define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true); define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true); No Runny Eggs

No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

October 29, 2007

Another happy week

by @ 23:07. Filed under Sports.

So I blew chunks again on the over/unders (down to 10-5-1 overall there); 9-4 against the spread made up for it. Let’s review the Man-crushing week that was:

Green Bay 19 (+3) @ Denver 13 – I knew Elway. Elway was an enemy of mine. Mr. Cutler, you are no Elway.
Detroit 16 @ Chicago 7 (-6) – I should’ve stuck with my initial thoughts.
Philadelphia 23 @ Minnesota 16 (+1.5) – Unhealthiest profession this year; Viqueens’ QB.
Cleveland 27 (-3) @ St. Louis 20 – It’s a dirty rotten shame that Duh Lambs and Duh Deadfins don’t meet </sarcasm>
Indianapolis 31 (-7) @ Carolina 7 – That’s how you go undefeated the “nice” way.
NY Giants 13 (-10-LOSS) "@" Miami 10 – The boo-birds made both the G-men and the Dolphins feel right at home.
Oakland 9 @ Tennessee 13 (-7-LOSS) – Too bad the Tennesseans are also a 1-AA school.
Pittsburgh 24 (-4) @ Cincinnati 13 – The trend is your friend.
Buffalo 13 (+3) @ NY Jets 3 – Come on, say it with me. J-E-T-S S*CK! SU*K! SUC*!
Houston 10 @ San Diego 35 (-9) – Vincent K. McMahon couldn’t script it better.
Jacksonville 24 (+4) @ Tampa Bay 23 – Not only did Garcia get picked (thrice), but the first pick was the margin.
New Orleans 31 (-3) @ San Francisco 10 – Algore must be playing for the Fourtiners.
Washington 7 @ New England 52 (-17) – Guess Belichick had the over.

I’m still 6 games under .500 and further out from break-even, but after the month from Hell, 51-57-8 is an accomplishment.

México Del Norte moment of the day

by @ 16:49. Filed under Business, Immigration.

Lao, the American Expat in SE Asia, recently tried to open up a bank account back in his hometown in Texas. First Bank and Trust East Texas wouldn’t take his United States passport, Social Security card or his birth certificate, so he couldn’t open up an account. The not-funny thing is, if he would have had the easy-to-forge Mexican matricula consular card, he could have opened up an account with them without any problems.

That is seriously, SERIOUSLY fucked up.

Project Valour-IT

by @ 16:14. Filed under Miscellaneous.

valour.gif
Cartoon courtesy Cox and Forkum

I don’t have a dog in this fight, as the blogroll is full of people on all 4 teams, but I’d be remiss if I didn’t get some money in to this 4-way battle royale between the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines. Soldiers’ Angels Project Valour-IT, which helps provide voice-controlled and adaptive laptop computers to wounded Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines recovering from hand wounds and other severe injuries at major military medical centers, is holding their annual fundraising competition, with many bloggers choosing between the 4 branches. This goes until Veterans’ Day, and your donations, regardless of which team you support, are tax-deductible as Soldiers’ Angels is a qualifying non-profit organization.

Since, unlike Blackfive, CDR Salamander, Michelle and Mary Katharine, I can’t choose just one, I’ll instead give you all 4 options. Choose one, choose some, choose all, but choose.

Revisions/extensions (10:40 am 10/30/2007) – Due to technical issues with ChipIt, the widgets have been replaced here, and will be very shortly on the sidebar.

Comments are now open at the Blogfather’s place

by @ 15:34. Filed under Miscellaneous.

True, they’re moderated, and there is no way to link back to your own blog, but the fine folks at WTMJ have enabled commenting over at Sykes Writes.

I won’t mention who got the first volley in :-)

October 28, 2007

NFL Week 8

by @ 9:50. Filed under Sports.

After last week’s 8-6 money-making performance, I’m now only 11 games under .500 (we won’t talk about those over/unders). Guess I’m peaking just in time for the 2007 Weblog Awards (we’ll know if the Bar is going to the finals later this week, and if it is, we really should have somebody lined up to go out to Vegas for Blogworld where the awards will be handed out Nov. 8-9). With that in mind, let’s start making serious bank with this week’s picks.

Green Bay (+3) @ Denver – Which Bronco team will show up, the one that stiffed the Steelers or the one that got shocked out of existence by the Chargers? Walker’s out, so take the latter. Oh, and take the over-42.5.
Detroit @ Chicago (-6) – I was SOOOO tempted to take the Lions until I remembered that this is on the road in the cold.
Philadelphia @ Minnesota (+1.5) – If it were just the Vikes D versus the Eagles, I would still take my one-and-a-half. In fact, that’s pretty much what it is, so take the under-37.5.
Cleveland (-3) @ St. Louis – We could have two teams go 0-16 this year. I see nothing that will stop the Lambs from sinking further towards that hole this week.
Indianapolis (-7) @ Carolina – CBS will let NOTHING happen to its dream matchup next week.
NY Giants (-10) “@” Miami – Can someone tell me why we’re playing an NFL regular-season game in Londonistan? Oh, that’s right, the Fins aren’t an NFL team.
Oakland @ Tennessee (-7) – It does not matter who’s starting for the Tennesseans; they’re playing a 1-AA school.
Pittsburgh (-4) @ Cincinnati – Stat of the week: Pittsburgh is 6-0 in their last 6 trips to Cincy.
Buffalo (+3) @ NY Jets – You may like the points, you may want the points, and by law, you will get the points, but you’re not gonna need them; the Bills are starting their squeaky-new QB, the Jets are stuck on stupid.
Houston @ San Diego (-9) – If a fire can’t stop the Bolts, what makes the Texans think they can?
Jacksonville (+4) @ Tampa Bay – It’s a MASH-unit mash. Stat that won’t survive the day – Jeff Garcia does not have a pick yet this year.
New Orleans (-3) @ San Francisco – Three weeks ago, that -3 would’ve been in the Niners’ corner. Now, they’re the disfunctional team, while the Saints got their “S” back.
Washington @ New England (-17) – Lesson of the day: Don’t bring Jason Campbell to a shootout.

Viva Las Vegas

by @ 9:10. Filed under Sports.

Hopefully I’ll be doing this from Vegas inside of 2 weeks after The Wisconsin Sports Bar wins the 2007 Weblog Awards Sports Blog of the Year, so it’s good that I’m reversing the losing trend. Let’s review how the nose picks did….

