No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

Archive for posts by Shoebox.

August 27, 2008

Beware of the PUMAs!

by @ 5:32. Filed under Politics - National.

Be Careful, be careful, be caaaaareful!

Those are the words you hear sung in “The Incredible Mr. Limpet” as Mr. Limpet is looking longingly off the dock at Coney Island wishing to become a fish.   If you haven’t seen the movie, do so.   It’s a Don Knotts classic and he does become a fish.

The same words keep singing in my mind as I hear the gleeful banter from Republicans and Team McCain as they court and prod the PUMAs.

Perhaps the most recognizable PUMA, at least in the upper Midwest, is Debra Bartoshevich.   Debra is from Wisconsin, and is a life long Democrat. She was elected to be a delegate to the Democrat Convention. She expected to be there to support Hillary. Once she found that Barack Obama would be the presumptuous nominee and she would not be able to support Hillary, Debra changed her allegiance and became a McCain supporter. Debra is the lady who made this ad for Team McCain:

Here is Debra explaining why she decided to support McCain.   It’s a long video but you need to watch it to understand my concern:

Debra explains her switch by saying that she believed Hillary to be the best leader and agreed with her positions. However, when the choice became Barack, she didn’t think he had answers for the problems. I remember watching numerous Democrat debates tossing live blogging quips back and forth with Mr. Eggs, trying to figure out what the policy differences were between Hillary and Barack. The only one we could see was that one wanted an absolute mandate for all people to be in their health program and the other was going to “Make you an offer you couldn’t refuse!” Somehow, Debra has gone down the policy checklist that she had for Hillary and is not able to see that Barack had almost exactly the same. Somehow, she now sees John McCain’s checklist as matching hers. Debra strikes me as a nice lady but there seems to be some logical dishonesty in her thinking. Which brings me to my other observation and my real concern.

As I watched the nearly 9 minute clip of Debra’s interview, it was clear that she was very passionate about politics. I don’t mean this deragatorially but she was emotional about her experience with the Wisconsin Democrat party and her subsequent choice to support McCain; and that’s the problem with the PUMAs.

If the PUMAs are intellectually honest they will say that Obama’s policies are the same as Hillary’s. But they’re not intellectually honest. You heard Debra say that she thought McCain’s military record was impressive. Did I miss Hillary’s impressive military record?

The fact is, the PUMAs are making their decision emotionally. That emotion is going to peak this week as Barack Obama moves from the presumptuous nominee to the presumptuous Presidential candidate. From Friday morning until election day, unless, and it could happen, Barack or his team dis Hillary along the way, the emotion of the PUMAs will ebb. How much, I don’t know.

Let me say that I view beating Barack Obama as an imperative. The damage done to this country if he served for only four years could haunt us for generations. To that end, I welcome and embrace every PUMA or anyone else that will vote for McCain. My concern is that I see some Republicans getting giddy over the thought of corralling the PUMAs.

If Team McCain builds an election strategy that depends on the PUMAs, including moving to the center on issues or choosing a pro-choice candidate, he runs the risk of losing an election that I believe is now his to lose.

The PUMAs are at their peak now. It’s possible that they stay mad right through the election. My bet though is that on election day, the PUMAs will be as reliable in voting for McCain as the under  25 crowd will be voting for Barack.

Huh?

by @ 5:07. Filed under Presstitute Follies.

Take a look at this live TV entertainment:

What is going on with Joe? Is he:

A. Just going for ratings?
B. Looking for a new employer?
C. Thinking he can push and push because once he’s gone, MSNBC has no plausible deniability of being the Obama Network?
D. Thinking it’s time for a new Congressional run?

August 26, 2008

Well, At Least She’s Consistent!

by @ 11:18. Filed under Politics - National.

In her Monday night address, Michelle Obama told the audience that she loves America.   In the twelve hours since, the MSM has been carrying the issue as if it was some kind of great revelation.   They point to this comment as if it should silence concerns about her patriotism.

From a recap by Brent Baker:

NBC’s Chuck Todd decided "this is definitely a response in some ways to that whole kerfuffle that she created for herself, six or eight months ago, about being proud to be an American."

CBS’ George Stephanopoulos gets the “suck up of the night” award with his take on Michelle:

"Tonight, there was no doubt. The money line in this speech was that line when she said, ‘that is why I love this country,’ and she lingered."

My question is: Why is any of this remarkable? Wouldn’t we expect the possible First Lady to “Love America?” After all, didn’t Michelle mark for us the exact time she began loving America when in a speech in February she said:

For the first time in my adult life, I am really proud of my country, because it feels like hope is making a comeback.

Wouldn’t it be expected that she still loves America?   Why would the media be making a big deal of her love for America?

The reason Michelle Obama’s line of “I love this country” is newsworthy  is not because it settles any concerns about her patriotism.   The reason it is  newsworthy is that she is the only Obama we’ve seen that has managed to maintain consistency on  a core  issue in the past six months.

Talking to Four Year Olds

by @ 5:19. Filed under Talking to Four Year Olds.

Steve has started (restarted) his Ask Egg series which provides insightful advice to the lost souls of politics.   Similar to Steve, I will start a column today and it will be focused on teaching simple truths to Liberals.   Liberals have a penchant for taking obvious truths and making them complex by adding multiple levels of relativism and obfuscation to the discussion. Part of my purpose is to help these lost souls regain control of simple, concise thinking. Today I start recurring column titled “Talking to Four Year Olds.”

