define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true); define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true); No Runny Eggs

No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

May 16, 2008

The Morning Scramble – 5/16/2008

by @ 8:14. Filed under The Morning Scramble.

I’m already half-brain-dead, so let’s have Joe Walsh finish the job…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9-uniiNuiM[/youtube]

May 15, 2008

A Prerequisite for Elected Office

by @ 15:00. Filed under Miscellaneous.

Why do we have people like Ben Bernanke, people who study economics, trade and monetary policy, handling the  Nation’s economic affairs  when we could have someone like the latest Governor of New York, David Paterson.

Paterson has come out against the gas tax holiday. A position which I agree with him on. My disagreement with the holiday is based on a fear that any reduction in the price will allow Congress to think they’ve actually accomplished something to solve a long term issue. Governor Paterson’s issue is that he things the gas companies are greedy. For his evidence he points to what happened following Hurricane Katrina:

At a press conference about a personnel matter in his midtown office, Paterson told reporters to go to the oil companies and "ask them why, the week after Katrina"”the Katrina Hurricane"”August 29, 2005, ask them why the gas prices went up in that week.

“It couldn’t have had anything to do with the gas,” Paterson charged. “Because gas delivery took place three weeks before then. They sold you the same gas that was in their tank the week before at"”at some points"”10 to 15 percent higher."

Paterson thinks that because the gas was put into tanks at one price, that should dictate what price the gas should come out of the tanks.

David, have you ever been in an area prior to a hurricane hitting? If you have, you would know that plywood has this nasty habit of increasing in price right before a hurricane. That plywood didn’t cost more coming in just because the hurricane was coming but it did cost more going out. Another thing David, plywood is also rationed when a hurricane is coming. Yup, the day before a hurricane you could have bought every single piece from your local home building supply company but the day the hurricane is announced, rationing starts.

How about another example David? After a hurricane generators get more expensive. Those generators were all sitting there prior to the hurricane at the same cost but lower price than after the hurricane where the cost stayed the same but the purchase price goes up.

The point David, is that increasing prices are the mechanism that free markets use to help manage demand for products that are, or are expected to be, in short supply.

I think we should test all political candidates for their knowledge of Adam Smith’s “The Wealth of Nations.” If they fail the part about supply and demand, they don’t get to run, pure and simple.

Instituting the test may not get us any better politicians but we would at least know that they do know better and not have to wonder whether they were lying to us or just flat out ignorant.

The Morning Scramble/Open Thread Thursday – 5/15/2008

The forecast as I type this (Wednesday night) doesn’t look promising for the original plan for baseball-then-dinner. Worse, I’ve already paid for the ticket. At least there’s a bit of good news; Favazza’s has a lunch menu, and the hour-by-hour forecast suggests it should start breaking up by 6. With that, I’ll still take the Flatland driving tips from Max and friends…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6Vw402IaII[/youtube]

  • Slublog has an open letter to the national GOP; one that I’m likely going to be delivering on my own to the Wisconsin GOP.
  • Jim Hoft has a link to a pretty good start to the platform for GOP 2.0. I wonder if I could sell that to the delegates Friday.
  • Bonus Slu – he notes some of the Pubbie members of the bipartisan Party-In-Government are in denial. For a moment, I thought he was talking about Assembly Speaker Mike Huebsch and my formerly-reliable Leggie Mark Honadel.
  • John Campbell is one Pubbie who gets it on the Farm Pork Bill. Incredibly, 5 of the 8 members of the Wisconsin delegation (all 3 Pubbies plus Ron Kind and Gwen Moore) also got it.
  • Nick Schweitzer has good news for fans of fine food in Chicago; they’ve lifted the foie gras ban.
  • Brian sums up the ‘Rat tax policy – “They won’t miss it.” After all, the Left believes that all money is government’s.
  • JammieWearingFool proposes a code of conduct for the media. They won’t do it.

By the time you see this, I’ll be on the road. I may or may not update the Twitter, but that’ll be about the only way to get a hold of me (unless I decide different).