Chicago 19 @ Philadelphia 16 (-6) – In other news, Rocky got booed.
Tampa Bay 16 (+2.5) @ Detroit 23 – Turnover, turnover, turnover.
Minnesota 14 @ Dallas 24 (-9) – Where did my sense of the over-unders go?
Arizona 19 @ Washington 21 (-8.5-LOSS) – Please send the bill to Messrs. Fletcher and Landry.
Atlanta 16 (+8-WIN) @ New Orleans 22 – Guess we know why the Jags gave up on Leftwich; he’s no Favre.
Baltimore 14 (-3) @ Buffalo 19 – The OldBrowns did everything right except win, dammit.
New England 49 (-17) @ Miami 28 – Start building.
San Francisco 15 @ NY Giants 33 (-9.5) – So it was Dilfer who put on the cement overshoes.
Tennessee 38 (-1) @ Houston 36 – And I ran, I ran so far away. Couldn’t get away, but I got just enough points.
Kansas City 12 (+3) @ Oakland 10 – I was only 28 yards and 2 scores off.
NY Jets 31 (+6.5) @ Cincinnati 38 – Where did these offenses come from?
St. Louis 6 @ Seattle (-8.5) – I picked the right week to go with the Hags.
Pittsburgh 28 (-4) @ Denver 31 – I think it’s safe to say that Pittsburgh is not a road team.
Indianapolis 29 (-3.5) @ Jacksonville 7 – The CBS dream is still alive.

If you stayed away from the now-toxic over/unders, you made bank last week to the tune of 8-6, at least if your vig is only 10%. That pushes the record to 42-53-8 against the spread and 10-3-1 against the over/under.

October 26, 2007

Roll bloat – from the logs edition

by @ 14:38. Filed under The Blog.

Sometimes, it pays to check the logs. This is one of those times, as without the logs telling me where people come from, I probably wouldn’t have found Thinking Out Loud.

This one’s a special for the mayor and five aldermen not named Verhalen in Oak Creek – Menomonee Falls found a way to raise their levy only 1.3%. If they can hold the line in a massively-growing community, why can’t you?

Let the local spending smash the ceiling, and other veto errata

by @ 12:49. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin, Taxes.

Let’s take a quick run through Gov. Doyle’s veto message (H/T – WisPolitics Budget Blog, which, though it lacks the words that were “Vannah White”ed, has a red-colored summary of each veto’s effects, shall we? For reference’s sake, here’s the Munich Acco…er, Grand Compromise. Late word from WisPolitics is Mike Huebsch won’t even try to override any of this. (“thanks” a lot, Neville) On your marks, get set,….

  • The Wisconsin Covenant – This is one of those times I wish we had the specific words that were whacked. While Doyle merely says he doesn’t want to set the financial eligibility requirements at this time (which the Grand Compromise set at Pell Grant/reduced-price school lunch), I find it extraordinarily odd that he mentioned “Wisconsin residents”, especially since he considers illegal aliens that have successfully invaded Wisconsin “Wisconsin residents”.

    Also, let the spending commence; we’re now on the hook for operating the “private” office that will run it.

  • Independent Purchase of Telecommunications Services – Message from Doyle to the UW system and the Legislature – How dare you let the UW system spend money they would spend anyway without going through me, Lord Craps. After all, I have a public union to keep happy, I don’t want them to turn on me like they have those that ultimately pay their salaries and benefits.
  • Information on Instructors – Nope, can’t let the students know who is going to run the class until they actually show up.</channel_Craps>
  • Levy Limits on Technical College Districts – A very modest 4% annual limit on the increase of taxpayer cash to overspenders like MATC just can’t be allowed to fly; after all, their teachers have to continue to earn more than UW professors.</channel_Craps>
  • Stewardship Review – Demandment XIII – I am Lord Craps. No one shall question how much land I remove from the property tax rolls in the name of envirowhackoism, or how much taxpayer money I use to do so.
  • Muskellunge Fishing Season and Catch and Release Bass Fishing – This is another time I wish I knew which words were axed. While the red-colored glasses review says he’s partially vetoing the provisions to not ensare those wishing to use barbed hooks or live bait to fish for other species during catch-and-release bass and musky seasons, I don’t see what words could be whacked to that end without whacking the entire relevant provisions.
  • Quarterly and Annual Reports from the State Fair Park Board – Demandment XIV – I am Lord Craps. No one shall question how much money is spent by the State Fair Park Board.
  • Technical Modification to Kenosha County Circuit Court Branch 8 – My mention of this one is my olive branch to Doyle. As the affected position was written, the election to the new-for-2009 branch would have happened in the spring of 2008. This was the fastest way to fix that.
  • Demonstration Waiver for Health Opportunity Accounts Under BadgerCare – Demandment XV – I am Lord Craps. No one shall question how much money is spent on BadgerCare Plus.
  • Reducing Fetal and Infant Mortality and Morbidity – When it comes to sunsets, Doyle believes in the British Empire concept of none.
  • Municipality property tax limit – Hang onto your wallets, folks. While Doyle and company believe the munciipalities cannot be expected to find pork to defund this late in the budget process for this year, I fully expect them to find additional pork to fund this year just so the base for next year’s one-year 2%-or-growth “freeze” will be that much higher.
  • Reports and Approvals in the transportation budget – Demandment XVI – I am Lord Craps. No one shall question how much money I spend from the transportation fund, or whether I give it all to WEAC.
  • Department of Transportation Permits for Activities Along State Trunk
    Highways Within Municipal Limits
    – Those highways are mine, MINE!</channel_Craps_Daffy_edition>
  • Vehicle Immobilization and Impoundment for Repeated Parking Violations – Huzzah part deux. No Denver Boots for the foreseeable future.
  • Kenosha-Racine-Milwaukee Commuter Rail Extension Project – Night of the Living Dead lives! DAMMIT!

October 24, 2007

So much for the political advantage

by @ 21:15. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin.

In case you missed it below, or elsewhere around the Cheddarsphere, the spin is that this is a political win for the Pubbies. I hate to rain on that parade, but there’s a slight problem with that; namely, a no-new-taxes pledge from Americans for Tax Reform 24 Assemblymen signed. Here are the RepubicRATs who flat-out lied to their constituents when they signed that pledge:

– Donald Friske
– Eugene Hahn
– Jake Hines
– Terry Musser
– Scott Suder – Forgot originally
– Jeff Wood

For those counting along at home, or inside the Square, that’s more than the Pubbie margin in the Assembly. Further, it wasn’t necessary for any of those five six to break their word publicly; Mike Huebsch still had a 5 6 5-vote margin to work with.

