define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Latest debate &#8211; instant review	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://norunnyeggs.com/2008/01/latest-debate-instant-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2008/01/latest-debate-instant-review/</link>
	<description>The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger).  The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:59:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: wyocwby		</title>
		<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2008/01/latest-debate-instant-review/comment-page-1/#comment-34052</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wyocwby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://norunnyeggs.com/2008/01/latest-debate-instant-review/#comment-34052</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I tell ya, after Fred stuck it to the Huckster thus:

&quot;Thats not the model of the Reagan Coalition.  Thats the Model of the Democrat Party&quot;

I all but had to light up a cigarette!  FINALLY someone stands up to the insanity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tell ya, after Fred stuck it to the Huckster thus:</p>
<p>&#8220;Thats not the model of the Reagan Coalition.  Thats the Model of the Democrat Party&#8221;</p>
<p>I all but had to light up a cigarette!  FINALLY someone stands up to the insanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hammertime &#171; Try 2 Focus		</title>
		<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2008/01/latest-debate-instant-review/comment-page-1/#comment-34050</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hammertime &#171; Try 2 Focus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://norunnyeggs.com/2008/01/latest-debate-instant-review/#comment-34050</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] one of the best lines on the debate I&#8217;ve seen, Steve at No Runny Eggs  had this to say of Fred&#8217;s performance: Get me my shades. He had Huckabee&#039;s breakfast, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] one of the best lines on the debate I&#8217;ve seen, Steve at No Runny Eggs  had this to say of Fred&#8217;s performance: Get me my shades. He had Huckabee&#8217;s breakfast, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dad29		</title>
		<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2008/01/latest-debate-instant-review/comment-page-1/#comment-34047</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dad29]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://norunnyeggs.com/2008/01/latest-debate-instant-review/#comment-34047</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And if you think McPain is bad news--you should have heard Rick Santorum&#039;s comments about McPain on last night&#039;s Levin show (WISN.)

Santorum absolutely DESPISES McPain for what he is and for what he did behind closed doors in the Senate.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if you think McPain is bad news&#8211;you should have heard Rick Santorum&#8217;s comments about McPain on last night&#8217;s Levin show (WISN.)</p>
<p>Santorum absolutely DESPISES McPain for what he is and for what he did behind closed doors in the Senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason		</title>
		<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2008/01/latest-debate-instant-review/comment-page-1/#comment-34046</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://norunnyeggs.com/2008/01/latest-debate-instant-review/#comment-34046</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I thought Thompson and McCain carried the night.  I thought Thompson was the clear winner, finally abandoning generalities from previous debates and laying out specific, detailed plans.  I was very glad to see McCain and others discuss tax cutting combined with reduced spending.  Giuliani looked foolish on that issue.

And Ron Paul?  Well, he just looked foolish...period.

And what was with that question on the incident with Iran?  What a waste of a question.  Obviously any sane candidate was going to give the same answer.  And every sane candidate did (not so fast RP).

Overall, the questions did allow the candidates to differentiate their positions from the Dems very well.  I would still like to hear what the candidates are going to do about health care and soon.  Otherwise that is a debate the Dems will win and we&#039;re stuck with socialized medicine.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Thompson and McCain carried the night.  I thought Thompson was the clear winner, finally abandoning generalities from previous debates and laying out specific, detailed plans.  I was very glad to see McCain and others discuss tax cutting combined with reduced spending.  Giuliani looked foolish on that issue.</p>
<p>And Ron Paul?  Well, he just looked foolish&#8230;period.</p>
<p>And what was with that question on the incident with Iran?  What a waste of a question.  Obviously any sane candidate was going to give the same answer.  And every sane candidate did (not so fast RP).</p>
<p>Overall, the questions did allow the candidates to differentiate their positions from the Dems very well.  I would still like to hear what the candidates are going to do about health care and soon.  Otherwise that is a debate the Dems will win and we&#8217;re stuck with socialized medicine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>