define('DISALLOW_FILE_EDIT', true); define('DISALLOW_FILE_MODS', true); Comments on: Miers not “stealth” enough for Specter? https://norunnyeggs.com/2005/10/miers-not-stealth-enough-for-specter/ The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger). The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think. Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:45:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9 By: Jib https://norunnyeggs.com/2005/10/miers-not-stealth-enough-for-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-21 Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:45:00 +0000 http://norunnyeggs.eggstor.com/?p=19#comment-21 (Head in hands) It’ll all be over soon. It’ll all be over soon.

]]>
By: steveegg https://norunnyeggs.com/2005/10/miers-not-stealth-enough-for-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-20 Mon, 10 Oct 2005 17:23:00 +0000 http://norunnyeggs.eggstor.com/?p=19#comment-20 Like just about everything else surrounding Miers, I can’t fully-assess the ICC statement from Protein Wisdom. That mushroom called Miers’ nomination just isn’t getting any clearer.

]]>
By: tee bee https://norunnyeggs.com/2005/10/miers-not-stealth-enough-for-specter/comment-page-1/#comment-19 Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:40:00 +0000 http://norunnyeggs.eggstor.com/?p=19#comment-19 Specter is just using the classic rhetorical device of decrying the Miers lynch mob to appear fair, before spouting off Roe gunk like he’s been in a vaccuum for the past four months. Or, with regard to the latter, he’s just your typical senator; doesn’t pay attention to the rabble bringing up silly points about not asking a justice nom to tell you how they’ll vote on something they are likely to vote on.

I thought it was good for a laugh, but I’ll have to see if Jib has bought into the whole “ICC” thing that Jeff G at Protein Wisdom had up last Tuesday. Sounds bad, but it attributes the pro-ICC sentiment of other lawyers to one board member, in this case, Miers.

]]>