And the Winner Is…..The One That Doesn’t Lose.

by @ 5:00. Filed under Miscellaneous.

Typical elections, especially Presidential elections, are usually focused on how to get the largest portion of the populations to vote for you.   Yes there are nuances due to the electoral system that makes a Presidential election a bit more like a bunch of individual state elections, but at a macro level, it’s still about getting more votes than your opponent.

The 2008 election, one that now appears likely to be between John McCain and Barack Obama, is shaping up to be nearly the opposite of traditional focus.   Rather than getting the most people to vote for you, the McCain/Obama contest looks to be more about getting the fewest number of people to not not vote at all or to not vote aganist you.

On the Democrat side we’ve been seeing stories for a few weeks about one camp’s voters not voting for the other candidate if they should win the nomination.   The exit polls from Tuesday’s West Virginia primary continued the trend as the AP reported:

Barely a third of Clinton supporters say they’d vote for Obama over John McCain in a November matchup. As many claim they’d vote for Republican John McCain and a quarter said they would not vote for president. If that horse race were Clinton vs. McCain, half of Obama backers say they’d vote for Clinton, about three in 10 say they’d back McCain and the rest would stay home.

On the Republican side while initially rejected, there had been a gradual acceptance of McCain as the nominee.  As various blog sites still had animated discussions about whether McCain was a conservative or if his various cross party endeavors had eliminated him from the use of the “True Conservative” moniker, most who did not originally support McCain had come to a point that they believed the greater good was served by supporting McCain. But then McCain made his environment speech in Oregon. Subsequent to that speech, the conservative blogs have become littered with comments such as:

His speech was the last straw. I am a conservative and John McCain WILL NOT get my vote. His global warming position is down right scary. I’ve tried really hard to get in the he’s “my guy” mindset and it’s just not going to happen. Every time I get close he opens his mouth.

So who will win? Well, it looks like it will be the candidate who gets the fewest of the folks who can’t stand them not to not vote for them.

Ain’t politics great!

 

Maybe There’s Hope After All!

by @ 5:00. Filed under Miscellaneous.

On Wednesday, the Chicago City Council reversed its ruling  of two years ago and again allowed foie gras to be served in the city.

The ban two years ago was argued for by animal rights advocates who said the process of creating the foie gras was inhumane.   The vote to ban foie gras was passed 48-1.

Leaving the animal rights folk infuriated, the Council voted this time 37-6 to overturn the ban.

OK, truth be told, I’ve never eaten foie gras, at least that I know, so it’s not like I’m rushing to Chicago or dropping my boycott of Chicago restaurants.   No, the reason I see hope in this story is based on the Alderman’s reason for bringing the vote,

“Supporters of this legislation have accomplished their goal by raising awareness of this issue,” Tunney said in a statement. “And while I respect their viewpoint, this is clearly a matter the council should stay out of and let the educated consumer and chefs make their own menu choices.”

Most elected officials are happy to opine and weigh in on any issue presented to them. It doesn’t seem to matter anymore whether the issue is even within their constitutional purview. In fact, Congress is known for taking on nearly any topic they want by simply swiping it with the “interstate commerce” pen.

When was the last time you heard an elected official say that an issue was none of their business?

How refreshing! There may be hope after all!

May 14, 2008

Republican conventions – BUMPED

by @ 22:37. Filed under Politics - National, RPW Convention.

Revisions/extensions/bump from the original post date/time of 5/12/2008 at 8:51 pm (10:37 pm 5/14/2008) – I’m still looking for a few more good questions for the RPW convention.

A couple of housekeeping items:

– Since I will have my credentials waiting for me in Stevens Point, I’m now taking suggestions of what to ask various political types at the RPW convention.

– That poll on the left side asking whether I should try for the national convention will be closing closed at 6:30 pm Tuesday night. The window to apply for the national convention credentials will close on Thursday. I decided to put in.

Latest “victim” of Gorebal Warming – the polar bear

by @ 14:22. Filed under Global "Warming".