First the Democrats had the presumptuous presidential candidate.   Now, they appear to have the presumptuous Pope in waiting.

In an interview this weekend on “Meet the Press,” Nancy determined she had an appropriate pay grade to determine when life began. This account from William Donohue:

"I would say that as an ardent, practicing Catholic, this is an issue that I have studied for a long time. And what I know is, over the centuries, the doctors of the Church have not been able to make that definition." Responding, moderator Tom Brokaw told her that the Catholic Church "feels very strongly" that life begins at conception. Pelosi said, "I understand. And this is like maybe 50 years or something like that. So again, over the history of the Church, this is an issue of controversy."

I’ll let Mr. Donohue give the slap down response:

"Here is what the Catechism of the Catholic Church says: "˜Human life must be respected and protected absolutely from the moment of conception.’ It also says, "˜Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable.’ Looks like Pelosi didn’t study the subject long enough. But not to worry: We are sending her a copy of Catholicism for Dummies today (the Catechism is like maybe a bit advanced).

My first attempt at educating a four year old:

I understand. And this is like maybe 50 years or something like that. So again, over the history of the Church, this is an issue of controversy.

A simple; “You’re wrong!” should suffice but ,I’ll give a bit more evidence. Donohue provides the Catechism answer. It’s source, if you claim Christianity, is authoritative, The Bible.

From Isaiah 49:

1 Listen to me, all you in distant lands!
Pay attention, you who are far away!
The Lord called me before my birth;
from within the womb he called me by name.

and

5 And now the Lord speaks"”
the one who formed me in my mother’s womb to be his servant,
who commissioned me to bring Israel back to him.
The Lord has honored me,
and my God has given me strength.

(Emphasis mine)
Isaiah made a claim of God personally knowing him while he was in the womb! He didn’t say “you named me at my birth,” or “You developed me from birth to manhood.” He specifically referred to activity while in the womb and he referred to “me” and not ” a pile of plasma.” And, just for the record, most of the Bible was written a bit more than 50 years ago.

OK, if Bible talk is a bit too advanced for your four year old try this one:

The basic argument of the “pro choice” crowds is that abortion is a women’s choice and it’s OK because it’s not a life. Let’s deconstruct that a bit:

Let’s stipulate that if you can survive outside of the womb, you are a life. I think we can also stipulate that you are a life even if you have to use extraordinary means. Even four year olds believe that people who have horrible diseases should get the benefit of extraordinary means to extend their lives.

When I was born if you weren’t nearly a full term baby, your chances of survival were very low. In fact (not that you’d know it now) but I was a full term baby and the story goes that my Great Grandmother told my Grandmother, out of earshot of my mom, that I was too small and wouldn’t survive. To the disappointment of many, I fooled her! Today, babies at 24 weeks are considered viable and the shortest gestation which the baby survived was about 21 weeks.

So what’s changed in the past (mumble, mutter, harumph, harumph) half a century? Well obviously, the medical community has gotten a lot smarter and technology has gotten much better. What’s not changed? Conception still occurs the same way (sperm fertilizes egg) even though we’ve found ways to help that and babies still develop in the same way and the same rate that they always have. In other words, what God designed hasn’t changed a bit but what Man understands about it continues to evolve.

Which brings me to a simple question:

If the only thing that is changing is our understanding and ability to define “viable,” doesn’t that mean that the fetus is viable and therefore a life from the day of conception and the only thing that prevents it is that we aren’t smart enough to successfully intervene…..YET?

Who’s The More Evolved?

by @ 5:05. Filed under Politics - National.

Who Knew?

From Reuters:

Monkeys experience joy of giving, too, study finds

Tests in capuchin monkeys showed the animals consistently chose to share food with another monkey if given the option, suggesting they are capable of empathy, the team at the Yerkes Research Center at Emory University in Atlanta found.

“They seem to care for the welfare of those they know,” Frans de Waal, director of the Living Links Center at Yerkes, said in a statement.

Capuchin monkeys are capable of sharing and are deemed to get joy from the experience.

Apparently capuchin monkeys have higher evolved concerns for their family than the presumptuous presidential candidate has for his half brother.

August 25, 2008

If You Can’t Beat ’em, Join ’em

by @ 5:38. Filed under Politics - National.

After campaigning for over eighteen months as the candidate of “Hope and Change,” Barack Obama succumbed to the sucking, black hole of Washington politics and officially became the candidate of “Same ol’, same ol'” on Saturday.   Rather than picking a VP nominee who would re-energize his claim for change in Washington, Obama chose a man who in all liklihood, will shortly have only six other Congressional members  with longer tenure and be second only to Daniel Inouye in terms of Senatorial tenure.

How the heck did  Obama end up here?   How and when did “Hope and Change” get tossed under the Obamination bus?

