by @ 22:17. Filed under Politics - National.

Nevada and South Carolina have knocked out my first backup, Duncan Hunter, and have all-but-sunk my boat of Fred Thompson. I’ll keep rowing until I have to swim back to the surface, but with the almost-concession, it’s time to ask the Marcellus Wallace question, “What now?”

First, we have to answer what happened today. There are two winners today; the media winner of John McCain, and the delegate winner of Mitt Romney. First, I’ll take Nevada, because outside the blogosphere, you won’t hear much about this. Yes, it was another “no-contest”, but it has become clear that the non-evangelical conservative end of the Republican base has coalesced around Romney. Thus far, only Romney has been able to get an absolute majority, and he’s done that twice. After the abberation of Iowa, Romney has literally cleaned up in contests where only Republicans participate. Morever, he has proven that he can survive in a contested race by taking Michigan. Yes, he had the “favorite son” factor working, but not only was it his father that was the popular Michigan politician, but because no actual delegates were up on the Democratic side, there was a significant “crossover” vote.

Now, onto South Carolina. Even though there will eventually be a Dem primary that does matter, once again, that is a a state that allows “independents” to vote in the Republican primary. That is what delivered the state to McCain.

So, who lost? Mike Huckabee. South Carolina seemed tailor-made to keep him afloat; indeed, it was the SC evangelicals that rejected McCain back in 2000 that were instrumental in giving us President Bush. That Huckabee could not repeat that despite a much heavier push on the evangelicals is telling.

So, what now? Let me tell you what now. I’m going to call my sister tomorrow and head over there to watch the Packers whup up on the Giants with a pair of shut-down corners and sideline heaters. You hear me talking, Manning boy? The cold ain’t through with you by a damn sight. Aaron Kampmann’s going to get medevial on the grass.

You’re probably saying, “I meant what now between you and the race?” Oh, that what now. Let me tell you what now between me and the race. If and when Thompson makes that exit official, I’m going to be left with much the same choice I had in 2000 after Steve Forbes departed the race; either support someone who would merely slouch toward liberal socialism, let it be a “spread-eagled” free-fall, or let it be an all-out streamlined free-fall. I rationalized that there would be a bit more conservatism in “compassionate ‘conservatism'”, and I swore that I wouldn’t delude myself again, and that I would do what I could to reverse the slide rather than merely quibble over the pace toward liberal socialism. In that eventuality, nay, likelyhood, I will have failed to reverse the slide, and I once again have been reduced to quibbling over the pace toward liberal socialism.

I’ll be walking into this one with my eyes wide open. I’ve already described Romney as slightly accelerating that slouch. I’ve also described McCain, Huckabee and the thus-far-absent Rudy Giuliani as turning that slouch into a free-fall, and Ron Paul as an anarchist (that’s a small-“a”) that will enable those that want to create a worldwide caliphate more than anybody else. In that fivesome, I’ll take the least-evil of the remaining five choices, Mitt Romney. I almost certainly will not be pouring as much energy into that as I did Thompson’s campaign because I’ve been drained.

As for the race itself, the Huck-a-Boom has gone Huck-a-Bust. Further, if Giuliani’s firewall of Florida fails him, and that’s looking more and more likely, he’s done. That leaves this thing as a two-man race between McCain and Romney, and that is setting up pretty much along the lines that the last two general Presidential elections have gone. I don’t know off-hand which primaries/caucuses/conventions are “open” versus “closed”, or beyond Florida’s fresh winner-take-all, how the delegates are apportioned, so I can’t tell yet whether the Dems and independents will choose the Republican nominee. Morever, if Paul remains in the race, and the Democratic nomination gets settled quickly, there is a significant chance of mischief. However, this will not, repeat, not go to a brokered convention.

My first fallback is out

by @ 18:03. Filed under Politics - National.

That’s what CNN was reporting (H/T – the indispensible Jim Geraghty)

No political predictions (or live-blogging) here

by @ 15:51. Filed under Politics - National.

Since the NFL playoff picks have been chunking, I decided I needed to devote all my time to those. They will be up tomorrow morning.

On a related note, Mike’s America will be hosting a liveblog of his homestate’s South Carolina Republican primary starting at 6 Central (7 for those of you on the East Coast). If it’s anything like American Princess’ liveblog of Michigan’s primaries, it ought to be a very good time.

Revisons/extensions (3:59 pm 1/19/2008) – Mike sent along the code to simulcast his live-blog. I’ll simulcast below, and ask that you give him some visits.

R&E part 2 (5:52 pm 1/19/2008) – I’m pulling double-comment duty, as I’m also at Justin Higgins’ liveblog.

Video of the day for a Siberian Saturday

by @ 15:40. Filed under Miscellaneous.

Head on over to TheWisconsinSportsBar (appropriate place) to see how Tequila can help you become an alpha (or at least a drunk beta). My favorite line – “…and it also may be a major factor in getting your ass kicked.”

Remember the rule of 4, rookies:

One Tequila
Two Tequila
Three Tequila
Floor!