(H/T – The FReepers)

That’s right. The Department of the Interior is putting the polar bear on the threatened species list not because their numbers are going down, but because they’ve bought into the Algore Goracle sect of Gorebal Warming.

It’s time to resurrect an old favorite from the dead….

Rather-extensive revisions/extensions (4:40 pm 5/14/2008)Mary Katharine Ham thoughfully collated some examples of heavy-hitting commentary:

  • Iain Murray points out that it would take but one swipe of the pen to eliminate the very-minimal safeguards against the use of the reclassification by envirowhackos to stop energy production.
  • Kevin Hassett asserts that it won’t just be ANWR that will be targeted by the envirowhackos because of the use of Gorebal Warming as the reason for the reclassivication, but potentially any item in any state that requires any sort of federal action or permit.
  • The crew at Powerline discovered that nobody knows what’s happening with the polar bears, either currently or in the future.

Given that all three candidates are Gorebal Warming acolytes, this steaming pile of horseshit is only the beginning.

The Morning Scramble – 5/14/2008

by @ 9:02. Filed under The Morning Scramble.

I’m trying to recover from Drinking Right, and I’m in the middle of putting Vista SP1 on the main desktop (can’t get the laptop to recognize that SP1’s out there)…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVF-0JKLnd4[/youtube]

Time to switch to the backup machine so I can let the black box of death choke on the upgrade.

Psssst, Mr. Populist, the Masses Don’t Like It (part 2)

by @ 5:00. Filed under Miscellaneous.

If Barack Obama wants to run as a populist he needs to get a better pulse of the people or maybe start reading some polls.

I wrote here  about Barack’s confusion about what he wants to do with Capital Gains taxes and that a majority of Americans are against any increase in those taxes.   In fact they go so far as to say that they believed that a President who raised Capital Gains taxes would raise other taxes as well.

It appears the American folks can still see how 2+2=4.

In a Rasmussen Report poll released Tuesday, 60% of Americans believe that tax increases will hurt the economy. As you might expect, 74% of Republicans agreed with that statement. What Barack needs to pay attention to is that 49% of Democrats and 60% of unaffiliated voters believe the same. Contrary to his primary results, this is an issue that truly crosses racial lines as 61% of White voters and 57% of African-American voters agree with the statement. In the “Can you hear me now,” observation of the poll, a significant majority of 70% of those under 30 believe that increasing taxes will hurt the economy.

With the economy now the number one issue in the Presidential campaign and McCain being more trusted to handle economic issues, Barack needs to figure out whether to lead, follow or get out of the way. Continuing to provide confusing, non specific tax and economic proposals are not going to help Barack reach his goal.

May 13, 2008

One less difference between the two halves of the P-I-G

by @ 17:43. Filed under Global "Warming", Politics - National.

That would be the bipartisan Party-In-Government for those new to this place. I just got an e-mail from Team McCain touting the green section of the John McCain store.

If I didn’t have a Drinking Right to go to, I’d explore why the cap-and-trade scheme is just as odious as the ‘Rat command-and-conquer scheme. That’ll have to wait until tomorrow.

Definition of insanity – Germantown edition

Albert Einstein’s definition of insanity – “doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”

Germantown school board – Let’s try that $16.5 Taj Mahal elementary school referendum that failed by 10 points again with absolutely, positively no changes again in November

What the blooming bloom is going on in Bloomer?

by @ 14:45. Filed under Compassionate Lieberals, Education, Military.