There were inklings  that Obama’s slogan of “Hope and Change” was never a vision but just, well, a campaign slogan.   Inklings but not absolute confirmations.   Inklings like:

  • His South Chicago political heritage where he had significant involvement with ACORN, was vetted by the likes of William Ayers and defeated political opponents who mysteriously had sealed divorce documents opened by courts with coincidental timing that doesn’t pass the smell test of Barry’s repeated “I didn’t know!”
  • His 20+ year association with Jeremiah Wright.   An association which Obama says was created from a mutual love of Christ.   However, the more we know of Wright and his teachings, an association that seems to have been more about attaining a gravitas designed to support his political aspirations.
  • Even though it was people like  Oprah  and  Nancy Pelosi who have anointed Obama with deity like status, Barack himself seemed overly comfortable in this suit provided to him.   In particular was his speech in St. Paul where in referring to the day of his election he said:
  • …This was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal. This was the moment when we ended a war, and secured our nation, and restored our image as the last, best hope on Earth.

While we had inklings, a large group, probably a majority of Americans, were still entranced by the message of “Hope and Change.” They really wanted to believe that Barack was something different than the remainder of Washington, whose public approval ratings, regardless of position, had dropped to levels rarely ever seen. This desire for something different is what Obama harnessed and rode for seventeen months. He rode it up until three recent events.

The first event started a little over a month ago. It was Obama’s “World Tour”. The tour was taken to give Barack a chance to say he’d been to Iraq and that things were still all screwed up.   He also needed to spend time with heads of states in countries he previously couldn’t find on a map. In short, the “World Tour” was set up to directly address perceived shortcomings in Obama’s military/Iraq knowledge and foreign affairs.

Yeah, that was the plan. It’s got to suck when well laid plans don’t turn out like you want them to. Even Time Magazine recognized that, rather than reinforcing his ability to handle foreign and military affairs,  Barack’s “World Tour” left many Americans with the impression that he was ignoring domestic issues.   The “World Tour”  left people with the impression that in fact, “The One” had become presumptuous. The net result of the “World Tour” is that Barack Obama lost several points in the national polls.   A secondary but I believe more impacting  cause of the loss of “Hope,”  is that the resulting drop by Obama in national polls started questioning, particularly in the MSM, about why Barack wasn’t smoking McCain in the polls.

The second event leading to the loss of “Hope,” was the Russian invasion of Georgia.   The Russian invasion was a test of Obama’s ability to answer the 3 A.M. call.   While McCain immediately recognized and called the parties what they were, i.e. Russia = aggressor, Georgia = ally, Obama tried several times to nuance his position.   To people who were watching, it appeared that Obama needed a program to be able to tell the good guys from the bad guys.

The resulting failing grade of Obama’s 3 A.M. test reinforced concerns that he lacked foreign affairs experience.   I believe it was this experience that forced Barack Obama to abandon his personal “Hope and Change” and caused him to choose Joe Biden for his VP.

The final event in the series was the Saddleback Civil Forum.   While getting specific questions, Obama’s responses were attempts at nuance and avoided specificity.   The most talked about example was when asked whether he believed that life began at conception, he responded by saying it was “above his paygrade” to make that determination.  

Saddleback was the first time that Americans got a chance to see Obama and McCain in a (nearly) head to head debate.   No one, not even Obama apologists could say that Obama had the better evening.   The feedback from Saddleback was that when compared head to head, people believed McCain had answers.   They did not believe that Mr. “Dance and Nuance” actually had answers that let them continue to “Hope for Change.”  

I believe Team Obama came to a painful realization following Saddleback.   Team Obama recognized that nuance was not going to let them win the  three actual head to head debates coming against McCain and in turn the election.   Team Obama realized after Saddleback that to win the election, the path forward would require one of two choices; either get specific with answers or attack McCain fiercely to move the discussion off of Obama’s policy   and put McCain on the defensive.   They would need someone on the ticket who could  hit McCain and let Obama “stay above the fray.”

Enter Joe Biden.

As I said earlier, I believe Biden became the front runner in Obama’s mind following the response he received from Russian/Georgia incident.   However, I also believe that each of the three incidents lead to confirm in Obama’s mind the need to abandon “Hope” and return to South Side Chicago politics.   “Hope and Change” was a great way to get win an affirmative action  cause disguised as a popularity contest (Democrat primaries), but not all American voters were only using their emotions.   As Barack is finding out some of America’s voters, even some registered Democrats, use their brains in voting for a President and those folks want answers.

So Barack  got Joe who:

  • Is amongst the longest serving of any Congress member
  • Has staff and family members who are or are tied to Washington lobbyists
  • Voted against the first Gulf War and for the Iraq invasion
  • Voted to give babies born after botched abortions, protection
  • Has no experience acheiving success outside of politics.

and with that choice became the candidate of “Same ol’, Same ol’.”

You see in the end, the only “Hope and Change”  that Obama was or is, about is the “Hope” that he becomes President and the “Change” he wants to impose on you.   In the end, Obama has the same self focused, it’s all about me perspective that is more the rule than the exception in elected leadership.

Hey, you Obamamanicas, don’t worry, Barack will still talk about “Hope and Change.”   He’ll need to pass out additional hits to get you through the dimming of his election hopes.

A Resounding THUD!

by @ 5:33. Filed under Politics - National.

That’s the sound that has echoed back from the choice of Joe Biden as Barack Obama’s VP pick.

According to a new poll done by CNN, the first poll done completely since Biden’s announcement, Obama and McCain are now in a dead heat.   The poll shows an erasure of a seven point lead from just one month ago.

To be fair, the THUD isn’t really due to Biden. If anything, other polls  have shown Biden to be a net zero on Obama.

No, the THUD is wholly owned by “The One!”

