define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Going from $100 billion of spending &#8220;cuts&#8221; to $18 billion of new spending &#8211; UPDATE &#8211; And maybe $20-25 billion of savings down the road	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/04/going-from-100-billion-of-spending-cuts-to-18-billion-of-new-spending/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/04/going-from-100-billion-of-spending-cuts-to-18-billion-of-new-spending/</link>
	<description>The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger).  The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:14:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: No Runny Eggs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I&#8217;ll gladly pay you Tuesday $25B in 2021 for a hamburger $18B in new spending today		</title>
		<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2011/04/going-from-100-billion-of-spending-cuts-to-18-billion-of-new-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-39346</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[No Runny Eggs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; I&#8217;ll gladly pay you Tuesday $25B in 2021 for a hamburger $18B in new spending today]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=10642#comment-39346</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] post that found that the federal government, under the &#8220;Grand Deal of 2011&#8243;, will be spending $18 billion more in discretionary funds in FY2011 than it did in FY2010 using the bottom-line outlays. I decided it needed its own [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] post that found that the federal government, under the &#8220;Grand Deal of 2011&#8243;, will be spending $18 billion more in discretionary funds in FY2011 than it did in FY2010 using the bottom-line outlays. I decided it needed its own [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>