(H/T – a semi-retired Cheddarsphere denzien)

I guess we can add Bloomer High School principal Brent Ashland, Bloomer School District Superintendent Doug Martin, and the majority of the Bloomer School Board, headed by president Joe Zeman to those whose patriotism we no longer need to question because they have none. Why? Allow me to recap the Chippewa Herald story I linked to:

– Bloomer High School senior Daniel Lingen finished his studies early so he could complete Marine Corps boot camp before the graduation ceremony on May 31.
– He requested permission from principal Brent Ashland to wear his soon-to-be-earned Marine dress blue uniform instead of the traditional cap-and-gown at said ceremony. Ashland, with no written policy to guide him, refused to allow this.
– His father, Charles Lingen, took his son’s case to the school board, after getting conflicting excuses for the refusal.
– On Monday, after what school board president Joe Zeman called weeks of discussion both among school board members and between school board members and the public, and after a snap decision to put this on the agenda the prior Friday and thus barely meet the requirements under the Open Meetings statutes, the school board adopted a cap-and-gown only policy written by superintendent Doug Martin. Of note, an attempt to carve out an exception for military dress uniforms died for a lack of a second to the motion offered by Ralph Bruxvoort.

The Chippewa Herald was thoughful enough to include a statement from the Bloomer School District. As you read it, note that there was no official uniform for graduation until after Daniel Lingen made his request and after the Bloomer School District spoke to their military representative:

The School District of Bloomer released the following statement Tuesday morning on the board’s decision:

It is the position of the School District of Bloomer that high school graduation, although it may hold different personal meaning for each individual, is a ceremony to recognize and honor students for their academic achievement in earning a Bloomer High School diploma.

Based on this, the Board of Education has determined that the appropriate attire for the Bloomer High School graduation ceremony will be the traditional cap and gown as selected by the Class of 2008.

In weighing this decision, the School Board and administration received input from individuals and groups on both sides of the issue, within and outside the community, including a representative of the U.S. Military. The military representative we talked with informed us that he understood our position because the military is all about uniformity; and if the uniform of a high school graduate is the cap and gown, all graduates should wear the cap and gown.

Unfortunately, there are some that will claim that by requiring graduates to wear the cap and gown, rather than their respective military uniform, that the district is somehow unpatriotic or unsupportive of those that serve our country. Drawing this conclusion is not an accurate assessment of the genuine appreciation felt by the individuals that comprise the School Board and administrative team.

The School Board and administration of the School District of Bloomer hold in highest regard the men and women who join and serve in our country’s military. We both respect and admire the sacrifices these individuals make to defend our national and individual freedom.

We are extremely grateful to our graduating students who choose to take this honorable path and, in recognition of that, there is time set aside during the Bloomer High School graduation program to acknowledge their commitment.

By adopting this official position only after it became an issue, and by at the least misleading that military representative what the official position of the school district was, I would say that deeming the school district is unpatriotic and unsupportive of the military is an accurate assessment.

$69 million in spending cuts? Bravo Sierra

by @ 8:20. Filed under Politics - Wisconsin.

So, the bipartisan Party-In-Government is about to “fix” a $652.3 million deficit in the current budget with, at least in part, what is claimed to be $69 million in reduced spending. Let’s take a look at what the state spent out of the general fund last fiscal year (numbers courtesy the Department of Administration) and what they’re going to spend out of it this fiscal year and next fiscal year, both with the present budget and with the semi-negotiated “fix” (numbers courtesy the Legislative Fiscal Bureau, with a $125 million upward adjustment to the “fix” for school payments pushed into the next budget, a net $121 million upward adjustment related to the tobacco re-refinancing, and a $69 million downward adjustment for the unspecified cuts the LFB considers “revenue”):

General spending in FY2007 doubled – $26.662 billion
General spending in FY2008-FY2009 current budget (as of now) – $27.952 billion
Net increase of spending in the current budget over FY2007 doubled – $1.290 billion (or if you prefer an averaged annual increase, $645 million per year)
General spending in FY2008-FY2009 “fix” (includes a net $177 million in upward adjustments outlined above) – $27.969 billion
Net increase of spending in the “fix” over FY2007 doubled – $1.307 billion (or if you prefer the averaged annual increase, $653.5 million per year)
Net increase in spending in the “fix” over the current budget – $17 million

That’s right, sports fans. The bipartisan Party-In-Government is planning on using a self-created budget crisis to increase spending even more. It’s time to send this barrel of pork back to the drawing board.

