No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

Archive for posts by Shoebox.

April 16, 2008

I’m back

by @ 9:31. Filed under Politics - National.

I feel a little bit like I’m running in a remake of “Airplane”…boy,  I picked  the wrong  week to quit blogging….so much fun that I missed!

Just for a couple:

China called Nancy Pelosi the “least popular person in China,” for her comments about China’s handling of their Tibet “crisis.”   This maybe the only issue I’ve ever agreed with Nancy on but even so, it can’t be good for your ego to be the least popular person in at least 2 of the world’s major countries!

Barack Obama’s now well publicized comments talking about how non coast line people handle the stress of economic uncertainty "it’s not surprising they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them . . . as a way to explain their frustrations".  

Giving Barack, or his wife for that matter, opportunities to ad lib are the best way to ensure that he does not win the election in November.   Contrary to what he has in his carefully prepared and scripted speeches, when ad libbing, Barack shows his contempt for anyone who has any tie to traditional values.   His ad lib script continues to show his  conviction that if you believe in anything other than the government solving all your problems, you are just another flat earther.

April 8, 2008

People get paid?????

by @ 7:02. Filed under Miscellaneous.

Blogging is stressful and can lead to death, at least so says this article.

I can’t say that I’m ready to die, 2 young sons etc. etc. but I’ve been at this blogging thing now for over two months, phew!

So, Shoebox, what are you going to do to keep your cardiologist at bay?

I’m going to DisneyWorld!

I’ll be out for the next week or so, don’t cry for me Argentina!

I now return you to your regularly scheduled host extraordinaire, Mr. Egg!

Obama and Patriotism

by @ 7:00. Filed under Miscellaneous.

Obama seeks to affirm his patriotism

That’s the headline from this article  by the AP, that talks about how Barack has been inserting more patriotic statements in his recent speeches.

The article quotes the following as his “patriotic” statements:

I love this country not because it’s perfect but because we’ve always been able to move it closer to perfection,” he told an audience in North Dakota.

And in Montana: “It’s a country where … I’ve seen ordinary Americans find justice, where I’ve seen progress made for working families who need leaders who are willing to stand up and fight for them. That is the country I love.”

But are these really patriotic statements?

I’ll concede that these statements are factually accurate, but they don’t seem patriotic to me. They strike me as more of the “yeah but” kinds of statements that Barack uses when he tries to deal with an issue without making himself look like the leftist he is.

“…move it closer to perfection,” I wonder where on the perfection scale Barack thinks we are? By his statement I assume he thinks we’re at least at 1 but not at 100, but where between 1 and 100 are we? Factually, I would agree with Barack that we are not at 100 for the simple reason that much of the country still views abortion as a valid birth control method, but I digress….See, if Barack wanted this to be a patriotic statement he would have said something like,

“I love this country because it’s the best system in the world. While we may not be perfect, we have a process that allows us to make constant, peaceful strides to that end.”

You may say I’m playing with semantics and that’s true. However, wasn’t it Barack who kept talking about the importance of “just words?” Words and how you choose to use them say alot about the intent of the speaker.   Making a beginning declarative statement rather than starting by trying to establish equivalency, would have made this patriotic, putting it together as he did makes it “yeah but.”

“I’ve seen ordinary Americans find justice,”   Is Barack suggesting that it is unusual for “ordinary” Americans to find justice?   Is he suggesting that only the wealthy or well connected can be assured of justice in our country?   Again, start with a declarative statement,

“I love this country because we have the best justice system in the world, a system where regardless of your economic or social standing, you can expect justice to serve you.   And in those few instances where the system doesn’t work as it should, I’m proud that there are leaders who will step up and fight to correct injustice.”