The THUD is owned by the person who surely thought he needed no one but himself to attain the Presidency.

The THUD is owned by the candidate who’s poll numbers are dropping faster than NBC’s ratings following the Olympics

August 24, 2008

Joe Biden Selects McCain’s VP

Over the past two weeks, speculation has been growing that Mitt Romney will be McCain’s VP.      In fact, several sources have flat out stated, that Mitt Romney will be McCain’s VP.   Even Intrade has shown a near doubling of the price for “Mitt for VP” as an indication that the market is quickly coalescing on this pick:

alt=”Price for 2008 Republican VP Nominee (others upon request)(expired at convention) at intrade.com”
title=”Price for 2008 Republican VP Nominee (others upon request)(expired at convention) at intrade.com” border=”0″>

But will Romney be McCain’s VP?   Let’s look at the events of this weekend to get a hint:

Other than what was spun by the Obama campaign, there were two story lines that followed the Biden announcement:

  • Biden was picked to shore up Obama’s inexperience in foreign affairs
  • Biden’s pick again showed  Obama’s  lack of core by picking a Washington insider after campaigning on Hope and Change

Neither of the main story lines were helpful to the Obama campaign.   Additionally, within a few hours of the announcement, the McCain campaign had ads running using Biden’s own words to reinforce the image of Obama being inexperienced and not ready to be “The One!”

The first rule of picking a VP is “Do no harm.”   It could be argued that Biden will help Obama get more of the Democrats to vote for him (latest polls show 20+% not currently doing so) but his dissonance with Obama’s message and his own harsh words about Obama’s readiness will make it difficult for Independents to see the Obama/Biden ticket as anything other than what George Will called a “Kangaroo ticket” where the hind legs are much stronger than the front.   People don’t vote for VP candidates who are presidential they only vote for Presidential candidates who are presidential!

If McCain picks Romney, the story lines following the announcement of  his choice will be:

  • Romney was picked to shore up McCain’s inexperience in Economic matters
  • Romney was the pick because McCain had to satisfy his conservative base

Within hours of the pick, the Obama campaign will have ads out using Romney’s own words whacking McCain and they’ll point out how his “conservative credentials” are recently acquired and can’t be trusted.

With what McCain saw in the last 24 hours, why would he set himself up for a replay of this weekend only  with different faces pasted on the animated bodies?

He won’t.

The selection of Joe Biden to be the Democrat VP and the experience of the past 48 hours following have determined who McCain will select for his VP.   John McCain will pick Tim Pawlenty as his VP.

As an experienced and arguably successful Governor from a blue state, Pawlenty passes the “do no harm” test.   While there will certainly be discussion about Pawlenty’s policy positions, there will not be any tape of him bad mouthing McCain nor will he be perceived to be upstaging McCain or filling a gap in McCain’s experience.   On the plus side, while Pawlenty is every bit as affable as Biden is reported to be, he is not enamoured with the sound of his own voice.  

The McCain campaign has had a good month.   With the Democrat convention this week, the momentum should naturally move Obama’s direction.   The timing of McCain’s VP announcement followed by the Republican convention should minimize both the height and duration of any Obama convention bounce.   Picking Romney would allow Obama a chance to expand his convention bounce and that’s not a mistake that the McCain team will make.

August 21, 2008

Punished by a Baby (part two)

by @ 5:55. Filed under Miscellaneous.

On March 30, 2008, at a townhall meeting in Johnstown, PA, Barck Obama made the following statement:

“When it comes specifically to HIV/AIDS, the most important prevention is education, which should include — which should include abstinence education and teaching the children — teaching children, you know, that sex is not something casual. But it should also include — it should also include other, you know, information about contraception because, look, I’ve got two daughters. 9 years old and 6 years old. I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby. I don’t want them punished with an STD at the age of 16. You know, so it doesn’t make sense to not give them information.”

At the time I wrote about the callousness Barack Obama had towards a life and how there was a difference between “punishment” and “consequences” of our actions and decisions.

Since the Saddleback Civil Forum, Barack Obama has had to reexplain his position on abortion, especially late term abortion. Since Saturday, I’ve counted at least 3 different explanations for Barack’s inability to support a bill in the Illinois legislature that would require doctors to provide medical care for babies who survived abortions. At different times I have heard:

  • The bill didn’t have the federal language that preempted this from impacting existing abortion law (it did)
  • His committee didn’t have time to act on it (they did and passed it out of his committee unanimously)
  • It was unnecessary as IL law already covered the issue (so why did other legislators pass it overwhelmingly?)

The Obama campaign has continued to try to obfuscate the issue, dancing from one excuse to the other.   All along Obama has claimed “as he has repeatedly said” that the claim that he supports infanticide is a lie and ridiculous to even consider.

Um, yeah.

I can’t vouch for this audio clip but it has been placed on Redstate and if it passes their muster, it works here.   Here is Barack Obama on the Illinois floor explaining why he is against the bill:

In the audio Obama claims that having two doctors help the baby after a botched abortion would be a “BURDEN!”

When Obama made his March comment about “punishment” his sycophants (of which a couple chimed in on my post) tried to argue that he wasn’t talking about the baby as punishment but the subsequent effort to raise and provide for it. Nice Try!

