Sorry I don’t have video, but the county signs are in the way.
The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.
Sorry I don’t have video, but the county signs are in the way.
Since this portion promises to be quick-hitting, I’ll fire up the CoverItLive….
Because I burned much of the last hour catching up on the speakers to the convention-goers, I have but a half-hour before things start back up. Good thing there’s an Arby’s on the same property.
Of note, Rep. Sensenbrenner hit Assembly Speaker Mike Huebsch rather hard on the budget repair bill.
This is actually the second speech from the convention chair; I missed the first. Greg Bump didn’t.
Time to burn the lunch hour catching up; once we got toward the end, I could not offload the audio fast enough…
Because of all the potholes in Wisconsin and his continued raids on the transportation fund meant to fix those potholes, National Committeewoman Mary Buestrin is now calling the governor Pothole Doyle.
I like it.
Revisions/extensions (8:52 pm 5/20/2008) – I apologize to those expecting video here. I did not know how long speeches would last, or whether I’d be able to offload the speeches from my camera in time in between speeches, so I simply took a couple pictures while my digital voice recorder caught the audio.
I’m a bit late because I had to head back to the bunker overnight, but I’m back in town. Owen had me covered though. Troy Fullerton is also in the room.
I missed out on the row with the power strip, so I’ll have to be brief with my updates. A brief word on the suites last night, Scott Walker’s Milwaukee-themed suite was the best-decorated, while Paul Ryan’s/John Gard’s suite won for best food (stuffed mushrooms and tasty meatballs).
The promised Gard speech will be up shortly.
On Thursday, the California Supreme Court ruled that domestic partnerships were not an acceptable alternative to marriage and that California would need to allow gay marriages. The decision overturned a previous voter approved ban on gay marriage.
Groups opposed to gay marriage indicated that they had enough votes to put the issue of a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage on the November ballot.
In a poll done immediately following the announcement, SurveyUSA found some interesting perspectives amongst California Voters.
When asked the question:
The California Supreme Court has struck down the ban on gay marriage in California. Do you agree? Or disagree with the court’s ruling?
the response was nearly evenly split between those who agreed with the decision and those who disagreed.
However, when asked:
Do you support? Or do you oppose amending the state constitution to define marriage as being between one man and one woman?
a majority, 52% said that they supported the amendment. 36% said they opposed the amendment and 12% were still unsure.
What I found particularly interesting was the response split on age. Looking at a split of over or under 50 years old, those supporting, opposing and unsure, nearly mirrored the overall population. Another split that took 18-34 year olds found that even this age group’s response looked similar to the overall population. In fact, the only split that looked different, and slightly so with an error margin of 4.5%, were those 65+ where 62% approved of the amendment, 25% opposed and 13% were undecided.
Each generation is concerned that the one following them doesn’t share their values and will somehow dismantle what was held dear. At least on this issue, it looks like the generations are pretty well aligned. It will be interesting to watch how this plays out in California.
[No Runny Eggs is proudly powered by WordPress.]