The Morning Scramble – 5/13/2008

by @ 8:00. Filed under The Morning Scramble.

Today’s song is dedicated to Dave Jones

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeZxRYXZ154[/youtube]

  • Owen and Dad29 do a tag team on the budget repair bloat bill. Stevens Point ought to be real interesting.
  • Ace spotted another way Barack Obama and John Kerry are alike; flips blamed on the staff.
  • Rich Horton outlines the “20 percent solution” for Obama, and while it isn’t pretty for West Virginia, he’ll be closer than Conventional Wisdom thinks in Kentucky.
  • Even if you noticed a certain trend in the chart in Rich’s post after Wisconsin, do read this one. Jim Geraghty provides another metric in Obama’s underperformance among whites. Hmm, I wonder what happened after Wisconsin that would have driven the white ‘Rats away from Obama. Bueller? Wright?
  • Gopfolk has today’s dose of Operation Chaos funnies.
  • Jon Ham proves once again that the ‘Rats are all about 110% compliance. Since when is the home of Robert “Sheets” Byrd “conservative”?
  • I could go many places for the Huck Is #2 story, but Slublog sold me with the obligatory SluShop.
  • Charles Johnson delivers another black mark against Condi As #2; the State Department-sponsored Jihad Exchange Program.
  • Mary asks, “Who’s paying Bob Barr to run as a Libertarian?” Good question.
  • Trail-Mix has my Need for Speed bumper sticker. Thankfully, I know of at least 2 ways to most places, including St. Louis.
  • Back to Obama for a moment; Bruce has a bumper sticker for those who question Obama.
  • John Adams cheers the support for anonymous speech from the Whitewater City Council.
  • The IBD editorial board bemoans the attempt by Michael Bloomberg’s New York City to strike the Second Amendment and the associated section New York State Constitution from the trial record. The takeaway line – “Without the Constitution, a trial is rigged, a defendant is left defenseless. Law becomes judicial and legislative whim, a farce, a tyrant’s command, not a timeless and unwavering standard.”
  • David St. Lawrence offers a few pointers to businesses on when to implement new technology (and a warning to stay away from the “phone tree from Hell”.
  • Keith got a ride in the Liberty Belle. Lucky dawg.
  • Wyatt Earp says that a Three Stooges eye poke works against sharks. Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk.
  • Shoebox explores why we can’t be like France when it comes to oil consumption.

Just in case you Cheddarheads weren’t paying attention, the May Drinking Right is tonight at 7 at the usual spot (Papa’s Social Club). Be there, or be somewhere not as fun.

If Europe Can Do It Why Can’t We?

by @ 5:00. Filed under Miscellaneous.

As oil and in turn gas, prices continue to increase and no action or plans in sight that suggest any near term reduction, I’m seeing articles and comments along the lines of, “It’s not uncommon in Europe to pay $7 for a gallon of gas.   If they can stomach it, so can we.”

An example of this logic is in this opinion piece  by Paul Krugman.   Krugman takes what is otherwise a thoughtful argument i.e. all the talk about speculation driving an “oil bubble” may not be based on  well reasoned economics but rather on wishful thinking, and destroyed his credibility with:

The consequences of that (oil) scarcity probably won’t be apocalyptic: France consumes only half as much oil per capita as America, yet the last time I looked, Paris wasn’t a howling wasteland. But the odds are that we’re looking at a future in which energy conservation becomes increasingly important, in which many people may even "” gasp "” take public transit to work.

Why is this kind of logic silly? How about a quick geography lesson.

France has an area of approximately 250,000 square miles, about the size of Texas which is approximately 269,000 square miles. France has a population of 64M people which means they have a density of approximately 256 people/Sq. Mi. Texas has a population of 24M people which means they have a density of approximately 164 people/Sq. Mi. Beginning to see an issue? Let’s extrapolate that to the entire United States. To be generous, I’ll exclude Alaska and Hawaii. The continental US has an area of 3.2 Million Sq. Mi. The continental US population is approximately 302 million people. That translates to a density of only 94 people/sq. mi. I won’t even drag you through the densities that exist west of the Mississippi and east of the Pacific coastal states. To suggest that a European country that is a fraction of the size of the US with a population density nearly 3X the US is comparable in energy use is naive at best and dishonest at worst.