Anyone, subsequent to the corroboration of this audio, who wants to argue that Barack Obama does not advocate the most self centered, arrogant positions on the issue of infant life may as well be arguing that the Bigfoot recently “discovered” wasn’t really a rubber gorilla suit but a uniquely mummified specimen.

If this audio is corroborated, Obama is toast. In fact, if this audio is corroborated, keep a close eye on the Democrats convention. With my apologies to Mad Max:

Two Dems enter, One Dem leaves. Two Dems enter, One Dem leaves.

Be careful as to who you assume will be the one leaving!

H/T Erick

You’ve Got to Handle all 10 Hurdles!

by @ 5:52. Filed under Politics - National.

We Shoe’s have become Olympic junkies!   Mrs. Shoe and I like to see the skill required for each event, even the more arcane like trampoline or ping pong.   Thing 1 and Thing 2 have been taking in every minute they are allowed to watch.   This is really the first Olympics they’ve paid attention to.   They  are mesmerized by the sports that they’ve never seen before.

Monday night’s broadcast had an event that we, and many of you, will remember for a long time to come.   Lolo Jones ran in one of the 100 meter hurdle heats.   She was a heavy favorite, expected to take gold in the Event.   While slow out of the block, Jones quickly caught and passed the other competitors.   She was about to blow the field away when at the second to last hurdle, her foot hit the hurdle, she lost stride and finished seventh, out of the finals.

After the event, NBC stuck a camera in  Lolo Jones’  face and asked “How do you feel?”  

Jones was obviously numb from the event.    With her mind reeling, Jones managed a response that applies not only to an Olympic hurdler but to many, many situations in life:

“It’s the hurdles. If you can’t get over all 10, you can’t be the champion.”

Wednesday, Zogby released a poll showing John McCain with a 5 point lead amongst likely voters. The poll shows Barack Obama losing significant ground in all of his core groups; Democrats, under the age of 35, women and voters with incomes under $50K.

After taking body blows for the past two weeks over his response to the Russian invasion of Georgia and his performance at the Saddleback Civil Forum, Barack Obama seeked  maintain the Marquess of Queensberry rules and reassure his acolytes while warning McCain and said that McCain:

doesn’t know what he’s up against!

A month ago Barack Obama was ahead by 7 points and in Germany finishing his “World Tour.” He was the toast of Europe. Today, Barack Obama may need to look over his shoulder just to ensure he gets out of the Democrat convention with the nomination.

Rather than touring Europe as if he was already the President of the United States, Barack Obama could have benefited from Lolo Jones’ wisdom. From here on out Barack should remember:

“It’s the hurdles. If you can’t get over all 10, you can’t be the champion.”

Simple Does Not Equal Simpleton

by @ 5:17. Filed under Energy.

Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the Democrats have been telling us for weeks now that they don’t want to increase drilling because it won’t help reduce oil prices even if they did.   Amongst their favorite talking points is a US EIA report that stated that drilling in ANWR and generating 1,000,000 barrels of oil each day, would only reduce the price of a barrel of oil by $1.44.

At heart, I’m a very simple person.   While I will dig into the complex if necessary, I prefer to use the simpler answers to a problem.   I’ve had enough On the Job Training (OJT) for various life issues, that I think I can safely say that the answers to many issues lie right in front of my face if only I stop to look.   I think the same holds for oil pricing.

I won’t go into debunking how the Dems have used the EIA report, plenty of other folks have done so expertly so there’s no need to retread that ground.   Besides that, rebutting the EIA report requires a complex answer.   No, I found an explanation of oil pricing that is much simpler.

This morning, oil prices were headed north again anticipating that US inventories were going to increase about 1.7 million barrels.   Prices had moved from  just under  $115/barrel to over $116/barrel in anticipation of this report.   As has been happening a lot lately, the “Experts” were wrong in their estimates and inventories increased by 9.4 million barrels, a 7.7 million barrel difference.   Following the report, oil not only dropped below it’s opening price, it zipped right past it dropping $3 from its high.

The US uses about 20 million barrels of oil each day according to the EIA.   The “excess” inventory of 7.7 million barrels announced this morning, amounts to about 1/3 of a days need or .1% of the annual needs of the US.   If an increase in inventory of .1% of the annual US usage causes oil prices to drop by over $3 per barrel, does it make sense to you that producing the equivalent of 5% of the US needs (50 times more than the “excess” inventory)….OVER A LONG TIME, would only decrease the per barrel price by $1.44?

Nope, it doesn’t to me either.

August 20, 2008

Barack, Don’t Look Now but…..

by @ 5:09. Filed under Politics - National.

You’re on your way to losing in Minnesota.

A recent SurveyUSA poll shows Barack Obama with a 2% edge over John McCain amongst likely voters in Minnesota.   And that’s the good news for Obama, in the most recent poll.

The bad news, at least for Barack, is that the poll shows that nearly all Republicans and Democrats have made up their minds.  

The stat that should leave Obama concerned is that in early June, Independents broke for Obama 50% to 36%.   In the latest poll McCain has the lead amongst Independents 44% to 42%.   Obama is not just losing the vote of Independents, the Independent vote is running away from him.

The results and direction of movement isn’t particularly surprising to anyone outside of the MSM who wants to pay attention. I wrote waaaaaaay back here that Democrats in Minnesota had overreached and were causing a backlash within the state. What I didn’t guess at that time was that DC Democrats were also going to overreach and give the Republican candidate a “Motherhood and Apple Pie” issue like gas prices.