Once last comment on “just words” and the Obama supporters who will tell me that I’m twisting his language.   These comments came not from off-the-cuff remarks.   These comments came from prepared speeches.   Off-the-cuff remarks like “I don’t want them to be punished by a baby,” show me the individual’s true heart on a topic as they haven’t had time to think through the words and craft them.   Statements may be mad in  factual error but when it comes to judgements,  they speak with their most prevalent thought on the topic.   However,  with  prepared remarks, words that are considered and crafted in a particular order, well, you don’t get the chance to say “but he really meant XXXXXX.”   See, if he had really meant “XXXXXX,” he would have  crafted “XXXXXX.”   Barack purposely chose not to use declarative, patriotic statements simply because he will not declare his patriotism.   How tough is it?  

Barack tried to distance himself from Jeremiah Wright’s hateful speech by saying he didn’t agree with it and then quickly added a “yeah but” by telling us that Wright had come out of a generation where this speech was acceptable and we needed to appreciate that.   Now Barack’s trying to tell us he’s patriotic, and it seems to me that he’s also trying to tell us that people are “patriotic” even if they don’t believe the US is the best country in the world.  

April 7, 2008

Because I said so…

by @ 7:00. Filed under Politics - National.

From the Politico.Com  

Barack Obama did not hunt or fish as a child. He lives in a big city. And as an Illinois state legislator and a U.S. senator, he consistently backed gun control legislation.
But he is nevertheless making a play for pro-gun voters in rural Pennsylvania.

By highlighting his background in constitutional law and downplaying his voting record, Obama is engaging in a quiet but targeted drive to win over an important constituency that on the surface might seem hostile to his views.

The need to craft a strategy aimed at pro-gun voters underscores the potency of the issue in Pennsylvania, which claims one of the nation’s highest per capita membership rates in the National Rifle Association.

I find it interesting that rather than address his position on the ability to own and use handguns, Barack Obama is busy telling people that he has a background in constitutional law.   This sounds  a lot like an answer I  used to  give my young boys when they’d debate me on why they should do certain things.   If it was a subject that I didn’t think they were old enough to debate, they would occasionally get a; “Because I said.”   While this is an adequate answer for 5 year olds, I don’t see how that  kind of response gets Barack  in good with pro-gun folks.    Beyond that,  I have other questions:

  1. Is a lawyer having a “background” in constitutional law all that unique?   Gosh, I kind of thought that a lawyer  having a “background” in constitutional law is like a doctor having a background in medicine.   Yes I know he taught some constitutional law courses but there is a vast difference between teaching a class and actually practicing it.   This follows along the well know and factual sports analogy of those who can’t play coach, those who can’t coach ref.   Barack is somewhere between a ref and a coach when he is implying to the pro-gun audience that he is an actual  player.
  2. OK, I know why the slobbering media hasn’t, but why hasn’t  an attender of one of these  pro-gun rallies  asked Barack straight up, what his position on hand guns is?   There’s plenty of evidence that gives every indication that Barack doesn’t believe that the Second Amendment allows citizens to own handguns for self defense.   Instead of allowing him to “position himself” let’s ask him and deal with his answer…assuming he’ll actually give an answer that has substance.
  3. Having a “background” in constitutional law, does Barack believe the whole constitution should be enforced or does he take the Animal Farm approach to the constitution where all amendments are equal but some amendments are more equal than others?

With District of Columbia versus Heller  likely to have a decision by June, Barack may be able soft shoe himself through the primaries but it won’t be so easy in the general election.   Heller, and the fact that its decision will be the first rendered on gun control by the US Supreme Court in nearly 70 years, will give a focal point for gun rights issues.   Assuming, as many who  ARE constitutional lawyers  have, that the Supreme Court finds the law, that in essence causes the complete abolition of handguns, not to align with the Constitution, Obama needs to be asked whether and why he agrees or disagrees with the Court’s decision.   Drawing on his extensive constitutional law background it should be easy for Barack Obama to explain why the Supreme Court is wrong.  

Obama may  be able  to pass off his “centrist” persona in the primaries but states like Pennsylvania are going to play much differently in the general election.

April 5, 2008

The Clinton’s Lament

by @ 7:00. Filed under Politics - National.