Message to the wise; it’s not 1988 anymore. It’s a lot harder to bury duplicity; just ask former Senate Democratic Leader Tom Daschle or former State Senate Republican Leader Mary Panzer.

Oh, and the recall window is now open.

Revisions/extensions (10:48 pm 10/24/2007) – Made a correction to the vote margin; Huebsch had even more room. Also added a reference the state Pubbies should have had burned into their collective memories.

R&E part 2 (12:06 am 10/25/2007) – I shouldn’t try this while watching the World Series and participating in a couple of open threads; I forgot Scott Suder. That also brings the vote margin back to where it was. Thanks, Jenny.

The budget – inside the Square view

by @ 20:19. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin.

I had the pleasure to talk with a couple of Republican Senate staffers today (don’t bother asking which ones; it was more of a “background” talk), and they’re actually pretty stoked about the budget. You know my views, but in the interest of fairness, and to explain both Fraley’s and Kevin’s optimism, I’ll go through the highlights:

– They’re pleased they got the most-odious of the taxes out, namely the combined reporting, the hospital tax, and the gas tax. Considering the original new-tax-increase estimates were $1.74 billion (at least officially), that’s an accomplishment.

– Healthy and Depopulated Wisconsin and KRM, a pair of Senate ‘Rat priorities, got shot down. While most of us, me included, figured and probably still figure H&DW was nothing more than a negotiating ploy, the reaction of the Senate ‘Rats is, in a word, priceless.

– Oh, and how about that reaction? It wasn’t yet official when we talked, but Robson’s gone. It’s odd when there’s a mid-term purge, especially when the side undergoing said purge can say it got most of what it wanted.

– Speaking of the Senate, all of the Senate Pubbies stuck together in voting against the budget. To be honest, nobody saw that coming.

– They see some political possibilities for 2008 and 2010, based mainly on the version that first went through the Assembly. After a review of the vote that I only got to after the conversation, I’m not nearly as optimistic.

Petulant Senate ‘Rats

by @ 19:23. Filed under Taxes.

I first saw the rumblings on a putsch in the Senate ‘Rat leadership over at Kevin Fischer’s place late last night, but it was a bit late to expound on it. I’ve been out all day, and it’s come to fruition. Russ Decker is now your State Senate Majority Leader.

Considering that they got over 75% of the additional taxes they wanted going into negotiations and better than 57% of the additional spending they voted for (less H&DW), despite being cut out of the negotiations, I was right when I said they wanted it all. Guess they forgot that the governor makes all the rules when it comes to the budget. I wonder whether they’ll try to knife him in 2010.

“Brilliant” negotiating Huebsch, part deux

by @ 1:12. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin, Taxes.

It might just be the time of the night, but the more I think about the “Grand Compromise”, the more I realize those of us who don’t want to be #1 in taxation got rolled. First, let’s go back to the spending numbers, and assume that Healthy and Depopulated Wisconsin was never a serious proposal. Throwing that up against what was passed last night, Robson got 76.3% of her her $1,000,000,000 tax increase and 68.5% of difference in the increase in state-funds spending (the amount that comes directly from our pockets versus what comes from that plus what comes from the federal trough) between her plan and the sop thrown to us in southeast Wisconsin.

What’s worse is something that GOP 1st District vice-chair Bob Geason dug up (H/T – Recess Supervisor). Remember that total spending “reduction” from Doyle’s original budget? When all the bonding gets put into the spending equation, all but $345,091,300 of difference between the original and the Grand Compromise disappears. It’s way too late to come up with the bonding numbers from the three intermediate proposals, but the total bond-and-spend number in the original budget was $60,346,104,400. However, if memory serves, it’s safe to say say that the final bond-and-spend number of $59,998,013,100 is closer to Doyle’s original proposal and probably the H&DW-less Senate proposal than the Assembly “sop”.

Revisions/extensions (7:06 am 10/24/2007) – I took the time to make a quick run-through of both the Senate and Assembly plans for bonding. Adding the Senate-approved bonding to the Senate H&DW-less plan made that plan’s bond-and-spend number $61,292,741,000 (with H&DW, it would have been $68,892,741,000), and adding the Assembly-approved bonding to the Assembly’s “sop” plan made that plan’s bond-and-spend number $59,036,762,500. In short, Doyle got 73.4% of the difference in the total spending-and-bonding between his original plan and the Assembly plan, and Robson got 57.4% of the total spending-and-bonding between her plan and the Assembly plan, at least if you take out H&DW. Disgusting.

As Wile E. Coyote would say, “Brilliance! Sheer, unadulterated brillance!”

Revisions/extensions part 2 (7:07 pm 10/24/2007) – The tax increases were recalculated after I left for Madison early this morning.

Eggs on the road

by @ 0:05. Filed under Miscellaneous.

Partly because I need to put some more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, but mostly because these are some good events, I’ll be at the following:

– Center-Right Coalition meeting 10/24/2007, 9 am, Madison Club (5 E Wilson St. in Madison) – Guest-speaker will be Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke.

Gathering of Eagles in Chicago, 1 pm, Federal Plaza (Dearborn and Adams in Chicago).

Be there or be somewhere, though I prefer you be there.

October 23, 2007

Higher taxes, more spending, bigger gubmint now a fait accompli

by @ 19:42. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin, Taxes.

Mike Huebsch, RINO member of the Party-In-Government and speaker of the Assembly, got 60 votes for the Munich Acco…er, Grand Compromise. Since the original tax-and-spend party runs the Senate and occupies the governor’s mansion, it’s all over but the packing.

