define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8220;We need to limit public union collective bargaining privileges,&#8221; says&#8230;IL Gov. Pat Quinn?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/06/we-need-to-limit-public-union-collective-bargaining-privileges-says-il-gov-pat-quinn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/06/we-need-to-limit-public-union-collective-bargaining-privileges-says-il-gov-pat-quinn/</link>
	<description>The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger).  The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:37:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: PaulM		</title>
		<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/06/we-need-to-limit-public-union-collective-bargaining-privileges-says-il-gov-pat-quinn/comment-page-1/#comment-39555</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 21:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10945#comment-39555</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Steve - 

What happens if, let&#039;s say, the R&#039;s win their recalls, and then the D&#039;s contest those recalls in court.  During the pendency of the court challenges, are the Senate seats considered to be occupied by their current resident, or is the seat considered to be &#039;undecided until court judgement&#039;, like it would be if a regular election was contested, and the prior holder&#039;s term expired ?

IOW, could the D&#039;s use this tactic to cripple the R&#039;s in the Senate, effectively creating 3 or more &#039;unoccupied seats&#039; for some few months ?  Effectively the same delaying tactic they used with the union bill ( which STILL isn&#039;t in effect ) ?

Tks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve &#8211; </p>
<p>What happens if, let&#8217;s say, the R&#8217;s win their recalls, and then the D&#8217;s contest those recalls in court.  During the pendency of the court challenges, are the Senate seats considered to be occupied by their current resident, or is the seat considered to be &#8216;undecided until court judgement&#8217;, like it would be if a regular election was contested, and the prior holder&#8217;s term expired ?</p>
<p>IOW, could the D&#8217;s use this tactic to cripple the R&#8217;s in the Senate, effectively creating 3 or more &#8216;unoccupied seats&#8217; for some few months ?  Effectively the same delaying tactic they used with the union bill ( which STILL isn&#8217;t in effect ) ?</p>
<p>Tks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>