The primaries have gone horribly wrong for the “Candidate of Inevitability.”   When she sees how Mugabe is being supported by his party, do you think she cries alone, at her Chappaqua home, “Why  don’t they love MEEEEEEEE?”

Mugabe Will Fight On, His Party Says

Didymus Mutasa, the governing party’s secretary for administration, told journalists after an all-day party meeting that there was a consensus that Mr. Mugabe should stand in a second round of voting.

"Mugabe, our dear old man, remains our candidate," Mr. Mutasa was quoted as saying in The Herald. "We shall take him and carry him along with us."

Or do you think her thoughts are, “if someone who can actually arrest and torture their opponents can’t fix an election, what chance does mere lying and personal assassination stand?”

April 4, 2008

A bit more respect for Bernanke

by @ 7:05. Filed under Miscellaneous.

I have to admit, I was no fan of Bernanke. He appeared to have an ability, in his Congressional testimonies, to say things that caused unnecessary market gyrations. He  looked to be very late to the game in reacting to the subprime turmoil. He  seemed to me to be one of those guys who was probably very book smart but just didn’t have the business common sense to be a successful leader of the Fed.

I may have been wrong.

I’ve written about Bernanke and the Bear Stearns take out. While I’m still holding onto some healthy skepticism, each day that passes  in which  we don’t see another financial shoe drop, causes me to believe that that single transaction was a master stroke and saved the US a really awful experience of financial meltdown. there’s been a lot of consternation and wailing over this transaction, complaining that the Fed didn’t have the authority to do what they did because Bear Sterns wasn’t a bank. Again, I’ve written on that, and while I agree with the concern of the issue, I believed at the time, and Bernanke has stated in his recent testimony to Congress, that he felt it necessary to act on Bear Sterns to save the broader financial system.
(more…)

Are you happy to see me or is that a guitar in your pants?

by @ 7:00. Filed under Miscellaneous.

LEWISTON, Maine (AP) – Police are searching for a man accused of shoving an electric guitar in his and walking out of a store in Lewiston, Maine. Police say the theft occurred last week and they’re looking for three men. One of the men shoved a Fender Stratocaster in his pants and pulled a sweatshirt over the top. The other two acted as lookouts.All three can be seen on footage from video surveillance.Strangely enough, the music store has seen the method before. A man did the same thing in 2006 but was caught as he tried to walk out.

I would love to see the video. Either the description of “in his pants” is overly generous or this guy has some really odd pants.

I wonder if they would pay mileage?

by @ 7:00. Filed under Miscellaneous.

The son of a retired widower has placed an advertisement looking for someone to have a few drinks with his father at a local pub for seven pounds (nine euros, 14 dollars) an hour.Jack Hammond, 88, and his son, Michael, will begin interviewing candidates for the position soon, after Michael posted the advertisement at their local post office in Hampshire, southern EnglandThe elder Hammond used to go to his local pub four times a week in Barton-on-Sea, Hampshire, with his neighbour, but had to stop the practice recently when he moved into a nursing home closer to the rest of his family.

“When you put an advertisement in a post office for 25p you don’t expect anything to come of it, so the response has been amazing,” Michael, a chef, said.

They have ruled out hiring a woman, as Michael Hammond said his father, a retired electrical engineer, would be uncomfortable having a drink with a woman he did not know, and are hoping to find “a gentleman who is not too bombastic and enjoys a nice pint” with an interest in engineering or golf.

“Dad will be going out with some of the candidates next week but we are going to do it properly, as he is vulnerable,” Michael added.

“It’s got to be the best job in the world.”

April 3, 2008

Columbia’s President criticizes Obama

by @ 8:00. Filed under Politics - National.

I thought Barack was going to improve the  reputation of the US throughout the world?  

BOGOTA, Colombia (AP) – Colombia’s president sharply criticized U.S. presidential contender Barack Obama on Wednesday for opposing a trade deal with his country, calling the Democrat out of touch with the realities of the South American nation.

It’s good to know that it’s not just North American countries Obama is out of touch with!

I’m not a CPA but I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night

by @ 7:00. Filed under Business.

