define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true);
define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true);<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Wisconsin Taxpayer Protection Amendment	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://norunnyeggs.com/2006/02/wisconsin-taxpayer-protection-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2006/02/wisconsin-taxpayer-protection-amendment/</link>
	<description>The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger).  The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:00:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: dad29		</title>
		<link>https://norunnyeggs.com/2006/02/wisconsin-taxpayer-protection-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dad29]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.eggstor.com/?p=350#comment-232</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well...regarding the &quot;less kids = less expenses,&quot; it ain&#039;t necessarily so.

Same goes for private industry.  Adding and deleting workers is a &quot;step&quot; process, not a &quot;curve&quot; process; thus one simply cannot reduce real expense every time one drops a couple of children.

Similarly, one should not add expense simply because of an INCREASE of one or two (or 3-10) children.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;regarding the &#8220;less kids = less expenses,&#8221; it ain&#8217;t necessarily so.</p>
<p>Same goes for private industry.  Adding and deleting workers is a &#8220;step&#8221; process, not a &#8220;curve&#8221; process; thus one simply cannot reduce real expense every time one drops a couple of children.</p>
<p>Similarly, one should not add expense simply because of an INCREASE of one or two (or 3-10) children.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>