Comments on: For We and Me?

By: Marie Devine

Marie Devine — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:36:37 +0000

If they didn’t want to accept Blagovitch’s selection for Illinois senator, what should they do if they find our president fraudulently represented himself to be eligible for president. If they further find that he did not sign up for Selective Service on time (until recently, and forged it to look like it was on time), should any of his appointments be accepted?

Twitter: Barack Obama prophecy at prophecies.org

By: Shoebox

Shoebox — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:31:57 +0000

In reply to scott.

Yes, just goes to show that there are folks across the political spectrum that have too much time on their hands and use it to find a boogeyman in every corner.

On a separate note, in the future, please refrain from using the name you did in a fashion that is other than referring to Him specifically or alternatively, in a form of adoration for who He is and what He has provided those who choose to follow Him.

Thanks

By: scott

scott — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:21:18 +0000

Sweet Jesus. Isn’t there medication that can help people like this?

By: Ted

Ted — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:03:54 +0000

Take the test.

FIRST QUESTION: Who IS the actual and lawful 44th President of the USA?

ANSWER: Joe Biden

Biden was initially the Acting President for at least 5 minutes under either the Constitution’s Article 2 or the Constitution’s 20th Amendment, from 12:00 Noon 1/20/09, having already taken his Oath of Office and before Obama completed his "˜oath’ at approximately 12:05 PM, 1/20/09. Under the 20th Amendment if the President-elect shall have failed to qualify, or alternatively under Article 2 if the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term, being 12:00 Noon 1/20/09, which ability and/or qualification includes that he take the Article 2 oath "before he enter on the execution of his office," then either the Presidency shall devolve on the Vice President under Article 2 or the Vice President shall act as President under the 20th Amendment. (The importance of the oath in "˜commencing’ an "˜Obama Presidency’ "” rather than merely the 1/20/09 Noon time "” is confirmed by the re-take of the "˜oath’ by Obama at the White House on 1/21/09 after the first "˜oath’ was NOT administered by Justice Roberts NOR recited by Obama in the words as required under Article 2.)

This is significant because at such time that the Supreme Court finally rules on the merits on Obama’s disqualification as not being an Article 2 "natural born citizen" (clearly he is NOT), Biden’s automatic status (without needing to take a separate Presidential Oath) of being President would be predicated upon four different bases: First, having been Vice President under Article 2; second, having been Vice President-elect under the 20th Amendment; third, having been actual President in the hiatus before Obama took the "˜oath(s)’; and fourth, retroactively deemed President during the full period of the Obama usurpation so that the acts of the Federal Government under the usurpation can be deemed authorized and/or ratified by Biden’s legitimacy.

SECOND QUESTION: Who will be the 45th President?

ANSWER: Hillary Clinton

One must assume that Bill and Hillary Clinton have been aware of all of the above. Biden’s wife recently "let the cat out of the bag" on the Oprah Show that both Biden and Hillary had considered alternatively Veep or Secretary of State, in either case, setting up Hillary to be President on a vote of the Democratic Congress if need be.

THIRD QUESTION: Is Obama an unwitting victim of this troika or a knowing participant?

ANSWER: Yet undetermined.

By: Shoebox

Shoebox — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:14:54 +0000

In reply to scott. I don't subscribe to the conspiracy theory. I didn't say I thought the issue was worth chasing or legitimate for that matter...just trying to figure out how far the new transparency goes.

By: scott

scott — Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:50:16 +0000

For example, if there was still a question about Obama’s birth certificate

Good grief. You’re kidding me, right? You’re edging into conspiracy theory nutjob territory when you invoke manufactured controversies such as this.