Actually, I am/was a CPA but that’s a separate story.

“Mark to market” is a term that few if any, outside of the financial or accounting industries had heard prior to mid last year.   Now, most people have heard the term and know that it is somehow related to the problem of the subprime market.

In short, “mark to market” means that financial institutions need to recognize the market value of their investments as they change rather than waiting until they dispose of the asset and recognizing a gain or loss.   The purpose for “mark to market” is to reflect the estimated “value” change of the asset real time rather than having shareholders or mutual fund holders get surprised (up or down)  in one fell swoop.

Numerous articles have been written suggesting that mark to market while not causing, greatly exaggerated the subprime issues.   The argument, one that I support, is that when the ability to sell what used to be “marketable securities” i.e. the bundled subprime mortgages, dried up and the only way to sell one of these was through   a forced or coerced sale, the value of these bonds was set artificially and unrealistically low.   The result was that financial institutions holding these bonds were required to write their values down to a “market value” which was substantially less than what the reasonably expected value of the loans were.  
(more…)

April 2, 2008

Congress is playing “Chinese Baseball”

by @ 11:17. Filed under Business.

I worked in the wireless provider industry for a number of years.   When I started it was a very new business with few rules and very little history to draw on.   At that time, fast, significant change was either something that energized and motivated you or you didn’t last long in the business.   I don’t remember where the phrase came from but we often referred to our environment as “playing Chinese baseball.”

I’m not sure why it was ever referred to as “Chinese” except that the concept was similar to a “Chinese Fire-drill.”   In the latter, upon stopping at a stop light or sign, everyone in the car would get out, run around the car and try to get back in before the light would turn green or a car would honk from the other side of the intersection.   In “Chinese baseball” it was played like a regular baseball game except that every time someone would hit the ball, the people playing the base positions would pick up their base and run around the field with it trying not to let the runner get to the base.   The concept for our business was that like Chinese baseball, you would play  the game  by the general rules of the game you were playing.   However, some of the basic rules would change frequently enough that you felt like the game was always stacked against you or that it was impossible to know at any given time, what the rules really were i.e. bases moving each time the ball was hit.

Yesterday, Congress had oil executives sitting in front of them to explain why gas had become so expensive and why the companies were making such large profits.   I won’t even get into the stupidity of their questioning except to point you to this article  which makes a great argument that Congress, through it’s inability to control the budget and thereby depressing the dollar, is actually responsible for a significant part of the increase in oil costs.   Oh, and Congress is also the ones that won’t allow drilling in the US…but of course, it’s the evil oil companies that are controlling the prices! (more…)

More things that make me go “Huh?”

by @ 7:00. Filed under Business.

Citi seeks finance-savvy directors – The Wall Street Journal

01 Apr 2008
Citigroup, as it unveiled the final in a flurry of internal organizational changes, appears to be getting started on a restructuring of its board.

The banking giant said in a statement on its website that its board “is actively seeking new directors” and is placing a “particular emphasis on expertise in finance and investments.”

Wow! Now there’s a novel concept! How about getting Directors on your board that have some expertise in the business they’re supposed to help guide!

There was a time when the smartest of the smart got wall street jobs. Apparently, that isn’t so true anymore.

April 1, 2008

Punished by a baby

by @ 11:30. Filed under Miscellaneous.

At a townhall meeting in Johnstown, PA yesterday, Barck Obama made the following statement:    

“When it comes specifically to HIV/AIDS, the most important prevention is education, which should include — which should include abstinence education and teaching the children — teaching children, you know, that sex is not something casual. But it should also include — it should also include other, you know, information about contraception because, look, I’ve got two daughters. 9 years old and 6 years old. I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby. I don’t want them punished with an STD at the age of 16. You know, so it doesn’t make sense to not give them information.”