For those of you interested in finding out the remainder of the RINO members of P-I-G sold us taxpayers out, they are – Joan Ballweg (41st Assembly District), Brett “Soybean” Davis (80th), Jeff Fitzgerald (39th; the Fitzgerald family Turkey Day dinner ought to be interesting), Donald Friske (35th), Eugene Hahn (47th), Jake Hines (42nd), Dan Meyer (34th), Terry Moulton (68th), Jeffrey Mursau (36th), John Murtha (29th), Terry Musser (92nd), Lee Nerison (96th), Alvin Ott (3rd), Kevin Petersen (40th), Jerry Petrowski (86th), Kitty Rhoades (30th), Scott Suder (69th), Gary Tauchen (6th), John Townsend (52nd), Karl Van Roy (90th), Mary Williams (87th) and Jeffrey Wood (67th). For those counting at home, that, including Huebsch, is less than half the Pubbie caucus and pretty much the entire outstate caucus. I could’ve swore there was a caucus rule that said more than half the caucus had to agree to bring it up for a vote; I would like to know who simply put on a good show, or alternatively, whether Huebsch decided to screw over most of the Pubbies.

I invite each and every one of those listed above, including and starting with Mike Huebsch, to renounce their Republican affiliation and just join the ‘Rats since they’re already 90.9% there.

Revisions/extensions (7:58 pm 10/23/2007) – While the Senate also passed this 18-15, the “Pubbies” know their politics a little bit better, as every one of them rejected it. As expected, East Side Plale voted for this to try to avoid a repeat of Double Vote Riley in 2010.

Now, on to Craps and the veto pen. Any takers on him excising the few good things while not taking out the pork?

Revisions/extensions part 2 (9:38 am 10/27/2007) – Had Mary Williams from the wrong district.

Roll bloat – the rabbit edition

by @ 11:05. Filed under The Blog.

Local, conservative, and a big football fan; yep, HeatherRadish’s place, Hasenpfeffer Incorporated is definitely a too-late addition to the roll. Now, don’t be like me and keep on putting off adding her.

Since I need the extra cash to pay for the extra taxes,…

I figure I ought to package up the assorted Paul-nuts that have shown up here and the TownHall version of this place and sell them. I’ve even ginned up a label (with all due apologies to Rebellion Brewing’s Roasted Nuts beer):

Maybe if the head Paul-nut would fight a tenth as hard for smaller government as he does for Dhimmitude,….

Make that budget 95% bad

by @ 10:00. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin, Taxes.

Revisions/extensions (5:36 pm 10/23/2007) – Upon reflection, and a bit of a “nudge” from Jib, I’ve taken out a cheap shot on those of you north of Hwy. 10. I apologize for that.

I knew about the fees that shocked, SHOCKED the folks at 4th and State, which never really disappeared from any of the budgets. I am not even really surprised that outstate Wisconsin is getting yet another 4-lane bypass that is not needed in the form of Highway 23 in Fond du Lac County (I do believe I said, “Gotta keep on building those 4-lane bypasses of every Podunk last north-Wisconsin town.” However, Christian Schneider delved in and found all sorts of “small-time” pork. Some of my “favorites”:

Short Course to Introduce Chinese Students to the Wisconsin Idea (p. 85) – What, the ChiComs don’t already know all about taxing and spending to death?

The Film Production Tax Credit for $1,000,000 (p. 113) – Ever since they took the stubs off the ends of the Hoan Bridge, Wisconsin hasn’t been on Hollywood’s radar screen. I mean, Scott Walker couldn’t even get them in to blow up the whaling wall.

$250,000 grant to the Painters and Allied Trades District Council 7 of the AFL-CIO for “training” (p. 447) – So that’s how Craps refunds his campaign contributors. Paging Mr. Biskupic. Paging US Attorney Steve Biskupic. Since that particular local is in New Berlin, and AG Kathleen Fal…er, JB Van Hollen won’t dig into anything related to Craps, you may as well go out with a bang.

Again, everybody who votes for this abomination of a budget need to be replaced forthwith.

October 22, 2007

Legislative Fiscal Bureau out with the spending numbers – ‘Rats win in a knockout

by @ 16:03. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin, Taxes.

(H/Ts – Owen and WisPolitics)

Assembly Speaker Mike Huebsch released a memo from the LFB comparing spending increases over the FY2007 portion of budget doubled for the various budget plans. The middle chart, showing just the General Purpose Revenue increases without the new segergated funds that would have been created in the first 3 proposals (the governor’s original, the Joint Finance Committee, and the Senate’s), is completely worthless because those new segergated funds disappeared starting with the Assembly’s proposal, but allow me to repost the relevant numbers from the other two charts for you:

All spending, which includes all that cash from the federal taxpayer trough (FY2007 base times 2 – $53,673,360,200):
– Governor’s original plan – An increase of $4,563,146,100, for a 2-year percentage of 8.5% and an annualized percentage of 4.2%.
– JFC’s plan – $4,440,511,200, 8.3% over 2 years, 4.1% annualized.
– Senate’s plan (with Healthy-and-Depopulated Wisconsin) – $12,433,308,700 (and the $7,600,000,000 portion that would have been spent on H&PW is just for the last 6 months), 23.2% over 2 years, 11.0% annualized.
– Assembly’s plan – $2,628,330,200, 4.9% over 2 years, 2.4% annualized.
– Doyle’s first revision (with additions made by the Senate, including the transportation budget not included in Doyle’s revision) – $4,452,896,700, 8.3% over 2 years, 4.1% annualized.
– The Munich Acco…er, Grand Compromise – $3,561,071,400, 6.6% over 2 years, 3.2% annualized

Spending from GPR + “new SEG” funds, which are funds that directly to Madison, and which does not and would not include H&DW (FY2007 base times 2 – $26,622,083,800):
NOT in the memo and included just for comparison because this deals with spending, not taxation – Growth in taxation without a single vote for “new” taxes or fees (to the nearest $100 million) – $1,200,000,000, 4.5% over 2 years, 2.2% annualized.
– Governor’s original plan – $1,633,079,100, 6.1% over 2 years, 3.0% annualized.
– JFC’s plan – $1,618,446,400, 6.1% over 2 years, 3.0% annualized.
– Senate’s plan (again, H&PW is documented above and not here) – $1,776,652,900, 6.7% over 2 years, 3.3% annualized.
– Assembly’s plan – $1,193,792,900, 4.5% over 2 years, 2.2% annualized.
– Doyle’s first revision (with additions made by the Senate, including the transportation budget not included in Doyle’s revision) – $1,614,013,700, 6.1% over 2 years, 3.0% annualized.
– The Munich Acco…er, Grand Compromise – $1,593,003,100 – 6.0% over 2 years, 3.0% annualized.

