define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Wisconsin Supreme Court Recount &#8211; Day 3	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/04/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-day-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/04/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-day-3/</link>
	<description>The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger).  The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 12:05:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tracking the Wisconsin Supreme Court Recount – Day 3 &#124; DAILY WISCONSIN		</title>
		<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/04/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-day-3/comment-page-1/#comment-39416</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tracking the Wisconsin Supreme Court Recount – Day 3 &#124; DAILY WISCONSIN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 12:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10782#comment-39416</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Via No Runny Eggs. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Via No Runny Eggs. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: steveegg		</title>
		<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/04/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-day-3/comment-page-1/#comment-39413</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steveegg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 01:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10782#comment-39413</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Going into this, I considered a less-than-300-vote swing either direction the most-likely outcome.

I’m wiped, but am glad to report the “anomalies” in both last night’s 6 pm GAB and today’s noon GAB spreadsheets have been corrected in tonight’s 6 PM GAB spreadsheet.
 
I’ll have a full post and an update of my tracking spreadsheet tomorrow, but the top line is that with with 1,214 of 3,602 reporting units recounted (33.70%) and double-checked (not canvassed, though) by GAB, David Prosser has a still-unofficial net 14-vote gain on his pre-recount 7,316-vote lead out of 407,180 votes recounted (just over 27% of the 1.50 million pre-recount votes).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Going into this, I considered a less-than-300-vote swing either direction the most-likely outcome.</p>
<p>I’m wiped, but am glad to report the “anomalies” in both last night’s 6 pm GAB and today’s noon GAB spreadsheets have been corrected in tonight’s 6 PM GAB spreadsheet.</p>
<p>I’ll have a full post and an update of my tracking spreadsheet tomorrow, but the top line is that with with 1,214 of 3,602 reporting units recounted (33.70%) and double-checked (not canvassed, though) by GAB, David Prosser has a still-unofficial net 14-vote gain on his pre-recount 7,316-vote lead out of 407,180 votes recounted (just over 27% of the 1.50 million pre-recount votes).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David L De Vlaeminck Sr		</title>
		<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/04/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-day-3/comment-page-1/#comment-39410</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David L De Vlaeminck Sr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 21:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10782#comment-39410</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We never thought there would be a change-maybe 50 votes one way or the other!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We never thought there would be a change-maybe 50 votes one way or the other!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PaulM		</title>
		<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/04/wisconsin-supreme-court-recount-day-3/comment-page-1/#comment-39409</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PaulM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2011 16:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10782#comment-39409</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Too funny !  Dane County &#039;found missing ballots&#039;, it&#039;s not even big news, and it&#039;s Prosser + 30, in DANE of all places !!! :-)

Rough SWAG tells me that when the fat lady finishes singing, it&#039;ll be one side or the other +/- 200 -&#062; 300 net.  Even if double that somehow magically goes to Kloppy, it changes nothing.  Hell, ten times that changes nothing.

I wonder if Kloppy will actually have the stones to go to court next ( I mean, &#039;will her union / Dem / Lib masters order her to ?  They&#039;re the ones paying the lawyers, after all ), and on what basis ?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too funny !  Dane County &#8216;found missing ballots&#8217;, it&#8217;s not even big news, and it&#8217;s Prosser + 30, in DANE of all places !!! :-)</p>
<p>Rough SWAG tells me that when the fat lady finishes singing, it&#8217;ll be one side or the other +/- 200 -&gt; 300 net.  Even if double that somehow magically goes to Kloppy, it changes nothing.  Hell, ten times that changes nothing.</p>
<p>I wonder if Kloppy will actually have the stones to go to court next ( I mean, &#8216;will her union / Dem / Lib masters order her to ?  They&#8217;re the ones paying the lawyers, after all ), and on what basis ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>