OK, let’s try a different tact. Let’s assume we could get rid of all those nasty, hydrocarbon burning, carbon dioxide spewing personal vehicles. If tomorrow we banned the use of all personal vehicles we would at most, reduce our oil per capita consumption by 40% (it would be less than 40% because of course, we’d have to provide transit solutions for those people and many of those solutions involve petroleum as the fuel). Even with a 40% reduction, we’d still be using 10% more per capita than France.

My point in all of this is that trying to compare the US to a European country, especially one that is a fraction of the size of the US with a population density nearly 3X the US, as comparable in energy use is naive at best and dishonest at worst.

The only way that we are close to being comparable to Europe is in the taxes and other costs waiting to be imposed to “solve” our energy “problem” by forcibly removing our need for oil. Oh, and another way that we’ll be like Europe, we’ll be heading for our own “Dark Ages.”

Yet another new player in the VP sweeps – Condoleezza Rice

by @ 0:12. Filed under Politics - National.

(H/T – Allahpundit/Hot Air Headlines)

At least that’s what the Palestinians think according to WorldNetDaily. Let’s take a quick, way-too-late-at-night (or is it morning already?) look at the tale of the tape:

Positives:

  • She covers both ends of a potential diversity pander.
  • Does have some Reagan credentials.

Negatives:

  • Utterly unimpressive as Secretary of State.
  • Very tied to the Bush administration, as she was the National Security Advisor during his first term.
  • What little I remember of her non-foreign-policy stands isn’t exactly comforting for conservatives.

May 12, 2008

Drinking Right – tomorrow night

by @ 20:36. Filed under Miscellaneous.

I’m not feeling particularily-witty, so it’s just a general announcement. The May edition of Drinking Right will be tomorrow, May 13, at 7 pm at Papa’s Social Club, 7718 W. Burleigh St. in Milwaukee.

I don’t feel like drinking alone.

The Morning Scramble – 5/12/2008

by @ 8:00. Filed under The Morning Scramble.

I doubt that welfare radio station in central Illinois will be having a blues fest this time around…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVF-0JKLnd4[/youtube]

  • Tom McMahon misses nougat. I also remember when Milky Way was a hefty candy bar.
  • Lawhawk says a couple of Al Qaeda types, including one returning from Iraq to Afghanistan, encountered Excedrin Heartache #223.
  • Kate delivers today’s history lesson on pork barrel politics.
  • Dusty drools over the (hopefully) coming supersonic business jet. I know a couple people who would like to get their hands on it (perhaps the next AB1 or BP1?)
  • Uncle Jimbo video break part 1 – cool cars (and a Pacer) on State St.
  • Gaius says, “Beware counterfeit Cisco routers.”
  • Owen doesn’t like the coming budget “repair” bill. If there’s a deal this week, it ought to make for some real interesting times in Stevens Point at the end of the week.
  • Trail-Mix toon break part 1 – Operation Chaos Edition
  • Mark Block asks the Department of Revenue, “What’s next?” After all, the appetite of the bipartisan Party-In-Government is insatiable. I wonder what the FairTaxers think about that.
  • Ed Driscoll found yet another example of the lack of math skills in the press corps.
  • Random10 exposes the world view of the worst SecState evah, and Barack Obama supporter, Zbigniew Brzezinski.
  • Jon Ham notes the violence veto is becoming commonplace. I’ll wager that most of those exercising this subscribe to the Brzezinski world view.
  • Jim Hoft notes something that, had it happened anywhere other than the home of the Religion of Pieces, would have got a lot of attention from the usual suspects. Maybe if they could find a way to have blamed Booooosh instead of the ROP,….
  • Flip has the official flag lapel of the BHO States 57 campaign. For those who believe in numerology, I wonder if Obama remembers what happened to the last candidate associated with the number 57.
  • Charles Johnson busts Obama and the Official Newspaper of the BHO States 57 campaign, the New York Times after they tried to rewrite history. I still don’t believe in numerology, but ask CBS, Dan Rather and John F. Kerry about tampering with the record with the Lizards patrolling right field.
  • Speaking of Rather, Ace notes with a SluShop that he claims to have been rejected by Fox.
  • Heather Radish breaks the Gorebal Warming code.
  • Headless Blogger lays the smackdown on biodiesel (aka The Next Corn-A-Hole).
  • Uncle Jimbo video break #2 – Duck surfing on Mendota. Unless you’re Steve Jobs, I apologize for UJ’s gratuitous use of colorful language directed at Apple and its murder of iMovie 08 in the first 39 seconds. Any Mac-o-philes know of a better A/V editing package for UJ and his HD camera?
  • William Teach marvels at the Leftists’ rank duplicity on use of military force.
  • Trail-Mix toon break part 2 – Burma and corn-a-hole edition.
  • Warner Todd Huston goes into the memory hole that Newsweek opened up on vote scaring. Something about stones and glass houses comes to mind.
  • Bonus Flip; he asks whether we want a third W term or a second Peanut Farmer term.
  • James Wigderson delivers education to a heap of pols.

