No Runny Eggs

The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.

Archive for May 22nd, 2008

Who Wants Gas Prices to Come Down?

by @ 17:26. Filed under Defending the American Dream.

…well, I do and I would guess you do too.   I’ll also bet that most people who have to pay for their gas also would like to see the price come down.   But what about our political elect?    Do they want to see gas prices come down?   This article today  from CBS Chicago says that for some of them, the answer is:   NO and HELL NO!

On average, the total government take on a gallon of gas is about $.40. However, there are areas where the state or local tax is not a fixed amount but is a percent of the retail value. The result is that as the retail price continues to climb, so does the tax that is paid.

Chicago is an area that has a percentage gas tax. As the article points out, tax on a gallon of gasoline in Chicago is now nearly $.80 per gallon. While Dick Durbin was asking oil executives whether they were ashamed of their profits, parts of the state he represents were charging nearly twice the national average for taxes. What makes this even more appalling is realizing that of the $.40 national average, the average for state and local taxes is about $.21. The combination of state and local taxes in the Chicago area are about $.61, nearly THREE TIMES THE NATIONAL AVERAGE!


One would think that with prices going up, the folks in Chicago might see fit to saying, “Hey, we could get by with just two times the national average,” and cut the rate by $.20 or so. One would think, but then, one would be wrong. See, there’s never been a governmental entity that couldn’t find ways to spend the WINDFALL PROFITS they may get…

And that, of course, is exactly the point for the politicians. Gov. Blagojevich, for example, is counting on the high price of gasoline to bring at least an extra $220 million in the State Treasury in the fiscal year that begins this July. Most of that will be used to balance the way-out-of-balance budget.

There is no solution to the creep (used as a noun and verb) and greed of government that doesn’t involve pitchforks and torches!

Where’s my lighter?

Happy Birthday Al Franken

Matt Lewis points us to a very-special birthday video from the NRSC…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSd9QJhemcA[/youtube]

Hey Al, here’s to #58 seeing you back home in New York City.

The Morning Scramble/Open Thread Thursday – 5/22/2008

If I were smart, I would’ve done this one last week…

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNId8clBdbI[/youtube]

  • Jim Hoft has the terror stats you won’t see trumpeted in the media.
  • Zip follows up on the Germans-let-Taliban-commander-walk story. Guess feeding the crocodiles is hazardous to one’s health.
  • Mike asks, “Who is to blame for high gas prices?”
  • Shoebox answers. Pay attention, Sen. McCain; he’s talking about you.
  • Speaking of McCain, Michelle Malkin notes his campaign is sponsoring comment spam. A healthy chunk of my roll is on the hit list, but I’m not. Could I be THAT mercurial? (Yes.)
  • Ace remembered the last candidate to do that. Guess the McCainiacs and the PaulNuts have more in common than I thought.
  • Ed Morrissey caught the New York Times violating their ethics policy in trying to roll the McCain campaign. Note; this message, while it may seem to be paid for by the McCain campaign, most certainly isn’t.
  • More Ed; he urges House Republicans to take the third and final chance to kill the Farm Pork Bill.
  • Still on pork, Kate catches Harry Reid giving a wet sloppy French kiss to Planned Parenthood while using the war supplemental bill as cover.
  • Jon Ham has a multitude of reasons to eat popcorn while the oh-so-tolerant Left eats their own. UUUURRRPPP!!!!! (Excuse me.)

As a reminder, I’ll be gone for a week starting Saturday on my Great Canadian Walleye Hunt. Shoebox is back from his fishing trip, and I should have the usual guest-blogging crew in.

Why Are Oil Prices Increasing?

by @ 5:00. Filed under Miscellaneous.

The price of a barrel of oil has increased nearly 50% since the first of the year.   There has been much speculation as to what is driving the increase.   The drop in the value of the dollar, increased usage from developing countries, tension in the Middle East, speculators and numerous factors have been pointed to as causing the run up.   Certainly, each of these have impact on the price increase but I think one factor has been missed entirely.

Let me start with some background, in poker playing.   When playing poker it’s important to not tell your opponent what you have in your hand.   That seems pretty obvious.   What’s not obvious to most folks is that telling another player what you have in your hand doesn’t typically involve spoken words.   Good poker players can tell what their opponents think of their hands based on “tells.”   “Tells” are unconscious body gestures, stroking your chin, pulling an ear, scratching your nose or a host of other things that the player may do each time they have a good, or a poor hand.   A good poker player will identify and use those “tells” to determine what kind of hand their opponent has.   Based on that information, they know how to bet.

So why has oil been increasing?   The world oil market has been reading the “tell” of the US political system.  

Look at this chart that shows the price of Light Sweet Oklahoma Crude (it tracks pretty close to the NY traded crude)  by day of 2008.  
oil-prices

OK, this would be a lot easier if I could draw arrows on graphs but….

Let me give you the events of a few dates:

  • February 6, 2008 – Super Duper Tuesday and John McCain takes an early, substantial lead for the Republican nomination.   (John McCain is anti ANWR.)
  • March 4, 2008 – John McCain wins enough delegates to claim the Republican nomination.   (John McCain believes in man made global warming and wants to institute a cap and trade system to carbon dioxide emitted from the burning of fossil fuels including oil.)
  • April 1, 2008 – Congress grills Oil executives and threatens to remove tax deductions and impose other sanctions that will increase their costs

So what happened to oil prices along those same dates?

  • February 6, 2008 – Oil began a price increase that saw it closing above $100 for the first time.
  • March 4, 2008 – After failing to $105 for nearly 2 weeks, oil begins a drive that takes it to a close above $110 for the first time.
  • April 1, 2008 – The begin of the most recent surge that has seen oil move, in a near linear fashion, to above $135.

I’m not saying that there is a direct cause and effect between the outlined activities and the move of oil.   I am saying that the world oil market is getting consistent and repetitive  “tells” that the US government, at all levels, is unwilling to do anything to increase the world’s oil supply.   As examples, all of the remaining Presidential candidates have refused to drill for oil in ANWR and the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee recently caved to environmentalists and refused to expedited leasing for oil shale in Colorado.  

Worse yet, the governement  is giving “tells” that indicate that along with not increasing supplies, they will increase the costs of doing business for US oil companies.   Examples of this are the  Cap and  Trade systems being proposed by the leading Presidential Candidates and  demanding excess profits taxes on oil companies.   Markets know that the impact of these items  is that  impacted companies will either reduce the availability of their products or increase their costs to the consumer.

The worse thing a beginning poker player can do is let their emotions get the better of them and bet irrationally hoping that that will improve the situation.   The US has shown that trait with their multiple demands to Saudi Arabia for increased oil production as well as Congress’s passage of a bill that would allow it to sue OPEC for price setting and limiting supplies.   Both of these are clearly actions of a frustrated player who sees no good options in their current hand.

Until the US starts a new hand and resets the odds by increasing the world oil supply by exploration and development within US territories, the world oil market will continue to hold a royal flush.   If they hold a royal flush and know that we hold 5 unmatched cards, they will continue to bet into the pot and we will see continued increases in the price of oil.

[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]