Testing a trackback for Beth

by @ 14:29. Filed under Miscellaneous.

It seems she’s having some problems with not getting trackbacks/pingbacks. Let’s see if this works.

January 18, 2008

A wee bit of housekeeping

by @ 16:20. Filed under The Blog.

I figured it was time to do a proper About & FAQ page. If you have a question that I didn’t answer, pipe up, and I’ll consider answering it.

PCTs no longer mandatory

by @ 14:31. Filed under Global "Warming".

(H/T – Michelle)

There is some good news for those of you in California. The nannies that run your state have gone from requiring thermostats you wouldn’t be able to override in a power “emergency” to allowing you to override those new thermostats to now dropping the requirement entirely (technical issues prevented me from getting the link to the story as of the writing):

But the agency backed off even more this week by announcing that the proposed remote-controlled thermostats would be dropped entirely from the 2008 edition of the building-efficiency standards.

Of course, the voluntary plan to stick these PCTs will continue unabated.

Revisions/extensions (7:57 pm 1/18/2008) – Missing link found.

Darshan Dhaliwal, Pubbie-only donor?

That is exactly what Raquel Rutledge, Jennie Tunkieicz, Ben Poston, and their editors at the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel would want you to believe. In their story about how Dhaliwal sold unbranded gasoline as BP gasoline, they gleefully point out how closely he was tied to both Tommy Thompson and President Bush.

Just one sliiiiiiiiiiight problem; they never heard of Jessica McBride. Her very-quick search through the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign archives revealed a who’s-who of Democrats and liberals very-amply supported by Dhaliwal, including $17,000 to Jim Doyle (almost twice the amount given to both the Thompson state and federal campaigns combined) and a $500 donation to Louis Butler during his previous, failed run for the state Supreme Court.

I decided to run Dhaliwal’s various donations, both state and federal (the latter from the FEC), through the spreadsheet, and imagine my surprise to find the following over the last 16 years (14 on the federal side):

– $75,980 in donations to 58 Democrats and liberal-leaning candidates and committees overall
– $53,280 in donations to the Wisconsin (not federal) campaigns of 48 Democrats and liberal-leaning candidates and committees
– $21,800 in donations to 13 Republican candidates overall (no non-Republican conservative-leaning candidates or committees)
– $17,500 in donations to the Wisconsin (not federal) campaigns of 11 Republicans

Hmmm, why do you think the Fifth Column at Fourth and State only mentioned Thompson and Bush, and went out of their way to avoid any mention of Democrats or Loophole Louis? Could it be that the presstitute-‘Rat alliance has elections to ste…er, win?

Roll bloat – trolling through Blogrolling

by @ 10:45. Filed under The Blog.

Yes, I occassionally check through Blogrolling, but it isn’t nearly often enough. I probably have a couple of these on the Blogs 4 Bauer section of the roll, but since they have me on some version of their main rolls, and because I don’t have control over the B4B roll, it’s past time to return the favor (and also add them to the ever-growing feed reader):

Death by 1000 Papercuts
Making Ripples
MY Vast Right Wing Conspiracy
A Blog For All (Lawhawk is one of the B4B guys)
SodaBoy.net
One of these years, I will prune that bloated roll some. I’m sure I have some dead links on there by now.

January 17, 2008

Highway Robbery – The Illinois Tollway Chronicles

by @ 19:38. Filed under Politics, Taxes.

Drew Veeneman is just destroying the toll-road pols on the wrong side of the toll booths at the Sam Adams Alliance blog. Once again, since I don’t want to steal his thunder, I’ll point you in the general direction:

Part 1 starts with the corruption of the 1990s, and ties in George Ryan’s “brilliant” idea to flop on a campaign pledge to dump the Tollway Authority.

Part 2 runs with the fallacies of the I-Pass system, especially its enforcement of “violators” (read the post to see why I put that in scare quotes).

I’ll keep this updated with the links to additional parts.

As a cheddarhead who occassionally has to go to (or through) Chicagoland, I hate having to choose between trying to time the lights on the Skokie Highway (and inevitably failing) and ultimately going through the heart of Chicago (if I have to go beyond) or hacking off an arm to pay for the tolls (which Rod Blagojevich doubled for cash users immediately upon getting into office) that pay for stuff like a helipad, custom office chairs for all, and marble floors at Taj Mahal Authority Drive. Worse, the special State Police unit designated for the tollways are starting to actually run speed traps (fortunately, I haven’t been nabbed yet).

Roll bloat – the mean dogs edition

by @ 18:50. Filed under The Blog.

Like Ace of Spades HQ, Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler comes with a major language warning. Let’s just say I’m a fucking fan of rottweilers, especially ones that bite various liberals in the ass.

Snow cream? Let it snow!

by @ 16:58. Filed under Weather.

Since, like Wisconsin, it’s snowing in Maryland, Michelle Malkin brought out her family’s snow cream recipe. If only I had more than a dusting here, I’d try it.

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]