A Growing Image Problem

by @ 5:00. Filed under Corn-a-hole.

It would certainly be easy to write a post with this title about Barack Obama and his Wright problem.   However, that’s not what I have in mind today.   The image problem today belongs to ethanol and its “Wright problem,” rising food prices.

I noted here  a Rasmussen Reports poll that showed 54% of those polled believed that the “push for alternative energy sources,” (read that: Ethanol) is impacting food prices. It appears that in spite of the impacts of public education the populace is beginning to figure out that 2+2 does in fact equal 4 and there is a growing unease with burning our food for fuel.

“Oh but that’s a national poll and barely over 50%,” you say. “It’s just some nasty group paying a polling company to get the desired results,” you say.

Wrong you are, “Increasing Cost of Tortillas Boy.”

In a story yesterday, the Star and Sickle picks up the story of increasing debate over ethanol and does something I rarely see them do on a topic that is loaded with Eco-sensitivities…they actually reported information!

Amongst other issues the author addresses:

  • The difference in energy efficiency between ethanol and oil based “gas.”
  • That many people wouldn’t buy ethanol if it wasn’t subsidized and priced $.50 a gallon below gas.
  • That the growth of ethanol is largely driven by subsidies from both Federal and State levels and not by any market demand.

OK, they did counter the above by finding a corn grower who claimed that corn’s doubling in price was not driven by an imbalance of supply and demand but rather due to increased fuel costs.   Really?   Corn is up 100% and fuel is up around 50% so this guy has figured out how a one  percent increase in fuel translates into a two percent increase in corn?   OK, it’s still the Star and Sickle.  

Minnesota is the fifth largest agricultural producing state.   It is the fourth largest corn producing state and the fourth largest ethanol producing state.   Suffice to say that corn is an important part of Minnesota’s economy and more than just farmers have ties to the success of corn in the state.

Attached to the online version of the Star and Sickle article was a poll.   The question was “Do you think ethanol is responsible for higher food prices?”   You could respond:

  • No
  • Maybe a little
  • Yes, very
  • It’s too soon to tell

Granted it’s an Internet poll but as of 9 PM last evening, 79% of the respondents said that ethanol had some effect on higher food prices.   63% said ethanol had a very large impact on rising food prices.

If you can get that kind of response in an eco-sensitive, corn economy state like Minnesota, it’s clear that ethanol has a serious and growing  image problem.  

 

May 11, 2008

Hooray Patti, America’s Favorite Mom

by @ 20:39. Filed under Miscellaneous.

