define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true); define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true); Comments on: Wisconsin Supreme Court Recount – Days 16/17 https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/ The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think. Sun, 15 May 2011 17:29:03 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9 By: EggSaladSurgery https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/comment-page-1/#comment-39478 Sun, 15 May 2011 17:29:03 +0000 https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10851#comment-39478 I suspect that Abrahamson feels she is above the law and sees no reason to recuse herself. In fact, she will likely go out of her way to validate whatever the chardonnay and brie crown in Dane County desires.

]]>
By: PaulM https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/comment-page-1/#comment-39477 Sat, 14 May 2011 19:19:31 +0000 https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10851#comment-39477 Or Abrahamson should recuse herself based on the fact that Prosser is a current fellow employee ?????

THAT would be sufficient grounds to recuse, IMO, and enough to take it to SCOTUS, also, if she doesn’t.

]]>
By: jones https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/comment-page-1/#comment-39476 Sat, 14 May 2011 18:03:35 +0000 https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10851#comment-39476 If this got to the Wi Supreme Court, would Abrahamson need to recuse herself due to past association with Klopper?

]]>
By: PaulM https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/comment-page-1/#comment-39475 Sat, 14 May 2011 16:36:58 +0000 https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10851#comment-39475 Mr D – on the recalls – my rough guess

6 R’s and 3 D’s are going to be ‘up’. The D’s need to gain 3 to take the Senate. IOW, hold all 3 D seats and take over 3 out of 6 R seats. If they lose one D seat, they need to gain 4 out of 6 R seats, etc.

Seems unlikely to actually change anything.

Wouldn’t it be a gen-u-wine pisser if they end up netting a LOST seat ??? :-)

]]>
By: Mr. D https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/comment-page-1/#comment-39474 Sat, 14 May 2011 16:25:21 +0000 https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10851#comment-39474 I’m sure Kloppy will try to find a pretext to challenge the results, but there’s no way she’ll ever get to sit on the court. She lost and if a court in Dane County tries to overturn the election, it will hurt everyone involved in the effort much more than it will hurt the Republicans.

By the way, what is the feeling on the recall elections? Is there any real momentum for Dem candidates, or are people simply getting sick of the whole process?

]]>
By: Wisconsin Supreme Court Recount – Days 16/17 | DAILY WISCONSIN https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/comment-page-1/#comment-39472 Fri, 13 May 2011 23:47:39 +0000 https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10851#comment-39472 […] Wisconsin Supreme Court Recount – Days 16/17 var addthis_product = 'wpp-257'; var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true};Via No Runny Eggs. […]

]]>
By: jjs https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/comment-page-1/#comment-39471 Fri, 13 May 2011 23:14:39 +0000 https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10851#comment-39471 Stephen, you are correct, that is what is going to happen. The communist party will win at any cost. She will steal the election by using the court system which the communist have control of. Hugo Chavez and Obama have and will do the same.

]]>
By: PaulM https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/comment-page-1/#comment-39469 Fri, 13 May 2011 22:23:34 +0000 https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10851#comment-39469 Rob – maybe you could practice spelling his name right before posting about him ?

Otherwise, you might look like a complete fucking asshole.

And we wouldn’t want THAT to happen, now, would we ?

]]>
By: Rob https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/comment-page-1/#comment-39468 Fri, 13 May 2011 22:11:03 +0000 https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10851#comment-39468 In reply to Stephen.

Stephan is a major idiot

]]>
By: PaulM https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/comment-page-1/#comment-39467 Fri, 13 May 2011 21:09:34 +0000 https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10851#comment-39467 Any way to know yet how many objections are on record, by which campaign ( especially in Waukesha ), and the nature of them ( whole bag or 1 ballot etc ) ?

]]>
By: Stephen https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/comment-page-1/#comment-39466 Fri, 13 May 2011 20:00:10 +0000 https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10851#comment-39466 There is no decision to make; in her mind, she won and all that remains is for the courts to confirm this so that she can take office in August. Prediction: recount done by May 20. She announces on May 21 that, due to “significant anomalies” she will challenge the certification in Dane County court. Barring that, or presuming she loses such a challenge (not likely – it is Dane County), she will plead her case before Abrahamson who will decide her case has merit and therefore appoint another Dane County lawgiver (to quote this site). This person will, just in time for the new term, decide that all votes from Waukesha county need to be thrown out in order to preserve the sanctity of the electoral process. The Astonished Cod will be seated in August.

]]>