define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Tuesday Hot Read &#8211; Matt Lewis&#8217; &#8220;Questioning the trajectory of Rep. Ryan’s rising star&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://norunnyeggs.com/2010/02/tuesday-hot-read-matt-lewis-questioning-the-trajectory-of-rep-ryan%E2%80%99s-rising-star/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2010/02/tuesday-hot-read-matt-lewis-questioning-the-trajectory-of-rep-ryan%e2%80%99s-rising-star/</link>
	<description>The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger).  The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:48:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: dad29		</title>
		<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2010/02/tuesday-hot-read-matt-lewis-questioning-the-trajectory-of-rep-ryan%e2%80%99s-rising-star/comment-page-1/#comment-38334</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dad29]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8201#comment-38334</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Umnnhhh...

Yup, TARP was a bill of goods that a LOT of people bought, and I was one of them.  (Still not convinced that it was totally off-base.)  And yes, some of the TARP recipients should be closed down (Citi, at least.)  But that&#039;s another battle.

As to the GM deal:  Ryan voted his district.  There IS something about &quot;representation&quot; which should ring a bell somewhere in someone&#039;s mind on that thing, &quot;representation.&quot;

As to the bonus clawbacks, well...

If the US taxpayer is supporting an enterprise--keeping it from BK filing--then the enterprise&#039;s execs should NOT expect bonus payments.

You will note that M&#038;I did not pay bonuses this year.

Who in F&#038;^% is GoldmanSachs or BofA to expect otherwise?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umnnhhh&#8230;</p>
<p>Yup, TARP was a bill of goods that a LOT of people bought, and I was one of them.  (Still not convinced that it was totally off-base.)  And yes, some of the TARP recipients should be closed down (Citi, at least.)  But that&#8217;s another battle.</p>
<p>As to the GM deal:  Ryan voted his district.  There IS something about &#8220;representation&#8221; which should ring a bell somewhere in someone&#8217;s mind on that thing, &#8220;representation.&#8221;</p>
<p>As to the bonus clawbacks, well&#8230;</p>
<p>If the US taxpayer is supporting an enterprise&#8211;keeping it from BK filing&#8211;then the enterprise&#8217;s execs should NOT expect bonus payments.</p>
<p>You will note that M&amp;I did not pay bonuses this year.</p>
<p>Who in F&amp;^% is GoldmanSachs or BofA to expect otherwise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>