John McCain is slated to announce his VP pic on August 29th. Intrade  and other rumblings are calling for McCain to pick either Romney or Tim Pawlenty as his running mate. Pawlenty has obvious advantages for carrying McCain over the top in Minnesota. Less known is that Minnesota was one of the few states that Romney won in the primaries and we are a caucus state. None of Barack Obama’s rumored choices are likely to have any impact on his support in Minnesota.

With Independents breaking for McCain, a VP choice that will likely get him some added support and the Democrat party refusing to address any additional oil drilling, look for McCain to make Minnesota a swing state for the 2008 election.

Say it Ain’t So!!!!!

by @ 5:07. Filed under Miscellaneous, Politics - National.

This is news?

Bigfoot was just a rubber gorilla suit

Really? Who’d a thunk? I suppose the next headline will be:

Obama was just a Soros puppet

August 19, 2008

It’s All Fun and Games Until Someone Dies!

by @ 5:46. Filed under Energy.

Barack Obama and his ilk think the way to solve our energy problems are to increase the pressure in our tires and  demand higher fuel efficiency in cars.   Included in this strategy conserving our way to energy independence would be using vehicles that are smaller, lighter, maybe single passenger…..like a motorcycle.

Monday’s Star and Tribune  puts a bit of a wrinkle into Obama’s energy plan.   Just a few weeks back  the greenies were trumpeting that car deaths were down as a result of higher gas prices. Now we’re hearing that motorcycle deaths are up in Minnesota because….more people are riding them because of high gas prices!

Sales are GRRRRRRREAT!

“Ours [sales] will double from last year,” said Hedstrom, owner of Scooterville Minnesota, a small-bike dealership at Cedar Avenue and Interstate 94 in Minneapolis.

But the consequences aren’t

Motorcycle fatalities hit a low of 2,116 nationwide in 1997. Since, they have risen 128 percent. Their share of crash fatalities has jumped to almost 13 percent from 5 percent.

Admittedly, the information is only through 2007 and while gas prices did spike over $3 a couple of times last year, it didn’t take it’s permanent place until the spring. Additionally, the article is focused on us “lost youth” guys for the increase of motorcycles.

That all said, if “conserving our way to energy independence” is the strategy, you can bet there will  be more and more motorcyles being ridden by young and old alike. With deaths per 100 accidents nearly 8X that for motorcycles over all other vehicles, well, that’s a trend that’s going in the wrong direction.

How long before we’ll hear cries for increased crash survivability standards for motorcycles?

August 18, 2008

And the Winner Is?

by @ 5:13. Filed under Politics - National.

During the Saddleback Civil Forum on Saturday night, each candidate was asked

WHO ARE THE THREE WISEST PEOPLE YOU KNOW IN YOUR LIFE AND WHO ARE YOU GOING TO RELY ON HEAVILY IN YOUR ADMINISTRATION?

In characteristic fashion, John McCain gave a specific and to the point answer: General Petraeus, Civil rights leader John Lewis and Meg Whitman the CEO of EBay.

The presumptuous nominee of the Democrats first attempted the “All American” response by saying Angry Michelle and the Grandmother who resides under the Obamessiah’s bus. With the audience sitting on their hands, he tried another well used tactic: attempt an answer without specifics:

THERE ARE PEOPLE LIKE SAM DUNN A DEMOCRAT OR DICK LUKER A REPUBLICAN WHO I LISTENED TO ON POLICY ON DOMESTIC POLICY. I GOT FRIENDS RANGING FROM TED KENNEDY TO TOM COLBERT WHO DON’T NECESSARILY AGREE ON A LOT OF THINGS BUT WHO BOTH, I THINK, HAVE A SINCERE DESIRE TO SEE THIS COUNTRY IMPROVE. WHAT I FOUND IS VERY HELPFUL TO ME IS TO HAVE A TABLE WHERE A LOT OF DIFFERENT POINTS OF VIEW ARE REPRESENTED AND WHERE I CAN SIT AND POKE AND PROD AND ASK THEM QUESTIONS.

One of the last questions asked was:

DOES EVIL EXIST AND IF IT DOES DO WE IGNORE IT, DO WE NEGOTIATE WITH IT, DO WE CONTAIN IT OR DO WE DEFEAT IT?

As he’s wont to do, the presumptuous nominee couldn’t leave with a straight answer. Again he laid out his own country as having no greater moral perspective than the rest of the world:

EVIL DOES EXIST. I MEAN, WE SEE EVIL ALL THE TIME. WE SEE EVIL IN DARFUR. WE SEE EVIL SADLY ON THE STREETS OF OUR CITIES. WE SEE EVIL IN PARENTS WHO HAVE VICIOUSLY ABUSED THEIR CHILDREN AND I THINK IT HAS TO BE CONFRONTED. IT HAS TO BE CONFRONTED SQUARELY AND ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I STRONGLY BELIEVE IS THAT, YOU KNOW, WE ARE NOT GOING TO, AS INDIVIDUALS, BE ABLE TO ERASE EVIL FROM THE WORLD. THAT IS GOD’S TASK. BUT WE CAN BE SOLDERS IN THAT PROCESS AND WE CAN CONFRONT IT WHEN WE SEE IT. NOW, THE ONE THINK THAT I THINK IS VERY IMPORTANT IS FOR US TO HAVE SOME HUMILITY IN HOW WE APPROACH THE ISSUE OF CON FRONTING EVIL, BUT YOU KNOW A LOT OF EVIL HAS BEEN PERPETRATED BASED ON THE CLAIM THAT WE WERE TRYING TO CONFRONT EVIL.