I missed “America’s Favorite Mom”, but Kat didn’t, and she delivers the good news, and the better news. The $250,000 that Patti Bader-Patton won for being America’s Favorite Mom is going to Soldiers’ Angels.

Happy Birthday!

by @ 16:30. Filed under Miscellaneous.

Sorry I’m late on this…..

What do the following have in common?

  • The Pillsbury Doughboy
  • Bob Dylan
  • Spam
  • Paul Bunyan and Babe the Blue Ox
  • Whoopee John Wilfahrt
  • Judy Garland
  • The Jolly Green Giant
  • Betty Crocker
  • James Arness
  • The Hamm’s Bear
  • Terry Gilliam
  • Post-it Notes
  • Kensington Runestone
  • The Andrews Sisters
  • The Replacements
  • Joe and Ethan Coen
  • Jessica Lange
  • Jimmy Jam and Terry Lewis
  • Mary Richards
  • Prince
  • The Mississippi River

Answer:   They all began or are from the state celebrating its 150th birthday today, Minnesota!

 

Slight change in the Teatotaler lineup

by @ 13:12. Filed under Sports, The Blog.

Now playing the part of The Wisconsin Sports Bar, Fire Ned Yost Now. Good call on the name change, Chris. Hopefully Melvin will figure out who to replace Yost with before we get too far into the Yost hole.

Call me a late-adopter

by @ 8:25. Filed under The Blog.

Just in case you didn’t notice that little item on the right sidebar, I’m probably one of the last bloggers on the planet to jump into the Twitter pool. Don’t expect a lot of stuff there, but why not give it a shot (I would’ve added “and a beer”, but it’s too early).

Eggs on the road – week of 5/11

by @ 7:47. Filed under Miscellaneous.

I’m going on vacation at the end of the month, but first I’ve got some wanderlust to take care of :-)

– Tuesday, 5/13: Drinking Right, Papa’s Social Club, 7718 W Burleigh in Milwaukee, 7 pm
– Thursday, 5/15: Day trip to St. Louis for a ballgame at New Busch Stadium and dinner at Favazza’s (see, I’m combining my trips)
– Friday, 5/16 – Saturday, 5/17 (tentative) – Wisconsin GOP convention in Stevens Point for a liveblog

Oh, that question on the sidebar is for the national GOP convention. Stevens Point is close enough for me to drive back home Friday night.

May 10, 2008

Why it’s all or nothing for Clinton

by @ 13:32. Filed under Politics - National.

I previously noted that in the modern era of Presidential politics, the Republicans have always gone for the person deemed to be “next in line”. One of the criteria used to determine the person who is next in line is the person who finished 2nd in the previous contested primary season.

There is no similar “next in line” in the Democratic Party. Indeed, 5 of the last 6 Democratic candidates, prior to their first nomination, had never sought the office of President, with the sixth (Al Gore) attempting to get a promotion from Vice President. Yes, Walter Mondale also had served as Vice President, but 1984 was his first and last attempt to become President.

The last person who won the nomination after failing to secure it in a previous attempt and without taking up residence at the Naval Observatory was George McGovern. He finished 3rd in 1968, and used the reforms he came up with to take away the nomination process from the party bosses to become the nominee in 1972. Before that, one has to go back to 1924 and John W. Davis and his nomination on the 103rd ballot after failing to get the nod in 1920. Needless to say, neither recycled candidate won the White House.

Revisions/extensions (1:58 pm 5/10/2008) – The news just gets worse for Clinton if she fails this time around. The Democrats have gone for a previous failure (either in the nomination process or in the general election) five times in the previous century (William Jennings Bryan for a third nomination in 1908, Davis in 1924, Adlai Stevenson for a second nomination in 1956, McGovern in 1972 and Gore in 2000), and lost all five times. Past performance is an indicator of future performance.

R&E part 2 (2:10 pm 5/10/2008) – I forgot to mention Lyndon Baines Johnson and his last-second attempt to get the nomination in 1960. In any case, he did serve as VP and President prior to 1964.

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]