<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Club for Growth says Hoffman leads in NY-23, NRCC hardest hit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://norunnyeggs.com/2009/10/club-for-growth-says-hoffman-leads-in-ny-23-nrcc-hardest-hit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2009/10/club-for-growth-says-hoffman-leads-in-ny-23-nrcc-hardest-hit/</link>
	<description>The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger).  The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 12:23:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shoebox</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2009/10/club-for-growth-says-hoffman-leads-in-ny-23-nrcc-hardest-hit/comment-page-1/#comment-37945</link>
		<dc:creator>Shoebox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=7264#comment-37945</guid>
		<description>Remember, you heard it here first!  WHIG!

300 is probably a good size sample given the size of the district.  Also, even if they skew 4-5% conservative, it still shows a significant trend up for Hoffman and down for Scuzzie.  I know I&#039;d be sleeping better this last week if I were in the Hoffman camp than in the Scuzzie camp!

Pawlenty...It&#039;s a surprise there was any room left on the band wagon for him to fill!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, you heard it here first!  WHIG!</p>
<p>300 is probably a good size sample given the size of the district.  Also, even if they skew 4-5% conservative, it still shows a significant trend up for Hoffman and down for Scuzzie.  I know I&#8217;d be sleeping better this last week if I were in the Hoffman camp than in the Scuzzie camp!</p>
<p>Pawlenty&#8230;It&#8217;s a surprise there was any room left on the band wagon for him to fill!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