I think I found someone who can help coach Barack on both of his answers next time they come up. I suggest Barack do some “poking and prodding” with Kobe Bryant:


Kobe
by burghnews

How can this answer be so easy for Kobe and so difficult for the Presumptuous Presidential nominee?

August 15, 2008

Suddenly, The World Comes into Focus!

by @ 17:39. Filed under Miscellaneous.

I never really understood how people who were at opposite ends of the beauty scale, could ever find themselves as a “couple.”   With the exception of my marriage to Mrs. Shoe which was of course, due to the fact that she felt an obligation to  man kind and sacrificed herself so that other women could live without fear of me stalking them, I never saw why attractive women would marry schlubs of a husband.  

Now however, through the wonders of modern science, we have the answer.   The results of two new studies:

The Pill may put you off smell of your man and ruin your relationship

with

Beer goggles really do work, new research suggests
 
suddenly provides all the information you need to understand even the most extreme of relationships.

Julia Roberts with Lyle Lovett used to really bother me. I’m looking forward to my first good night’s sleep in about 15 years!

Eggs is Back!

by @ 7:32. Filed under Miscellaneous.

And what was Silent E doing on his last night in charge?

Well, if he says it’s OK, it must be!

by @ 5:35. Filed under Miscellaneous.

You’ve probably heard about the Burger King employee in Xenia, Ohio who took a bath in the restaurant’s washing sink. He filmed the event to be used for a viral video. You may also have heard that he and other employees who watched this event have been fired.

What you may not have heard is that the bather refers to himself as “Mr. Unstable” and he insists that the Burger King where he bathed is a “totally a safe place to eat.”

I believe him!

What I’m trying to figure out is how it could have been a safe place to eat while he was working there?

Never Fear, Tim is Here!

by @ 5:07. Filed under Politics - Minnesota.

Tim Walz is one of Minnesota’s Congresscritters.   Walz, a Democrat represents Minnesota’s first congressional district which is the  South end  of the state abutting Iowa.   Included in the district are  the cities of Rochester, Mankato, Austin (Home of Spam!) and the home of my collegiate Alma Mater, St. Peter.

St. Peter, like many other cities across the country, is having a tough time making ends meet this year.   The biggest  culprit is the dramatic increase in energy costs that have made things like operating fire trucks, much more expensive than a year ago.

Enter Tim Walz.

Congressman Walz knows just how to fix the problem with the increased fuel costs: give the cities more money from the Federal budget!   Walz doesn’t want the cities to have to make difficult choices:

“What we don’t want is, we don’t want our fire fighters making that choice training or fuel. We don’t want to see them out fundraising again just to put fuel in their vehicles.”

Um, Tim? May I call you Timmy?

You’re solution to keep cities from making budget decisions is to just give them more money? Gosh, why didn’t I think of that? Oh Yeah, it’s because that’s a horrible answer!

Timmy, how do you think my family is dealing with the increase in energy costs? Hint: I don’t get paid more just because I have to spend more. Com’ on, I know you can figure this out, you’re a Congressman after all. That’s right, we have to change our budget! We don’t get to spend as much on other things as we used to because we need to spend more on our fuel costs.

I know, you’re going to say that you support increased drilling (I heard you got permission to say that from Nana Pelosi.) You’ll probably even tell me that you have signed on to a “Bipartisan” bill that would do just that. Thanks for playing Timmy, I took that bill apart a couple of days ago here. The only thing that bill would expand would be the noses on the faces of Democrats who try to sell it as a bill that would increase drilling.

Timmy, rather than just printing more money to put a band aid on a problem, how about doing something that would actually bring down fuel costs for everyone? Can you guess what I might be referring to? Yup, sign on to that discharge petition and get a straight up and down vote on expanded drilling!

August 14, 2008

(Allegedly) This Wouldn’t Explain Rielle Hunter’s “Mistake”

by @ 5:33. Filed under Miscellaneous.

The Pill may put you off smell of your man and ruin your relationship

According to this article, women who are on the pill get their olfactory scrambled. The result is that they don’t follow nature’s preprogramming for choosing a mate that is genetically compatible. Instead they pick “Mr. Wrong.”

We’ll have to await the (if ever taken) paternity test. However, it would appear Rielle Hunter can’t even blame her “bad choice” on drugs!

Will Harry Apologize Now?

by @ 5:04. Filed under Miscellaneous.

In 2002, well known leftest whacko, Harry Belafonte, accused Colin Powell  of being a house slave as he pushed the Bush administration’s policies regarding Iraq.   In an interview, Belafonte said:

“There’s an old saying,” Belafonte said in that interview. “In the days of slavery, there were those slaves who lived on the plantation and there were those slaves that lived in the house. You got the privilege of living in the house if you served the master … exactly the way the master intended to have you serve him.”

Belafonte refused to apologize or adjust his position during an interview with Larry King.

