Charlie Sykes has an exchange between a pissed-off reader and asterisk-writer Gregory Stanford* (the asterisks are in the Sykes post)-
Mr. Poole:
Thanks for your message. Mr. Pimentel* asked me, as the writer of the editorial, to respond. We were merely noting in the passage to which you object that the elder President Bush had appointed Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court for the sake of racial diversity, but that, because Thomas often takes stands at odds with mainstream black thought, his appointment does not help the court mirror America as much as it could have – which is what diversity is all about. Noting that Thomas is on the fringes of black thought is merely observing a fact, not stereotyping. Justices Stevens and Ginsburg do represent wide swaths of American thought.
Gregory Stanford*
Editorial Writer/Columnist
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Figures that the black racist on the board would write this tripe. I wonder what Eugene Kane* will spew forth.
*Self-named, racist arbiter of who’s who.
Amazing that even after all this negative reation to the racist editorial he wrote, Mr. Stanford still doesn’t get it. Race is “thought,” not skin color in his book. Hmm…Judge Thomas is out of the mainstream? He and his ilk will be forever lost and bitter. It’s what they surround themselves with.