There are sooooooooo many things I want to YELL at Barack right now.   Here are a few:

Barack, you talk about teaching values and morals, that’s great.   However, your teaching needs some updating because you have left out the end part where if you live short of values and morals, there are CONSEQUENCES!   Let me enlighten you on the difference between”Punishment” and “Consequence.”   “Punishment” is something that is done to you, “Consequence” is the result of something that you have done.   I understand how you easily confuse these concepts as you believe that you are being “punished” for standing by Jeremiah Wright when in fact you are suffering the “consequences” of your action of continuing to support his black liberation theology.
(more…)

President Bush Resigns!

by @ 7:00. Filed under Miscellaneous.

Following the less than respectful response he received at the National’s home opener:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHUAsTrl4JI[/youtube]
President Bush announced his resignation with the following statement: (more…)

March 31, 2008

A Constitutional Firewall?

by @ 7:00. Filed under Law and order.

Included in Article VI of the constitution is this direction regarding the enforcement power of treaties:

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Up through the early 1900’s, this phrase was interpreted to mean that treaties would outline relationships between the US and another country but that the language of the treaty could not override the US or state constitutions.   That interpretation changed in 1920 when a US Supreme Court case, Missouri V. Holland  concluded that a treaty could override a State’s authority and in fact, become the “Supreme law of the land,” coequal with the constitution and supplanting state law.

One would think that well negotiated treaties, agreed to by the President and 2/3rds of the Senate would not be much of a concern.   One would think wrong. (more…)

March 29, 2008

A way to reduce the deficit with NO pain!

by @ 17:15. Filed under Miscellaneous.

But it will require some intelligence!

Saw this article today talking about an agency that was hired to provide assistance payments to Katrina victims.  

Now, other than a smarmy “You’re doing a great job Brownie!”, I won’t take the easy path and denigrate the stupidity of yet another bureaucracy.   Nor will I call into question their intelligence when they managed to pay the maximum payout of $150,000 to people who didn’t qualify at all for the program.   I also won’t cast aspersions on their integrity just because the only way this “leaked” out was that they had to put out a contract to hire a collection firm to help them get the money returned.

I will give them the benefit of the doubt because they had a

“sense of urgency in paying Road Home applicants, and ICF knew applicants might eventually have to return some money.”

Here however is the money line of the article:  

Brann pointed out that 5,000 collections cases would represent a 4-percent error rate for the Road Home that is “quite good for large federal programs.”

Let’s see, the current Federal budget is $3.1 trillion dollars.   If 4% of that is just “error”, we have $124 Billion we should be able to take out of the budget just by hiring a few people that are smarter than your average fifth grader!   Of course Brann thinks 4% is “quite good”, probably representing an “A” or “A-” in government speak.   If that’s so, the average error rate is probably more like 6% – 7% or around $200 Billion dollars.

The current budget deficit is estimated to be around $400 Billion. I think we’ve just found a way to cut that in half!

March 28, 2008

A moment of Silence

by @ 20:13. Filed under Miscellaneous.

A moment of silence please for Mr. Egg and the team who shall not be named.

Bucky Badger RIP

What does “Subprime” really mean?

by @ 7:00. Filed under Miscellaneous.

Since last fall we’ve heard a lot about “subprime” mortgages.   We’ve seen their troubles impact the housing, stock, and financial markets as well as cause consumers to feel less like spending.   We’ve heard about them and seen their impact but other than some passing references, I haven’t seen specifics about what these loans look like.

I found this article  today that gives some really frightening insight to what a typical subprime loan and  borrower  looks like.  

Warning:   what I am about to share is not for the financially faint of heart!
(more…)

March 27, 2008

I’ll bet it would have worked if he had tried to pay his sewer bill!

by @ 17:36. Filed under Miscellaneous.
Man Writes Check on 2-Ply Toilet Paper

BINGHAMTON, N.Y. (AP) – An upstate New York man embroiled in a dispute over his water bill is not being allowed to pay off his debt with a check written on toilet paper. Ron Borgna tried to settle his $2,509.66 bill with a check written on floral print, two-ply toilet paper Wednesday.The disagreement began in September 2006 when Borgna received a $422.90 water bill. Borgna claims he was overbilled. With additional charges, penalties and late fees that bill has grown.Binghamton city officials refused to accept the check. After a short argument, Borgna was escorted out of the building.

