define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);
Comments on: Wisconsin Supreme Court Recount – Days 16/17
https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/
The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.Sun, 15 May 2011 17:29:03 +0000
hourly
1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9
By: EggSaladSurgery
https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/comment-page-1/#comment-39478
Sun, 15 May 2011 17:29:03 +0000https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10851#comment-39478I suspect that Abrahamson feels she is above the law and sees no reason to recuse herself. In fact, she will likely go out of her way to validate whatever the chardonnay and brie crown in Dane County desires.
]]>
By: PaulM
https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/comment-page-1/#comment-39477
Sat, 14 May 2011 19:19:31 +0000https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10851#comment-39477Or Abrahamson should recuse herself based on the fact that Prosser is a current fellow employee ?????
THAT would be sufficient grounds to recuse, IMO, and enough to take it to SCOTUS, also, if she doesn’t.
]]>
By: jones
https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/comment-page-1/#comment-39476
Sat, 14 May 2011 18:03:35 +0000https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10851#comment-39476If this got to the Wi Supreme Court, would Abrahamson need to recuse herself due to past association with Klopper?
]]>
By: PaulM
https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/comment-page-1/#comment-39475
Sat, 14 May 2011 16:36:58 +0000https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10851#comment-39475Mr D – on the recalls – my rough guess
6 R’s and 3 D’s are going to be ‘up’. The D’s need to gain 3 to take the Senate. IOW, hold all 3 D seats and take over 3 out of 6 R seats. If they lose one D seat, they need to gain 4 out of 6 R seats, etc.
Seems unlikely to actually change anything.
Wouldn’t it be a gen-u-wine pisser if they end up netting a LOST seat ??? :-)
]]>
By: Mr. D
https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/comment-page-1/#comment-39474
Sat, 14 May 2011 16:25:21 +0000https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10851#comment-39474I’m sure Kloppy will try to find a pretext to challenge the results, but there’s no way she’ll ever get to sit on the court. She lost and if a court in Dane County tries to overturn the election, it will hurt everyone involved in the effort much more than it will hurt the Republicans.
By the way, what is the feeling on the recall elections? Is there any real momentum for Dem candidates, or are people simply getting sick of the whole process?
]]>
By: Wisconsin Supreme Court Recount – Days 16/17 | DAILY WISCONSIN
https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/comment-page-1/#comment-39472
Fri, 13 May 2011 23:47:39 +0000https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10851#comment-39472[…] Wisconsin Supreme Court Recount – Days 16/17 var addthis_product = 'wpp-257'; var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true};Via No Runny Eggs. […]
]]>
By: jjs
https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/comment-page-1/#comment-39471
Fri, 13 May 2011 23:14:39 +0000https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10851#comment-39471Stephen, you are correct, that is what is going to happen. The communist party will win at any cost. She will steal the election by using the court system which the communist have control of. Hugo Chavez and Obama have and will do the same.
]]>
By: PaulM
https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/comment-page-1/#comment-39469
Fri, 13 May 2011 22:23:34 +0000https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10851#comment-39469Rob – maybe you could practice spelling his name right before posting about him ?
Otherwise, you might look like a complete fucking asshole.
And we wouldn’t want THAT to happen, now, would we ?
]]>
By: Rob
https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/comment-page-1/#comment-39468
Fri, 13 May 2011 22:11:03 +0000https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10851#comment-39468In reply to Stephen.
Stephan is a major idiot
]]>
By: PaulM
https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/comment-page-1/#comment-39467
Fri, 13 May 2011 21:09:34 +0000https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10851#comment-39467Any way to know yet how many objections are on record, by which campaign ( especially in Waukesha ), and the nature of them ( whole bag or 1 ballot etc ) ?
]]>
By: Stephen
https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/05/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-days-1617/comment-page-1/#comment-39466
Fri, 13 May 2011 20:00:10 +0000https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10851#comment-39466There is no decision to make; in her mind, she won and all that remains is for the courts to confirm this so that she can take office in August. Prediction: recount done by May 20. She announces on May 21 that, due to “significant anomalies” she will challenge the certification in Dane County court. Barring that, or presuming she loses such a challenge (not likely – it is Dane County), she will plead her case before Abrahamson who will decide her case has merit and therefore appoint another Dane County lawgiver (to quote this site). This person will, just in time for the new term, decide that all votes from Waukesha county need to be thrown out in order to preserve the sanctity of the electoral process. The Astonished Cod will be seated in August.
]]>