<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monday Hot Read &#8211; Jon Ward&#8217;s &#8220;Paul Ryan explains his votes for TARP, bailouts and tax on AIG bonuses&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/02/monday-hot-read-jon-wards-paul-ryan-explains-his-votes-for-tarp-bailouts-and-tax-on-aig-bonuses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/02/monday-hot-read-jon-wards-paul-ryan-explains-his-votes-for-tarp-bailouts-and-tax-on-aig-bonuses/</link>
	<description>The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger).  The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:40:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soapbox Jill</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/02/monday-hot-read-jon-wards-paul-ryan-explains-his-votes-for-tarp-bailouts-and-tax-on-aig-bonuses/comment-page-1/#comment-38370</link>
		<dc:creator>Soapbox Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8253#comment-38370</guid>
		<description>With just 6 hours to decide about AIG, who could do better?
But let this be a lesson to Ryan and others that trying to &quot;punish&quot; corporations can easily backfire in house/senate dominated by capitalism-haters, and perhaps keeping it a bit more pure and simple would end up better, or not. (It&#039;s a six of one, half-a-dozen of the other thing.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With just 6 hours to decide about AIG, who could do better?<br />
But let this be a lesson to Ryan and others that trying to &#8220;punish&#8221; corporations can easily backfire in house/senate dominated by capitalism-haters, and perhaps keeping it a bit more pure and simple would end up better, or not. (It&#8217;s a six of one, half-a-dozen of the other thing.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Soapbox Jill</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/02/monday-hot-read-jon-wards-paul-ryan-explains-his-votes-for-tarp-bailouts-and-tax-on-aig-bonuses/comment-page-1/#comment-38369</link>
		<dc:creator>Soapbox Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8253#comment-38369</guid>
		<description>With just 6 hours to decide about AIG, who could do better?
But let this be a lesson to Ryan and others that trying to &quot;punish&quot; corporations can easily backfire, and perhaps keeping it a bit more pure and simple would end up better. (It&#039;s a six of one, half-a-dozen of the other thing.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With just 6 hours to decide about AIG, who could do better?<br />
But let this be a lesson to Ryan and others that trying to &#8220;punish&#8221; corporations can easily backfire, and perhaps keeping it a bit more pure and simple would end up better. (It&#8217;s a six of one, half-a-dozen of the other thing.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dad29</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2010/02/monday-hot-read-jon-wards-paul-ryan-explains-his-votes-for-tarp-bailouts-and-tax-on-aig-bonuses/comment-page-1/#comment-38368</link>
		<dc:creator>dad29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=8253#comment-38368</guid>
		<description>That AIG thing &#039;splanation also makes it clear that &quot;purity&quot; is not so simple.

There was a lot of &#039;inside baseball&#039; Congressional crap involved in that vote; Ryan had good reasons to go either way.  IOW, it was not simply whether/not limiting compensation.  It was also an issue of keeping the (D) rats&#039; feet to the fire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That AIG thing &#8216;splanation also makes it clear that &#8220;purity&#8221; is not so simple.</p>
<p>There was a lot of &#8216;inside baseball&#8217; Congressional crap involved in that vote; Ryan had good reasons to go either way.  IOW, it was not simply whether/not limiting compensation.  It was also an issue of keeping the (D) rats&#8217; feet to the fire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

