No Runny Eggs

4 Responses to “The case against Obama”

• matt lepree said on October 21st, 2008 at 13:27:
  

  Let’s talk about the man who is 100 percent disabled, over a thousand dollars a week in veterans disability, and yet can hike the grand canyon, and work for 35 years in government svc. Also voted againsted most increases for Veterans benefits. I for one don’t want someone 100 percent disabled to lead this country.
• Shoebox said on October 21st, 2008 at 13:50:
  

  Matt,

  Fortunately, McCain’s disabilities are limited to his physical abilities. Obama’s are obviously inhibiting his cranial faculties. He has been completely unaware of strongly held positions of those he has held in high esteem for 20 years, can’t hold to a consistent policy for any 2 week period and seems to be unable to refer to a being living outside of the womb as a “baby”, “Infant” or even “alive.”

  I’ll go with the physical handicap thankyou. I don’t need anyone that can physically beat up a foreign despot (we’ve got a pretty effective military when that’s required), I just want one that will lay consistent security boundaries that won’t bend because he has some how determined that we “deserved” what we got.
• The comprehensive argument against Barack Obama | Right Voices pinged back on October 21st, 2008 at 17:43 with:
  

  […] No Runny Eggs » Blog Archive » The case against Obama […]
• steveegg said on October 21st, 2008 at 18:19:
  

  Matt, you ignorant, and I do mean IGNORANT, slut.