define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true); define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true); Comments on: Government/UAW Motors and closed dealerships – an alternate take https://norunnyeggs.com/2010/07/governmentuaw-motors-and-closed-dealerships-an-alternate-take/ The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think. Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:16:31 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9 By: dad29 https://norunnyeggs.com/2010/07/governmentuaw-motors-and-closed-dealerships-an-alternate-take/comment-page-1/#comment-38768 Tue, 20 Jul 2010 15:16:31 +0000 https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=9012#comment-38768 In reply to steveegg.

They considered graft and corruption.

They’re Democrats. That’s what they DO.

]]>
By: steveegg https://norunnyeggs.com/2010/07/governmentuaw-motors-and-closed-dealerships-an-alternate-take/comment-page-1/#comment-38763 Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:27:53 +0000 https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=9012#comment-38763 That’s the way I read the arguments from the likes of Hot Air and Charlie Sykes this morning – they focused on the “Auto Team didn’t consider the job losses” part of the SIG report.

If they didn’t consider either job losses (something that should be outside the consideration envelope of a business in bankruptcy) or cost savings (the primary, and some would say only, thing a business in bankruptcy should consider), then what did they consider?

]]>
By: dad29 https://norunnyeggs.com/2010/07/governmentuaw-motors-and-closed-dealerships-an-alternate-take/comment-page-1/#comment-38762 Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:30:37 +0000 https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=9012#comment-38762 Private (or putatively private) enterprise, especially one in such bad financial shape that it is in bankruptcy, does not have a responsibility to be an employment-for-all agency.

Who the Hell argued THAT case?

The argument from Conservatism NEVER implied that Gummint Motors should have kept the dealerships b/c jobs were on the line. The argument was that there was NO GOOD REASON to CLOSE them, period.

If a dealership goes banko, that’s the dealer’s problem. Too bad, so sad. Not very pretty, some lives ruined, but hey…that’s the game.

The “Toyota Does It This Way” argument is irrelevant. And it was clear that the US dealership structure was heading that direction, anyway; by 2020, the mergers and consolidations due to economics would, perhaps, have resulted in exactly the same closures as happened last year.

But that would not have been arbitrary, capricious, or NEARLY as disruptive as the ObamaGoon method.

]]>