Borgna says he is appealing the judgment against him in small claims court.

The speech Obama should have given

by @ 8:02. Filed under Miscellaneous.

This is a MUST read!

 I can add no more to this other than to say, Amen!

"You have all heard the racist and anti-American outbursts of my pastor Rev. Wright. They are all inexcusable. His speeches have forced me to reexamine my long association with Trinity United Church of Christ. And so it is with regret that I must now leave that church.

Read it all Here!

Things that make me go, Huh?

by @ 7:00. Filed under Miscellaneous.

SurveyUSA  released a poll last week that surveyed nationally, the public’s sense of the current economic situation.

Amongst the survey findings:

Only 9% believe the current economy is strong.

70% believe there could be a run on the banks (the survey was taken 2 days after the Bear Stearns arrangement)

While 46% have worries about losing their home and 81% have some worry about the ability to pay their bills,  56% believe the Federal government should not get involved in bailing out home mortgages.

They took a favorable/unfavorable poll on Alan Greenspan and Ben Brenanke.   Greenspan had a favorable/unfavorable of 26%/15%, Brenanke 7%/14% (I wish they would have asked if people even knew who they are/were.)

But here’s the one that made me go Huh?
(more…)

March 26, 2008

Dissembling that would put a tear in Hillary’s eye!

by @ 20:25. Filed under Politics - National.

On last night’s “Hardball,”Chris Matthews took up the case of Hillary’s changing, fantastical recollections of her trip to Bosnia.   Sitting in to fend for Hillary was Pennsylvania Representative Joe Sestak.   Sestak dissembled responses in a way that made “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is,” look  accurate and revealing.

In the matter of Hillary’s faulty recollection of her Bosnia trip, the ending exchange was:

MATTHEWS:   Are you defending lying?   Is that what you"˜re defending, or what are defending?   Tell me what you consider fair ball in the game, if you will, of getting elected president.   How big a fish can you claim to have caught, if you caught none?   That"˜s all I"˜m asking.

SESTAK:   Well, Chris, you know, I went to the Naval Academy.   There was an honor code there, but very few people read that honor code.   That honor code says, Hey, you won"˜t lie, steal or cheat.   But it also says if you see someone who does, you don"˜t, then report them.   You have a choice.   You report them or you counsel them because we recognize that we"˜re humans.   Whether it"˜s Teddy Roosevelt, Franklin Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy or Hillary Clinton or Senator Obama, we all have our faults.   The question is this.   Who"˜s ready on day one because of what she learned in Bosnia…

(more…)

March 25, 2008

“Sacrifice” says Obama – Do as I say, not as I don’t!

by @ 17:32. Filed under Miscellaneous.

Toledo Blade:

"The question is at what point are we willing to get together and understand that doing many of these things are hard, that it’s going to require sacrifice from those of us who are lucky in this society to pay a little more in taxes, or to, if we’re going to drive a Suburban, then you know there may be a disincentive to doing it, and that’s where leadership comes in,"   Barack Obama February, 2008

Barack Obama wants us to sacrifice. His vision will “require” sacrifice. How long do you suppose Barck has had this vision for sacrifice?

Bloomberg reports information from Obama’s 2000 to 2006 tax returns.

March 25 (Bloomberg) — Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama and his wife Michelle gave $10,772 of the $1.2 million they earned from 2000 through 2004 to charities, or less than 1 percent, according to tax returns for those years released today by his campaign.

The Obamas increased the amount they gave to charity when their income rose in 2005 and 2006 after the Illinois senator published a bestselling book. The $137,622 they gave over those two years amounted to more than 5 percent of their $2.6 million income.

Let me see if I have this right……Obama, the man who calls us to “sacrifice,” and his wife, earned an average of $240,000 each year for the first 5 year period. During that same period, according to their spokesman: …”giving $10,000 to charity was as generous as they could be at the time.”

