<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: George W. Bush &#8211; &#8220;There is no (conservative) movement.&#8221; Me &#8211; &#8220;We&#8217;re back!&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://norunnyeggs.com/2009/09/george-w-bush-there-is-no-conservative-movement-me-were-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2009/09/george-w-bush-there-is-no-conservative-movement-me-were-back/</link>
	<description>The repository of one hard-boiled egg from the south suburbs of Milwaukee, Wisconsin (and the occassional guest-blogger).  The ramblings within may or may not offend, shock and awe you, but they are what I (or my guest-bloggers) think.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 22:59:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dad29</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2009/09/george-w-bush-there-is-no-conservative-movement-me-were-back/comment-page-1/#comment-37810</link>
		<dc:creator>dad29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=6925#comment-37810</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;An empty, elitist, droning, sonorous suit&lt;/i&gt;

McCain ran?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>An empty, elitist, droning, sonorous suit</i></p>
<p>McCain ran?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dad29</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2009/09/george-w-bush-there-is-no-conservative-movement-me-were-back/comment-page-1/#comment-37809</link>
		<dc:creator>dad29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=6925#comment-37809</guid>
		<description>Naaaah.

What WOULD have happened is that Congressional (R) Conservatives would have had a better chance to frustrate GWB&#039;s inanities.

But you&#039;re right--Kerry may well have been elected for the same reason that McCain lost:  Conservatives would not have given a rotten rip about the Moron-In-Office (R).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naaaah.</p>
<p>What WOULD have happened is that Congressional (R) Conservatives would have had a better chance to frustrate GWB&#8217;s inanities.</p>
<p>But you&#8217;re right&#8211;Kerry may well have been elected for the same reason that McCain lost:  Conservatives would not have given a rotten rip about the Moron-In-Office (R).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shoebox</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2009/09/george-w-bush-there-is-no-conservative-movement-me-were-back/comment-page-1/#comment-37807</link>
		<dc:creator>Shoebox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:07:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=6925#comment-37807</guid>
		<description>Dad, you raise an interesting question; what would have been the conservative response to Bush had 9/11 not occurred?  It could be argued that without 9/11, Bush may have been turned on by conservatives, Kerry would have been elected.  If Kerry elected, given he wasn&#039;t the brightest or most ambitious lefty ever, it&#039;s possible that the incrementalism of the left may have moved slow enough to have been accepted by the broader public.  We may look back and say for good or bad, Bush actually saved us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dad, you raise an interesting question; what would have been the conservative response to Bush had 9/11 not occurred?  It could be argued that without 9/11, Bush may have been turned on by conservatives, Kerry would have been elected.  If Kerry elected, given he wasn&#8217;t the brightest or most ambitious lefty ever, it&#8217;s possible that the incrementalism of the left may have moved slow enough to have been accepted by the broader public.  We may look back and say for good or bad, Bush actually saved us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veeshir</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2009/09/george-w-bush-there-is-no-conservative-movement-me-were-back/comment-page-1/#comment-37802</link>
		<dc:creator>Veeshir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=6925#comment-37802</guid>
		<description>Conservatives were paying attention, the elections in 06 and 08 show that. 

As to 2004, the choice was between Bush and J Effing Kerry. 
Kerry was, at the time, the worst presidential candidate ever. 

Choosing Bush in that scenario was only fitting. Look at how close that election was. 

An empty, elitist, droning, sonorous suit almost beat Bush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatives were paying attention, the elections in 06 and 08 show that. </p>
<p>As to 2004, the choice was between Bush and J Effing Kerry.<br />
Kerry was, at the time, the worst presidential candidate ever. </p>
<p>Choosing Bush in that scenario was only fitting. Look at how close that election was. </p>
<p>An empty, elitist, droning, sonorous suit almost beat Bush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dad29</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2009/09/george-w-bush-there-is-no-conservative-movement-me-were-back/comment-page-1/#comment-37799</link>
		<dc:creator>dad29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=6925#comment-37799</guid>
		<description>Umnnnhhh...GWB&#039;s domestic agenda was non-existent following 9/11.  &quot;Movement&quot; attention was diverted, shall we say.

In fact, GWB&#039;s Second Inaugural revealed his utter fecklessness (&quot;save the World from All Bad Guys&quot; or some such crapola) and the stupidity of his &quot;houses for All&quot;) program was over-run by Greenspan&#039;s Bubble Wealth-Generator.

So yah, it is the Conservatives&#039; fault--they weren&#039;t paying attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umnnnhhh&#8230;GWB&#8217;s domestic agenda was non-existent following 9/11.  &#8220;Movement&#8221; attention was diverted, shall we say.</p>
<p>In fact, GWB&#8217;s Second Inaugural revealed his utter fecklessness (&#8220;save the World from All Bad Guys&#8221; or some such crapola) and the stupidity of his &#8220;houses for All&#8221;) program was over-run by Greenspan&#8217;s Bubble Wealth-Generator.</p>
<p>So yah, it is the Conservatives&#8217; fault&#8211;they weren&#8217;t paying attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dad29</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2009/09/george-w-bush-there-is-no-conservative-movement-me-were-back/comment-page-1/#comment-37797</link>
		<dc:creator>dad29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=6925#comment-37797</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;What a seriously-ungrateful fucktard&lt;/i&gt;

And oh-so-intellegent, too!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What a seriously-ungrateful fucktard</i></p>
<p>And oh-so-intellegent, too!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shoebox</title>
		<link>http://norunnyeggs.com/2009/09/george-w-bush-there-is-no-conservative-movement-me-were-back/comment-page-1/#comment-37794</link>
		<dc:creator>Shoebox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 01:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://norunnyeggs.com/?p=6925#comment-37794</guid>
		<description>While I understand and agree with your broader point, you have to admit that there was little if any &quot;movement&quot; through the early Bush term.  The movement that did exist was lulled into the notion that he was a passable &quot;conservative&quot; not unlike many of the left who believed that Obama was something more of a centrist...there is snookering that occurs in both parties.  You also have to give him credit as for a time he did redefine the REpublican party...we don&#039;t have to like what he did but it&#039;s hard to argue that he didn&#039;t have a major influence on where we are at today...that&#039;s not a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I understand and agree with your broader point, you have to admit that there was little if any &#8220;movement&#8221; through the early Bush term.  The movement that did exist was lulled into the notion that he was a passable &#8220;conservative&#8221; not unlike many of the left who believed that Obama was something more of a centrist&#8230;there is snookering that occurs in both parties.  You also have to give him credit as for a time he did redefine the REpublican party&#8230;we don&#8217;t have to like what he did but it&#8217;s hard to argue that he didn&#8217;t have a major influence on where we are at today&#8230;that&#8217;s not a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
