Comments on: Wisconsin Supreme Court Recount – Day 9

By: PaulM

PaulM — Sat, 07 May 2011 16:16:01 +0000

Egg Meister – thanks again for your continuing work on the spreadsheet. Beats hell out of taking that GAB original and cleaning it up enough each day to derive simple totals.

I read the GAB as showing Kloppy + 400 net right now, with 80 % in. I would not offer that number as verified work product if I were doing it for my employer, that input data is too dirty.

May your yolks always be firm !

I know, that was a bad yolk …..

By: Russ Davis

Russ Davis — Fri, 06 May 2011 23:04:37 +0000

In reply to PaulM. Kleptoburg and her fellow Dem fascists are deranged lying treasonous criminals who should be jailed at their own expense for about ten years, at least as dangeous to our republic in their own way as OBL.

By: Russ Davis

Russ Davis — Fri, 06 May 2011 22:53:58 +0000

I wonder how much Kleptoburg paid to steal those few hundred votes from Prosser. Hopefully even her allies can see from this her delusional infantile narcissism makes her unfit for any kind of responsible office, public or otherwise, certainly unfit to hold a law license, though that’s true of many with black robed delusions of godhood (e.g. Tony Kennedy of the Sopranos-COTUS).

By: Wisconsin Supreme Court Recount – Day 9 | DAILY WISCONSIN

Wisconsin Supreme Court Recount – Day 9 | DAILY WISCONSIN — Fri, 06 May 2011 16:20:37 +0000

[…] Via No Runny Eggs. […]

By: Jack

Jack — Fri, 06 May 2011 13:26:02 +0000

This entire drama which began with an attempt to rein in unchecked public sector unions and their overpaid members reminds me of a chess game. Unfortunately it’s a chess game where the other side can ask their mommy—courts—to change the rules mid-game.

By: PaulM

PaulM — Fri, 06 May 2011 12:33:25 +0000

and of course the hyper-challenge strategy is only laying the groundwork for their court challenge to follow. WHich they will delay filing for until the last possible day. I won’t be suprised is they ask for :

Try to have all of Brookfield disenfranchised ( throw all the votes out )
Try to get a ‘do-over’ election in Brookfield, or
Try to get the entire election invalidated, ask for a ‘special SC election do-over’ to coincide maybe with the upcoming recall election day.

It won’t suprise me if this goes all the way to SCOTUS.

They’ll lose, but they know that. It’s fodder / red meat for the base they’re after, they want to scream ‘Looky looky ! Florida 2000 all over !’ EVen though what actually happened in Florida 2000 is that SCOTUS *PREVENTED* the Florida SC from retroactively changing the rules of an election after the election.