Let’s break this down:

$240,000/year earned, 2,154/year donated
$20,000/month earned, $180/month donated
$657/day earned, $6/day donated.

Do you think you could manage donating more than the value of 2 cups of Starbucks each day if you made $240,000 each year?

Don’t give me garbage saying either, “he’s up to 5% now,” or, “the national average is only 2.2%.”

Crap!

Obama is willing to be charitable with my income and expect my family’s “sacrifice” but not his own!  

Another situation where Obama’s words are “just words” as his own actions don’t bear out his own expectation!

Now that’s Audacity of Hope!

Oops!

by @ 15:51. Filed under Miscellaneous.

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. military mistakenly shipped four fuses for nuclear missiles to Taiwan in 2006 and never caught the error, the Pentagon said on Tuesday, acknowledging an incident likely to rile China.The military was supposed to ship helicopter batteries to Taiwan, but instead sent fuses used as part of the trigger mechanism on Minuteman missiles. Taiwan returned the parts to U.S. custody last week.

I’ve got so many questions on this…

Do you think Taiwan had to call ahead to get a return authorization request for the fuses?

2 years. Do they still get a refund? Did they still have the receipt?

Based on the information now known, the four fuses, which do not resemble helicopter batteries,

Really? They don’t look alike? Who’d a thunk?

How long did they tried to install the the part labeled “battery” before they realized it didn’t look like the one they took out?

I’ve gotten plenty of stuff made in Taiwan that had instructions that, well…. let’s just say I can see how they could have confused a fuse for a battery.

Do you think the US military stores nuclear missile fuses in the same warehouse as helicopter batteries? I suppose it’s that whole hazardous waste thing.

The fuses, which send an electronic signal to the device that starts the nuclear weapon’s trigger process, are among a class of sensitive equipment that must be accounted for on a quarterly basis.

Walmart has figured out how to do their inventory accounting more frequently than once a quarter. Can someone send the area code for Bentonville, Arkansas to the Pentagon?

When Taiwan realized it had received the incorrect shipment, it notified the U.S. military. …But U.S. military officials did not understand the nature of the problem until last week.

What part of “Wrong part” do you think they were having trouble understanding?

Henry said there was no indication Taiwan tampered with the fuses before returning them.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight!   Has anyone checked Ebay to see if the schematics are available yet?

March 24, 2008

Words matter, but actions matter more

by @ 7:00. Filed under Miscellaneous.

“Don’t tell me words don’t matter. ‘I have a dream’ — just words. ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal’ — just words. ‘We have nothing to fear but fear itself’ – just words. Just speeches.”

…Barack Obama

In a well publicized speech, Barack Obama tries to dodge the accusation that he is an empty suit with flowery language and nothing else.   He tries to equate his words to those of words that have formed the history of the United States.  

While Obama makes a valid point showing that well crafted words can encourage, challenge and motivate us, he misses a more important point that if all we had were these words, without the action that followed them, none of these words would be remembered.

And so it is now with Obama.   For the past ten days he has been using words to attempt to explain his affiliation with Jeremiah Wright and to distance himself from Wright’s hateful language.

Words like:  

"I reject them completely "” they are not ones that reflect my values or my ideals or Michelle’s."

or

"If I thought that was the repeated tenor of the church then I wouldn’t feel comfortable, but frankly that has not been my experience at Trinity United Church of Christ.”

Now it is found that Jeremiah Wright used his column in the chuch newsletter to reprint a Hamas hate manifesto, Obama uses these words:

“I have already condemned my former pastor’s views on Israel in the strongest possible terms, and I certainly wasn’t in church when that outrageously wrong Los Angeles Times piece was re-printed in the bulletin,”

Hey Barack, there is a point where words without actions mean nothing.   You have reached that point.   No one should believe another word about your alledged disgust with the positions of Jeremiah Wright until you not only talk about it, but denouce your affiliation with the church that has been the host of his hate messages for these past 20 years.  

If you don’t follow your words with actions, we can only assume that in fact, they are JUST WORDS!  

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]