define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);
Item #2 – Thanks for proving my point. The money simply isn’t there to support a 4.7% increase in spending.
Now, what did you do when that increase in pay didn’t match the increase in expenses? You cut, didn’t you? Why can’t state government do the same?
]]>“Compensation for state employees totaled $2.1 billion last year.” So? How can you use this single item to show that there are too many state employees? Is this an increase or a decrease? What is the average compensation per employee? This is not near enough data to make any analysis one way or the other as to the appropriate size of the state workforce. If I told you that Major League Baseball has roughly the same payroll (actually $2.7 billion) would you then imply that state workers get paid the same as professional ball players? Of course not.
“Did any of you non-union/non-government workers get a 4.7% increase in pay over the last 2 years?” Neither will state workers. State workers may have received between 1% and 1.5% increases in pay per year in the past couple of years, if they got any increase at all. Perhaps you haven’t noticed that the cost of virtually everything has risen. State agencies buy gasoline, heat, electricity, food, office supplies, uniforms, asphalt, concrete, steel, etc. Those costs are what drive the need for increases, not worker salaries.
]]>