I resubmit that it is an all-but-complete win for Doyle and the ‘Rats. While it is true that total spending is significantly less than what was originally proposed by both Doyle and the JFC, almost all of that is a result of taking less from the taxpayers of the entire country. The spending of Wisconsin taxpayer dollars is only $25,413,300 less than what came out of the Joint Finance Committee and $40,046,000 less than what Doyle wanted in the first place. To contrast, that spending is $399,210,200 more than what the Assembly wanted.

My calculator shows that Doyle got 90.9% of the difference. That, combined with both the present and future tax increases to pay for the excesses of Doyle’s spending in this and previous budgets, gives the ‘Rats a knockout win, and that’s before the worse-than-worthless KRM is added in.

Revisions/extensions (12:40 am 10/24/2007) – Forgot a few zeroes in the H&DW cost.

Roll bloat – the Taxpayer Rally edition

by @ 14:37. Filed under The Blog.

Mr. Bill, the guy in the “Sign of the Day” pic (let’s run that again just because I can)…

…has a read-worthy blog called mrbillsbraindrain. Since the “auto-discover” feed links are fouling up at the moment, I tracked down an alternate address for your feed-reading pleasure. Add him.

Grading the Republican Debate #9

by @ 14:15. Filed under Politics - National.

Here we go again, basically relying on my semi-drunk R-rated notes along with the tape from Stan to fill in the blanks from the HamNation Memorial Clinton Bashfest. It’s SOOO much nicer listening to Brit and company than Prissy Chrissy. I wonder if Clinton will continue to refuse to debate on Fox News once we get into the general election season.

Fox News – B – For the most part, they let the blood be spilled. Golner dragged down the team’s performance signifcantly, and the exclusion of Alan Keyes to include Ron Paul, Tom Tancredo and Duncan Hunter isn’t exactly defensible.

Rudy Giuliani – B – Don’t let my constant “Rudi” calls in the live-blog fool you. Once he got done lying about his conservative creds (and that’s exactly what they are, lies), he became UPS Man and delivered the raw red meat. Those early lies knocked this down from a probable “A”.

Mike Huckabee – B+ – He wasn’t around much, and seems to be resigned to the fact that he won’t be President in 2009, but he’s making lemonade out of that by becoming the early front-runner for the Veep slot no matter the man on top.

Duncan Hunter – C – Once again ignored, but finally found something other than Red China to talk about. Caused Romney to stumble on CubaCare Taxachusetts. Unfortunately, he hasn’t been paying much attention to the recreation of the Soviet Union.

John McCain – A- – Delivered the Smackdown of the Night, and is committed to the protection of America. A couple bouts of vagueness hurt the final score some.

Ron Paul – F – Once again, proved he’s the wrong man for the wrong party in the wrong era, and that he’s clueless on history to boot. Couldn’t answer a single question without dipping into the Hussein Obama/Osama bin Laden playbook of foreign relations. If we could get at least one non-Paul-nut debate before the convention, I would get to remove the R-rating from my live-blogging efforts.

Mitt Romney – C+ – Easily his weakest performance. Revealed himself to have hands-so-soft when it came time to break out the brass knuckles, but eventually managed to get a good shot at Clinton. Worse, he doesn’t see that the Dems have no intentions of compromising on anything, and we all know what happened to the last guy who resolutely said he was a “uniter, not a divider”.

Tom Tancredo – C- – See the start to Duncan’s grade, but he got in a heck of a shot on Nancy Pelosi in between his one-issue anti-illegal-alien crusade. He was led into it by Thompson.

Fred Thompson – A- – Just call him Broadsides Thompson. Plenty of shots to be had for all within range. Still has a bit of a problem with specifics, however.

AFP delivering pigs, hearing aids to the Capitol

by @ 6:36. Filed under Politics - National, Taxes.

This press release from Americans For Prosperity just popped up in my mailbox:

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – October 22, 2006
Contact: Mark Block (262) 617-2716 or Annie Patnaude (202) 349-5896

Americans for Prosperity Delivers Pigs to Legislature, Hearing Aid to Governor in Strong Message: No New Taxes

MILWAUKEE – The Wisconsin chapter of the free-market grassroots group Americans for Prosperity (AFP) today delivered toy pigs to the Wisconsin legislature as symbols of the tax-hiking compromise budget slated to come up for a vote Tuesday. Governor Doyle and Speaker Huebsch unwisely continue to refuse to listen to Wisconsin citizens, the group says, so they will be sent hearing aids.

AFP Wisconsin Director Mark Block made the following statement:

“Governor Doyle and many members of the legislature chose to have selective hearing even after Wisconsin taxpayers brought their outrage over proposed new taxes to the steps of the Capitol. The proposed budget compromise ignores taxpayers wishes by including tax hikes and failing to deliver tax deductibility for Health Savings Accounts.

“"I said last week that if the Governor and the legislature did not hear the voices of the taxpayers in Wisconsin we would have little choice but to think they were deaf. We’ll be sending Speaker Huebsch and the Governor hearing aids to remind them to listen to taxpayers not just special interests.

“"Even as Wisconsin loses jobs, politicians are seeking ways to hike taxes. Today we are urging the legislature to defeat attempts to pass a budget compromise that raises taxes." Block said.

“"Decades ago Illinois Senator Everett Dirksen said of the grassroots, "˜’When I feel the heat, I see the light.’ We came to Madison last week to do just that – turn up the heat. Yet tax-happy politicians continue to refuse to listen."

###

Americans for Prosperity (AFP) is the nation’s premier grassroots organization committed to advancing every individual’s right to economic freedom and opportunity. AFP believes reducing the size and scope of government is the best safeguard to ensuring individual productivity and prosperity for all Americans. AFP educates and engages Citizens in support of restraining state and federal government growth, and returning government to its constitutional limits. For more information, visit www.americansforprosperity.org

Can they hear us now?

October 21, 2007

Insta-review of the second Florida Pubbie debate

by @ 21:53. Filed under Miscellaneous.

I’m too drunk to go through everybody else’s notes and give out grades tonight. I will say, looking back through just my notes, McCain won, and Giuliani and Thompson had strong debates. Romney, not so much. Paul-nut, as usual, took his performance right off the rails (did he take driving lessons from Swimmer and Patches Kennedy?), even when it appeared like he would finally get through a question without doing so. Huckabee, Tancredo and Hunter were essentially non-entities, though Huckabee was usually strong when he would actually get into the act.

