define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The dangers of an activist court and homosex &#8220;marriage&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://norunnyeggs.com/2006/10/the-dangers-of-an-activist-court-and-homosex-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2006/10/the-dangers-of-an-activist-court-and-homosex-marriage/</link>
	<description>The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger).  The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 20:15:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Peter		</title>
		<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2006/10/the-dangers-of-an-activist-court-and-homosex-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-20560</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 20:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.eggstor.com/?p=656#comment-20560</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t get the pro-homosexual marriage trolls over at my place to understand that once marriage is defined legally as a civil right, it cannot be denied to ANYONE. A man and two women, two men and two women, a woman and two men, a man and his legally adult daughter, a brother and sister, etc.

Don&#039;t count the NAMBLA folks out either.

In this case, the slippery slope argument holds.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t get the pro-homosexual marriage trolls over at my place to understand that once marriage is defined legally as a civil right, it cannot be denied to ANYONE. A man and two women, two men and two women, a woman and two men, a man and his legally adult daughter, a brother and sister, etc.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t count the NAMBLA folks out either.</p>
<p>In this case, the slippery slope argument holds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>