define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Would you want this man with his finger on THE button?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://norunnyeggs.com/2008/02/would-you-want-this-man-with-his-finger-on-the-button/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2008/02/would-you-want-this-man-with-his-finger-on-the-button/</link>
	<description>The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger).  The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:25:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: steveegg		</title>
		<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2008/02/would-you-want-this-man-with-his-finger-on-the-button/comment-page-1/#comment-34463</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steveegg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://norunnyeggs.com/2008/02/would-you-want-this-man-with-his-finger-on-the-button/#comment-34463</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Adam Lawson said on February 22nd, 2008 at 16:05: 

If McCain wins with 50% + 1 in Texas, I believe the state becomes &#034;Winner Take All.&#034; If he accomplishes this, and Huckabee stays in the race&#034;¦ I can&#039;t even put into words how much I will loathe the man.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Yep.  However, according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P08/TX-R.phtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Green Papers&lt;/a&gt;, it&#039;s a combination of by-district (3 per, 32 districts, 96 total) and statewide (41).

If there is not a majority, it becomes proportional for the statewide and a 2-1 split between 1st and 2nd, with a 20% minimum to qualify in either case.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Adam Lawson said on February 22nd, 2008 at 16:05: </p>
<p>If McCain wins with 50% + 1 in Texas, I believe the state becomes &quot;Winner Take All.&quot; If he accomplishes this, and Huckabee stays in the race&quot;¦ I can&#8217;t even put into words how much I will loathe the man.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yep.  However, according to <a href="http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P08/TX-R.phtml" rel="nofollow">The Green Papers</a>, it&#8217;s a combination of by-district (3 per, 32 districts, 96 total) and statewide (41).</p>
<p>If there is not a majority, it becomes proportional for the statewide and a 2-1 split between 1st and 2nd, with a 20% minimum to qualify in either case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Adam Lawson		</title>
		<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2008/02/would-you-want-this-man-with-his-finger-on-the-button/comment-page-1/#comment-34461</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Lawson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://norunnyeggs.com/2008/02/would-you-want-this-man-with-his-finger-on-the-button/#comment-34461</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If McCain wins with 50% + 1 in Texas, I believe the state becomes &quot;Winner Take All.&quot;  If he accomplishes this, and Huckabee stays in the race... I can&#039;t even put into words how much I will loathe the man.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If McCain wins with 50% + 1 in Texas, I believe the state becomes &#8220;Winner Take All.&#8221;  If he accomplishes this, and Huckabee stays in the race&#8230; I can&#8217;t even put into words how much I will loathe the man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>