One more thought before I crash, with all the focus on Hiliary, I have to say this was the HamNation Memorial Debate. Thank you, Katie, for snapping Mary Katharine out of her Edy’s and Cheeze-It stupor, and thank you, MK, for putting it on the web in time for the candiates not of Italian extraction to focus on it like a laser with six-string razors and mouths like alligators.

Make that a second thought and a hell of a regret as I dug up Quiet Riot’s “Bang Your Head (Metal Health)”; if only I had video editing software and a TV tuner on the computer, I could’ve punched out a Metal Health review of the debate.

First-, er, Second-in-Florida Pubbie debate – LIVE THREAD

by @ 10:43. Filed under Politics - National.

If I’m back home in time to do some live-blogging of the debate, which starts at 7 pm on Fox News Channel, sothis is where I will do it. Otherwise, The usual suspects (namely, Allahpundit, Free Republic and Matt Lewis, though I expect RedState to have it up as well should have it, along with Fred’s campaign in bilingual (DAMMIT!). Unlike the first, which featured nothing but 2nd- and 3rd-tier candidates and the introduction to Campaign 2008 of Alan Keyes, the 8 surviving “big” names will be the only ones invited to this pool.

As usual, I paraphrase a lot, even if it’s in quotes, the questions are in italics, my own comments are in parentheses, and the times are Central Daylight in 24-hour format (I won’t have time to keep on putting in “p.m.”). Also, as usual, I’ll probably insult every candidate before the end, some more than others. So, with 19 minutes before we go live to Florida, that’s that.

Actually, that’s not quite that; The Real Sporer is live-blogging as well, and the Vodkapundit will be drunk-blogging (he wasn’t real clear whether it would be at his place or at Pajamas Media). That reminds me; get the first beer out of the fridge.

18:45 – Hopefully Pixy Mixa fixed the commenting problems at Ace of Spades, because Ace has joined the party. Guess nothing is going to get done tomorrow morning as we’ll all be drunk.

18:51 – It’s Pajamas Media for Stephen Green. First gulp of Maximum Ice down. Meanwhile, the Spanish version of the Thompson Team take is now live.

18:57 – Supposedly, Fox News is streaming it. I can’t get it to work. Meanwhile, the Paul-nuts are busy itching their texting fingers.

19:00 – We go live to Brit Hume, the man the DhimmiRATs are most-afraid of. Joining him are Chris Wallace, Wendell Golner and Campaign Carl.

19:01 – Up come the Gang of 8 – Tom Tancredo, Ron Paul, Mike Huckabee, Rudy Giuliani, Mitt Romney, Fred Thompson, John McCain, Duncan Hunter. Brit lays down the ground rules, complete with the lights and the “ding-ding” (when I use that, that means they ran over).

19:03 – We start with Wallace to Rudy – Who is more conservative, you or Fred? – Rudi starts off with the lies, claiming he ran the most-conservative gubmint in the US in the last 50-60 years (that rumbling you hear from California is Reagan turning over in his grave). “You can always find one exception or two….” DING-DING! (I can think of more than 1 or 2)

To Mitt – Same question – I’m a uniter, not a divider. Mitt finally hits on Hiliary, and takes a swipe or two at Rudi. (oh, Mitt, you governed much like her as well, or doesn’t CubaCare Taxachusetts Edition count?)

To Thompson – SMACK upside Mitt’s head – “I didn’t know there was any room to the left of Ted Kennedy.” “I compiled a 100% pro-life voting record.” Oh, and Rudi supports fed funding of abortion, sanctuary cities and Mario Cuomo. DING-DING.

Rudi, retort – He voted against tort reform. DING-DING.

Back to Fred – I support state rights, and Rudi fought to keep sanctuary cities.

Back to Rudi – We reported everybody who committed a crime, but didn’t report anybody in school. Oh, and Fred doesn’t have executive experience.

19:10 – To McCain – Who’s more conservative, you or Mitt? – I’m running on my 25-year record (which is mostly liberal). I’m prepared because I led the largest squadron in the Navy, and not for profit.

To Mitt – Retort – “I respect McCain and his service.” I fought against Teddy in 1994, and fought against the Taxachusetts ‘Rats. I’m a uniter, not a divider.

Back to McCain – Defend hitting Mitt on his lawyers remark – When it’s time to piss or get off the pit, that’s the wrong time to call in the lawyers.

Back to Mitt – I’m backing off the lawyer comment if it’s an immediate security threat. The question was, ‘What role does Congress have?’ I won’t go off half-cocked, and another smack at Hiliary as Bush did go to Congress.

19:15 – To Paul-nut – Defend your support for gay marriage. – Pulls the TOT/McCain defense. Get gubmint out of marriage because it’s a religious. Trust the courts to read the dictionary and respect the states (have another toke, Paul). DING-DING

To Romney – Why do you support a traditional-only marriage amendment when your main opponents and Paul-nut don’t? – It’s because my state got fucked by those Lawgivers-In-Black. DING-DING

To Rudi – Defend your opposition – We don’t need an amendment until more states go down the Taxachusetts road (if memory serves, New Jersey and Hawaii already have, and Californica is on that road). DING-DING It’s not just a religious institution, it’s a civil institution, Paul-nut you dumbass.

To Huckabee – Can somebody like Rudi personally “oppose” abortion while publicly supporting it? – “I’m not interested in fighting these guys, I’m interested in fighting for the American people.” Most of those who wrote the Declaration of Independence were clergymen, and “I still believe in that” (refering to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness).

To Thompson – Defend your lawer’s defense of abortion – It was just professional, and I forgot about it.

To McCain – Are you mending fences with the evangelicals or are you a maverick – “I don’t change and I haven’t changed.” I won’t pander, and I’m proud to have engaged in reconciliation, even with the Vietnamese. “I believe in reconciliation, and I believe they’re an important part of the party…. I hope the (entire party) will support the nominee of the party.”

To Tancredo – Are the rest of the guys “hyphenated”? – “It’s not a sin to discuss (differences).” Touts his ACU and National Right-to-Life ratings. DING-DING. “Everybody runs to the right in the primary, but moves to the left, and that’s why people are so cynical>”

To Hunter (oh, he’s here) – “You’ve been dividing the party the last 10 minutes, Carl.” Contrasts the Bay of Pigs with El Salvador.

19:27 – Golner up now on health care. To McCain (missed the q) – “It’s an important issue.” If you don’t believe me, go to England. We want to move the tax incentives from the employer to the individual.