Now comes the story that Colin Powell may endorse Barack Obama and explain his endorsement at a speech during the DNC convention:

Sources say former Secretary of State Colin Powell will endorse Barack Obama at the Democratic National Convention, Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol told FOX News exclusively on Wednesday.

"He may well give a speech at the Democratic convention explaining his endorsement of Obama," Kristol, a FOX News contributor, said, citing inside sources.

If you’re African American and don’t toe the leftist line you’re labeled an “Uncle Tom.” Would Belafonte now call Powell “Spartacus?”
What are the odds on a Belafonte apology if Powell does endorse Obama?

August 13, 2008

Barack, You Missed a Spot!

by @ 5:40. Filed under Politics - Minnesota.

To hear it from the MSM, the entire world was enraptured by Barack Obama as he moved about his recent “Tour of Planet Earth.” Even the normally stoic Germans were reported to have 200,000 devotees clamoring to get near enough to touch his robe (messianic reference there.) After this successful tour I remain surprised that the presumptuous Presidential candidate would settle for being mere President of the US of A. I have been fully expecting the presumptuous candidate to announce that based on the world’s need for change, he would bypass being President of the US and move right to being elected President of the World.

However, with all the spit and polish that was used to produce his tour, it appears Obama missed at least one spot.

Andrew Bolt, a conservative columnist for the Australian newspaper Herald Sun had some observations about the way that the Republican’s presumed nominee and the Democrat’s presumptuous nominee responded to Russia’s invasion of Georgia:

Don’t Barack for Georgia
WE have just had a lesson in how the next president of the US would react to a real menace to the world’s peace.
…Here’s McCain: “Tensions and hostilities between Georgians and Ossetians are in no way justification for Russian troops crossing an internationally recognised border.”

Russia had “to immediately and unconditionally withdraw its forces”. NATO should swiftly accept Georgia as a member, which would oblige Europe and the US to come to its aid.

Now here’s Obama’s camp: “It’s both sides’ fault — both have been somewhat provocative with each other.” The United Nations should step in and send a peacekeeping force under “an appropriate UN mandate”.

Not a very flattering take on the presumptuous nominee’s approach to this international crisis.

Apparently unfazed by his messianic aura, Bolt goes on to point out Obama’s gaffe in responding to a “3 AM call” moment

Knock, knock. Excuse me, Mr Obama, sir. But Russia is one of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council and would veto any UN move in Georgia it didn’t like.

Mr. Bolt goes on to sum up what a growing number of people are realizing:

One of these two men will next year take charge of the US – the greatest guarantor of freedom in a world increasingly threatened by freedom’s enemies. Pray the right man wins.

Apparently the whole world hasn’t become enraptured by the Obamessiah. While he may have won over countries that already have the characteristics of what Obama wants America to look like i.e. more socialism, more government, less individual responsibility, he hasn’t pulled the wool over the eyes of countries who still understand that capitalism and individual accountability are still key to a country’s success.

Silence, be Still!

by @ 5:26. Filed under Politics - National.

With my apologies to St. Luke….

The disciples went and woke him up, shouting, "Master, Master, we’re in a pickle!"When Barack woke up, he rebuked the Bear and its raging armies. Suddenly the conflict stopped and all was calm.

Obama 8:24

Honestly, what kind of a sycophant must you be to believe that Obama’s contorted response had anything to do with the events in Georgia? Apparently one who has less experience in his current role than the one who’s butt he’s trying to chap.

August 12, 2008

I am Rubber You are Glue!

by @ 5:01. Filed under Politics - National.

It appears that McCain’s recent ads portraying Obama as “Big hat, no cattle,” have struck a nerve.   Obama responds with this ad:

The response reminds me of the playground taunt used in a name calling contest…”I am rubber, you are glue. Whatever you say bounces of me and sticks to you!” I don’t remember that reply being very effective on the playground. I don’t suspect it will be any more effective in the campaign ad.

A couple of thoughts:

Obama still doesn’t know his left from his right, both politically and visually. Note in the video where it refers to McCain going right and left, the video actually shows him going left when it says right and vice-versa . Don’t Obama’s folks  know that you refer to directions from the perspective of the person you are assigning them to and not the audience?

OK, that was fun and trivial wasn’t it?

Obama refers to McCain getting all kinds of press and being a celebrity in Washington.

Question: Who made  McCain  a celebrity?
Answer: MSM
Question: Why did they make him a celebrity?
Answer: Because it was a poke in the eye to Republicans to make McCain a celebrity every time he showed he was a Maverick!

Kind of ironic that McCain’s celebrity came from actions that aligned him more closely with Obama…don’t ‘cha think?

August 11, 2008

Dr. Suess explains the Obamessiah

by @ 8:12. Filed under Politics - National.

I got back late last night (had to move my brother’s new bride to Omaha), but that’s not your problem, just means I didn’t get a chance to find anything interesting to write.   That’s the bad news.

The good news is that Jim Lynch over at bRight & Early has done a fantastic job channeling Dr. Suess as he explains last week’s response from Obama where he told a seven year old that he wanted to run for President because America sucks!.  

I’ll tease you with the first couple of lines.   Go to Jim’s site to see the rest of this Halll of Fame quality piece!

Some kids here in U-ville,
(The U.S. of A)
had invited the Obamessiah to play.

One wanted to know why he wanted the job
of leading a nation of ignorant slobs.

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]