define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);
The only “nuclear” reference in the Senate version (which just passed) is a single $1 billion item for “weapons activities”. There is no reference in the version that passed the House.
]]>No, I dont’ think we do. The anti-nuclear sentiment in America has its roots in the “don’t litter” environmental roots of the 1960s and 70s. I don’t recall that global warming and greenhouse gas emissions were making news headlines then. I for one am very glad to see the resurgence of nuclear power return to the forefront of discussion. I would very much like to see us invest money in the construction of new plants immediately.
Also –really? No mention of nuclear in the stimulus bill? I haven’t even attempted to read the bills that have passed the house and senate, but I have seen/heard a few news references to funding nuclear power in the stimulus bill. Did everything get removed?
]]>FAR more important than “prices” is SUPPLY. Russia has already cut off the gas once, and could do it again.
So could a few well-informed terrorists.
]]>