19:29 – To Paul-nut – Is charity the way we should provide health care to the poor? – Nobody is happy with HMOs except the HMOs. We need Dhimmitude, not freedom. (can someone please gong Paul-nut out of politics) DING-DING (thank you)

19:31 – E-mail Q from Kendrick from California – Why is CubaCare Taxachusetts good for Taxachusetts but CubaCare not good for the entire country? – “It’s different from HiliaryCare” because the gubmint isn’t running it (what’s the difference if it’s mandatory?)

19:33 – To Hunter – It’s the mandates that makes CubaCare Taxachusetts the equivalent to HiliaryCare.

19:34 – Romney – It’s the Rats’ fault. DING-DING I’m proud.

19:35 – To Huckabee – “We have a health care maze…and crisis.” Channels The Other Thompson and Suzie T (for those out-of-staters tuning in, that is “We’re going to make you healthy whether you want to or not”).

19:36 – To Tancredo – Your entire health care plan is anti-illegal-immigrant. What about the 50 million who don’t have health insurance? (ignoring that many of those 50 million are illegal aliens) – Hammers the original CubaCare and Michael Moore. What’s the Constitutional right of the feds to get involved? (none I can see) If there is any, let’s expand HSAs. DING-DING. Let’s get the feds out.

19:38 – To Thompson – Is No Child Left Behind a mistake? – Some states have taught to the test. “I like testing, but tests have to mean something.” We need to recognize the role of the federal government, currently 8% (Constitutionally, it is 0%). DING-DING. “We need more fathers to stay and raise their kids.”

19:40 – To Rudi – You met your match with the schools. You alienated the teachers, so how are you going to win back public school teachers? – Choice, and to hell with the tradesmen who masquerade as public school teachers. The problem with NCLB is the enforcer; it should be the parents. DING-DING. “It’s (education) the single biggest civil rights issue for the 21st Century”.

19:42 – BREAK!

Thanks for the traffic, ST. Meanwhile, while RedState hasn’t popped up on my feed reader, Team Thompson’s English live-blog has, as well as a corrected link to Matt Lewis’ TownHall live-blog.

19:45 – Chris Wallace asks how are the gang of 8 will beat Hitlery, while pointing out all of them are losing to her in the polls. First on the firing line, Romney, who’s 12 points behind – Is she fit to be CinC? – The Chinese tiger is rising, and somebody who never spent a day in private business isn’t the right person. I’ve done it, she hasn’t run anything, even in gubmint. DING-DING. Another 30 seconds to answer the question? – HELL NO!

19:48 – To Rudi, who’s 4 points behind – Is there any real difference between you and Hitlery? – “Are you kidding?” There’s 2 things we agree on, we’re both Yankees fans, though she discovered them in Chicago, and (missed the other one) caught it thanks to Ian, America can’t afford all her ideas. Takeaway line, which I did catch – “America can’t afford you.” But, but, but you’re down in all the key battleground states. – Well, Ketchup Boy was up in the polls in those same states. DING-DING!

19:50 – To McCain, who’s 3 points behind – Is continuing the Iraq War a winning strategy? – I’d rather lose a campaign than lose a war. I’ll hammer fairly on spending. Brings up the Hitlery/Upchuck Schumer $1 million Woodstock museum. Allahpundit and Ian had better have that monologue , and Ian does. I’ll win because she’s a liberal Democrat, and I’m a reliable conservative.” (well, half is right).

19:53 – To Huckabee – Was it a mistake for the front-runners to skip the minority debates? – Yes. “There’s nothing funny about Hillary Clinton being President.” DING-DING

19:54 – To Thompson, who’s down 12 – “Hillary is a good applause line.” Lists the heap of spending all the ‘Rats would fund on the backs of the rich, who are defined by the ‘Rats as everybody who works. “If we stick to our basic principles, we’ll win in November.” DING-DING.

19:56 – To Paul-nut – Since you and Hiliary are of the same mind on the War, how are you two different? – I’m the one that wants O-W-T OWT!

19:58 – Brit to Thompson – Expound on your touching the third rails of SocSecurity and Medicare. – “We’re bankrupt in the next generation…. It’s unsustainable…. Can you comprehend that not being discussed on the campaign trail?”

20:00 – To Rudi – That will open Thompson up to the “cut” charge. Will you be as bold? – Let’s start with private accounts. Medicare and Medicaid are going belly-up first, so let’s privatize them as well, as well as more people buying their own health insurance so the prices drop. Those not covered are not the poorest because they’re covered by Medicare, they’re buying stuff like TVs and cell phones.

20:02 – To Romney – Same question – Nope. I won’t open myself to the “cut” charge, at least to the poor (keep on redistributing, Bill Jr.). Brit – You saw what happened to the last guy who said he was a uniter, not a divider. – But, but, but I’m DIFFERENT (Bravo Sierra; the national DhimmiRATs will never find common ground with Pubbies.).

20:05 – Same question to Huckabee – Let’s call it personalization because of WorldCom. Points out the actuary tables were set up for people retiring at 65 and dying at 67.

20:06 – Same to Paul – We need to take care of those who are too old to get out, and let those younger out. Deal with the dollar (how do you propose to do that with the $oro$es and Red Chinese of the world manipulating the currency, Paul-nut?). Accept Dhimmitude (stock answer; I’m surprised he didn’t say “gold standard” in there as well).

20:07 – Same to McCain – Convince the populace with charts. It has to be bipartisan (which means it will never get done, as SocSecurity is the original 20th-Century Rat plan to create a one-party system).

20:09 – To the forgotten man, Hunter – Hammer Red China.

20:10 – To the other forgotten man, Tancredo – I agree with everything, especially with structural changes. Killing discretionary spending won’t fix it. There’s a plan to make it worse; give it to illegal aliens, who are also responsible for much of the health care problem.

20:11 – BREAK PART DEUX! I need a refill.

RedState shows up late with an open thread, and Jawa Ragnar joins the live-blogging. Meanwhile, Ian comes through with the three-way catfight over who is more conservative.

20:14 – And we’re back. Campaign Carl to McCain – It looks like the Soviet Union is back, and was Bush naiive dealing with Vladimir Putin – “I saw three letters: K-G-B.” Russia doesn’t have the territory or the capabilities to reignite the Cold War, but he wants to get them back. I don’t give a flying rip if Pootie-Poot doesn’t like US missile defense in Czechoslovakia (er, is it the Czech Republic or Slovakia) or Poland.

