define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);
Comments on: Grading the Republican debate #8
https://norunnyeggs.com/2007/10/grading-the-republican-debate-8/
The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:39:34 +0000
hourly
1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9
By: Mary
https://norunnyeggs.com/2007/10/grading-the-republican-debate-8/comment-page-1/#comment-33353
Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:39:34 +0000https://norunnyeggs.com/2007/10/grading-the-republican-debate-8/#comment-33353Ron Paul deserves an F for his performance at this debate, not just his overall looniness. No doubt about that.
I’m not sure about a B for Thompson. That might be a bit high. I would give him a B- or C+. I agree that Thompson improved as the debate went on. He had a very shaky start.
I’m also with you that no one earned an A.
I think we may have to start grading on a curve. :)
]]>
By: steveegg
https://norunnyeggs.com/2007/10/grading-the-republican-debate-8/comment-page-1/#comment-33349
Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:57:30 +0000https://norunnyeggs.com/2007/10/grading-the-republican-debate-8/#comment-33349What can I say; I’m not an easy grader. Notice nobody picked up an “A”.
I tried to limit the influence of the grading to just the 2 hours of the debate, which is something that definitely hurt Huckabee. He’s done better in earlier debates where the focus has not been so much on the economy.
]]>
By: Robert
https://norunnyeggs.com/2007/10/grading-the-republican-debate-8/comment-page-1/#comment-33348
Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:42:52 +0000https://norunnyeggs.com/2007/10/grading-the-republican-debate-8/#comment-33348I think Huckabee did a lot better than you give him credit for. At least a B and Ron Paul did better than an F although I can not stand the guy.
]]>