20:17 – To Hunter – Putin gave us an opening to put Aegis in the Black Sea (as if that’s going to float). We have to keep missile defense strong.

20:18 – To Rudi – Should we work with Mother Russia on missile defense? – It’s a good time to expand NATO well beyond the North Atlantic (say, don’t we have close working relationships with Japan and Australia?). Ronald Reagan quote time – “The answer is a very strong military no other country would consider challenging.” DING-DING. Increasing military spending would send that message to the Soviet Unio…er, Russia and Red China.

20:20 – To Thompson – Shouldn’t Turkey be allowed to go into Iraq? – Let’s hope it doesn’t go to that. Turkey is a friend who has the right to defend itself, and the PKK is a terror group. We should be able to work it out diplomatically DING-DING, but Plastic Pelosi fucked it up.

20:21 – To Tancredo – No shit she fucked it up to fuck up Iraq. Pelosi is not a good Speaker and a worse SecState.

20:22 – To Huckabee – Let’s arm the friendly Kurds to fight the bad Kurds, and make it clear to the Turks there’s no good to be gained by going in.

20:23 – To Paul – It’s all our fault (BULL FUCKING SHIT, YOU DUMB FUCK! The Kurds and the Turks have been at each others’ throats for centuries. Guess the Paul-nuts are NOT in the audience, as Paul-nut got boos.)

20:24 – To Romney – “We got the peace dividend, but not the peace…. The UN is failing in its mission to protect the world and prevent genocide.” DING-DING We also need a strong economy and a strong education system.

20:25 – Golner trying to invoke Reagan with Paul-nut – Have you left the party or have they? (er, Golner, Paul-nut is a literal definition of a RINO as he’s a Libertarian). – We have lost our way. (Hey dumbfuck, how many attacks on American cities have happened since 9/11/2001, which, BTW, you also blame on us).

20:27 – To Rudy (missed the Q) – “A nuclear-armed Iran is more dangerous.” If Iran and its Soviet partner thought we would use any means necessary to keep Iran from getting nuclear weapons, sanctions would probably work. DING-DING. Contrasts Peanut Farmer’s and Reagan’s methods of dealing with Iran.

20:29 – Golner brings up the “lazy” question to Thompson – I’m a country boy who was an assistant US Attorney at 26, went to DC at 30, elected to the Senate twice in a state S(l)ick Willie carried twice, much more I missed. “If I could do all that and be lazy, I’d recommend that to everybody.” Brit ends, but not before Thompson gets in his big and young family.

20:31 – AND WE’RE CLEAR!

Revisions/extensions (10:05 pm 10/21/2007 and prior, and now 6:20 am 10/22/2007) – First, I added links to a few videos over at Ian Schwartz’s place. While I was doing that and bemoaning the fact that I have neither a TV tuner on either computer nor video editing software, Stan at Free Constitution found posted the full five- ten-part YouTube version. Thanks, Ian and Stan.

NFL Week 7

by @ 9:47. Filed under Sports.

After the first over-.500 week of the season, I’m still scuffling along with a 34-47-8 record against the line, and my first loss against the over-unders puts me at 10-1-1 in that department. Treat your man like Home Depot during a fire sale on lumber with these nose picks:

Chicago @ Philadelphia (-6) – Chicago police will be cordoning off the streets around the Sears Tower Monday.
Tampa Bay (+2.5) @ Detroit – You know the drill by now. The fans at Ford Field will see what could’ve been if only Matt Millen weren’t GM.
Minnesota @ Dallas (-9) – Dallas defense, meet Mr. Peterson. Adrian, meet Astro-turf. Oh, and jump all over that over-46.5 for some extra cash.
Arizona @ Washington (-8.5) – I do believe I said the Redbirds are done.
Atlanta (+8) @ New Orleans – The fresh QB scenario is operative.
Baltimore (-3) @ Buffalo – When will Dick Jauron be fired in Buffalo? I say Week 11.
New England (-17) @ Miami – Normally, I wouldn’t lay the collegiate-worthy lumber, especially with the Pats not having a running game. However, who needs a running game against the Fins?
San Francisco @ NY Giants (-9.5) – Mr. Smith, meet Mr. Hoffa.
Tennessee (-1) @ Houston – Ignore the injury report; the former Houston team will run away with this one (literally).
Kansas City (+3) @ Oakland – If LT can get almost 200 yards and 4 scores against the Raiders, LJ can get 130 and 3.
NY Jets (+6.5) @ Cincinnati – Go under, way under the 47.5.
St. Louis @ Seattle (-8.5) – The Rams picked the wrong week to take a trip up to the Pacific Northwest.
Pittsburgh (-4) @ Denver – It just doesn’t get any better for the Broncos.
Indianapolis (-3.5) @ Jacksonville – It’s not the playoffs yet, so CBS will not be disappointed at the end of the week.

Finally, a week above .500

by @ 9:16. Filed under Sports.

Sure, it’s a crushed-by-the-vig 6-5-2, and I only went 1-1 last week against the over/under, but a win’s a win!

Washington 14 (+3-TIE) @ Green Bay 17 – D-FENSE! D-FENSE! D-FENSE!
Minnesota 34 @ Chicago 31 (-5.5) – Unfortunately for me, all the D was up north.
Cincinnati 20 (-3) @ Kansas City 27 – Back to the BenGALS.
Houston 17 @ Jacksonville 37 (-7) – Mo-Jo Rising!
Miami 31 @ Cleveland 41 (-4.5) – Add Trent “Never Played a Full Season” Green to the dead pool.
Philadelphia 16 (-4) @ NY Jets 9 – 9-0, baby.
St. Louis 3 @ Baltimore 22 (-9) – Let’s party like it’s October 1962. On second thought,….
Tennessee 10 (+3-TIE) @ Tampa Bay 13 – The Bucs are the plague.
Carolina 25 @ Arizona 10 (-6) – Stick the fork in the Redbirds.
New England 48 @ Dallas 27 (+6.5) – Can ANYBODY stop the Pats? They came within 6 of doing the over themselves.
Oakland 14 @ San Diego 28 (-10) – I have two letters for you; LT!
New Orleans 28 @ Seattle 17 (-6.5) – Another night game, another extra-chunky call.
NY Giants 31 (-3.5) @ Atlanta 10 – Good thing it wasn’t an official over/under call.

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]